operation in Europe:-
- Steam reforming of natural gas or other light hydrocarbons (Natural Gas Liquids,
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, Naphtha)
- Partial oxidation of heavy fuel oil or vacuum residue
The use of natural gas as the raw material (feed stock) is the best way to decrease the
waste emissions from an ammonia plant. The natural gas has high hydrogen content and
a higher heating value than most of the hydrocarbons. Processes based on heavy
hydrocarbons such as oils and coal, generate waste many time greater than natural gas
based plants.
The IFA recommends the use of excess air reforming for improving the waste
conservation and control of the ammonia plants [2]. The recommendation is based upon
the fact that primary reformers have low efficiencies. By reducing the share of primary
reformer in the reforming reaction, the primary reformer size and energy demand can be
decreased. While at the same time the life and efficiency of the catalysts and the catalyst
tubes is increased. This will increase the reaction share of the secondary reformer. By
supplying the air in excess to the secondary reformer, the internal firing in the secondary
reformer is increased, which makes it possible to achieve the same degree of total
reforming as in the case of conventional steam reforming process. The reduced need of
energy to the primary reformer will decrease the use of fuel gases and the hence the
emissions of combustion flue gases.
The heat-exchange autothermal reforming is based upon the principle that the heat of
reaction in the secondary reformer can be used to supply the heat needed to the primary
reformer for reforming reaction. This eliminates the fired furnace and hence the reformer
flue gases, thus significantly reducing the NOx and carbon oxides emissions. Excess air is
supplied to the reforming exchanger, to increase the internal firing, which increases the
reforming reaction. According to the IFA, these processes can reduce the NOx emissions
by 50% or more as compared to the conventional steam reforming processes [2]. Kellogg
Brown & Root (formerly M.W. Kellogg Company), introduced its new process in the 1990s,
called Kellogg Brown Root Advanced Ammonia Process plus (KAAPplus [11]), which is
based upon the same principle.
Most of the CO2 removal processes used in the ammonia production use some type of
absorbent for CO2 removal. These absorbents have to be regenerated after their use.
Those absorbents should be used which are easier to regenerate and do not result in toxic
releases. During the regeneration operation proper control of the process can also reduce
the waste emissions. Reducing the use of organic absorbents such as amines can also
decrease toxic releases to the environment. Use of CO2 removal processes, which do not
use any chemicals, is another way of reducing the emissions. Processes such as
adsorption and membrane treatment can be used. However, the main problems
associated with the membrane processes are the huge pressure drops in the gases after
membrane treatment and temperature sensitivity of membranes. The cost of energy to
overcome this pressure drop has to be justified before membranes can be used in the
ammonia production processes.
Improving the purge gas recovery can also control waste emissions. Ammonia is
recovered from the synthesis loop purge, while the remaining gases along with small
amounts of ammonia are sent to the primary reformer for use as fuel. If the argon
present in the purge gas can be removed (i.e. after ammonia removal), then this gas can
be recycled back to the converter. Thus increasing the ammonia production.
The main reason for purge requirement in the synthesis loop is the build up of inerts in
the recycle stream. Accumulation of these inerts hinders the ammonia conversion in the
reactor. The two inert gases present in the feed gas to the ammonia reactor are argon
and methane. These inerts keep on accumulating in the recycle stream making it
necessary to purge in order to avoid over accumulation of these inerts. If the inert gases
can be separated from the ammonia reactor feed gas, then there would be no need for
purging. Furthermore, it will also improve the conversion reaction and also decrease the
operating cost of the synthesis loop. Rectification columns, Cryogenic purification units, or
a combination of both can be used for this purpose. These units can be used prior to the
ammonia reactor, after the methanation step.
Ammonia Synthesis:
The low conversion rate of the ammonia converters is another reason for waste
generation. Most of the conventional ammonia converters (reactors) have a 12-13%
conversion. Only recently some reactors have been developed which have conversions as
high as 17%. The main reason for this meager conversion is that the ammonia synthesis
reaction is highly exothermic. Due to this reason, the temperature of the reaction gases
increases as ammonia is formed, increasing the rate of the reaction, but shifting the
chemical equilibrium in the opposite direction. Thus the temperature for maximum
conversion decreases with the increase in ammonia concentration. With the shift of the
reaction in the opposite direction, decomposition of ammonia starts. Also the tremendous
amount of heat evolved during the reaction increases the temperature of the catalyst bed
to its maximum potential. Further increase in the temperature can permanently damage
the catalysts. In order to avoid this situation, the ammonia converters are provided with
cooling systems, which remove the heat of reaction. Heat quenching and heat exchanger
systems are the two of the many methods used for this purpose. Ammonia synthesis can
be improved by improving the converter design. Using improved heat removal techniques
and catalyst with higher temperature resistance can improve the ammonia conversion
rate. Gases increases as ammonia is formed, increasing the rate of the reaction, but
shifting the chemical equilibrium in the opposite direction. Thus the temperature for
maximum conversion decreases with the increase in ammonia concentration. With the
shift of the reaction in the opposite direction, decomposition of ammonia starts. Also the
tremendous amount of heat evolved during the reaction increases the temperature of the
catalyst bed to its maximum potential. Further increase in the temperature can
permanently damage the catalysts. In order to avoid this situation, the ammonia
converters are provided with cooling systems, which remove the heat of reaction. Heat
quenching and heat exchanger systems are the two of the many methods used for this
purpose. Ammonia synthesis can be improved by improving the converter design. Using
improved heat removal techniques and catalyst with higher temperature resistance can
improve the ammonia conversion rate.
Water-gas shift
High temperature shit reaction at high
conversion temperature CO converted to CO2
Water-gas shift
Low temperature shift reaction at low
conversion temperature Residual CO converted to CO2
Carbon dioxide
absorption Chemical Absorption CO2 absorbed by G.V solution
Refrigeration and
compression Screw compression To liquefy ammonia for storage
The partial oxidation process is used for the gasification of heavy feedstocks such as
residual oils and coal. Extremely viscous hydrocarbons and plastic wastes may also be
used as fractions of the feed. The partial oxidation process offers an alternative for future
utilisation of such wastes.
An air separation unit is required for the production of oxygen for the partial oxidation
step. The nitrogen is added in the liquid nitrogen wash to remove impurities from the
synthesis gas and to get the required hydrogen/nitrogen ratio in the synthesis gas.
The partial oxidation gasification is a non-catalytic process taking place at high pressure
(>50bar) and temperatures around 1,400 C. Some steam is added for temperature
modera-tion. The simplified reaction pattern is:-
Carbon dioxide, methane and some soot are formed in addition. The sulphur compounds
in the feed are converted to hydrogen sulphide. Mineral compounds in the feed are
transformed into specific ashes. The process gas is freed from solids by water scrubbing
after waste heat recovery and the soot is recycled to the feed. The ash compounds are
drained with the process condensate and/or together with a part of the soot. In at least
two units in Europe, the soot is separated from soot water in a mainstream filtration
stage, to avoid ash build-up in the gasification cycle downstream units. The heavy metals,
such as V, Ni and Fe are recovered. The hydrogen sulphide in the process gas is separated
in a selective absorption step and reprocessed to elementary sulphur in a Claus unit.
The shift conversion usually has two high temperature shift catalyst beds with
intermediate cooling. Steam for the shift conversion is supplied partially by a cooler-
saturator system and partially by steam injection.
CO2is removed by using an absorption agent which might be the same as that in the
sulphur removal step. Residual traces of absorption agent and CO2are then removed
from the process gas, before final purification by a liquid nitrogen wash. In this unit
practically all the impurities are removed and nitrogen is added to give the stoichiometric
hydrogen to nitrogen ratio.
The ammonia synthesis is quite similar to that used in steam reforming plants, but
simpler and more efficient, due to the high purity of synthesis gas from liquid nitrogen
wash units and the synthesis loop not requiring a purge.
Auxiliary boilers are required if the compressors are steam-driven. The flue-gas from
these power plants is the main source of emissions which are mainly SO2, NOx,
and CO2. The site emissions are very low if the compressors are driven by imported
electric power.