To cite this article: J. S. N. Murthy & P. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy (2012) SOLID-STATE REACTION
BETWEEN BARIUM SULFATE AND CARBON, Chemical Engineering Communications, 199:8,
966-990, DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2011.631204
Article views: 77
J. S. N. MURTHY1,2 AND
P. VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY1
1
University College of Technology, Osmania University,
Hyderabad, India
2
Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology, Ghatkesar,
Hyderabad, India
Barium sulfate is the chief source for the manufacture of barium compounds, which
have a wide range of applications in chemical industries. In the preparation of these
compounds, the first step is the reaction between barium sulfate and carbon to pro-
duce barium sulfide. In the present work, the mechanism of reaction between barium
sulfate and carbon is investigated experimentally, covering a wide range of tempera-
tures, times of reaction, and stoichiometric ratios of reactants. The reaction is con-
ducted in air, nitrogen, and vacuum. It is also studied using the reactants in pellet
form to determine the effect of compaction pressure on rate of reaction. A model is
developed to estimate the kinetic parameters and mechanism of the reaction. An
attempt is also made to study the feasibility of conducting the reaction for continuous
production of barium sulfide in a moving bed rector using the reactants in pellet form.
Introduction
Solid state reactions are of considerable industrial importance in the technology of
material processing and production of commercially important chemicals, including
a number of barium compounds like barium carbonate and barium chloride. Barium
compounds are used for a number of applications like glass manufacture, paints,
drilling mud, the production of caustic soda, and others.
The main commercial process for production of purified barium chemicals is the
black-ash process in which the raw material used is barite ore, which usually contains
75% to 90% barium sulfate. It is reduced with coke at about 1100 C in a rotary kiln
to form barium sulfide, which is very soluble in water. The reaction time is about 6 h.
The solution containing barium sulfide is then used for the production of all other
commercially important barium compounds. Thus, the reaction between barium
sulfate and carbon is the essential step for the preparation of barium compounds.
However, the mechanism of such an important reaction and effect of various factors
on the reaction have not been investigated in detail.
966
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 967
The present work investigates the mechanism of the reaction between barium
sulfate and carbon in loose powder form through experimental studies covering a
wide range of variables: temperature, reaction time, and stoichiometric ratio of
reactants in air and nitrogen environments. The reaction is also studied using the
reaction mixture in pellet form to determine the effect of compaction pressure on
rate of reaction. In addition, the reaction is also conducted in vacuum to determine
the effect of absence of air and establish the mechanism of the reaction. The feasi-
bility of the continuous production of barium sulfide in a moving bed reactor, using
the reaction mixture in pellet form, is also tested.
Literature Review
Barium compounds have wide-ranging applications in chemical and manufacturing
industries like glass manufacturing, pigment industry, sulfuric acid industry, sugar
industry, and manufacturing of caustic soda (Shreve, 1984). The main commercial
process for production of barium sulfide from barites is the black-ash process.
Barites are reduced with coke in a rotary kiln at about 1100 C. The resulting product
called black-ash consists of crude barium sulfide. Barium sulfide is leached from the
reduction product for production of barium chemicals. Several manufacturers,
including FMC Corporation (U.S.) and Sousui Chemicals Co. Ltd. (Japan), use this
method (Bohnet et al, 2005; Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia, 2004) for production of
barium sulfide. The method of fluidized bed reduction of barite is claimed to be more
economical for low-grade ores. However, it was not found to be commercially
feasible due to problems caused by choking of the reactor because of sintering of
the reacting ore.
Tunison (1971) has studied the reduction reaction and reported that thermal
reduction is accomplished between 900 and 1200 C. Lobunez (1973) has reported
that the reaction is completed in about 10 min at 1100 C, and 6% of the feed barium
sulfate remains unreacted after 30 min at 1050 C. Silica is generally the most com-
mon impurity in barite ore. Searls (2002) reported that if carbon is not present in
sufficient quantity, more barium silicates are formed. Muyskens et al. (2002) has
found that barium sulfate can form the orthosilicate if carbon is not present
above 1100 C. It is reported (Tunison, 1971; Muyskens et al., 2002; Brownell,
1963; Yamaguchi et al., 1972) that with increased retention times, the chance of
occurrence of side reactions increases and the amount of water-soluble barium
sulfide is decreased. The reaction between barium sulfate and carbon is reported
to take place through gaseous intermediates (Budnikov and Ginstling, 1968) as
per the following reaction scheme:
1
Initiation: Cs O2 g ! COg 1
2
Propagation: BaSO4 s 4COg ! BaSs 4CO2 g 2
Cs CO2 g ! 2COg 3
A number of studies have been reported on the reduction of metals using either
graphite or carbon (Otsuka and Kunii, 1969; El-Guindy and Davenport, 1979;
Klinger et al., 1966; Rao, 1974; Freuhan and Martonik, 1976; Freuhan, 1977;
Wouterlood, 1979; Barin and Schuler, 1980, Maitre, 1977). Rao (1974) proposed
a physicochemical model for reduction of hematite by carbon and reported that
the reaction occurs through gaseous intermediates. The Boudouard reaction, i.e.,
the reduction of CO2 by C as shown by Equation (3), has been found to be the
rate-controlling step of the overall reaction mechanism in the above reactions.
Rao and El-Rahaiby (1985) studied and proposed a model for the reduction
of lead sulfide with carbon and lime. The reaction consisted of reduction, carbon
gasification, and lead sulfide vaporization steps. The experimental data are analyzed
by means of a physicochemical model that envisions the Boudouard reaction as the
rate-limiting step for the overall reduction process. The intrinsic rate constant values
were derived by the application of the model.
Experimental Section
The experimental work is divided into three parts: studies using the mixed reactants
in loose powder form, studies using the reactant mixture in compacted pellet form,
and experiments in a moving bed reactor.
The variables considered for the study are reaction temperature, molar ratio of
reactants, reaction time, compaction pressure (for pellets), reaction environment,
and vacuum. The experimental plan is presented in Figure 1. The scope of the
experimental data is shown in Table I.
software works under the newest Windows OS so that time is saved with the
multitasking of measurement software and data processing. The diffractometer
consists of an X-ray generator with 3.0 kW power output, tube voltage of 60 KV,
and maximum tube current of 80 mA. The X-ray tube consists of a target copper
anode tube (3 KW). The detector system consists of a scintillation counter. Other
attachments included a counter monochromator, a rotational sample stage, and thin
film analysis attachment. A water chiller was supplied for smooth running of the
X-ray diffractometer.
Parameter Value
Temperature ( C) 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100
Reaction time (s) 120, 180, 420, 600, 900, 1200, 1800
Molar ratio (BaSO4:C) 1:2; 1:4, 1:6, 1:8
Compaction pressure for pellets (kg=cm2) 10, 20, 30, 40
Environment Air, nitrogen, vacuum
970 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
samples for each run. The results were in agreement within 2% with respect to the
conversion obtained. The procedure was repeated for all experiments. The X-ray
diffractograms of pure barium sulfide and one of the samples reacted in air are
shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. The high intensity peaks for pure barium sul-
fide are present at 24, 28, and 40 . These peaks are seen clearly in the diffractogram
of the reacted sample, indicating the presence of barium sulfide.
The experiments were conducted at temperatures of 950 , 1000 , 1050 , and 1100 C.
The reaction was studied for 5, 7, and 15 min. After the reaction, the pellets were
ground and analyzed. Comparison of conversion data for the moving bed reactor
and batch experiments at a compaction pressure of 30 kg=cm2 is presented in
Table II.
Table II. Comparison of conversion data for moving bed reactor and batch
experiments
orange as indicator. The end point was noted when the colorless solution changed to
a light pink color.
K1 Pco2
Rc RCO2 0:5 Rco g mol=g of C s 5
1 K2 Pco K3 Pco2
The value of K2 and K3 are those proposed by Wu (1949) and are accepted for
all sources of carbon. They are given by the equations below:
253000
K2 3:26 1011 exp 6
RT
27700
K3 1:74 103 exp 7
RT
The value of the rate constant K1 is dependent on the source of carbon and is
found from experimental data using the carbon conservation equation.
The reduction of barium sulfate by carbon monoxide is a gas-solid reaction.
The fundamentals of these reactions are extensively discussed in the literature
(Szekely et al., 1976; Levenspiel, 1999). The reaction mechanism based on the
974 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
unreacted core model is found to be suitable for the reduction of barium sulfate by
carbon monoxide.
The barium sulfate particles are surrounded by the carbon monoxide and carbon
dioxide. CO diffuses through the product layer and reacts with BaSO4 particles to
produce an equal number of moles of CO2 and barium sulfide. The process is repre-
sented in Figure 6 for a single particle of BaSO4.
The model is developed based on the following assumptions:
1. The reaction takes place at pseudo steady-state condition. The reaction interface
is considered to be stationary at any time due to high density of solid compared to
that of a gas.
2. The particles are assumed to be spherical.
3. The concentration of gases is assumed to be constant at the surface of the particle.
4. Temperature of the system is constant.
5. The reaction takes place at atmospheric pressure. Hence, the sum of the partial
pressures of CO and CO2 equals atmospheric pressure.
6. The ratio of partial pressures of CO and CO2 is assumed to be constant as they
are dependent on the stoichiometry as per the reaction Equations (2) and (3).
7. The diffusion fluxes of CO and CO2 are equal and opposite in direction with
respect to barium sulfate as per Equation (3). The diffusion of gases is in the
radial direction.
8. Only a fraction of the gases produced is utilized for reactions.
The model equations are developed based on the unreacted core model
(Levenspiel, 1999). External mass transport through the gas boundary layer usually
provides a negligible resistance to the progress of the reaction and hence has only a
small effect on the overall rate. Hence, the other two steps, namely diffusion of the
gases through the product layer of barium sulfide and the surface reaction between
carbon and barium sulfate, are to be tested for rate-controlling steps in order to find
the rate-controlling step.
To test the rate-controlling step, a plot of [1-(1-Xb)1=3] versus time is plotted as
shown in Figure 7, where Xb is the conversion of barium sulfate to barium sulfide
(Levenspiel, 1999). If the surface reaction is rate controlling, the plot would be a
straight line. As the plot in Figure 7 is not a straight line, it is inferred that the dif-
fusion of CO though the product layer of BaS is the rate-controlling step with refer-
ence to the reaction given by Equation (2). Accordingly, the corresponding model
equations are developed and the equation for the diffusion coefficient of CO through
barium sulfide is derived.
Development of Model
The porous reaction mixture consisting of barium sulfate and carbon powder is con-
tained in a refractory boat, as shown in Figure 8. Only the upper surface is exposed
to the atmosphere. To aid the formulation of mass conservation relationships for the
species CO and CO2, a reference volume element of thickness Dz located at z is con-
sidered, as shown in Figure 8.
A part of CO gas generated by the Boudouard reaction is utilized in
oxide-reduction, while the rest is transferred into the volume element. Similarly, a
portion of CO2 gas produced is consumed by the Boudouard reaction, the remaining
being accounted for by mass transfer.
From stoichiometry, it is evident from the reaction given by Equation (3) that
one-gram atom of carbon gives two-gram moles of carbon monoxide. However, not
all of the CO gas thus generated is available for reduction of barium sulfate particles.
Let b denote the fraction of CO gas utilized for the reaction given by Equation (2).
The net rate of production of CO is then given by
21 bK1 Pco2
Rco g mol=g of C s 8
1 K2 Pco K3 Pco2
Figure 7. Plot for testing the experimental data for rate-controlling step.
976 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
From the reaction given by Equation (2), it is known that each mole of CO pro-
duces one mole of CO2. The quantity of CO produced by the reaction as given by
Equation (3) is 2 moles. As b is the fraction of CO utilized, the quantity of CO gas
utilized is 2 b moles. Hence, the quantity of CO2 produced is 2 b moles. But of the
total quantity produced, one mole of CO2 is used in the Boudouard reaction.
Hence, the net rate of production of CO2 is
2b 1K1 Pco2
RCO2 g mol=g of C s 9
1 K2 Pco K3 Pco2
The mass transfer of the species CO and CO2 through the porous sample is influ-
enced by it structure. The flux of CO and CO2 through the powder structure may be
expressed by the equations proposed by Rao (1974):
1 dPco
JCO DCO 10
RT dz
and
1 dPco2
JCO2 DCO2 11
RT dz
where DCO and DCO2 are the diffusivity coefficients for CO and CO2 in the reaction
powder mixture respectively. Based on the foregoing treatment, the conservation
equations for CO may be written as below across the finite element shown in Figure 8:
Rate of mass Rate of mass Net rate of production
0
of CO in at z of CO out at z Dz of CO by reaction
12
Nco S Nco
S RCO S Dz qc 0 13
z zDz
dNco
RCO qc 0 14
dz
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 977
dCco
Nco Dco 15
dz
Substituting Equation (15) in Equation (14), we get
d2 Cco
DCO RCO qc 0 16
dz2
Pco
CCO 17
RT
Substitution of terms from Equation (8) and Equation (16) in Equation (18)
gives the differential equation for conservation of CO as
or
Equations (19) and (20) are interdependent by the relation as per the assumption
number (6), which may be represented by the equation given below:
Pco2
a 21
Pco
where a is a constant.
Substitution of Equation (21) in Equation (19) and then equating to Equation
(20) gives
p
DCO2 =DCO MCO =MCO2 0:8 23
978 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
0:5 0:8a
b 24
1:0 0:8a
or
The following equation for mass balance on solid carbon in the reaction mixture
is obtained as per Equation (5):
dqc K1 Mc qc Pco2
26
dt 1 I Pco2
qc Pco2
w ; s t Mc K1 P0CO2 g IP0CO2 ; and c 27
q0c P0co2
dw wc
0 28
ds 1 gc
dw w
0 29
ds g
Integrating Equation (29),
s
ln w C2 30
g
The initial condition is the amount of carbon reacted at the starting time zero.
So,
w 1 at s 0 31
Hence, C2 0
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 979
Hence,
s
w exp 32
g
qc t Mc K1 Pco2
exp 33
q0c K2 Pco K3 Pco2
Hence,
qc Pco
ln q0
: K 3 K 2 Pco2
c
K1 34
12t
where qc is mass concentration of carbon present per unit volume in the reaction
mixture at time t and qCO is the initial mass concentration (bulk density of carbon)
present in the mixture. The number 12 is the molecular weight of carbon, Mc.
The mass concentration qc of carbon in the reaction mixture at any time may be
obtained from experimental data as shown below.
During the progress of the reaction there is weight loss in the weight of reaction
mixture. The loss is due to two reactions:
1. The conversion of the reaction of barium sulfate to barium sulfide by removal of
oxygen from BaSO4.
2. The carbon reacted by the Boudouard reaction.
total weight loss of the mixture after each run of the experiment DWt 35
Hence, the weight loss in the reaction mixture exclusively due to reduction of BaSO4
to BaS is
DWReduction n1 Xb 64 38
Let
DWc
Fc 41
Wic
Assuming that the total volume of reaction mixture is constant,
qc Wic Wc
42
q0c Wc
For two gram-atoms of carbon reacted with one mole of BaSO4, four gram-
atoms of oxygen are lost from the reaction mixture.
Hence,
DWc
oxygen lost for carbon loss of DWc 2Mo 44
Mc
2bDWc
loss of oxygen Mo 45
Mc
So, the total loss of reaction mixture
2bMo
DWt DWc 1 46
Mc
Using Equation (47), the utilization factor b may be found from experimental
data.
Using the value of b, the value of a, which is the ratio of PCO2 and PCO, is
calculated from Equation (25).
The total pressure is constant and is equal to 1 atm, i.e.,
Hence, simultaneous solution of Equations (25), (47), and (48) gives the value of
Pco and PCO2 for each experimental run.
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 981
dCpco
4pr2 De constant Qsay 49
dr
Here, CpCO is the concentration of CO in a single BaSO4 particle.
Boundary Conditions
At r ro
and at r rb
CpCO 0 50
Integrating Equation (49) with the boundary conditions given by Equation (50)
gives
4p De
Q Cp co 51
1=rb 1=r0
dCpco b4p De
4pr2 De Cp co 52
dr 1=rb 1=r0
drb
rate of reaction of particle 4pr2b qb 53
dt
1=4 4p De drb
Cp co 4pr2b qb 54
1=rb 1=r0 dt
Or
Z Z
1=4 De 1 1
Cp co dt r2b drb 55
qb rb r0
982 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
Figure 9. A typical plot of z vs. PCO to calculate De. (Figure provided in color online.)
Integrating Equation (55), with the initial condition at t 0 and r b ro, we get
3 De t
Cp co 1 31 Xb 2=3 21 Xb 56
2 qb r20
Let
y 1 31 Xb 2=3 21 Xb 57
Ppco
Cpco 58
RT
Substitution of Equation (57) and Equation (58) in Equation (56) gives
2 R T y r20 qb
De :Pp co zsay 59
3 t
Ppco is PCO, the partial pressure of CO at the surface of barium sulfate
(unreacted), and is calculated from Equation (25) and Equation (48).
Hence, Equation (53) may be written as
z De Pco 60
Thus, from the slope of the plot z versus PCO, the effective diffusivity De of the
reduction reaction is calculated. A typical plot is shown in Figure 9.
Experiments in Air
It was observed that in all experiments, the percentage conversion attained a
maximum value and then dropped steeply with time afterwards. Typical plots show-
ing the trend of conversion degree with time are shown in Figure 10.
Conversion increases with time due to the formation of BaS in the mixture as the
reaction proceeds with time as expected. The fall in conversion is attributed to the
dilution of CO and CO2 gases by diffusion into the surrounding atmosphere, thereby
causing the surrounding air to react with BaS to form BaSO4.
Experiments in Nitrogen
The experiments conducted under nitrogen environment also showed a similar trend,
but the rate of fall in degree of conversion is considerably reduced, as shown in
Figure 11. It is inferred that due to a significant decrease of air concentration in
the vicinity of BaS, the rate of reaction with air is decreased. Hence, the rate of fall
was reduced.
Figure 12. Conversion-time plots to study the effect of temperature on percent conversion and
optimum reaction time.
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 985
Molar Ratio
The percentage of conversion to BaS increased with molar ratio of carbon to BaSO4
in comparison to that under stoichiometric conditions with other conditions
Figure 14. Conversion vs. time graph to study the effect of compaction pressures.
986 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
remaining constant. The plots of conversion versus time showing the effect of molar
ratio are presented in Figure 13. The conversion is expected to increase due to the
increased availability of CO for the reduction reaction with BaSO4. However, the
trend in the degree of conversion is the same as that observed for experiments conduc-
ted under atmospheric condition in air.
Compaction Pressure
When the reactant mixture is compacted into pellets and reacted, the degree of con-
version is found to increase in comparison to that in the loose powder system under
similar reaction conditions, as shown in Figure 14. However, the degree of conversion
was found to increase up to 30 kg=cm2, beyond which there was marginal decrease in
conversion.
The degree of conversion increased due to the increased closeness between the
reactants and also due to the slow rate of diffusion of air into the pellets. However,
the degree of conversion is observed to increase up to a compaction pressure of
30 kg=cm2, after which there was a marginal decreasing trend, as seen from the data
obtained at a compaction pressure of 40 kg=cm2. This is attributed to the decrease in
effective diffusion of CO to the reactive sites because of reduced porosity. The
relationship between compaction pressure and porosity is presented in Table III.
Table IV. Values of rate constant K1 and effective diffusivity De for loose powder
system
Conclusions
1. The air present in the interstices of the reaction mixture is sufficient and necessary
to initiate the reaction. Subsequently, the reduction reaction of BaSO4 to BaS
proceeds faster, giving higher conversion in the absence of air.
2. The percentage of conversion of BaSO4 to BaS increases with temperature,
compaction pressure (up to 30 kg=cm2), and molar ratio of carbon to BaSO4.
3. It is recommended that the production of BaS be done using the reactant mixture
in the form of pellets.
4. The activation energy of the Boudouard reaction is lower than that of the
reduction reaction, confirming that the reduction reaction between CO and
BaSO4 is the rate-controlling step in the overall reaction mechanism.
5. The optimum conditions for continuous production of BaS at laboratory scale
under atmospheric air conditions are found to be a temperature of 1100 C, a
compaction pressure of 30 kg=cm2, and reaction time of 7 min.
988 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ms. S. K., Barium Chemicals, Hyderabad, for supply of materials
for the studies and P. Victor, B. Swetha, Anil Kumar, Deepthi, Dr. T. Sankarshana,
and Dr. D. Jaya Prakash of University College of Technology, Osmania University,
Hyderabad, for their help in experimentation.
Nomenclature
B stoichiometric coefficient of carbon monoxide
C1, C2, C3 integration constants
CCO concentration of carbon monoxide at any radius
CCO0 concentration of carbon monoxide at the surface of BaSO4 particle
CCO2 concentration of carbon dioxide at any radius
CCO20 concentration of carbon dioxide at the surface of BaSO4 particle
De effective diffusivity, cm2=s
DCO diffusivity of carbon monoxide in the pores of the sample, cm2=s
DCO2 diffusivity of carbon dioxide in the pores of the sample, cm2=s
K1, K2, K3 rate constants for Boudouard reactions
MC molecular weight of carbon
MCO molecular weight of carbon monoxide
MCO2 molecular weight of carbon dioxide
Mo atomic weight of oxygen
n1 initial number of moles of BaSO4, mole
PCO partial pressure of carbon monoxide in the mixture, atm
PCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the mixture, atm
Q a constant.
R universal gas constant, cm3-atm=g.mol.K
RCO rate of formation of carbon monoxide
RCO2 rate of formation of carbon dioxide
r radius of particle at any time, cm
rb radius of barium sulfate particle, cm
r0 initial radius of BaSO4 before reduction reaction, cm
T temperature, K
t time of reaction, min.
DWt total weight lost during reaction time t, g
DWc weight loss of carbon, g
Wic initial amount of carbon in reaction mixture, g
DWReduction weight loss due to reduction reaction, g
Xb conversion of BaSO4 to BaS, %
y 13(1-Xb)2=3 2(1-Xb)
2
z 3 RTyr0 qb
2 t
Greek letters
a ratio of partial pressure of carbon monoxide in the mixture to partial
pressure of carbon dioxide
b utilization factor
c Pco2
0
P co2
g K2PCO K3PCO2
Reaction Between Barium Sulfate and Carbon 989
References
Barin, I., and Schuler, W. (1980). On the kinetics of the chlorination of titanium dioxide in the
presence of carbon, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 11, 199207.
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N. (2002). Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., John
Wiley, New York.
Bohnet, M., Brinker, C. J., and Clemens, H., eds. (2005). Ullmans Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry, 6th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
Brownell, W. E. (1963). Reaction between alkaline-earth sulfates and cristolbalite, J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 46, 125128.
Budnikov, P., and Ginstling, A. M. (1968). Principles of Solid State Chemistry, Mclaren,
Croydon, UK.
El-Guindy, M. I., and Davenport, W. G. (1979). Kinetics and mechanism of ilmenite
reduction with graphite, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, l, 17291734.
Fruehan, R. J. (1977). The rate of reduction of iron oxides by carbon, Metall. Mater. Trans. B,
8, 279286.
Fruehan, R. J., and Martonik, L. J. (1976). The rate of reduction of MgO by carbon, Metall.
Mater. Trans. B, 7, 537542.
Grabke, H. J. (1966). Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 70, 664674.
Klinger, N., Strauss, E. L., and Komarek, K. L. (1966). Reactions between silica and graphite,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 49, 369375.
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5th ed., Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken,
N.J.
Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd ed., John Wiley, New York.
Lobunez, W. (1973). FMC Report No. 5686-R, Princeton, N.J.
Maitre, A., and Lefort, P. (1997). Solid state reaction of zirconia with carbon, Solid State
Ionics, 104, 109122.
Muyskens, D. J., Tunison, D. W., and Rau, E. (2002). Barium compounds, in: Encyclopedia
of Chemical Processing and Design, Vol. 4, ed. J. J. McKetta, 5062, Marcel Dekker,
New York.
Otsuka, K., and Kunii, D. (1969). Reduction of powdery ferric oxide mixed with graphite
particles, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 2, 46.
Rao, Y. K. (1974). A physico-chemical model for reactions between particulate solids occur-
ring through gaseous intermediates. I. Reduction of hematite by carbon, Chem. Eng. Sci.,
29, 14351445.
Rao, Y. K., and El-Rahaiby, S. K. (1985). Direct reduction of lead sulfide with carbon and
lime: Effect of catalysis, AIChE J., 31, 918926.
Rao, Y. K, and Jalan, B. P. (1972). A study of the rates of carbon-carbon dioxide reaction in
the temperature range 839 to 1050 C, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 3, 24652477.
Searls, J. P. (2002). Barite, in Mineral Commodity Summaries 2002, U.S. Geological Survey,
28, Reston, Va. Available from http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/2002/
mcs2002.pdf
Shreve, R. N. (1984). Chemical Process Industries, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sohn, H. Y., and Szekely, J. (1973). Reduction between solids through gaseous intermediates.
1. Reactions controlled by chemical kinetics, Chem. Eng. Sci., 28, 17891801.
Szekely, J., Evans, J. W., and Sohn, H. Y. (1976). Gas-Solid Reactions, Academic Press,
New York.
990 J. S. N. Murthy and P. V. V. Reddy