Quinn Holmes
AP Language Pd. 6
10/18/15
Ralph Waldo Emerson writes, what lies behind you and what lies in front of you pales in
comparison to what lies inside of you. What Emerson is saying is that there are two distinct life
modes. One is the what and the other is the who - the who grounds people in the present,
separate from what has and will happen as external experiences. This is validated in
In pop culture, specifically movies, the difference between what and who is a common
narrative theme. Filmmakers inspire audiences with stories of opportunity. Everyone has to deal
with challenges and adversary but those who succeed are the people who know the difference
between who they are and what has happened to them. They dont let those negative
experiences define their character. This is shown in the movie, The Pursuit of Happyness,
where the main character, Will Smith, is poverty-stricken and eventually becomes homeless. His
wife gives up on him and moves to New York, leaving their son with him. After a series of events
Smith lands a job as an intern at a brokerage firm. Through strength of personality and an
understanding that his past isnt going to hold him back, Smith gets the job under circumstances
that seem impossible. He goes on to become a millionaire. Lesson of the true story? The main
character sees himself for who he truly is and what he is capable of doing. The managers at the
firm could have picked any of the wealthy, well-educated men, but instead chose Smith,
because they sensed how much effort, dedication, and passion he put into life. This is just one
Holmes 2
As in film, current politics exemplify the what against who in Emersons quote. In
defending themselves, politicians minimize the mistakes they have made in the past and re-
focus their attention to who they are now. This was demonstrated in the 2015 Democratic
Presidential primary debate, specifically between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. A huge
scandal associated with Hillary Clinton was that she used her own personal email account to
send official, classified governmental material when she was the Secretary of State. During the
debate in October, many candidates jabbed at Hillary for her past scandal. The only person in
the debate who did not was Bernie Sanders. He argued that it was time to move on, and to shift
their attention on the relevant problems happening in present time. This helped Clinton because
it showed that her prior actions didnt define her. Not only did it help Clinton get re-rooted in the
present, but it helped Sanders because it showed that he clearly understood character versus
experience. Despite a checkered political career, what counts to voters is an internally driven
who.
What matters most is our now character; the only state we live in. As long as people
work on themselves and life around them, then they wont have to worry about their past or their
future. The what has happened or what will happen doesnt define oneself.