Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#343 COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Friday, March 03, 2017 7:32:38 PM
Last Modified: Friday, March 03, 2017 8:29:18 PM
Time Spent: 00:56:40
IP Address: 107.77.204.142

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name Kim Witham

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught Fifth Grade

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/09/2017

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/03/2017

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement Bettie F. Williams

Q7: School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last) Megan Tipton

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address: megan.tipton@vbschools.com

Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role Classroom Teacher

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for? Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Superior
area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the Exemplary

age group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students Exemplary

use of higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Exemplary
applications.

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Mrs. Witham was not familiar with the math and science curriculum at the beginning of this placement. However, she
went above and beyond to sure she was an expert in the subject areas before she taught it to be sure that she was
teaching the students the correct information at all times. She always considered what the kids needed to know for the
SOLs. Mrs. Witham attended all math and science collaborations to discuss the objectives and SOLs. She actively
participated in all meetings and asked questions to better her instruction.

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and Exemplary
student learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner Superior

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior

transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
All of Mrs. Witham's lesson plans were aligned the Virginia Beach Objectives and the Virginal SOLs. Mrs. Witham was
always receptive to feedback from cooperating teacher regarding her lesson plans and adapted them as needed. One
area that Mrs. Witham and I worked on is planning for transitions within a lesson. Mrs. Witham was very receptive to
feedback and suggestions and implemented her lessons well. Mrs. Witham started using a timer during her lessons
early on as a way to keep her lessons on track and to the point.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning. Proficient

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Superior

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Superior

resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Superior

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Mrs. Witham did a great job differentiating to meet the needs of all students. She implemented the use of reminder
cards when teaching metric conversions in small groups. Mrs. Witham used the promethean board, videos,
manipulatives and instructional technology in her lessons. Occasionally, when giving direct, whole group instruction,
Mrs. Witham lost the attention of most students due to either focusing on behavior of specific students or the lesson
went on for too long.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Exemplary

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior

instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Exemplary

purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Exemplary

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Mrs. Witham did a great job grading assessments and being very thorough with feedback for the students, but also
reflection on her lesson. Mrs. Witham used the assessment data to either reteach a lesson or to pull a small group of
students to remediate. She gave formative and summative assessments.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to Superior

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students diversity, including language, culture, Exemplary

race, gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Exemplary

responses.

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
Mrs. Witham did a wonderful job of establishing good relationships with all students and was very receptive to their
needs and responses. Mrs. Witham used the established classroom routines and procedures put in place by the
classroom teacher. One area that Mrs. Witham is working to improve is establishing clear expectations for students.
This includes transitions and directions.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional Exemplary
critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Exemplary

professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration Exemplary

with teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and Exemplary

ethical interactions.

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
Mrs. Witham was consistently working to improve upon her performance. She was extremely receptive to feedback and
did an outstanding job at persona reflection. She attended all teacher meetings and collaborated with teachers and
specialists.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the Superior
placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Superior

Uses available data to document/communicate student Superior

progress and develop learning targets.

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Mrs. Witham kept running records of students' progress in small group instruction. She recorded grades for
assessments as well as entered them into the digital gradebook.

4/4