ABOUT On 28th Jan 2005 , P&G purchased Gillette in a $54 Billion stock deal in which 40% was paid in cash and 60% in stock.
REASONS FOR ACQUISITION
Gillette was strong in emerging markets like India and Brazil where P&G has always been outperformed by Unilever. P&G is already the worlds largest consumer products company, But the addition of Gillette gives it new clout with retailers, including the worlds largest, Wal-Mart. P&G GILLETTE
Origin- Cincinnati, Ohio
origin - Boston, Massachusetts. strength- Strong Distribution Strength - Strong market tactics channel Weakness - Deals only with Weakness - Weak influences in male products. markets like - India, Brazil, e.t.c. Products - Gillette, Oral-B, Products - Head & Shoulder, Duracell Olay, Pampers, Tide Legalfinancial Counsellor- UBS & Goldman Sachs Legal financial counsellor - Merrill Lynch & Co. CHALLENGES Enquiries in Massachusetts - Gillette was facing enquiry in its home state by US Environmental Protection Agency. The enquiry was regarding discharge of chlorinated VOCs, which was slightly above the permitted level.
Enquiries in the deal of P&G with
Gillette - Oce of secretary of states, Massachusetts had launched a probe in the role of both Goldman Sachs and UBS in providing a fair deal price for Gillette. SOLUTIONS In case of discharging of Chlorinated VOCs, P&G came up with the solution to establish a new treatment plant to treat the waste water before draining it. With the team of legal attorneys, Goldman Sachs and UBS justified the worth of Gillette($57 billions) by explaining the market scenario at that time. CHALLENGES Retaining top talents of Gillette- Most important problem for P&G was to retain the existing skilled employees of Gillette.
Incorporating superior production
technology from both companies- P&G was struggling to establish best production method so that companies could merge their best processes and talent into one profit- boosting entity. SOLUTIONS To retain top talent of talent of Gillette, P&G communicated a message of inclusion Merge rather than Acquisition. Instead of rating Gillette employees on performance as normal, during the corporate integration, P&G gave the Gillette employees a year before they would review performance and tie bonuses to the outcome. SOLUTIONS P&G took its time to research, they formed 100 integration teams globally. Typically, each team would have two executives, one from each company, who were responsible for similar functions. P&G emphasised the goal of joining the best of both companies. The idea of replacing under-performing P&G employees with better-performing Gillette talent was a bold strategy for this promote-within company. It paid o: P&G leaders were supportive of this initiative, and most all employees found motivation in becoming even better by learning from the best talent at Gillette. RESULTS They managed to retain 90% of top management level employees as they accepted their new jobs. It was better than average buyer could retain. P&G met their revenue and cost goals within a year and enjoyed ongoing growth.