Content
Aim and Objective
1.0 Introduction
2.0 What is productivity?
3.0 What is workstudy?
4.0 What is method study?
4.1 Human factors in enterprise operation
4.2 Method study procedure
4.2.1 Select the work to be studied
4.2.2 Record the existing work method and all other relevant facts
4.2.2.1 Recording Techniques and Tools
4.2.2.1 Recording Techniques and Tools
4.2.3 Examine the records
4.2.4 Develop the improved method
4.2.3.1 Classification of activities
4.2.3.2 Procedure of examination
4.2.4 Develop the improved method
4.2.5 Evaluate alternative method
4.2.6 Define the improved method
4.2.7 Install the improved method
4.2.8 Maintaining the new method
4.3 Methods and Movements at the work place
4.3.1 The principles of motion economy
………….
Summary (Key Terms)
Reference
Work study is an industrial Engineering Technique to improve productivity. It is very often used to increase the
production from a given quantity or resources without additional considerable capital investment (very small amount).
One of the most effective ways to raise productivity is often the development of new processes and the installation of
more modern plant and equipment. However, this is true only where production is dependent mainly on machines and
plant rather than on human labour. The research and development necessary to develop a new process or a machine of
higher performance are usually very expensive and lengthier process. In addition, there is always a risk that the
improvements achieved may not justify the amount time and money spent. In country like ours, where there is not much
capital to spend for improving the productivity, such approach may not be possible.
Workstudy has to be looked at keeping in mind the above mentioned factors. Work study concerns mainly with
operation rather than with technical processes. Therefore, it involves human beings: workers, planners, technicians,
managers, and so on. The study of processes and equipment leaving the operator behind is only a technical problem.
Workstudy is not usually concerned with it.
Let us now assume that as a result he was unable to sell pots and he had to lower his price from Rs. 20 to Rs. 18 a
pot. If the potter wants to assess the productivity gain, it may be more interested in using monetary terms rather than
simply number of pots produced. The potter can argue that the value of his output used to be Rs. 8,000 (400x20) a
month and is now Rs. 9,000 (500x18) a month. Hence the productivity gain is 12.5% [(9000-80000/8000].
From the above example, two observations are visible. First, productivity was used to measure increase in output
expressed in number of pots produced in the first case, and in monetary terms in the second, giving different values in
each case. In other words, depending on what one is interested in measuring, the nature of output and input will vary
accordingly. Second, while actual production increased in this example from 400 to 500 pots, productivity in monetary
terms did not show up the same corresponding increase. This means we have to distinguish between increased
production and increased productivity, which in this example was measured in terms of monetary gains. Now consider
the following examples:
Assume that the potter decided to replace the wood-fired kiln by and oil-fired kiln for the purpose of increasing the
productivity. This cost him an investment of Rs. 60,000, which he recons should be recovered in ten years time. In
other words, the cost of investment will be Rs. 6,000 (60,000/10) a year for ten years or Rs. 500 (6,000/12) a month.
He also would need oil that would cost him Rs. 500 a month more than what he would have paid for wood. Let us also
assume that the production also remained constant at 500 pots a month. Measured in monetary terms, the value of
his output is Rs, 9,000 per month as stated previously, from which will be deducted Rs. 500 for capital investment and
Rs. 500 for fuel, or total Rs. 1,000. Monetary value gain is Rs. 8,000 per month (9,000–1,000). Thus the productivity
expressed in monetary gain has not improved since while keeping him in original value before the investment.
However, the potter wish to argue that as result of the new kiln, the quality of pots has improved and fewer rejects
were returned and the user’s satisfaction has increased over the time and as result the price may be able to increase.
From the potter’s viewpoint, it has become much easier to operate the new kiln.
Therefore, productivity in the individual enterprise may be affected by a series of external factors such as availability of
raw materials and skilled labours, existing infrastructure, etc.; as well as by a number of deficiencies in its operations or
internal factors. External factors are beyond the control of the enterprise, but other factors are within the control of
operations managers and these are outlined in next section.
Workstudy is the systematic examination of the methods of carrying on activities numerous ways so as to improve the
effective use of resources and to set up standards of performance for the activities being carried out.
Workstudy then aims at examining the way an activity is being carried out, simplifying or modifying the method of
operation to reduce unnecessary or excess work, or the wasteful resources, and setting up a time standard for
performing that activity. The relation between productivity and the workstudy is thus obvious. If workstudy results in
cutting down the time of performing a certain activity by 20%, merely a result of rearranging the sequence or simplifying
the method of operation and without additional expenditure, then the productivity will go up be corresponding value,
which is by 20%. To appreciate how work study acts to cut down the costs and reduce the time of a certain activity, it is
necessary to examine more closely what that time consists of.
The time taken or a machine to carry out an operation or to produce a given quantity of a certain product may be
considered as made up in the manner illustrated in Fig. 1.1.
Basic Work
(A) (A) Total time,
Content of product
Basic Work Content Basic Work Content if all perfect
and/or operation
C.2 Inadequate
C.2 Material handling
material handling
Total work
content C.2 Frequent stoppage
as production C.2 Production
changes from one Work content added planning Ineffective time
product to another by inefficient totally eliminated,
methods of if all perfectly
manufacture/ applied
C.4 Ineffective method operation C.4 Workstudy
of work (method study)
C.6 Frequent
breakdown of C.6 Preventive
machines and maintenance
equipment
D.1 Proper
D.1 Absenteeism and
management &
lateness
policy
Work content
resulting from the
D.2 Poor workmanship D.2 Training
contribution from
human resources
Similar definition presented by International labour office, ILO, Geneva, 1960 also highlights the issues of workstudy
techniques:
Work study is a term used to embrace techniques of Method Study and Work Measurement which are employed to
ensure the best possible use of human and material resources in carrying out special activity.”
Therefore, workstudy constitute two groups of techniques which are distinct from each other but completely
interdependent. These groups have been subtitled Method Study and Work Measurement as shown in Fig. 1.3. As the
diagram shows, one technique is concerned with the way work is done (the method) and the other is concerned with
value or work content of the task itself.
Work Study
Higher productivity
Work Measurement: The application of techniques designed to establish the time for a qualified worker to
carry out a specified job at a specified level of performance.
Method study and work measurement are, therefore, closely linked. Method study is concerned with reduction of the
work content of a job or operation, while work measurement is mostly concerned with the investigation of any ineffective
time associated with it; and with the subsequent establishment of time standards for the operation when carried out in
the improved fashion, as determined by method study.
The aim of workstudy is to assist management to obtain the optimum use of human and material resources available to
an organization. Fundamentals this aim has three folds:
the most effective use of plant of equipment,
the most effective use of human effort, and
the evaluation of human work.
Accordingly, the purpose of method study is to find better ways of doing things in order to improve efficiency by getting
rid of unnecessary work, avoidable delays, and other form of waste. This purpose or objective is achieved through the
following:
As the method study aims to establish a method for a job or to review and improve existing methods, the types of
problems which are likely to be concerned are:
Getting a job done more efficiently and so more cheaply;
‘Rationalising’ the work - questioning whether work needs to be done at all, or whether it can at least be done
more simply and with less effort; alternatively, trying to establish whether better use can be made of existing
idle time by spreading employees’ work loads more evenly over their working time.
A method study may be part of routine ‘auditing’ of the organisation affairs, or it may be requested by departmental or
senior management. It may arise from:
The introduction of new products, services or equipment;
The identification of problems:
o Bottlenecks, causing unbalanced workflow
o Idle workers or equipment – i.e. under use of resources
o Poor morale indicated by trivial complaints or absenteeism
o Escalating costs
o Excessive errors due to rejected work
o Inconsistent earnings, where the earning of employees are not related to output
Method study provides a comprehensive routine for improving methods of work. Frank Gilbreth (1886 to 1924) made a
major contribution to the techniques of method study, by presenting a detailed and objective approach.
4.2.2 Record the existing work method and all other relevant facts:
Having selected the work to be studied, all the facts relating to existing method should be recorded. The success of the
whole procedure depends on the accuracy with which the facts are recorded, because they will provide the basis of both
critical examination and the development of improved method. Recording serves essentially as a basis for subsequent
analysis and examination. Recording may be carried out in two phases: first, rough sketch or charting of the job being
studied to establish whether the recorded information is of use; and second, a more formal and accurate charts or
diagrams to include clear and precise details.
The usual way of recording facts is to write them down. But, such method is not appropriate for complicated processes.
This is particularly is true when an exact record is required every minute details. Needless to state that in order to
describe everything that is done in even a very simple job, which takes perhaps a few minutes to perform, would
probably result in several pages of closely written script overcome this difficulty, other techniques and tools of recording
have been developed, so that detailed information may be recorded precisely in standard form.
4.2.2.1 Recording Techniques and Tools:
The most common techniques are charts and diagrams. There are several types of standard charts and diagrams
available, each with its own special purpose. In broad sense, they fall into two groups:
o Those which are used to record process sequence, i.e. series of events or happening in the order in which they
occur, and
o Those which record events, also in sequence, but on a time scale that enables to interact with related events.
The diagrams are used to indicate movements and/or interrelationships of movements more clearly than charts. But,
they do not show all details recorded on charts, which they supplement rather than replace. The most commonly used
method study charts are given in Fig. 1.7.
Process Chart Symbols: The recording of the facts about a job or operation of a process chart is made much easier by
the use of five standard symbols, which together serve to represent all the different types of activity or even likely to
encountered in any factory or office. Name, Symbol and the description of each standard symbol are shown in Fig. 1.8.
Type Base Name
Chart Indicate process Outline process chart
sequence Flow process chart – workflow type, material type,
equipment type
Two handed process chart, Procedure flowchart
Chart Use time-scale Multiple activity chart
Simo chart
Diagram Indicate Flow diagram, String diagram, cycle graph,
movement Chronocyclegraph, Travel chart
Fig. 1.7: Common Charts and Diagrams
It is usual only one printed form of chart for all three types, the heading bearing the word “Worker/Material/Equipment”.
When flow process charts are being used regularly, it is convenient to use printed sheets similar to Fig. 1.11, which
illustrates a several process to be carried on a bus engine for maintenance purpose.
Fig. 1.12 shows flow diagram and process chart for clerical operation in an office environment.
Fig. 1.13 shows flow process charts of two types (worker and material) shown in one sheet for writing a letter by short-
hand typist.
Fig. 1.13 Flow Process Chart for Writing a Letter by a Short-Hand Typist
BEFORE PRESENTING WITH OTHER RECORDING TECHNIQUES, EXAMINE AND DEVELOP STEPS ARE NOW
DISCUSSED SO THAT THEIR MERITS AND DEMERITS COULD BE DIFFERENTIATED EASILY.
The first question “what is actually achieved” ensures that whatever is written as description against the symbol on a
chart is accurately stated and properly understood. In this way, the real achievement of the activity is established. The
purpose of the primary questions is to ensure that every fact on an existing method is clearly understood. It is therefore
important not to confuse the questions and answers relating to purpose and means. For example, when considering the
operations of “tying a parcel with string”, the question under purpose, “what is actually achieved?”, would receive the
answer, “the parcel is fastened”, but not “the parcel is tied up with a string”.
Secondary Questions: These are primarily to search for alternatives, which might lead to improvement. These
questions cover the second stage of the questioning technique, during which the answers to the primary questions are
subjected to further query to determine whether possible alternatives of purpose, place, sequence, person, and means
are practicable and preferable as a means of improvement upon the existing method.
Therefore, during this stage of questioning (having asked already about the activity recorded, what is done? and why is it
done?), the method study specialist goes on to inquire: “What else might be done?” And hence: “What should be done?
In the same way, the answers already obtained on place, sequence, person and means are subjected to further query. It
is clear that in this stage, two sets of questions are to be asked to set out the alternatives. The Fig. 1.15 lists out such
questions to be asked for each category.
The last set of questions would indicate the direction along which a new method should be developed. However, it is not
possible at this stage to make adequate decisions to develop the new method. In obtaining the answers to the secondary
questions, the following considerations are of primary significant;
1. When an activity is challenged, the purpose is to see whether it can be eliminated entirely
2. If the activity can not be eliminated because it is essential, then it is required to see how it could be best done
3. Attention must also be given to see the activity can be combined with any other activities
The above queries are to be made systematically every time a method study is undertaken. Such an approach is the
basis of successful method study.
The questioning process could be performed very rapidly by experience specialist. In fact, it uses more common sense
while observing the activity with the focus of answering “What is done?” and “Why is it necessary?”
Fig. 1.19: Flow Diagram: Inspecting & Marking Incoming Parts (Existing Method)
Fig. 1.20: Flow Process Chart: Inspecting & Marking Incoming Parts (Existing Method)
Fig. 1.21: Flow Diagram: Inspecting & Marking Incoming Parts (Proposed Method)
Fig. 1.22: Flow Process Chart: Inspecting & Marking Incoming Parts (Proposed Method)
The string diagram shown in Fig. 1.23 is thus a special form of flow diagram, in which a string is used to measure the
distance travelled in ware house operation of tiles. Because of this, it is necessary that string diagram be drawn to scale
unlike ordinary flow diagram. The string diagram is started in exactly the same way as all other method. Both flow
diagram and string diagram are often used to supplement flow process chart enabling to provide a clearer picture. If the
journey is long and study area is fairly large, methodical notes such as the direction of flow, arrival t& departure times
should be noted clearly to avoid later confusion.
15 Goes to
Manager's Office
Idle
Idle Check & Sign
Type Envelop,
20
Types the Insert Letter & Idle
Envelop Place it Inside
25
Fig. 1.26 and Fig. 1.27 show another example, where multiple activity charts have been prepared for the inspection
operation of catalyst in a converter with the original and improved process. It is worth to note that the idle time has been
reduced drastically in the improved process.
Fig. 1.26: Multiple Activity Chart for Inspect of Catalyst (Original Method)
Fig. 1.27: Multiple Activity Chart for Inspect of Catalyst (Improved Method)