Case 2:17-cv-00035-VAP-KS Document 32 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:356

1 Paul R. Kiesel, State Bar No. 119854

kiesel@kiesel.law
2 Helen E. Zukin, State Bar No. 117933
zukin@kiesel.law
3 Jeffrey A. Koncius, State Bar No. 189803
koncius@kiesel.law
4 Nicole Ramirez, State Bar No. 279017
ramirez@kiesel.law
5 KIESEL LAW LLP
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
6 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2910
Tel: 310-854-4444
7 Fax: 310-854-0812
8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes
9 (Additional Attorneys Listed on Signature Page)
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 PAUL STOCKINGER, ELIZABETH Case No.: 2:17-cv-00035-VAP (KSx)
STOCKINGER, GAILYN KENNEDY,
13 BASUDEB DEY, BRENDA FLINN,
and ELIEZER CASPER on behalf of STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
14 themselves and all others similarly
situated, Complaint served:
15
January 12, 2017
Plaintiffs,
16
v. Judge: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips
17 Ctrm: 8A, 8th Floor
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A.,
18 INC., a California corporation,
19 Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
Case 2:17-cv-00035-VAP-KS Document 32 Filed 03/13/17 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:357

1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 and the Courts Standing Order 4 & 11, and as
2
set forth in the Declaration of Peter A. Muhic, Plaintiffs Paul Stockinger, Elizabeth
3
4 Stockinger, Gailyn Kennedy, Basudeb Dey, Brenda Flinn, and Eliezer Casper

5 (Plaintiffs) and Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Toyota), through
6
their counsel, respectfully submit the following Stipulation to Extend Time:
7
8 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint against Toyota on January 3, 2017
9 and served Toyota on January 12, 2017, and pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, the parties
10 agreed to extend the deadline for Toyotas responsive pleading until March 3, 2017;
11 WHEREAS, Toyota filed its motion to dismiss the Complaint on March 3,
12 2017, and Plaintiffs response to the motion to dismiss is currently due on March 13,
13 2017;
14 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to amend their Complaint under FED. R. CIV. P.
15 15(a)(1)(B), which provides for an amendment, as a matter of course, within 21 days
16 after the service of Toyotas motion to dismiss;
17 THEREFORE, good cause exists to grant this Stipulation in order to clarify
18 any conflict between Plaintiffs March 13, 2017 deadline to respond to the motion to
19 dismiss and the March 24, 2017 deadline for amending the Complaint under FED. R.
20 CIV. P. 15(a)(1)(B), and in order to provide the parties adequate time for briefing the
21 issues in this case, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following schedule:
22 1. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint shall be due no later than March 24,
23 2017;
24 2. Toyotas answer or motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint shall be
25 due no later than April 17, 2017;
26 3. Plaintiffs opposition to Toyotas motion to dismiss the Amended
27 Complaint shall be due no later than May 8, 2017;
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
Case 2:17-cv-00035-VAP-KS Document 32 Filed 03/13/17 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:358

1
4. Toyotas reply brief in further support of the motion to dismiss the
2
Amended Complaint shall be due no later than May 22, 2017; and
3
5. Toyotas motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint will be heard on
4
June 5, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.
5
6 The parties respectfully request the Court enter an Order approving the above-
7
schedule.
8
9 IT IS SO STIPULATED

10
11 Dated: March 13, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
12 KESSLER TOPAZ
13 MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
Joseph H. Meltzer
14 Peter A. Muhic
15 Melissa L. Troutner
16
17 By: /s/ Peter A. Muhic
Joseph H. Meltzer
18 Peter A. Muhic
19 Melissa L. Troutner
20
21 KIESEL LAW LLP
Jeffrey A. Koncius
22 Paul R. Keisel
23 Helen Zukin
24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
Case 2:17-cv-00035-VAP-KS Document 32 Filed 03/13/17 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:359

1 Dated: March 13, 2017 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2 David L. Schrader
Esther K. Ro
3
4
By: /s/ Esther K. Ro
5 David L. Schrader
6 Esther K. Ro

7 Attorneys for Defendant

8 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
9
10
L.R. 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i) Certification:
11
12 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), the filer of the document attests that
13 concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other
14
Signatories.
15
16
17 /s/ Peter A. Muhic
18 Peter A. Muhic
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME