Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#368 COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:12:32 PM
Last Modified: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:47:18 PM
Time Spent: 00:34:45
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name Hannah Wissman

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Secondary Education, Math

Q3: Grade Taught Middle School

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/09/2017

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/03/2017

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement Brandon Middle School

Q7: School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last) Cheryl Gould

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address: chergou@regent.edu

Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for? Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Superior
area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the Proficient

age group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students Superior

use of higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Superior
applications.

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Hannah has sound content knowledge that provides a solid foundation for instruction. She provided students with
learning activities that require them to solve problems that have real-world applications. In this placement, she has been
learning new pedagogy for teaching middle school students in small group settings. This has been a wonderful
opportunity to see this as a new initiative in teaching middle school math.

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and Superior
student learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner Superior

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Proficient

transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Proficient

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
Overall, Hannah consistently meets this standard. When planning, she will further consider lesson pacing and better
articulation for how her high and low group work is different. In addition, she will expand her use of learning strategies
as she tended to use the same strategies from lesson to lesson.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Proficient

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Superior

resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Hannah provided effective instruction to the middle school students at Brandon Middle School. She grew to provide
more student-centered instruction over time. She will continue to refine her differentiation strategies as she gains
teaching experience.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior

instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior

purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Hannah grades student work on a regular basis to determine student understanding. She uses the data to adjust
instruction toward student success. She uses a variety of assessments to include formative and summative methods.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to Proficient

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students diversity, including language, culture, Superior

race, gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Superior

responses.

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
This has been Hannah's greatest growth area since the beginning of student teaching. She is continually learning best-
practices for keeping middle school students on-task and engaged in learning math. Students were adequately engaged
during my second and third observations. She continues to refine her skills in this area. I have no doubt that she could
handle her own middle school classroom.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior
critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior

professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration Superior

with teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and Superior

ethical interactions.

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
Hannah is a well-rounded practitioner. She developed positive relationships with her school community members. She
worked well in a co-teaching environment where there were several adults in the math classroom assisting students
during her instruction. This placement provided her with good opportunities to see how the co-teaching concept works in
reality. Hannah sought constructive feedback during each of my conferences with the desire to continually improve
professionally.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the Exemplary
placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Superior

Uses available data to document/communicate student Superior

progress and develop learning targets.

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Hannah documented student progress throughout this placement. She is well beyond her student teaching peers in
being able to present evidence of student learning progress.

4/4