Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Case 1 Less Consideration of Economic Criteria But Rather To Have The Safety

    Diunggah oleh

    Nicole Guillermo
    15 tayangan3 halaman
    The document outlines four cases for evaluating different design criteria for waste containment systems. Each case assigns different levels of importance to the criteria of economic cost, safety, sustainability, and constructability. The overall rank is then calculated for each design based on its ability to satisfy each weighted criteria. Case 1 prioritizes safety over economic concerns. Case 2 emphasizes economic criteria over safety. Case 3 focuses on sustainability more than economics and safety. And Case 4 considers constructability over economics and safety.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Sensitivity Analysis of Trade-offs

    Judul Asli

    Sensitivity Analysis

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    The document outlines four cases for evaluating different design criteria for waste containment systems. Each case assigns different levels of importance to the criteria of economic cost, safety, sustainability, and constructability. The overall rank is then calculated for each design based on its ability to satisfy each weighted criteria. Case 1 prioritizes safety over economic concerns. Case 2 emphasizes economic criteria over safety. Case 3 focuses on sustainability more than economics and safety. And Case 4 considers constructability over economics and safety.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    15 tayangan3 halaman

    Case 1 Less Consideration of Economic Criteria But Rather To Have The Safety

    Diunggah oleh

    Nicole Guillermo
    The document outlines four cases for evaluating different design criteria for waste containment systems. Each case assigns different levels of importance to the criteria of economic cost, safety, sustainability, and constructability. The overall rank is then calculated for each design based on its ability to satisfy each weighted criteria. Case 1 prioritizes safety over economic concerns. Case 2 emphasizes economic criteria over safety. Case 3 focuses on sustainability more than economics and safety. And Case 4 considers constructability over economics and safety.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 3

    Criterion's Ability to satisfy the criterion

    Importanc (on a scale from -5 to 5)


    Design Criteria e
    Geocellular Sand-filled
    (on a scale Grouted Rock
    Containment Geotextile Bags
    of 0 to 5) Boulder
    Systems with Wire Mesh
    1. 3.63 5
    5 -3.52
    Economic(Cost)
    2. Safety 5 5 4.77 0
    3. Sustainability 4 -2.57 3.63 5
    4. 3.19 4.49
    4 5
    Constructability
    Over-all Rank 17.12 69.28 62.96

    CASE 1
    LESS CONSIDERATION OF ECONOMIC CRITERIA BUT RATHER TO HAVE THE SAFETY

    Criterion's Ability to satisfy the criterion


    Importanc (on a scale from -5 to 5)
    Design Criteria e
    Geocellular Sand-filled
    (on a scale Grouted Rock
    Containment Geotextile Bags
    of 0 to 5) Boulder
    Systems with Wire Mesh
    1. 3.63 5
    3 -3.52
    Economic(Cost)
    2. Safety 5 5 4.77 0
    3. Sustainability 4 -2.57 3.63 5
    4. 3.19 4.49
    4 5
    Constructability
    Over-all Rank 24.16 62.02 52.96
    CASE 2
    LESS CONSIDERATION OF THE SAFETY CRITERIA BUT ECONOMIC CRITERIA MUST BE
    CONSIDERED

    Criterion's Ability to satisfy the criterion


    Importanc (on a scale from -5 to 5)
    Design Criteria e
    Geocellular Sand-filled
    (on a scale Grouted Rock
    Containment Geotextile Bags
    of 0 to 5) Boulder
    Systems with Wire Mesh
    1. 3.63 5
    5 -3.52
    Economic(Cost)
    2. Safety 3 5 4.77 0
    3. Sustainability 4 -2.57 3.63 5
    4. 3.19 4.49
    4 5
    Constructability
    Over-all Rank 7.12 59.74 62.96

    CASE 3
    LESS CONSIDERATION OF ECONOMIC AND SAFETY CRITERION BUT SUSTAINABILITY
    CRITERIA CONSIDERED

    Criterion's Ability to satisfy the criterion


    Importanc (on a scale from -5 to 5)
    Design Criteria e
    Geocellular Sand-filled
    (on a scale Grouted Rock
    Containment Geotextile Bags
    of 0 to 5) Boulder
    Systems with Wire Mesh
    1. 3.63 5
    3 -3.52
    Economic(Cost)
    2. Safety 3 5 4.77 0
    3. Sustainability 5 -2.57 3.63 5
    4. 3.19 4.49
    4 5
    Constructability
    Over-all Rank 11.59 56.11 57.96

    CASE 4
    LESS CONSIDERATION OF ECONOMIC AND SAFETY BUT CONSTRUCTABILITY
    CRITERIA CONSIDERED

    Criterion's Ability to satisfy the criterion


    Importanc (on a scale from -5 to 5)
    Design Criteria e
    Geocellular Sand-filled
    (on a scale Grouted Rock
    Containment Geotextile Bags
    of 0 to 5) Boulder
    Systems with Wire Mesh
    1. 3.63 5
    3 -3.52
    Economic(Cost)
    2. Safety 3 5 4.77 0
    3. Sustainability 4 -2.57 3.63 5
    4. 3.19 4.49
    5 5
    Constructability
    Over-all Rank 19.16 55.67 57.45

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai