Classics 51A
Disc. 1A
104274948
Even though the Minoan and Mycenaean architectural styles were similar there
were structural differences attributed to background differences in war and extensive trade.
A characteristic feature of Minoan architecture were flat-roofed complexes, enclosing
many rooms, containing a system for lighting to be reached in lower levels, bathrooms, and
staircases to name a few (Biers, 1996, 29-30). In terms of constructing, Minoans used the
post-and-lintel system also known as verticals and horizontals and had unfortified
palaces (Biers 1996, 28). In contrast to this system, Mycenaeans used large blocks of
stone, a method called megalithic architecture which allowed for constructing fortified
walls around their citadels and palaces (Biers 1996, 64-65). Using the megalithic
technique, easily distinguishable features of Mycenaean architecture is the relieving
triangle about a lintel block and corbel vaulting that can be seen on the Lion Gate at
Mycenae (Biers 1996, 66; Preziosi and Hitchcock 1999, 176). Since the Minoans were
heavily engrossed with trading and had a strong navy, fortified walls were unnecessary.
Both cultures built palaces that contained a central point, and evidence of
engineering skills. In Minoan palaces the courtyard took up a substantial amount of space
and served for religious and theatrical gatherings under the eyes of the rulers (Biers
1996, 28, 35). Moreover, the megaron (an open porch and hall) served as the central point
in Mycenaean palaces and private houses (Biers 1996, 66). Additionally, Mycenaeans
engineered fortification walls and roads that allowed them to be connected to numerous
major centers (Biers 1996 66, 74). On the other hand, Minoans had a sophisticated
hydraulic engineering system allowing them to have sewers, toilets, water pipes and pipes
leading to the oceans (Biers 1996, 29, 41). It is apparent that the palaces built by the
Minoans and Mycenaeans functioned as commercial, cultural, religious and administrative
centers.
Both cultures also made figurines that reflected similarities and differences. For
instance, the Minoans made figurines that depicted their female household goddesses
deities and were used as a dedication or type of offering (Biers 1996, 53). Again, the
Minoan figurines were much more detailed and nature orientated whereas, the Mycenaeans
focused on warlike sculptures of warriors in chariots, ornamental designs and scenes of
animals (Biers 1996, 77). The Mycenaeans did however make female figurines that
obviously originated from the Minoans female goddess (Biers 1996, 87). Differences
between the Minoans and Mycenaeans female goddess figurines were the size of the
women, the Mycenaeans made their women larger and not as subtle as the Minoans (Biers
1996, 89).
The religion and burial practices of both cultures shared several similarities but also
had distinct differences. The basis of Minoan religion resided on fertility, the death and
rebirth of vegetation (Biers 1996, 26). Similarly, the Mycenans accepted the same
fertility and vegetation deities of the Minoans (Biers 1996, 63). Another deity that was
prominent in Minoan religion was the female mother goddess that has been depicted on
frescos, sculptures and pottery (Biers 1996 28, 35, 53). A big difference in the cultures
were their burial practices. Mycenaean burial practices were more prominent due to the
different tombs. There were interment in chamber tombs, also family tombs, and tholos
tombs for the royals (Biers 1996, 71, 73).
Similarities are present in the hieroglyphic language that Minoans and Mycenaeans
establish. Sir Arthur John Evans was the first to discover the engraved stones containing
hieroglyphics from Crete, revealing the earliest form of Minoan writing referred to as
Linear A (Etienne 1992, 113; Biers 1980, 25). Linear A is not completely deciphered, but it
is understood that the stone tablets comprised of transactions supporting the trade
orientated nature of the Minoans (Biers 1980, 26). Using similar hieroglyphic engraved
stone tablets the Mycenaeans used a language called Linear B that was more sophisticated
than Linear A consisting of symbols that represented concepts (Biers 1980, 26; Chadwick
1987, 255).