Im looking into SEM (Structural equation modelling using covariance matrixes)

as an analysis technique and am finding it difficult to find consistent information

on the assumptions of the technique. Below is what I currently have from
reviewing the literature over the last couple of days. Is this a complete list to check
before undertaking SEM? If not, could anyone point me in the direction of
assumptions I may have missed or correct me on my current ones?

1. Common Method Bias

2. Outliers

3. Multicollinearity
1 down
vote 4. Multivariate Normality
favorite
2 5. Relationship between the observed variables and their constructs and
between one construct and another is linear.

6. No Missing Data

7. Unidimensionality Of Constructs

assumptions sem
edited Aug 3 '15 at 15:32 asked Aug 1 '15 at 15:57

shareimprove this question

Jeremy Miles John Smith

5,86911136 4711
you aren't defining your acronym Taylor Aug 1 '15 at 20:36
add a comment

1 Answer
active oldest votes
up vote 2
down vote There's nothing special or magically different about structural equation modeling
accepted (SEM) and other statistical techniques. Regression (and hence t-tests, anova),
manova, etc can all be thought of as special cases of structural equation models.
In addition, SEM and multilevel models are often equivalent - see
http://www.unc.edu/~curran/pdfs/Curran(2003).pdf . If something is an
assumption in statistical analysis generally, it's an assumption in SEM. If
something is an issue or a problem in statistical analysis generally, it's an issue or
a problem in SEM.

1. Common method bias is an issue in the interpretation of your model. It's

 not an assumption.

2. Think of multiple regression as being a structural equation model. If it's

an assumption in regression, it's an assumption in SEM. Outliers are a
problem in regression, and a problem in SEM.

3. Multicollinearity is not an assumption in regression, or SEM, unless your

matrices cannot be inverted because they are not positive definite, in
which case it's an assumption everyone. It's a problem.

4. Normality is an assumption in regular ML, as it is in regular OLS

regression. But there are ways to handle it (as there are in regression).

5. Linearity is as assumption, there are ways around it but they vary from "a
bit fiddly" to "really hard".

6. There are ways to handle data that are missing at random or missing
completely at random, same as (almost) every other type of statistical
analysis. It's a problem, and the solutions bring assumptions.

7. Not an assumption, it's something that your model can test.

http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/152025/sem-what-is-
measurement-model
http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/156819/parameter-estimates-in-
sem
http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/54853/path-analysis-or-a-full-
sem