Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • A Mechanical Model For The Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Diunggah oleh

    Alla Eddine G C
    11 tayangan18 halaman
    A Mechanical Model for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Judul Asli

    A Mechanical Model for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    PDF atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    A Mechanical Model for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PDF atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    11 tayangan18 halaman

    A Mechanical Model For The Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Diunggah oleh

    Alla Eddine G C
    A Mechanical Model for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Old Masonry Buildings

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PDF atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 18
    | | | | | | | Barguaes ond Sree, ol 2, a 1 201) 2842 5 A mechanical model for the seismic vulnerability assessment of old masonry buildings Luisa Carlota Pagrin', Romeu Vicente, Sergio Lagomarsino™ and Humberto Varum? ‘Department of Ca, Govier and Acct Engheers-DICAT Unray of Gor, Inky “pepotrent of Gn Engineering = DECIVL, Unversity of Ako, Porte (Pecans Jue 9,210, Aesplad Never 2,20) ‘Abstract This reper discuss mecateal model forthe rulerailty asessnent of old mony hating sears ts csi assure te Ueno inka tothe king pone, sets eran enl tthe rode! emo, The seats capecy ls epseied an uae! fndon of & ‘elec mumber of gate and mecha parameter. Apovig a sible pcsfue fare ‘ucerity propgnc, the ase! moments of te cg ae ae obalacd ss fomten of Be Sudstcl moments of th inpt ranma, showing the tle of each ont i the overall cope efhiticn. The scimie mad is epeserted by reponse spec vl aria Seared ot With epet fo #cersin mer of andre lt sists ally carver me ved king ho cunt {he unerains ofeach uty ivcved Keywords: capacity spectrum; ality curves were: damage eset sie vane 4. Introduction Seismic vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios at an wan sale are usually hased on 'macosesmie or mechanical methods (Lagomarsno end Giovimzi 2006). The former make we of Imasostsinieintensiy bazar maps and ive an estimate ofthe expected damage once the typology has bee recognied stong a given building catalogue. The lator simulate te attire capity by ‘echanioal models nd represent the hazard scenarios i tems of peak ground acceleration or spectral vals, Even within this approach, a sin observations of damages sil representa uefa ‘ool (O'Avala 2005, Inthe elas of mechanical methods, non-linear tie procedures are gaining & central role (se for instnee Cardone 2007 foe general fame) and have been adopted by mest seismic codes forthe design andthe rebabitsion (BCR 2005), The eapcity spectum (Freeman 1998) & the main method used im ATC-40 (1996), while FEMA? (1007) rele to the displacement coefficient methed: the main difrences is in the definition of inlastieseimis 1). I sven by Pya7 FPaboaafodaiy o wie te vale of Su F, ie camuatve don fnctoe of 5 he Protbly density ton of FLO” Sap. dSdy gd HOV e esaip ® where FD ae vectors listing the parameters of the stuctre an ofthe seismic demand and iss ie ferent random quis, inci the zrrmean mel ear ays Is the Gay funation of S, condoned by te ocsurce of PD, fn cae the Jomt dehy nt of D6: dee the sate variables of PD, #; Di the co domain of BD, 22 Fragity cuves ‘The evant ofthe itgral in B52) is gute det when the random quaitis are more fan two or ise. Thefoe rou is mace 1 simplified procedures tat dont wage, oe ‘nowledge ofthe disrbuons of the variables nor the solution ofa mull top Toe safety margin Mf reste to the bth damage limi tate is defioed os Me totsy ® es sh a ogi. is uly sep ha an Za ogama nioe ‘Puri tesa ea = gf £04 fas Tt ° where isthe cumulative dsubuton function ofthe nommal reduced random viable (with 2x0 ‘mean an unit standard devstion), [and Tina mean en variance, Jn engineering prac, the condtonl probability (4) forthe aca displacement of exceding a sive bh due it state is generally defined inthe form of a agility cave (FEMA 1997) sys o[pnon()} a [fee] © 28 Luna Caro Papin, Rome can, Seo Lagomarsino and Humberto Var whee th symbols S, Ze ae mean values, or nominal values, of Sj and Ly; fk the standard h related tothe ith ‘ory; = HIN the inter-oor height Te has W elements, each Fh skmont is characterized by fhe ‘en Au and the inertia moment gy of the resistant walls in the dhection dr dr i te Almcton paral taxi, airy i parallel to Y axis. The strstul response related 0 the ‘Vector Wa whic lists the N components yi ofthe findamets! mode she ‘The equivalent SDOF has an elastic petty plsticfann, It represents, snplifeation of the ‘xual pshoves,obsined by suitable rules taking into accounts for the stifness deradtin and ost peak breach “The clastic virtion period inthe ietion considered is Tay = 28% fMan/Ra, an) 30 aia Cro Pagnint, Rome Veen, Spo Lagomarin an Humberto erm ” ” ™ a raat fg fom 1) vas desde z z 2 4 army A fa © o ® Fig 2 (isk mod, @) unit mets nd (so-so mesh whore Mi, i th equivalent generalized modal mass Mar Yom Pons on and Ky isthe eqivalet generalized medal sifiness, which depends on the shear and flexural Stites ofthe wal. The evaluation ofthis ler component requires a detailed defation of the ‘resistant wall, which harly pursued uring » quick biking survey. This study res te modal Shape to the shear component ony, which is prevailing inthe building typology examined. Its sven by Kae ™ BS Chae Wied a 11% the 5h component of the prime derivative of the mode shape; G isthe shear ‘modus. The yielding acceleration is given by «3 whore Fis he yielding load of te building, i the equivalent mass, iy isthe model partipaton factor - oa mae ian S089 Yaar = PE a Zev ra a ‘The yetingdaplacement di given by Fer ‘oor be (Tare Gus | | | | | | | A mechanical mode forte sete uci asescnent of od mavcry bugs 31 For masonry buildings, Py is basicaly related to the shear strength of the wall atthe round for evel Fl Bhan % a9) {boing a coefsent mhish takes ino account the nonsnifrm response of the masony panels ‘onsdered a8 shear diven mechanism, ty So ulimate hase shear stongth of the masonry (Tarsek and Covi 1971) as) with g the gravity acceleration. The resistant wall ea da forthe direction considered is expres 15 function of te gros area Ay at tp lor level in the same detion ns = bays Aa $01 LN oy ™ ar Ae 9) hore Br» nate stable ebefclents. The fh mass related lve canbe expressed ws mn Cyt Ad * Th Ag co) where 7 i te mas densiy ofthe masonry, q i the Noor mass (rated to permanent and live loads). The compressive strength Eg, (1), can therefore be expressed as a 4 being a Boolean type coeticien, d= 0 ot 1 depending on the path ofthe lor loading onto the masonry walls. When the loading pth varies, isan average value between O aod “The ultimate diplscement ofthe bliner epecty cue, di, colle mode tig = ty M2 fora itor eolose made 4% the EB) a ne ma were ts the wlimate dri of the masonry pate, which depends on the mascory quality and 32 Lata Clon Pag, Rome Pct, Sergio Lagomarsno ant Hambert Yoram ‘typology (ECS 2008) "On te bass of numeric! simulations (Car eta 2008), suitable coucents can te applied 10 ‘the seg and the sfifines to acoact forthe ls conibution to siffess, for lexurlire Ineshanams of pes, fr iroglres in the pice dstrbuion or inthe plan configuration, fr 8 failure mechanism related tothe weak spandas ~ tong pies candtion, for regulars inthe cae of flexible diahranms. "The aumercl validation of he mechanic! model andthe cabbratin of coe as been eveoped inthe ambi of isk asvessnertresewch program (Lagomarsino eta 2010, Ctr et {a 2010) over the eae ofan ancient Tllan toa cen shnken by a severe earthquake. 4.2 Unilorm mechanism ‘When the stuctre responds tially according to a uniform mode shape, the (component of ‘he fnamentaleiganvectr is essurned f be linear, ie. yay = UV (se Fg. 26), The fundamental pid of vibrition andthe yielding seceleratin 2, canbe expessod by fr ar Sint oop 6m?) ee ‘| ey aaron, Te abe finale St SH) fA 4) tei [rehfagitintom girder] rebx( aioe oS bunt $? ° 26) vobe(achtintoad fag ” renal font raS 335 per le spe | | | | 1 | | | | A rechonca! mol forthe sinc warily xsesonent of ll mavony bulge 33 83 Sot.strey mechanism ‘When th structural haviour is ruled by @ soft storey mechanism, the modal displacement at ‘upper levels i sumed tobe constant, ie. y= 1 (ee Fig 26) abd che resting cqutions tke 4 Simpler lyout. The fundamental vibeation period and the yskngacelrton ae given by Ta tex ear realtor (astturo Jonna] ey tne ata G Ey with eo ‘The ukimatedisplocoment di obtained by Eq (22); Fis equal 1. “he ped [Lis omited fom now on 3.4 Wal area dlsnbution Expressions are hein derived for ems ia Bas. (23, (24, (28), (29) scoring to two dierent «conditions of te wal resist aren eistibution. The fist condition apis wien the rst walls tne charveriaed by Inge openings or disalignment atthe fest vel. In thi case a bilnem

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai