0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
832 tayangan1 halaman
The checklist provides a framework for local governments to assess event risk management plans. It outlines 7 key risk management activities: 1) Establishing the context by outlining event details, stakeholders, and risk criteria; 2) Identifying risks, their causes and potential impacts; 3) Analyzing risks by evaluating consequences and likelihoods; 4) Evaluating risks and assigning owners; 5) Treating high priority risks through identified options and plans; 6) Communicating the risk management plan to stakeholders; and 7) Monitoring and reviewing the plan for changes and emerging risks. The checklist aims to determine if risk plans align with risk management standards and reflect best practices.
The checklist provides a framework for local governments to assess event risk management plans. It outlines 7 key risk management activities: 1) Establishing the context by outlining event details, stakeholders, and risk criteria; 2) Identifying risks, their causes and potential impacts; 3) Analyzing risks by evaluating consequences and likelihoods; 4) Evaluating risks and assigning owners; 5) Treating high priority risks through identified options and plans; 6) Communicating the risk management plan to stakeholders; and 7) Monitoring and reviewing the plan for changes and emerging risks. The checklist aims to determine if risk plans align with risk management standards and reflect best practices.
The checklist provides a framework for local governments to assess event risk management plans. It outlines 7 key risk management activities: 1) Establishing the context by outlining event details, stakeholders, and risk criteria; 2) Identifying risks, their causes and potential impacts; 3) Analyzing risks by evaluating consequences and likelihoods; 4) Evaluating risks and assigning owners; 5) Treating high priority risks through identified options and plans; 6) Communicating the risk management plan to stakeholders; and 7) Monitoring and reviewing the plan for changes and emerging risks. The checklist aims to determine if risk plans align with risk management standards and reflect best practices.
The following checklist can assist local governments in assessing risk management plans to determine if they align with relevant risk management standards (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009) and generally reflect best practice.
Risk Management Supporting Evidence Commentary
Activities 1. Establishing Organisational and Event Context This is the most important the Context Organisers details activity in the risk Event name, objective, deliverables and management process. other supporting details, schedules and information The supporting evidence Site plan may also be sourced from Key stakeholders identified with roles and event management plan, responsibilities event schedule, event Risk Management Context operations plan, event Risk management process application forms etc to Defined risk criteria assist in determining the (measures of controls, consequence, organisational and event likelihood, level of risk and risk acceptance context. criteria) 2. Risk Identified risks and supporting information Ensure risks are defined in a Identification (sources of risk, areas of impact, causes, way that is meaningful and potential consequences and existing describes the impact to controls) event objectives.
A risk register is the typical
way of documenting identified, analysed and evaluated risks. 3. Risk Analysis Risks analysed by determining Rating of existing controls, consequences and their likelihood to while subjective and not produce a level of risk essential, does provide Consideration should also be given to assurance to third parties existing controls and their effectiveness that the event organiser and efficiency understands requirements and expectations associated with event risks. 4. Risk Evaluation Risk owner assigned The risk owner and risk Decision made, based on outcomes of risk acceptance decision may be analysis, about which risks need treatment explicitly stated or implied and the priority for treatment as defined in the risk criteria implementation 5. Risk Treatment If required, from risk analysis and Detailed risk treatment plans evaluation, risk treatment options may exist in other identified, owner assigned and documents such as implementation plan/timeframes Emergency Management documented Plans, Traffic Management Plans, Waste Management Plan etc. 6. Communication Has the risk management plan been and communicated to key stakeholders? Consultation 7. Monitoring and Defined monitor and review plan and Review responsibilities for the risk management plan, changes in the context and individual risks, emerging risks, controls and/or treatments.