a. Meaning -
Regional imbalance is the disparity in economic and social development of two regions. One
are made to set up industries, service sectors, educational institutions, health care facilities
etc. In India after liberalization, the role of private sector has increased in investment
decisions. Naturally, the investments will flow in regions which are favourable to return
maximum return on investments. This rules out the possibility of investments in poorly
connected and geographically separated regions (for example mountains), and regions with
hostile political environment. The maximum share in gained by the regions which have
adequate physical and social infrastructure and a conducive environment. This results in
1. Migration: Migration from economically backward area towards economic strongholds. For
example the rural-urban migration. Cities are more prosperous as compared to rural areas,
2. Social unrest- Differences in prosperity and development leads to friction between different
sections of the society causing social unrest. For example Naxalism. Naxalites in India function
in areas which have been neglected for long for development purposes/economic prosperity.
3. Aggregation of the imbalance: Once an area is prosperous and has adequate infrastructure
for development, more investments pour-in neglecting the less developed regions. So an area
which is already prosperous, develops further. For examples- the rate of growth of the four
1. Historical Factor:
Historically, regional imbalances in India started from its British regime. The British rulers as
well as industrialists started to develop only those earmarked regions of the country which as per
their own interest were possessing rich potential for prosperous manufacturing and trading
activities. British industrialists mostly preferred to concentrate their activities in two states like
West Bengal and Maharashtra and more particularly to three metropolitan cities like Kolkata,
Mumbai and Chennai. They concentrated all their industries in and around these cities neglecting
2. Geographical Factors:
economy. The difficult terrain surrounded by hills, rivers and dense forests leads to increase in
resources particularly difficult. Most of the Himalayan states of India, i.e., Himachal Pradesh.
Northern Kashmir, the hill districts of Arunachal Pradesh and other North-Eastern states,
remained mostly backward due to its inaccessibility and other inherent difficulties.
Adverse climate and proneness to flood are also responsible factors for poor rate of economic
development of different regions of the country as reflected by low agricultural productivity and
lack of industrialization. Thus these natural factors have resulted uneven growth of different
regions of India.
3. Political Instability:
Another important factor responsible for regional imbalance is the political instability prevailing
in the backward regions of the country. Political instability in the form of unstable government,
extremist violence, law and order problem etc. have been obstructing the flow of investments
into these backward regions besides making flight of capital from these backward states. Thus
this political instability prevailing in same backward regions of the country are standing as a
Economic overheads like transport and communication facilities, power, technology, banking
and insurance etc. are considered very important for the development of a particular region. Due
to adequacy of such economic overheads, some regions are getting a special favour in respect of
overheads, some regions of the country, viz., North-Eastern Region, Jharkhand, Chattisgarh etc.
remained much backward as compared to other developed regions of the country. Moreover, new
investment in the private sector has a general tendency to concentrate much on those regions
The Government of India has been following a decentralized approach for the development of
backward regions through its investment programmes on public sector industrial enterprises
located in backward areas like Rourkela, Barauni, Bhilai, Bongaigaon etc. But due to lack of
growth of ancillary industries in these areas, all these areas remained backward in spite of huge
Although balanced growth has been accepted as one of the major objectives of economic
planning in India since the Second Plan onwards but it did not make much headway in achieving
this object. Rather, in real sense, planning mechanisms has enlarged the disparity between the
developed states and less developed states of the country. In respect of allocating plan outlay
relatively developed states get much favour than less developed states. From First Plan to the
Seventh Plan, Punjab and Haryana have received the highest per capita plan outlay, all along.
The other three states like Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have also received larger
On the other hand, the backward states like Bihar, Assam, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan
have been receiving the smallest allocation of per capita plan outlay in almost all the plans. Due
to such divergent trend, imbalance between the different states in India has been continuously
widening.
Growing regional imbalance in India has also been resulted from lack of motivation on the part
of the backward states for industrial development. While the developed states like Maharashtra.
Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu etc. are trying to attain further industrial development, but
the backward states have been showing their interest on political intrigues and manipulations
While making necessary award, the Finance Commission in India has been giving due weightage
to backwardness of a state as an important criteria for resource transfer from the centre to the
states. Under the present system of federal fiscal transfer, the transfer of resources from the
Centre to States includes central assistance for State Plans, Non plan transfer as per the
recommendations of the Finance Commission, ad-hoc transfer, allocation of fund for centrally
sponsored schemes, allocation of both short-term and long-term credit from financial institutions
etc.
In order to develop hilly areas, tribal areas, drought- prone areas, specific plan schemes have
been designed with full central assistance. Besides, other schemes of rural development
formulated for the improvement of specific groups such as marginal farmers and agricultural
labourers were implemented in the backward regions. An area based approach of Tribal Sub-
Plans (TSPs) is now being implemented for the development of scheduled tribes located in the
backward rural areas. The Tribal Sub-Plans are implemented through 194 Integrated Tribal
Development Projects (ITDP) and 250 Modified Area Development Projects (MADP). All these
programmes include SFDA, MFAL, Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP), Crash Scheme for
In order to fight the problem of industrial backwardness of some backward regions and also to
promote private investment in backward regions, various fiscal and other incentives have been
provided by both the Centre, the States and other financial institution under public sector. These
In order to promote investment in the backward regions, the Government of India has been
As per this concession scheme, new industrial units settled in backward areas and set up after
January 1971 are allowed a deduction to the extent of 20 per cent of their profits for the
computation of its assessable income. This concession was introduced in April 1974 and it was to
In order to give stimulus to new industries in backward regions, the 1993-94 budget introduced a
system of tax holiday for new industrial units located in backward regions, i.e., in all states in the
North-eastern region, Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Goa and the Union
Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu.
made provision for outright subsidy at the flat rate of 10 per cent subject to a maximum limit of
Rs. 5 lakh on fixed capital investment like land, factory buildings, plant and machinery.
Subsequently, this rate of subsidy was raised to 15 per cent and then to 25 per cent.
In July 1971, this transport subsidy scheme was introduced for those industrial units established
in hilly, inaccessible and remote areas of the country. Under this scheme, these aforesaid
industrial units were entitled to 50 per cent transport subsidy on the expenditure incurred
particularly for movement of raw materials and finished goods to and from certain selected rail
heads to the location of these industrial units. This scheme is applicable to remote and
inaccessible areas of Jammu and Kashmir and also in North-Eastern hill states.
In order to accelerate the pace of industrialization in backward areas the Government of India
has promoted new financial institutions specially for those areas. In the budget of 1995-96 the
government has announced the establishment of Regional Rural Development Bank (RRDB) for
Later on, this institution was inaugurated in 23rd February, 1996 in the name and style of North-
Eastern Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (NEDFC) as a catalyst for the industrial and
established a new Rural Infrastructural Development Fund (R1DF) within NABARD from April
Moreover, the Central Government has been introducing some other measures for the
development of backward regions. Accordingly, since August 1972, the Central Government has
The Central Government has again introduced a scheme for assisting the state governments to
extent of one-third of the total cost of such development projects subject to a maximum limit of
Rs. 2 crore.
With the help of this scheme the Central Government has been helping the state governments to
develop a good number of growth centres through the development of infrastructural facilities.
The Government has again granted liberal concessions to MRTP/FERA companies for setting up