FORMULAE
s
CI (x )=x t
n
CI ( p )= p z
p (1 p )
n
LEARNING OUTCOMES
General
o Appreciate the importance of using best available evidence for
professional practice
o Formulate relevant questions and source, evaluate and synthesise
evidence to answer these questions across a range of veterinary
contexts
o Create a database for scientific references (such as an EndNote
library), include references in writing articles and reports, and create a
bibliography
o Summarise and synthesise information from a journal article, a
scientific presentation or a report and prepare an abstract
o Design simple field experiments including randomised control trials and
critically evaluate the design of published experiments
o Analyse data from simple field experiments using a statistical program,
interpret results and present the result in a journal article, a scientific
presentation or an industry report; and
o Interpret statistical results from simple experiments presented in a
journal article, a scientific presentation or an industry report
Influence of research on policy and practice
o Identify the research methods used to describe the epidemiology of B.
suis in humans and animals in NSW
o Describe the policy response to the emergence of B. suis in dogs in
NSW and the approach taken to devising such a policy
o Describe the clinical presentation, transmission and clinical
management of brucellosis (B. suis) in dogs
o Describe the public health risks associated with B. suis infection in feral
pigs and dogs and suggest measures to reduce these risks
Acquiring
o Identify keywords, synonyms and related terms
o Create a search strategy for a veterinary clinical question using
PICO/PECO
o Search a database to find articles relevant to a clinical question
o Locate and access the selected articles
o Manage your references using EndNote
Ethics in research
o Identify important ethical issues in research
o Source and understand various guidelines on the ethics of biomedical
research
o Apply your understanding of ethics in your planning and/or
participation of future research activities and in the critical evaluation
and analysis of published research
Randomised control trials
o Explain the process of designing a clinical trail
o Identify key biases influencing validity of clinical trials
o Explain the reasons for control selection, sample size calculation,
randomisation and blinding
o Critically evaluate the design of a published study
o Evaluate reports of randomised control trials
o Determine what information from such reports are relevant to a clinical
question on treatment
o Design a simple randomised control trial
o Randomly allocate animals to treatment and control groups
o Prepare protocols for follow up of enrolled animals
o Make decisions on the appropriate method for assessment of the
outcome
o Critically evaluate the design of a published randomised control trial
o Formulate a clinical question on treatment
o Contribute to the design and conduct of a randomised control trial to
provide best evidence to address a clinical question on treatment
BIOSTATISTICS
Phases to statistical analysis:
1. Descriptive statistics description of population using key population
variables
a. Measure of location (mean, median)
b. Measure of variability (standard deviation, IQR)
2. Statistical inference use of study data to make inferences about the general
population
a. Estimation generation of confidence intervals of unknown population
parameters
b. Hypothesis testing
Determining presence of extremes:
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
Brucellosis:
B. suis in pigs:
Risk-free: euthanasia
Treatment using doxy + rifampicin
More PPE when any procedures relating to reproductive tract
Testing dogs that have paralysis/reproductive symptoms
Testing all dogs in contact with infected dog
Information sources:
1. Research
2. Journal articles
3. Review articles
4. Text books
5. Reference books
6. Clinical experience and teaching
7. Websites
Evidence-based practice: integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient
values
1. ASK: convert need for information into answerable question using PICO
a. Patient/population/problem
b. Intervention/exposure
i. Intervention: something the researcher applies to the individual/population
ii. Exposure: application due to external factors
c. Comparison to alternative tx
d. Outcome
2. ACQUIRE: find best evidence to answer
3. APPRAISE: for
a. Validity
i. Bias
ii. Peer-review look out for
1. Scientific layout (abstract, scientific process, references)
2. Academic credentials
iii. Chance variation explains results
b. Importance (size of effect)
c. Applicability
4. APPLY: apply by integrating evidence with clients preferences, particular circumstances
5. AUDIT: evaluate how well is working
How to practice:
->EBP about mindfulness: does the level of mindfulness meditation practiced correlate to the ability
to focus on complex mental tasks?
Types of questions:
Background question general information about what the issue/disease is can be found in
o Textbooks
o Reference books
o Review articles
o Reputable websites
Foreground question specific question that can only be answered by very specific research
o Can be found in
Research articles
Systemic reviews
o Can concern
Therapy
Diagnosis
Aetiology/harm
Prognosis
Learning Activity 2:
Write down one SCIENTIFIC question you have from the session on mindfulness meditation:
Medline domestic animals with strong clinical focus need precision search
terms
PubMed mostly for genetics and molecular biology
Ovid
o Add key terms one by one if term is in their list of key terms, will open
window with related terms
Check explode to search all terms under the main term
Check focus to search mainly for one term
CAB abstracts
Zoological Record - exotic/zoo animals
o Use scientific names
o Refine search by selecting descriptors that correspond to question
Types of studies:
Meta-analysis statistical synthesis of many independent studies on the
same topic to obtain an overall conclusion
Systematic review qualitative comparison and synthesis of an overall
position based on many systematically-collected randomised controlled trials
(RCTs)/observational studies
Independent study
Cross-sectional analytic study presence/absence of disease/health-related
variables determined in each member of a study population/representative
sample at one particular point in time
Randomised controlled trial for questions about tx and diagnosis
Cohort study observational study in which a defined population followed
over a period of time and different subsets (according to exposure to a factor)
compared. Concern prognosis and aetiology/harm
o Prospective
o Retrospective
Case-control study compare people with disease/outcome of interest to
people from the same population without the disease/outcome of interest to
find link to exposure to particular risk factors. Retrospective
Research according to topic: different topics are best suited to different research
methods:
Searching databases
Research terms:
AND between key terms that both need to be present in your source
(.OR.) between key terms of which only one needs to be present ->
broadening search
() nesting
* - truncation searches all terms with different suffixes to the term
Term.mp searches for terms only present in title, abstract, or as a subject
Term.tw (text word) searches for terms present anywhere in the article
POPULATION
ANIMAL CONDITION INTERVENTION
Hendra virus
History of outbreak:
1994
o Pregnant mare brought in and died
o 2 weeks later, further 12 horses died or euthanised
o Horses drown in their own lung fluids
o Virus forms syncitia on epithelial lining to form holes in lungs causing
plasma to leak out
o Blood collected for pathology, monitor signs and clinical disease
progression, post morterms
o On-site post-morterms
o Possible causes:
Poison deliberate or accidental monensin
1080
Paraquat
Arsenic
Bacteria
Anthrax
Legionnaires disease
Plague
Toxins
Botulism
Mouldy corn aflatoxin
Exotic disease
African Horse Sickness
Hanta virus
o Negative influence on industry
AAHL identified new virus by cell culture, direct horse inoculation
o Developed new assays to identify virus
o Equine morbillivirus
o Humans and horses tested for serological
Horse owners
Overseas virologist send a team to Aust
7 horses recovered but eventually died
1995-2000 :
o Environment of outbreak site monitored flying foxes
o One vet dies
o Flyuing foxes identified as seropositive 265 human cases, 105 deaths,
o Nipah virus outbreak Malaysia and Singapore
Tranmistted bats -> pigs -> humans
All pigs destroyed
Easily grown in cell culture
RNA virus mutate quickly
Transmission by responsiratory aerosols
Animal -> human -> transmission
Greater pathogenicity than hendra
Food-borne
2001 US
2008 2 mo
2009 held workshop to recommend vaccination to be prioritised for hendra
control
2010 Funding available from AAHL collaboration with CSIRO, unis,
2011 18 oubreaks
APVMA approved vaccine 2012
Hendra vaccie fully registerd 2015
AIN receiv
M102.4 monoclonal antibodies
Summary:
58 different ou
Spectacled
Little red
Black
Grey-headed
Bat-orginiating viruses:
ABLV
o ABLVp, ABLVs
o Menangle virus
o Cedar virus
o Other b
Diagnosis
ETHICS
Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects: World Medical
Association declaration of Helsinki
Medical research has to include human studies, however, they dont have to
include non-human animal studies if technique not intended for use on non-
human animals -> harder to justify
Health, wellbeing and rights most important
Generation of new knowledge should never be more important than test
subjects rights, life, dignity and interests
Stop when risks outweigh benefits
Research must have foreseeable benefits to them and to other individuals
Post-trial provisions
Only the welfare of animals is important compared to the rights, life, dignity
and interests of human subjects
Compensation/treatments offered to test subjects harmed rather than
euthanasia
Need to give informed consent only if able -> animals arent technically able,
but in humans, they must not be included in a research study that has no
likelihood of benefit for them or their wider group, and the research entails
only minimal risk and minimal burden
Focuses on vulnerable groups, to avoiding abusing your power as a
researcher can apply to animals as can be considered a vulnerable group
Comparison with actual legislation: Australian code for the care and use of
animals for scientific purposes, Section 1: Guiding Principles
Types of research:
According to
o Pure/basic
o Applied
Accordig to
o Positivist
o Anti-positivst
Methods of research:
Laboratory experimentation
Observations
Questionnaire
Quantitative/qualitative analysis
Influence on research:
Hx human experiment:
1. Began in anveint Greece
2. Systemised scientific research
3. Backlash over first research carried out without consent
4. Self-experimentation focused on
5. Nueremberg code 1947
6. Declaration of Hlsinki
7. Scandals continued to happen
Hx animal experimentation:
1. Started in Greece
a. Anatomical studies on dead animals
b. Vivisection and physiology on live animals
2. Ans
Animal-human interaction: specific to research
Ensuring welfare in animal research:
3Rs
o Refining
o Reducing
o Replacement
ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments)
Client-owned animals
o Obtain informed consent
o Owner = representative
Clinical trials
o Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) two diseased groups selected and
outcome of tx compared to control
Cross-over trial animals serve as their own control and
switched to alternate intervention after a period of time, incl.
wash-out period, esp. when tx alleviate rather than cure
condition
Minimises need for large sample size
Minimises between-animal variability
Good for chronic disease with slow progression
Bias can occur if carry-over effects beyond wash-out
period
o Challenge trials disease outcome deliberately induced by
investigator, then randomly assigned to intervention group useful for
infectious disease
Can use smaller sample size, since sample population included
can be more similar (as disease is induced)
Attenuated/modified strain of disease agent often used low
external validity
Lower quality of evidence compared to RCTs
Bias summary:
Aim of study:
o Determine if multiple outcome measure of OA Rx is better than single
outcome measure
o Determine if a placebo is necessary for client-owned dog clinical trial
o Compare 3 different popular analgesics to each other
Recruitment:
o Not triple-blinded need the recruitment to be blinded too
o Not properly reported does not indicate who performed the
examination, or how allocation was blinded for person performing PE
(assumed not)
o Carprofen group had a lower severity level -> could affect level of
success
o Included dogs previously treated for OA or joint injuries -> affects
success of clinical trial
o Included dogs currently receiving tx for OA -> skew results
o Included dogs with all levels of OA, which means degree of success of
tx depends on initial condition
Randomisation of tx allocation avoids selection bias
o Groups not re-randomised in response to significantly different age
distributions -> source of selection bias
Blinding
o Double-blinded (assumed blinding for (1) individual allocation to group,
and (2) group allocation to tx)
o Blinding was not reported for either (1) or (2)
Effect of tx was found to be correlated to clinical severity at start of trial, even
though this seemed to be different between groups -> not corrected for
General population: dogs with osteoarthritis
Target population: client-owned dogs with osteoarthritis
Sample population: client-owned dogs with radiographically and clinically
evident osteoarthritis in at least one hip
Potential biases:
o Biased sampling strategy sampling strategy by referral and ads could
select for dogs with severe OA, otherwise o and vets would not make
the effort to join the study -> good bias, since the more severe, the
harder to treat, so underestimates effectiveness of tx
No recruitment blinding
o Selection bias randomisation was carried out but not allocation
blinding (or at least was not adequately reported), causing different
distribution of OA severity, which was not corrected for/re-randomised
-> could cause smaller effect in Carprofen group
No attrition bias observed
No other biases evident
Conclusion: results have suspected low internal validity due to lack or
incomplete reporting of blinding, affecting the external validity
TPLO: tibial plateau levelling osteotomy, surgery for cranial cruciate ligament
rupture
Types of studies:
Avoiding bias: