Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • 09-08-13 Sturgeon V La County (BC351286) at The Los Angeles Superior Court - #9 - DR Zernik's Motions Vol II Part4 p319-343

    Diunggah oleh

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    152 tayangan25 halaman
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Judul Asli

    09-08-13 Sturgeon v La County (BC351286) at the Los Angeles Superior Court - #9- Dr Zernik's Motions Vol II Part4 p319-343

    Hak Cipta

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Format Tersedia

    PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    152 tayangan25 halaman

    09-08-13 Sturgeon V La County (BC351286) at The Los Angeles Superior Court - #9 - DR Zernik's Motions Vol II Part4 p319-343

    Diunggah oleh

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    Executive Summary Los Angles, July 15 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case. · Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. · Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. · Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon. Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come. Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents. The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the just

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 25

    1'1·180

    AnORH£v 00 P"RT"r WITHOUT "nORN£v 1 _ St.,. B.r " ' _ r><1_...../ F-f)R COURT U.~ ( ~l'"

    ~rcyL 110
    634a VenICe Blvd
    Venice. CA 90291 ";Ul'U·UKlVIt.U ~UP\'
    TELfPHONE NO· 3105708963 FjIJ(NO OF ORIGINAL ALED
    E.-.wL AOORESS (~
    rJl~ Anrel~SllnerinrCoun
    ATTORNEY FOR -.t
    SUPfRl()ft COURT Of C~ORNlA, COUNTY Of Los Angelea AUG n8 2007

    STREET AOOR£SS 1725 Main 51 , 224

    MAlLt..a ~ss 1725 Main SI , 224 I)hn A. (.:'artIC, 1"'~1I'1V' OmcutClcrll


    CITY I>HO Z,. CODE Sarrta Monica. CA 90401
    8AAHCli IWIf Santa Monica fly n. Geter. Deputy
    PETlTJOHfA Marcy L Ito

    RFSPOIUMT TomonorI T Ito

    JUDGMENT CASE NUMlIf:R

    IX] Ofasolution o uv-l aep8Utlon D Nullfty

    c;D 02-~1Iq
    o Sutuaonty
    o Rnervlng jurladlc:tlon O¥er temllndon of •
    m8I'tUI 01' d~ partNnhlp statua
    D Judgment on ~ "auea AUG 0 7 2007

    0 ... I'IWltaI 01' ~sttc status ends:

    1. 0 thiS jtJdgment 0
    oonta,nt personal condud restraining on1ers 0
    mocItlies e)lusbng restrllmng orders
    The restraining orders are conlatned on pege(s) of me a1\ac:tlmenl They eXplre on (data)

    2. thiS proceedtng was heard 81 loIIows !Xl Delault or uncontested 0 By declarlltlOn under I'em Code. t 2336
    o Contested
    ...la'"·d J . cowan
    8. Date AUG 0 7 20~ ; Room I" Judge Pro Tem

    b JudICial officer (name): Q( TemporlllY Judge

    c. 0 Pelitioner present in Ct)UI1 o Attorney pnnentln Ct)UI1 (~me)


    o

    d 0Respondent present in court A.nomey Pl"enlln court (name)

    e 0Claimant present in oourt (name) o AltorMy present In COUl1 (".me)

    I. 0 Other (sptjcify name}

    3 The court acquired jurisdictlOfl of !he r"pondent on (data). 02/01/2007


    80 Respondent was serwd with process

    b lZJ Respondent~ .

    •. THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:


    a. !Xl Judgment of dIssolution IS entered Mantal or domestic partnership slatus 15 lemllf18ted and lhe parnes lire restored lo !he
    status of single peISOfls
    (111Xl on the following date (sptjelfy). 0711512007' AUG 0 7 2007
    (2) 0 on a dale 10 be determined on noticed mobon of lIither party or on stipulation
    b 0 hdgment of legal .epara1lOn '5 enlered

    c 0 Judgment of nullity is entered The partIes are declared to be unmamed persons on the ground 01 ('5{'6cdyl

    d 0 ThIS Judgment shall be entered nunc pro lune as of ((1/)le)


    e D Judgment on reserved ,ssues

    f 0 ~tJtionOf's 0 respondent's tormer name IS restored (specIfy)

    9 0 Junsdlction is reserved over all other Issues. ,itn!l aU present ordefs ramaln ,n effect except u proV1ded below

    r 0 ThIS Judgmenl contaIns prOVISIons for child support OIlamily support Each party shal complete and f,le With the court a
    C~'ld Suppor1 Case RegIstry Form (form FL ·191) with., 10 da~ 01 tn.t 1ate of Ih,s ,udgment The parent, musl nollfy the
    c.curt of ani change in the Inl(Jllllat,on submlnltd WIthin 10 days of the chang6 by filing an updatltd lorm The form NotIce
    of R'qhls and ResponslblMl6s - lieanh Care Costs and Rermbur.sement ProCOO"'llS and InrormatlOn Sheet on C/",ll>gmg a
    C~ddSupport()rrJer (lormFL·192"S31lached .... 1012
    -. , ,'''' f " ...... "',.\.1:)'. :''Iol'l JUDGMENT I """'. ..,.. ~ 10]. 2'''WO

    • <101' ........ (Famllyuw) })oII) ,~

    .... - ~ ..,. ..,-,' ..:

    319 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p319/679


    "T1'OlUCY OIl PAllfY WITHOVT "TTOllt<£Y .-.... s.. .... _ . _ - . , KIll COU!tT I.IU 0Ill r
    . - ....
    ~STEVEN L. 8ZOCS
    12304 SANTA MONICA BLVD., *300

    LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025


    lIUPHONIllO
    1 - . Al.DIUI /OIIMNO
    (310)820-9499 'Nl.NO ,,=--0 CONtUHM.ED COP'
    STEVEN L. SZOCS
    "TTOIlI«Y FOlI ,....,
    OFORlG£NALALEO
    SUPeRIOR COURT Of CALFORPIA, COUNTY Of LOS ANG ELE S

    Los Anttles SlJIlrrior C,OOI1


    1725 l1.AIN STREET

    .nlgUOD'. . .
    AUG 08 2007
    MAUG~ SAME AS ABOVE
    OTYNcu.aa SANTA I1ONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
    lIlW04lWiC WEST DISTRICT
    101m AJ"., ~vc Ulllcer/Cle.J

    MMRIAO!Of By 0, Oeter, Deputy


    PET1TION£R STEVEN L. SZOCS

    RESPONO£.NT JCATALIN H. SZOCS


    JUDGMENT
    CA$( ";¥Ill"

    :-X] DtSSOLUnON CJ LEGAL SEPAAAnON C== NULUTY

    :::.J Statui only


    80021451 /
    o ReHrvlng jurisdiction aver termination of

    marital or domestic I)lIttnerlhlp status

    o Judgment on r...rved ISlues

    Date marltat or domestic: oar1nershlD status ends: AliI: n .,


    I) ?nn7

    ~] ThIs judgment
    [=::.1 contall\' ~II Clmduct restramlng Ofders L_j modifies lXI.ling restr8iNng ordert
    The restraining orders are contained on page(l) of the attachment They exptr. on (d.,)

    2 Tntl procHding WIt helrd II follows 0 Deflult Of uncontested ~XJ By declillbon under Flmlly COde section 2338
    ~J Coot_ted
    I o.t. AUG 0 A 2007
    {nMn.r Dept f3 R~' t( David J. Cowan
    b Juctaal offtcer C=-_J Temporary Judge Judge Pro Tem

    c 0 Petitioner present In court C~ J I\ttorney PfIMllt in court (flMne)

    d CJ Respondent ptaent In court : Attorney preunt In court (n.",e)

    e L_J Claimant present In court (name) CJ Anorney pr.ent in court (MIM)

    I r::::J Other (specly name)

    3 Th',~rt acqUired JunlciCtlon of the respondent on (date)

    /_ :>~. o\.-f
    a l.x J The respondent wal lerved WIth prOCesl

    b L_! The r.pendent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a 'X Judgmetlt 01 cinOlutJon la entered Mllntat 0' domestiC partnershlp Itatul" term,naled and the part... I'e ,.tored to tNt
    stalus _~~ SIngle per~on. _ • _ 007
    (1 i ~:.:
    on (sf)fK1y dBte) :% ",b", f. Zz;lo:¥ ~AUG 0 8 2
    (2 1 ~ __ on a date to be de!ermlOed on noticed mobon of etther party or on stJpulatlor
    b Jud~ment o!eQal separatlon 'I entered
    Jud~mer"t of ",\A~f IS entered The partes are ceCiared to be SIngle per~ons on lhe around of (specify)

    ~~·'S ~date) 6'~'\ ~


    '~"!rveo ~
    Juo\j"",ert M,' b4! entered nunc pro lu"'c as 01

    .. .:udgment en ISSUes

    ~"e ! pel:~c"f'r ~ . S;C respondent's ror""!!r name IS reslored to (spec/y) lQ.TALIN H. NEMETH
    __ "soctle" 5 '~e",ed over all oil,!!, ISSUes. a"c at: present orders rematn 10 eftect except U prOVided below
    -. s .ud:;"~" :(" a' ns prOViSions lor child sq~PO~ :;Jr 'amlly support Each party must com p1ete and file WIth the court
    ,'".k1 S1J::c-;r' ':ase Reglslr! Form i,form .L' 3~) ..... ,1'1'1 10 days of the dale cl tt',s ;udgment The parents musl notify It
    _.~ J( -l~.1 :"a-;e ,'1 tre Inlorm,lllon s~tw',~e(j Nlthln 10 days of the charlie Cy r,ling an updated lorm. The Notl
    ' - ';"1S /.-: ;:)~c::-c"stJt,'I3S-Hed','"CiJ'~ C:,~lr5 ~nJ Re<mbufsemenl PrOC~L'(~S ard '''formaIJOn Sheet on CtlBllgrlS
    ... ~, ._, ...... ~'--~92: c; at'!a-!'~-~

    i p~d --- -_.- ;;,., 'y c-,;;, -:~ ~:r.--'


    320 ATTACHMENTSJUDGMENT

    & EXHIBITS p320/679


    ," "lm·!v La',N\ ~,~~~q(~~~~ ;~4~

    ATT~~OII'MITYWI1'HOVT ATTCII"'V _ _ . . _ _ _
    --_._--_._- -­ --_._~_._- . .. _,--~,----,,-_.~
    Fl·110
    ..

    _ Lisa Jov Woo-ROQlr.


    I
    11927 Aneta St
    Culver City eall'oml. 90230
    TIU_HO 31D-895-0929 ~ AlIlO /QIlIIOIIO

    • . - . AOO"fIi /QIIlIoIIO
    CONf'OKMt.U c..;UP}
    ...ntll'INO 'ell ,.."..,
    OF ORIGINAU1LED
    (..(K ~nitltl SUfl('rn,r Cnun
    IUPfRIOA COURT Of' CAUFOAHtA, COUNTY Of'

    '1'I'dT AOCIIlIi

    AUG ~8 ;1\'17
    _uo«J ACllfW:II
    CITY AIfO lll' 000Ii ohnA. C1i1fk be,:ull\C UllK('rfCler~
    1l'WoIO< .......
    MARAlAGl Of'
    ,,~ U. tjllet: P'~~h'
    PETlTIONER: LIII Joy Woo-Roger.
    RESPONDENT: Jerry Alfred Rogers
    JUDGMENT CA.~11

    ~ DISSOlUTION
    LEGAL SEPARATlON o o NULUTY
    bUlonty o
    o
    ReterVlng /urlldIcUon Oftr 1iInnIMIIon of
    nwttaI Of domHtJc peIhIrIhIp ecatul
    ..;nn~~271 :)
    o
    Judgment on 1'eMl'Wd ......
    AUG 0 8 Z007
    ,, DatlIINI1tIlI Of domHtle J*'NIIhIp ..... enct.:

    1. 0 This Judgment 0 cootai'lI ptt'IOI'laI Cl<lfdJct reA1rainrlg 0fdIra 0 mocillel ullting _rU*1g ontM.
    The rellrainlng oro.... a,. c::c:JrUiMd on page(1) d the atlIaCI'lI1*lI. They axpq on (<»"')

    2. ThiI proceedng wu heard a lolIowI: lKXJ OeIaull 01 uncontMled o By declaratIOn under Farnty CedI Metion 2338
    oa.Contetted
    Dale: AUG 0 8 2007 Dept.: e ~tlJ
    '~vld J. Cowar'
    -' utlgH Pro Tern
    b. Jud1ci31 offICer (nMM) ~ Tef\'llOfary judge
    c. ~ Pelitionef ptelertlln COUIt
    CJ AnomIy pI'lIWt In COIMt (nam.)
    d. 0 R.ponc_1'l1 p"eeenl in CDUlt CJ AIlolrWy pl'Mft In court (neme)
    • 0 a.imant pr.... ln court (netnlj o AIlOlTll)' preeent ., court (neme)
    I. 0 0theI' ($pfICiIy flMMj"

    3. The COUI1 ecqulred Jutllddion of the ~ on (eW.)


    a. [iiJ The respondert wa ..Md wtItl procell.
    b. 0 The reepondenllppNl8d.

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARINO


    4. a [iiJ Judgment or diuoIlJbon it ent.red Martial 01 domeItiC partnerll'ap atalUi II tefTTllNlle<J and the partlea are rellored to !hi
    31atul or single pereona AUG 0 8 2007
    (1) [XX] on (!peCJfy dati)
    (2) 0 on a dale to be detormtned on notICed moIl()n 01 either party ()( on Illpul,llon

    b 0 I'
    JudgmeMI oItega! separation enterld

    ( [~ Judgment 01 f'UI~ly I'


    enterld. The partie-. are declared to be lingle persons on the ground or (spfKAfy)

    f-'
    a ~~ n"s Judgmenl will be /tnterld nunc pro I~nc II 01 ((1alt!

    e Lj Jvogl11t1nt on re$l1rvld Issue.

    T'le :)(X; petitioners [:-:J responoar.l S forme: name II reslore<llo . ~1.'ftcd,1 lila Joy Woo

    .:; " J,,"Sdlc~lon IS 'esttrved over ail oirerssues, and aU prlsenl orders lemall' In etfllCl except al prOVIded below

    .
    r, : -: 1 t 1l5 Judgment c.ontalns prOV's,ons 10r child suPl)Ort or flll'l'l4ly sUPpQrt E Bcll part)' ~ oompIeli and hie Wtlh the court a
    Chdd Support Case RfI'J,slry F[)(r'1 it Or", FL·,g1) Wllhm 10 Clays of In" 'late of thiljudgnenl The parenti must notify \he
    .'),,11 at a"y Change ,n
    Ihe '"!ur",,,i,or l>ubmrt1id Within 10 days of :r'll (rIlN;le 0)' hhflQ an updated form ~he Notice
    j RJi)h!S 8n,1 R9~PO~5Ibil,(.(J5·-Mfjd:r" Care Costs 1J~(1 R",mbUI~8r'111"1 "flK9f.lu reS ana Informe/lOn SflfHll ()'l Chang".,,..
    :t;,IO$uPNrtCrdf:1rlf0m"_Fv192; s,,~~~ .. ~._ __. ....., .._~
    ' ••.-:;--..; --- ------ - JUDGMENT ....... ' - K:IOt·}}ol(,
    (F.mllyUlw) ~-=~:

    321 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p321/679


    FL·180
    rOR~Ev OR "ARrY t'\"1"'~LT ATTORNEY '\'''''''f' ",Ol'''~'''' ",,, ..:,,... ,,;+~,-{ 'f)I/ COlJj!' usr ONt r
    STE'v~ ~~ PE~~~

    S~EV N REI~ SEN ~S21,~

    LA'~ FFreES CF STF"'E:; ,. ;'. . _,

    4382 ALA.'10 ST

    SIMI VALLEY, CA. ?3:~3 CONFORMED COpy


    Tt:LEPt<ON£ Ne 80 5 - 3 0 E- ~ .3: ': H.. NO :~ : OFORIGL"IALFlLED
    e.-. o\COReSS (O/lI>oraJ' los An~c1es Surrrior Coun
    AnQfUl£YFOR(No...., CHRISTOF:-:E:F AC;'~~:::'
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CAUFORNlA, COUNTY OF LC3 hNGE:"ES ! AuG 0 a 2007
    ITRfEUOOAUS
    loWUNGAIXlPElIS
    1725 MAIN STPEr:: l ·
    IfhDA. Oadc, ElIecUll~C UfhcerfQcrk
    CIlYANCZlPCOC£
    81WIC'HW.IE
    SAmA MCN:CA, CALIfOP.NIA 90401
    WEST D!ST?)C':' ---1
    I
    lJ~fJ(j~~f\~'rY'Y
    ~GEOF
    PETITIONER CHRI S ~.DA."1': A..0
    te..JI.
    '

    RESPONDENT PAtiLINA FEG.r..Gl'CN • RiG'~"3'lt


    n'~

    JUDGMENT CASE OfUUlIfA

    x DISSOLUTION LEGAL SEPARATION NULLITY


    Status only sc. ~. 3~~l~
    Reserving jurisdiction oYer termination of
    marital or domestic partnership status
    Judgment on res.rved issues
    Date marital or domestic partnership status ends: Nover:-,ce r : i:..!-1..:~s....~ ~ __
    This judgment contains personal conduct rnstralnlng orders mOOlfies eXlsling restraining orders
    The restraining orders are contamed on pagels) of the 8nacnmenl They expire on (da/pl

    2 This proceeding was heard as follows Default or uncontested x By declaratlOO under FamIly Code section 2336
    . Contested
    a Date AUG 0 8 2007 Dept G ROOf!l /1/ ;)3111d J. COWS
    b JudiCial officer (name) . " Temporary judge
    Judge Pro 1e""
    c Petitioner present In court Attomev present ,n court (namel
    d. Respondent present,n court Anorney presenl,n court (namel
    e, Claimant present in court (name) Attorney present ,n coun (name)

    f Other (specify name)

    3 The court acqUired junsdlcllOn of the respondent on (date) r·1a'i 'I .


    a x The respondent was served WIth process
    b The respondent Itp~ared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a x JUdgment of dissolutIOn IS entered Marital or domestiC partnerShip status IS terminated a 'cl the parties are restored to the
    status of Single persons
    111 X on (speelfydale) :k'J€ m i::er :0, ::'~,'
    ::; on a date 10 be determined on nCJllted motion;)! eltl1er pany or on Slipulatton
    b Judgment of :egal separatton IS entered

    c Judgment cf nurlity IS entered The partie!, are declared:G be s,ngle persons on the grC'Uf'd of (specify)

    d Tn's Judgment /I'll be entered nunc pro tunc as of (dar.."

    e Judgment on reser..ec ,ssues

    f The petitioner's respondent's former nar'-e ~'"slued 10 speed, I

    ~
    ~~r:Sdlc::on '5 "=5er,<:j e,er all other 'ssues and ali r:',;,e~! ... ~ce·s re~aln 'f' effect ex',e,:! as prov'ded below
    -'
    ~'~Isudgment :c;r~ai~S ;:rov's'on5 fer o"ld SUPlCort :' ',lIT", ;,,,ppo'" Eac~, party mus' c:;mp1ete and file With the court a
    ::""10 Sucra,.; Case ::;1'Ij'sf'Y Fem, iforrn FL·191 w"",' .~ la\5:' the jate oltnls JudglY'enl The carents must notify t"e
    :2,,1' of ary crarg€ 'n the ,rfcrmalicn submitted /,:1 '~ • ) days of t"e change t:y !,[ ng ;,n updated form The NOIICf'
    :" R.',;ht" and Fe""';r:slt"ites-i-Ieait!i Cilr!:' Costs ,I'·' F,. nh",·r·ent Prncl"dlires In,! "l/,)rrpaf'OIl $I'eef on Chant;/I''; il
    c.,'",(, $Ln' 0r: O"J-o. 'C'~ F~ " S2', :s attached '09" '" I
    ,-,~:- ~ ----- ,---,-~----JUDGMENT .. ~"i '::';:1' -- - -- '-""';-.:,. H,: :: ",:.
    (FJo,,;y l.aw' ", !\I"
    .•~ l It ~>

    322 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p322/679


    · i~!.~
    ! ~., ,',R"n 0R PlR~ w· n.ou T l 'I ()ll"ll' ..#"_ \r... "" ·v_· .,...-. I" ,Oft ((luIIT ,III 0IlIt •
    I ~ .::~;. :<,:-~F:E C':::".:.::J;\~~:
    - :
    t- ~\ ~ ~,~ ~", .=\ F : t G::,~, ~ :-,h I .. : : \ ~ F- ~ i E~
    I ~~~: ~!·;::_~C EL\":

    !'-'L;.. ~: ',::.: .;, '-~;....... , • r


    ,;

    '1,1"',,:)Ojf ..0
    ·_h A[)()H( ~~
    JIUt«) I~.
    CONFOI(MED COp~
    OF ORI~AL PItE.D
    t
    I AT',""~n
    ,"""....
    I,)R , - _ .. _
    .
    SUPERIO" COUIitT Of CAlWOMflA, COUNTY Of ;'CS ANGf :".t.~~

    I~ AlWin ~r".",
    STRff~ A(~Rf!S : ~ ~~ L !"~;'.: '< :-: t- fo.f.:­
    W,1i .,.G >,(lO!lt SS SA.~ E AUG O. lD07 :
    (t' ...."-r;o'J"I,'C'tO( ~A·~7r., !'-: \: L. :¥'A, <":·4;': J~A.'-'I·'·.~~Ut~
    tlRAItC .. loAM \\ EST

    MARRIAGE Of'

    PETITIONER C'CN~~A MM P I F ; :. :..:.. I ~_AN r 8~D.OUer.~ :i


    RESPONDENT fA~lL 1-.:;-\0;,,;' :.::,: ::.: ;";,N[ ._
    '---'-1
    JUDGMENT I ...... - , .. I

    :--. DISSOlUTION LEGAl SEPMATION NUlUTY

    Statue onty

    ReseMnQ jurl.diction o¥er termlNltion or

    mantal or domntIC pel'tr1erwhip .taU

    Judgment on ntMtVed Iu.....

    L D.te marital or domntic pa"""hip.tttw enda: AUG 0 8 2007


    ThiS Judgment contalnl peraona/ conduCl reltra'"'"O or()efl restrltntrlg Ofl1e,. modt"-••• """0
    The restralntng orders arfJ contained 00 page(l) 01 the ~ They ••Plr. on {d.~1

    2 ThiS prc)(:e~lng WI' helrd .1 IoIlOWl Default or uncontested EI., <Ieder.tton under Famlly C~ lectIOO 2336
    Conte.t~
    a Dale AUG 0 8 2007 Dept £ R~'" DaVid J Cowan
    b JudlCJ81 otfteer (name} Temporary jUdge Judge Pro rem
    c PetitIOner present In court An~ ~ In COUI1/nMfWI
    d Respondent preaent In court Attorney pr1lMnl In COUI1 (namel
    e Claimant present In court (name) "nomev present In COUft ill""')
    Other (spec1f¥ neme}

    3 The court acquired Junlolctton of the respondent on ((Je;tel

    a ThfJ relpondent was ~rvfJd WIth proceu

    b T~r.lPOndentappeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOO CAUSE APPEARING


    4:1 JuoQment of d"Iolutlon I' entered Mantalor domeille partneflhJQ Itatu. II terminated ,,'Id Ihe part,., .re r.Il0fe<2 't 111..
    ~talul 01 s,nglfJ perlOn~ AUG 0 8 2007
    ,' , on (Sf)f'of, naIf"
    ;> on a date to be determined on notl(:ed motion of ,-!the' party or on Il,pul.tto"
    t, ,',"1gmen! of legal ~f'paral,on III entefe<l
    .'Jdgmenl of nulll'¥ I~ f!rllt-red The p.nles "l! dedared to be Single pe',ons 00 1M g'uu"'),I , 'I'#", "1)

    I r ~ !UdgnlPf't ~,\l tit- P'11t-'Pd flU'H D'O hJnc ,itS of I {1 .... rt· ,
    'u;Jgment O' feSer"r.' ~~ue~
    ',. petitioner s "'!>pv"'j",,, S 1011"1"1 name .~ ',,!>lo-tlll to ,SPit, If) f

    : .• r !>rj'C110n IS res~r,,""J ..:.1" dl' ~IH,er 'S!oll4!S and all pW!>er,1 fl/rjefll remain or' etl"c~ e'c"~! ,is ,",'(;v'ile'" 1""1..,....
    " ". IJdgme r'. COn~aLr.~ ~,r)'w'i~IUfl~ to' (r\lld !l.Jppon )f ~n'llly ~~.JPP0rt Eact"l par1y (TllJ~! ,"!'Jilflt,. jot,"li'j fllt" ~!,t tt)~ COlJf~ ,-"I

    I,~ ,()UPlh)f! ( ,i\t' '''f~ Jr'.", r J,r,' '0':1\ rL '9' w't~l,n 1dV~ of ttl...,1dte l)f f~IS !,J'Lr' r,·t ~ .. ,fo tl<itprth~ "1<..1)' 'lott~ th ...
    " t ci",. U'.-;' jt- •••. ',fll ..11IU'\ ~ut'·),"ea ~\~. 1,,1Y~ .if tt'jt' :.ti~ll\4" t 'y' ~ 1 .~"1dt"'(1 ()H" 1 ~f' 1\w. ,r: t

    ,.: II r' f' 1 : hI' t~ ... ; I, , I~f"dlt"" ,1ff '~r: """"f,,. '-·t U 'lf'J 1 lr l "),t'.1'j"" I" ,·,'t" f d'tl.i"
    .. j l .', r~ tir.-l, t f'(~
    .......
    '

    ,JUDGMENT
    " .anI i., '. d ~ ~
    . '

    323 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p323/679


    "T---.··---.o;t(·Ot,W,-vw MOl'
    FL.-nO
    "nOR~f:'¥"

    "' , ~
    eli PAwl.,.
    - ..
    ~ ;~"t()vr A""":)R~I"(

    "f' ••. v '-~


    -", t:" .. '/
    ,....... .),,,..
    r -" H I •J.l,~
    s.. ~ . . .t ... ........ ~.
    " PF . -"' •• 1.. ,.•. " - •. !'\•
    ,
    ~ r'·.nl t. t -: t ~." Lt
    t
    ;-)

    10..; B'<·,;:;\;-:
    A~7A ~:·~~t~:,=A, .:;\ 9~';,=)4

    rhE~ ItO 310J - 383 - 5526 ,"'" Il1O 'o.ooro..,


    CONFORMEl> COpy
    E-MM IIOO'lfIS ,.o.ooro.wi OF MIQINAl AttD

    ATTOflN(YfOfli-"', IN FFO PER I,MAIlCftft ~,~roort

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LCS M.': E u: S

    srlllfEHOOllESS 172: ~AIN STPEET AUG n 8 lC~1

    ,....'liNG~S$ SA.~E
    Joh" A. (;larU. t:.,C4;Y\I~. VIItl,;edOer~
    C,TYANOllPCOOE SAN'":A MONICA, CA 9C4-::;'

    elll""'C ........ WES'!'

    MARRlAGEOF Ry 0, Geter.Drputy

    PETITIONER TRACEY WADMORE - SM I TH

    I RESPONDENT CHP I STOPHEF< BLANCH _


    JUDGMENT r.ASf" ......, . I
    :: DISSOLUTION LEGAL SEPARATION NULUTY '" F ~ : ;. ~ ~ ~. !
    Status only . ' . 1
    Reserving Jurisdiction owr terminatiOn of •~ ._ " ' .. .
    mlrital or domestic pe~lp .tatus .. I . ., . • !
    I
    Judgment on reserwd ........ I
    Date mlntal or dome.tic plrtnershlp .tatue end. A ~ "S t 31 ~ \ \' ~_ j
    This Judgment. contain. personal conduct rHtrlllWlQ orders modttle, •• r.stralnlrlg order, II"no
    The reslralnlng ordef'1 are contllned on page(l) of the ettIchment They e.plfe on /d.r.)

    2 This proceeding was heard as foIloWI .X Default or uncontested X. By dedaraoon under Family Code Mctl()l'l 2336

    a Date
    Contested

    b Jud,clal o~/'"(nam~)
    AliI':. n Q 2007 Dept e ROOff>'i
    . ; Tempor8rl JUdge

    f' Da"ld J Cowan

    l'jdQ~ Pro Tem

    C Petitioner present court In Attorney present In court (name)

    d Respondent present In court Attorney pre""'''' court (name)

    e Claimant present tn court (name) Anornt>y present ,n court (/lame)

    f Other (SpecIfy name)

    - (" .....
    3 The court acqUi/ed ,unsdlC!Ion of the respondent on (dale) • - <L.. 1';" - \) ,

    a Y The respondent was served WIth procell ... , .' '. to; • ,.".'" ;

    b The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 J judgment of dissolution IS entered Mantal 0' domestic partn.rVl,p status IS te,nl,n~', J J' l""~, !·1'l!S d'e ' .. ,fl.... d to l~
    status 0 1 Singe persons
    (I) on specify dale) ;"":J.~ -, ~
    ,2) 0'1" nale to be determined on nol,ced "1otlon of either party Of on S!·puldflon
    o JUiJg"'e r ,! c.' 'ega' separatton IS ent.. red
    c ,;uog'''<,''! (.'1 'ull,', S entered The r-arN!S all" ,1":'3'£00 10 be s,ngle perSOIlS on It'.. ~"urh1 01 \,'p, ,I"

    "rh S u';~'-'-'fr~ ,"_' t::'e er.fereO ru'1C 0'0 tunr 1~ "t,""'-I


    "r:;grrf:'''r ,~ ..., ~~,,",'\'~a ssues
    "'t eo ~,...., t,o'~er s respc n 1£Or>t S .... "', ,j"'es restored to (spec'f, '
    .' '> ~" • 'i 'J-lSt- r .Aj )'~ef all r;tl-e-' S~.J·~ ~ t ~~·'eSt;,nr :,fclers '~malq -, •.. /'ft' ~ ~'I ~<" t .... I' 10,_;",·,1 ~,,...' ..\
    I l ' ~ ~r J.. . ~Irf'''''' r ~ •• ',1':"1,"( S'-lpp\).-1 Edct" ~ i', ' .... ~ t' t,.-. 1 ~',..:, I.
    .~

    " C,. ;.''':', r ","" . "... H- " '~jars :;1 "',e (Ll~t-" , ':> • ,t ,)1 'c..-. ••', >h<2

    ;.: ) ''-'t~ • "",r Y"d' •••• : I" .: _~ay~ :,f rr,c .1 i ..... : 'I".) t

    t·~ i" ~ I ' .r ,..' ~. It ,f, J I ';f. >", t·' r


    ! j. '. ,
    '~~' ~ 1"., ' .

    JUDGMENT
    'i dW)

    324 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p324/679


    • ,1'1 l
    . IT.,.... ..."...n .. TTr--.. _ FL-«
    rr 6tM""""
    (J'l " " ' " "
    - ClOU'T . . 0lIll'
    ~ \l
    '-110/ ~,)nw;lV 11/"1 {~ ~;t4: ""/)
    'I'fU~ on . 'II' ~
    F~'lO~ 1L7- 'ot1rJ'~ ,-\~\.' ,~" .,.{'
    A~"'lI'l""" . \' .~

    ==
    ~,
    SUP£AIORCOUtn'Nt".&I~&rftWTVN ~ 0 I f. til' "trotJ1tT
    l~tS- . ~4J fl:
    08 ZOO7
    ~~ ~" G+. 9Iv.fJ/
    AUt;
    ClT'fAHO.OOOI

    ~--.. ~.J". 1~
    lUG
    t...A- 4~j.(

    . ~.~NA
    '\ ",.\J
    j~ttN
    I C CL!AK
    ,DePUTY

    REQUEST POR JUOQII!NT. JUDGMENT OIl

    OISSOlUT1OH OIl MARRIAGe. AND NCmCI OP!NTAY OP JUDO_NT

    1 The Joint PefIfIott lot SImrwy 0IIe0AI1bt etI MIl'"


    (toml R.-«)O) . . . fled on (dale)'
    2. No notice 01 ~ _ bMft -.ct Mel . . pe........ not become r.coflc"c1

    3 I ~ ful9nent of c-..oIl*," of rnerrtege be

    .0 ~lObe""""now.

    b ..-red 10 be ~ (nunc CWO tlrc) . . of ,,.,.,..

    tot the toIowIna reMQft:

    I dedaiPa'f)Qer ~ lMIf' hlllWl of II. S1IIII of CeIIomiIlhet the ~ .. trw It'd ~.


    Dell: AU\) U U tJ)J{ , -.J­
    e4'~ r:(T'tt'f
    ~vln~
    011 ~-l
    ~ ~ ­

    4 0 HUItlend, 0 Wh, wt'O cId ftOI ~_ hili 01 her own ~ neme be ~ when he 0I1fte IiIJ*' the IoH

    peCIlon, now lWQUMIs Ihlt • be ~ . The ~ Iomw ".",. II:

    n....
    ~
    n"""011_~ ~ TIMW 0I1'NlTY WlIIeNO TO ",,\II . . Oft .... _ 1lUT0MDI

    fkI e- UIIt <loIfI

    JUOGIII:NT OF DIS8OUI1lON OF MARRIAGE

    5 THE COURT ORDERS


    •. ~ 01 clleolulion of ~ wII be ,~ and the paI1Iee .... I'Nlored 10 Iha a.tua 01 unmarTle(l ~

    r,
    A.

    b The JUdgment 01 cIatoIlllion 01 rnen'iellt wII be entered nunc pro I\n: .01(0.")'

    c
    d.
    . 'Mfa's tomw Mme II r.a.d (.".ely):
    _J Husbandstomw neme II r..eored (l/I.l«iIy):
    (4 t.A :JU YJ (:n (0---;>
    • HlJ5bend and wh mull CCJI"1lIY ... eny ~ an.cn.d to the petIbon. b-.".U ~
    Date AUG 0: 2007 -------.--. - JlJOOf 01 rH(
    ~-=----=:=L-
    ".oj."
    !'iIJ't RIOA
    1 ' - - - .--_ .. -------.-. .-.-----.­
    I NOT1C£: Dts8OlutIOn ""y 8l./IOIT'ldC:II ca<aI h n\tttl ~ • IPQU$I lnclIr !toe <A'4r spotM" ... , trull, I'MtWnenl beneIlI plan, power of
    i attorney lJIIYon dM" bw* ~ lrWodef on dMlt1 ~ "'OI'hton, ~ ngt'IlIlO.,., propet1y 0'iIlf'..cI1I'I ron...-.cy, and trfy
    olhe! !iIInlar ltllnQ It doee no! ~ cancellht"l1* oIa!pllUlle" ~ at h o4her ~', 1If. ~ policy. You II'llUd
    n<tVIew lh8~ rl'lft~, . . . . . . . trfy cndI caro., 'JIher cr.- 8llCXU'tla, If'o8lJFW'ICe ~, ' .......... bena4Il pIan&, and credit , . . , . to
    rJelem"",., ~ ltle~ ~ be ~ Of wtlelheI you IhouId • • 1Ily oIlet.ctlont
    . - .. - _ . _ - - - - - - '
    ---~..!
    ~'>fT' ""' ....... 11,~ '-4J111.W--. . . . . . g~", !~CT ~,",g "11nr.U~NT ",nr.U~NT '"'~ NCC,",! 'lTV'\W F. . . . c-_t_

    325 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p325/679


    FL·180
    A 1 TORNf v i)f4: p"... ~ ... \\" T ~4( )\;1 It, T1'Or«tlri' ... "'Ii.... <, ' . ' . ft; "'.l ·"Ift' ,-,c ..... ~,.•• , 'Off Cou.' 11\1 0"'" 'r
    --'" 1
    ,) !;]
    M(l h 'Hn~ 1, I L":,, \ r~ i '; ,:
    I
    1 3 3 := (: l~ !. ~ • r f 'I ~ 'K i'1! 1 ... f' , t:l I

    Be IJ f' r 1y H.::;" CAl)·,:';'­


    TflIPI<0><I ..O 3:'3-R;"·f't n 'A-lNO ,,~,

    ( MAotl A()()Af, SS I W"",.I/ CON.'OKMED COP""

    AT1o'u.rH()lO ...._' Mohamm,ld F~zfj ~,lhloJ'iln OF ORIGINAL t-1U.o


    SUPERIOR COURT OF CAliFORNIA, COUNTY OF La s Ange 1(: 5
    STRHT..w"n~ 172~ MiHn Stlen SMSHLAC
    r.0< An~clt\ Superior ft\t''''
    IMlllllG 1IO[)Il! 55
    (',llif()rnl<J Cl1401
    AUG 0' 1007
    CITY AHO liP (OOl !;a n 1. a M',',rll Cd,
    I 8RANCH........ We s t Dis t t 1<; t _ ~ John A. Clark bec1111 vc Ollu;CfI'-lc(:
    MlRRlAOEOF
    PETITIONER Mohammad P(,7.d Mahlo) lao
    h~ fl tJ~"'1 "'rY'~
    RESPONDENT Maria Andreina Power Perdomo
    JUDGMENT
    (ASf ",_r.
    ;.; DISSOLUTION LEGAL SEPARAnoN NULUTY

    Statu. only ~.: :-11,1. ~,. t'

    R•••rvlng jurladlctlon over tMnlnation of

    mlrital or dome.tie paltnetlhlp ,tatus

    Judgment on merved I.. ~,

    D.~ mlrlt,l Of dom..tlc ".rtnerahlp~tatu••"ctI: _·····L


    Thll judgment contatnl perlonal conduct r>eltralntng orderl modlliea e."I,ng reltrllnlng orderl
    The restralntng orderl are contatned on p8ge(S) of the .n,chment They e.p.re on (dill")

    2 Tht' procee<"ng W8S heard 85 lollows Defau« or unconle5ted By decllrat,on under Famlfy Code sedlon 2336
    Contested
    8 Date AUG 0 8 Z007
    Depl Room
    b Judloal officer (name) Temporary ludge wei oJd .Opnr
    C Pet,llOnef prelenl In court Attorney presen' In court (name) 'JeMO~ 'r DI~~r
    d Respondenl preaent tn court Attorney pr.sent In cour1 (name)
    • Clal",ant prer.ent In court (name) Anorney present In court (narne)

    I on'e' (.~peClfy namp)

    3 The court acquored /uflldlCllon of the respondent on (da/fl') ~, i 4" ~: '


    8 :.~ The '('$pondent was "rved wllh procell
    b Thl' lespondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a JU\1g'11ent 01 dlUolutlon IS entered Mantal or dlomesllC Plrtnersh,p stalus IS lermlnaled and Itle part,e. ,Ie lettored to the
    statlls 01 Single per&onl Aij6 8 2e9~ 1/. __S-' 07 e
    /1 .: on (speCIfy dale)
    (~I on a date 10 be dl~lelmlned on nohc,ed mol,on 01 e,the' party or on shpulahon
    b Jud'j,nenf 01 legal separation 15 entered
    chlil,j'nent of nullity 15 entered The partIes aff! dedared to be single perlon. on the ground (It (,\I'fluf~ I

    d Iii>, IUdgment w,lI be enlpled flunc pro tunc al~ of (dale)

    ~ ,d'.,·ller,t on reserved ISSl.es

    1Il,.1 pelltIOl1l:'r'S 'r·<,~'on(le"l's lor mer name 'S rf>,,!r)red 10 (sperrfy)


    9 ,j'el,on 15 reserved OVI" ail other ISSlies and all presenl ordm!> rema,n !n effect ".cept as p,ovt<jer1 ol'lOYl
    ' " , I'

    I' ~I ""dgrr>t'nl Conlalns ~I'W,<.',J"S for child support or lamily support Each party must complete ar'd f'\1; ""'Ih the court a
    , 1,,' 'Jul'l'{]fl CiJ~e Pl'l)!:,fl, Inrni ,'o'n1 fl 191) Within 10 days of Ihl.' date ot thiS Judgment Thl.' part-nt5 mu,I no"ly the
    ,A <J1'y chanqe /I' P .. "I''1'''.ll'On '-.Ub>'lllt1ed "",thlll 1() d:l,,~ 01 the change by filing ~n UDrjated fo'm The Notice
    1,1, Jnd R"'.11nf)',,(1' I"H, /fe.,Ir!1 (--'If" r:(,~ts ,J!ut RI-';f',tHil~,p(n(lnt Pfu('tJdurf~S ilnd Infj)!nldrlllll ::)flf.-"'( 011 Changtng II
    r,(!~I{"()'dt"I.'1J" l '.' ~",H<,(h(lj
    ~_''''l
    ;('···i.~-.""-:-,:-
    JUDGMENT 1 ; A1',;J!
    ,'\.4\. ;,t
    l\ I~ I d II 1\
    IF am/ly law) ';, Plll .

    326 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p326/679


    I Ano",",VO/fPAIll'WlIHlXlTllrTORNP ,"'..... 5,.,.-. . --··---··-..o.CcX..,~,_!ki"
    r-Jory Rryan Posen
    4~~ Broadway, Apt . • ]0;

    Sdnta Monlca, CA 90401


    (~~nl(~
    TUrPt;Qlolf NO 'tollNO~ CONFOKMKD COP\I
    IITTOflHfV FOfl ~
    OF ORIGINAL mED
    SUPERIO.- CcxmT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 01 Los Anqe h~ s
    tn, Anrtlf't ~1,",M. rttufl
    ITllffUDI,....a
    MM.1ttO 1lOOM. .
    1725 Mai n Stre@t SMSHLAC AU'i n 8ne1
    CITVAHOllI"COOI Santa Monica, California 90401 IOMA, \"'lll"(, &,;AClVlI"l VlIKtdllu
    ~"~ West Di~trict
    MARRIAOE OF
    PElITIONER Jory Bryan Ro!u.. n !1y 1): O.ttr. Of".,?
    'RESPONDENT Rebecca Jean Rosen
    JUDGMENT
    CAMIIU.....

    ~'XI DISSOLUTION ..
    r
    ! leGAL Il'AJtATION NULUTY

    : Status ontr s nn;'~) (' - .

    I .... Rnervtng Jurttdlctlon over ~ 01

    . marttat or domntlc partNmttp atatus

    Judgment on ~"'un
    OIIte mlrttal or domntlc oartn.,..hlD atatut ende:

    ,p·I'- tJ7
    Thiljudgment contlinl peraonal oonduc:t rettrl"'tng orders !nOdlftea .xla'ing re'\T1IlM'lO orderI
    The reatl'llnlng ordera are contatned on pagefl) Of the anachment They.~ on Ida,.)

    2 ThiS proceeding Wli heard al follows X; Default or unc:onlelttel X By dedaretlon undef F.mlly Code Mdlon 2338
    Cont'IJ~
    I Date AUG 2007 Dept 08 cd Room , II
    b JudiciI! ofllcer (name) ./Temporary )Udge Daw:l J. CowIn
    c . Petitioner present in COY" Att~ pre..". In COUt1 (,..meJ
    Judge Pro rem
    d Reapondent present in cou" Att~ preMnI in COUt1 (,..meJ

    e Clllmant present in (nerne) COY" Attorney preMnl In court (tNIIftI)

    Ot,* (5P«ify nameJ

    3 The cou"ecqutrtd jurlldlCttOn of the reapondent on (dateJ 6/1 f:< I II .,

    e X The ""pendent w....rved with proeHl

    b The "apendent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. 0000 CAUSE APPEARING


    .. a X Judgment of dll~utiOn II enlered Marital or ~tlbc partnerahtp Itetul II t.m'lInated Ind the ~..... rettoreclto the
    "atu, of lingle pertons
    (1) 'X on (5peclfydtJleJ II'· I~,I)
    (2) on I deteto be determIned on notICed motIOn of erther P'''y or on ItlpulatlOn
    b Judgmen: of legal leparalton II entered
    c Judgment of nullity II entered The Plrtiel Ir. de<~lred to be lingle persona on the ground of ISj>ftCIfy)

    d ThiS Judgment Will be entered nunc pro tunc .1 of fdale)

    ,
    e
    The
    Judgment on reserved Issuel
    peilltoner', ret>pondent'l former name II re,!O!ed to 1~lfyJ
    9 JUf1Sdlc1IC1n IS reserved ove, III other liluel, and '111 present orel.." remlln 10 effect except .. prOVIde<! below
    h ThiS Judgment conlalns provillon, for child iUppol1 or 'emily suppo" Each party must complete and file with the oourt •
    CI/lld Support Case Rttqlsrry Form (form fL-19'1 Within '0 day. of the date of Ihll,udgment The ~rents mUlt notIfy the
    r;ClJr1 of any change In thl' Inform,lion lubmtned WIthin 10 Clay. of the d1.nge by filing an updated form Th. Nobe.
    (I Pi:Jh/s and Responsd!lII/I(fs~·He8Itl1Ca,. Cost! /llld R,nmf'ursemellt Procedures and Inro/1IIIIIIOf) ShHl on Changing •
    (/il/d Support a,
    dOl (form r: L H12) II 8nached
    ~''''
    ">',:. :W
    Ii.,
    ,
    ,'''.
    <ii' " It
    .... JlJociMENT- ---, ----- ~Ji~~:}," t .,"'t.. ~. (41
    ;' .... ) ;'"..,

    (Flmily L..... l "r~\l:,

    327 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p327/679


    •
    FL·180
    "nORNEYQRP.r.ANWllHQUT"noR"fY i"""" 51... " , . . . - " " " _ , FOIf COUIfT IJSf 0ilIl ,
    __ Margarita Oshiro

    10425 Irene St .• Apt In

    Los Angeles. Ca 90034 (ONtUKMI£U COpy


    TEl£f'MONE NO 310-202-7350 flU NO r~,
    OF ORJGINALFILED
    £.-wL.lIDDIlln ~
    "nOltNO f(ltl ~I
    I.m An~tlt$ Suroeriof COUfl
    SUPERIORCOURTOFCALIFORNlA,COUHTYOF Los Angeles
    ITllUlAOOftESI 1725 Main Street S~iSHLAC
    AUG 0 e2007
    -.ING "OOIlESS I( hn A. Clarke. t:.Kecuuve OfticCflClcrk
    CIlYANODPCOOE Santa Monica, California 90401

    ~H~ West District


    fly t1 Qeter,OtpU'Y
    MARRIAGE Of

    PETITtONER Margarita Oshiro

    RESPONDENT Julio Oshiro


    JUDGMENT
    CASf....-lR

    :.. ~C DISSOLUTION ~:: LEGAL SEPARATION NUWTY

    Status only SDr:,r,(,~ 7

    Reserving jurisdiction owr annlnatlon of

    ,--
    marital or domestic partnership atatus

    :~-_ ._ Judgment on ,..erwd laaun

    Date marital or domestic PJlrtnerahip atatus ends: II. ,,0.07


    Thil judgment contains pel'IOO8l condud restraining Clf'Ct4n modifies eXIsting reltratning orders
    The restraining orders are contained on page(s) of the attIIChment They explre on (date)

    2 This proceeding was heard as follows


    ,- -~; Contested
    x-Default or uncontested ,~ By declaration under Farmly Code lectlon 2336

    .-oate: AUG 0 8 2007 Dept ~ Room' II


    --/. T.mpcnry judge
    Davtd J. Cowan
    Judge Pro Tem
    b Judicial
    .... -"1
    officer (name)
    C Petitioner present In court Attorney present in court (name)
    d Respondent present In court Attorney present in court (name)

    e ClaImant present In court (name) Allomey present In court (name)

    r, - Other (specify name)

    3 The court acquired /unsdic:tion of the respondent on (dare) 5/29/ C7


    a, : ~- The respondent was served with procell
    b, • The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a X Judgment of dissolution II entered Mantal or domestic partnership status IS terminated and the parties are restored to the
    status of single persons
    (1) X on (specIfy date) II· 5(). 07
    (2) on it date to be determined on not"',,,! motion of erther party or on stipulation
    b Judgment of legal separation IS entered
    c Judgment of nullity IS entered The parties are declared to be single persons on the ground of (SpeCIfy)

    d ThiS Judgment Will be entered nunc pro tunc as of (dare)

    e Judgment on reserved Issues

    f rhe petitioner's respondent's former name IS restored to (specIfy)

    9 Junsdidlon IS reserved over all other issues and all present orders remain In effect except as prOVided below
    h ThiS Judgn1ent contains prOVISions for child !,Upport or family support. Each party must complete and f,le Wlth the court a
    ChJid Supr0rt ~asc Registry Form (form H '91 ).v,thln 10 days of the date of thiS Judgment The parents must notify the
    coun of any charge ,n the Informatton submitted Within 10 days of the change by flltng an llpdated form The NO/Ice
    of RI'Jhts JiJU Re,';punsd.i1lrtres-- Health C ale Sosts and Reimbursement Pro,e(!IJlfl S ,HId Infof')Jilt,on Sheet on Changrng a
    C!"fu SlJPiJurl 'J"jljl (for'T'l FL 192) ,s anactled
    _._~----_._. __
    ._--- - - ._---- _._- ----------- ,_._--_. -
    ,j'<<.fd 'r P_'olZ
    <'"",:' ',l.~
    JUDGMENT \( 'i'lll( '/;' ' c'" \~ :':: .....
    (Family Law) i~ l11h ,"'J :w:

    328 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p328/679


    Fl·110
    A'"ToR'NI" f"~ PAul) ~"""),;' ,,'P. ~f 'I , ......... ¥:,M/IW .... ~ *"'" ...... u., _C_'USf~'
    Judllh A Br.. d,~ #4"7 ~1I1
    - La\\ Olf"'l' "I Jlldllh:\ IIn'lla
    ~Oll! Ph" Ill, d , ~anl" ~I"n":t, f ,\ 'l{)4ft~
    I
    Thl'
    f........ AOr"'f
    ·'
    fl'lfW .. ,.-.,.
    illl·4"2-I2IO .......' -"-- 'llll·'14"7lN) JCONFORMED COP'J
    •

    &TT(_' '("'1"-' Catalina I·OloS. Petltlonet' Of OlUOl'NALFltEO


    SUf'£1UO.-C~CAi.if:OI'NIA. COUNTY OJ los An,elr~'---'--"--- _ ..- I lM 4ftffltt ~ r/Wt
    IITIlfIT &fX"'r,.', 17~ ~ Main Street
    17~~ Malll Slrt'ct I AUG n8 ?t'07
    r
    UA'L1"',OPO"'"
    Santa MonKa. Ca 9l)401 I · "
    "AR~;t;."·"
    ur'AHC'lll'UJ(Jf
    I Santa Momca _., ... _ obft A.C1IfU.beI;u\lveVIIMMIQIr
    PE1iTIONfR ('al;IIIII3 1o,!> I I
    "yD,Oeter,~"
    RESPONDENT Wllhall1.1 t (l!'>!'>
    I
    JUDGMENT ............q-.

    [",,] DISSOLUTION .J LEGAl SEPARATION .J NUlLITY SDO~"''f,' I


    i i Status only
    I Rewrving Iurladlclton cwet' temlination of I
    marttal or domestic: partnenhlp status
    l ..

    [ ,.. j Th'~ 11ldQmenl


    JudgfTK>nt on rwMfV9d '...ues
    Date m.ltal or cSornfttlc pat1n«s'" status ....: I It''tcmhtor

    I i (()n1lttll~ personal conduc1 ....,t';tllllng o,de,s


    12. ~1l()7
    'TllJdlflflfl ",.r;tlnq 'esl'.......ng o,~

    TIl" "'S" ;lIn'nq ",dp" a'p ,'onlalnpd 00 page( s l Ii' Itlr "nltchmen1 , hf!y ~'Jl"" on /dlftfd

    2 Tt\l~ prCK'eedlnQ \lViiS twa,(1 il5 'nli"w~ l _ .c Default (If u,)(~'nlt"ilt'd ! ... J flV "'1ft","hon lJrlI1p' f Itmtty Code M'dwlfl 1336
    I j Coo"'51,.d
    € R,~ "1 JavlI.l J cowan
    ~:: ,al o~y[~ (,gw!1 2007
    a Df'I~
    b l. __• TPmpOtNy ~ Judge Pro Tem
    ['OJ Ppf~lOne, presenl ,n court r'l Anomtty prewnllfl c-OUl1lnwne!
    r"--­
    d l Rp~p()ndef1' pl'psenl lfl r~>Utt 1 AIt()(~ pre",,", ,n <:out! ,'iill'''')
    f ! _ ! "nOl''lf'V pt ..M'Ol ,n cnurt (nillfJfl!
    ,

    f' CI;ltmanl ptesent In COUf1 (name I


    (>thpt ( ... /U·/ rfy nalnp)

    3 Tt)(> COIJl'1 a< QUlfe(1 11I"sd.1IOn of Ihe respondenl on (dalel June 12. :'007
    .1 [... nIP ,pspnndpnl was Y'rved w'th pr~1
    l> ! .. Thp rr'"polldp", apf~arf'(l

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    ~ il i" JJ,lq"lf'''' u! r11~5()llIlK)(1 ,:; P.flle.ed Manta! Of d<.lfll4>..I... p.ar1()('f!;!lop ..li"l}'. ,~ ,.... " ... ,"11'<1 ",,,,,,n. pitrt ... !> "'.. ,ps\o,..<1lo the
    c.trlt\J~ uf '),nqlf~ Itefs()f"1S

    ,1, ,; "" ("pf'ufy dale) I )('n~mher I:? ~(l07


    i/' a date 1o be detennmed 00 nolleed motlOr' of fl,tlleI' party or "n "'Ik"al.",
    In

    tJ' 'j., "1"""1' , t .f''1.l1 sepa'ahon IS ..mered


    ):,.";"".,,, , f ''>J''''V "enlNed ThE> partlPS arp Cif.. lared 10 he ",ngle Pt'(f,Of\5 .,n I',.. 4'0,,'>11 ull~ "V'

    d l Pi,', :'id ;ntt· f 1 ~'dl t,... pnterf#1 nUll( pro tJfY .t~ of If/ate'
    {'; JlJI1 ;rn"t! : In H'~f:rv~d I~~ue~
    1

    n", " ;., '!"" 'f" , '! rP.sponr1enl's I'H'"I" 'l,11Tlf' 15 r!'stOl'ed 10 /'('11(1'." III III, l'lllJ
    '; J J''' .",:, " ", "",l'rvl'd oVt'r "II othN 'S<',"-", ,I'\[1 ,IIIIJff'!>f"nl ()ldf;f!, rer-lIn!n '''' '" •. t ~.I f>~~ d~ ~OVldf!d beklfW
    rf ", J,1'j")f>1)1 (Jnta'''s rfnvl~)lons f()( (·llj"~ '.U~I~)otJrt ()( famlty !tljJ)()(}f1 r df n ;htr'\o ;llu',l ~ pn,~>Jete and f,~ wrth thf' (ouf'1 a
    , : ;',1/7 ( ,j',J' 1';,,(1".,')' f (lflr') Iffy··, ; I 1 ~, h'Ithl""O I'IJY~ III Hw '1 it" -. llq\ jll·1'J"\t>nf The parents rnuc.,1 llflt,f .. lh~
    ! \' 1,;':'1" 1'1 HH" l"h,rPld'I')'~'" It·"l:nf·1 Nt·t\;q 11) (1(tv~ 1)1 Hw' (t,,1f)fl(' t,~ I ' i l ' ) ; ,\'1 '.Il-)(1.\ttld torf'll 1 tI.· ~t!t!l I'

    I ~ ~ 1'1 ',;'{"J\ltl/II!/f'~ fi~>"ftf,' .frt '~'. d'H1Rf·;'nhW"ot"'If·"! I '. . I" . ,-\furrnettuln (~'lf'f·t (Ill ( tl.-t'l~JHlq d

    , !. -, ',..r '11 ~. i I ' • . ' . . . , t'- . t- I· f . ~


    "'-r 1~t

    JUDGMENT . .
    '
    . , ",,,,IV La\IV1 ',I, ,*)-.~

    \ .' ...

    329 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p329/679


    t\'l"\l~~I'f(lf(J'A'.'· \\ ~0'4 , . '
    -----~~---_._-_._

    Io'Y "J..o",.,
    _---_.,----~~_._-~~._-

    \ , .... ,·".Iv 4,.~


    •..
    .~. . . . ot."", ... -~-'T -.----- 'Mc-Wi;;"" n.;.~,; . ~_.n.·'10
    . ,

    r-. "1' \' I I


    i
    I
    I

    lON~OKMEJ)
    L <I I; j • t \

    ~>'d Ii· (1 ~ :, j "', .., i • t l' .. , , ,,; ';


    fOP'
    'tl f PH()f# NO J.......
    ltY'-'"...
    OF ORIGINAL Fll[I>
    r MA'l o\O[)Rl:S$I(lr"~·"t. LIl~ ",,('r'c' 'll''I'nM Cr1llrt
    ._-----------
    ATrO~"I""OR

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY Of


    .""• .....,
    i..... ' C'; h':l(1'? 1() 5

    ._.- ttJ(j 08 nQ7


    . r ,.,., t .lh'l A OJr"". t:.c~\)U\( Ijllili~~
    STAFl' AO{)qt ~s ";:2~' Md i ~'. ;;: :;M ~~ HLAC.

    MAIlING AOOQr ~ s
    CITVAHOtlf'CfIOf Sant a Mc.'filca, allf·::rr.:.a (;'0401
    IIIWIC"_ W(>!\t Dist riet
    '1\11' (lettr, n"puty
    MARRIAGE OF

    PETITIONER D<'Icl" ;'·v'-'r,KE"

    RESPONDENT Vadims Fuukens


    _-.flit
    JUDGMENT
    rA~f

    X DISSOlUTION LEGAL SEPARATION HULUTY

    StatU'l only
    f< ';
    R"ervIng juMdletion OYer ...-mlNltion of
    marital or domestic pI"'*-hiI' ttatu8
    Judgment on ,...N9d "lues
    l Dele maritalOf' domnlit partnenhlp lUiw.~: I/'(}&?' a7 I I

    This Judgment rontalns personal condUC! rt",tralning orders mod,fI.s .xIsllllQ fI'5t r "nlng orders
    The re5lra,ntng orderl .re contained on pagelI) of !he attachment They expire on (date!

    2 This proceedIng was heard al follows ;'. Default or uncor~ested By dfoclarahon under f emtly COde MCtIOn 2336
    Contested ,.. oavid J CoWan
    8 Date AUG 0 8 2007
    Dept J,:= Room)11
    }1l0(1e f'r(\ lprT'
    b JudlOal officer (name! ~ emporary fUdge

    c Pelthoner present In court Attorney present If'l court (nRme)

    d Respondent present In court Attorney present In court (namf')

    e Claimant present In rourt (na/'THI) Anomey present If1 COUf1 (name)

    Other (specify name!

    3 The court acqUlfed JunsdtdlOO of the respondent on (date) I () I~' n 0 7


    a X T~ respondent WIS served with procell
    b The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a X Judgment of dIssolution 15 entered Mantal Or domeltlC partnerIhlp It.uS IS term mated end ~ p.m., are restored to the
    statuI of Single persons
    (1) i: on (specIfy-date) II'~ '0;1
    (2) on a date to be determined on noticed r'lOClOn of either party or on stlpulahon
    b Judgment of legal separahon 15 entered
    ( Judgme r" of nullIty IS entered The parties are ~dared to be Imgle persons on tM ground of (speC/for)

    d Th,S Jud9 r'lent Will bt' entered nunc pro tunc as of (date)
    e Judgme"t on reserved Iswes
    I The Pf'litlonl'rs respondents former name IS re"ore<! to (speClfyJ
    9 Ju"Sdlcl,'.'1 IS ,,'served (Wer ai' othe' Issues and all preHnt orders remain In eflect except prOVIded belo.... a,
    h n"s JudJ"lenl r:ontalns prOl/l!>IOnS for child ~upport or family supP<>f1 Each party must complete and file ....,th the court •
    CIIM 5'111'011 Ca~p Rf'glstr'y Fonn (form f I , 911 within 10 days of the date of H"~ Judgment The parents must notify the
    COurt of dPy Char]e In t"re in formalro'1 SutJ,n,ttpej WIthin 10 days of the change by fll,ng an updated lorm The Notice
    01 RiC/I,(-, ,;,,\1 Qp.~p(1,,~'bN"'\-· H"allt, (;,f" ( ('~Is and Rfl/mbursement Pmrp'JurpS <llld IntaMa/lon Shf>f'/ Oil CIJan91ng a
    e'"le1 ~:I:: fl()'~ ")r(jef forn: r l ~ ~2 I~ ana~t\ . 'a

    JUDGMENT , jJ~d~-- r.· , '-''''''


    ,,-:... I~~
    . .,...,~ ':';.tIt­
    (llOlmlly Law) ~ >:~~ t~~:~

    -i, . ..

    330 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p330/679


    n.11l
    ArrORNEYQRPNlTYWlTHOVl ATTORNEY _ $1. . . . . _ """-'001 "OIl COlMf lIU 001. "

    I - BI1L DIRK~'
    9903 S~~Th
    BEVERLY HILLS, C'A 90212
    MONICA BLVD. ~9S9
    "'O~~O\l~l311
    r.,..'
    "opy
    OfOR1GlNi\Lfll£D
    10 i 420-6398 . C(1Uf1
    Los ,t.,n2clCs SUllC nClf
    telE_t«l ( j Ulll«)ra.--tl
    E.... AOOflESS tormr-rI

    ~UG 0' 2007


    ATTOAIEYF(JR~I I N PRO rER
    SUPERIOR COURT Of CAliFORNIA. COUNTY OF L()~~ !,Nr;E LES
    5TREfl AOORE ss )-'i'; MAHJ STREET P lUI U..OC\,l\\VQ \)\ ti~·
    IoNJHGAOORESS 1::"1 MAIN STREET
    Jonn~' IV ,
    CITY AN) 1f> COO£ ~~ MiT!, MON rCA, CA 9(40)

    ay D. Gcter,Deruty
    IIRNO< ..-:
    MARRIAGE Of

    Wf ~ :: 1

    --
    PETITIONER B l LL [J I f\ KS

    RESPONDENT ANNE DI RKS


    JUDGMENT
    CA5f .........

    X OISSOLUT1ON LEGAL SEPARATlON NULLITY

    Status only
    5L10; ( 11':'
    R...rvtng JurtIdictIon 0Wt' termlnlUon of

    marital 01' domestic ~ p status

    Judgment on NMfWd !aaue.

    Oete marttal or domestic status ends: 12/2 0 107


    1. This Judgment coruinI perIOOaI conduct res1T8ining ordeB modifies eXlStlng restrlWllllg Ofders.
    The restraining orders . . oomained on page(s) of the 8lIachment They elilP're 00 (date)

    2. This proceedtng was heard as foIowI X Default or unoontes1ed X By dedaratlOO under Family Code sedion 2336

    8.
    Contested
    Oate AI It:
    b. Judlcsal <ftW (nfln'l'i
    c.
    n II. 2007
    PelJlIoner present in COIJl1
    Oept t;;. - Room: r "
    , /Temporaty judge
    Attorney present in COUf1 (name)

    DaVId J Cowan
    judge Pro Tam
    d Respondent Pfesent In court Anomey present In court (name)

    e Claimant present in court (name) Attomey present In COIJl1 (name)

    f Other (speCIfy name)

    3 The court acQUlr",d JUfI!>dlCllOO ci the respondent on {dater () 6 ! I q 107


    a ;.: The r""ponderJl wtI5 served WIth process
    b The respomlent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a :-: Judgment of dissolution IS entered Mantal or dom.lS!ic partnership status IS terminated and the parties are restore<llo the
    status of Slflgle ~ons
    ( ~ ) (lr (S()ecrfy dale) :.
    (2, nn a date 10 be dele<rr"ned or' noticed mollon of llither pilf1y or Of', stipulation
    b Ju<!r;"lw,1 of leqa/ separalJon IS entered
    r J.j['" .,,~,,! o( ruPlty IS entered The ~ldrtles are declared to be Single persc)!'> on thi! yloufJd of (speotf'

    d 1" .T:""·"\ N':1 be entered "vnc pro tunc as of Idale)


    r, -,'; rf)~eried 'SSJ€ S
    ,I,,""" re~p(Y",~f:-Pt ~ forrner name IS re~lOff4(_~ to \ '>1'Pl f~'1 ....

    ·f'~,f:r.lHC o.-er .j: 'Pt" ",S,;;:"~ ,lnd al: prC5enl ord(~"~ rpr"Tl,1!f, '1 e Mec1 P;lCt~\Jl .JS pruvl~ed t}HoY\
    '!,-1I"-''- ;V('.· , ' ( • , r (: . . uPf)(Yl ()I fdnl11y <;u;'.XJr1 t ,I" ;ld 0 y '1,U~' (Of"'p!(~1(~ ;tf1l1 rilt~ Mttl !"'H~ court a

    331 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS


    'P '\-1,'" ,'''" p331/679
    ,+ ,Iurh;n,(,/:!
    -,.,1 1 .,."'Ir,r~ Th :.1'1' I I':> f • , .. ,t"4r t~ .. \,; .... ~ nU'lfy the
    " t, I ';"i~.)1 1:\" "I"~ f f'l ~ t\tJ t./t,l,rtj
    -.n~YOll"M.TYWtTHOUTA"OOII«Y _ SI... tw ... - _ _,
    fL·"(
    I'<» C~ lJV 0lIl'

    ~Rosa Lee
    7160 Presidentlal Dr.
    Horsham, PA 19044
    1'IlPIIOMl NO '~NO~
    CONFUKl~.lr.Ut,;Ut'\
    t ..... llOOIlUI~ OFOR1GlNAlALED
    A1'TOIIMn '011 ~ Los An~tlt~ Surcrior r,Otlr
    IUPI"'OR COUIIlT OF CAlJFOlINA. COUNTY OF Los Ange 1 'II
    .'tMtTADOI~U' 1725 Main St r e e t SMSHLAC AUG nq 2007
    MllA.INC'lADOllfU
    J.A.CItRt,6~IIUVCOtb~
    Cll'UNllll'COOl Santa Monica, Cal Hornia I~0401
    IllANC'IftIIMl Wes t Di 5 t r i ct
    MAMIAOIOF 8vD. neter Oet'ut"
    PETITIONER Rosa Lee

    RESPONDENT Robert Blobner

    ···X· DISSOLUTION
    JUDGMENT CASE"'''
    LEGAL SEPARAnoN NULUTY
    Status only SDO~1~2f'
    .ReHMno jurtsdleuon ~ -.rmlnlltlon fA
    marital or domestic pertnerlhip Ntue
    :... JudgIMnt on rnerved tnun
    Date maritalOf' doft'lMtic hlp ltatue tndI: AIlIf! . . . . ._••
    . ' Thil judgment r - ' , contlins pertOnaI conduct ntttlalning orders modi'" IllIting mtrainlng 0fderI.
    The restratning 0l'd4n are contained on page(l) of Itle att8<:hment They.xpire on (dare/

    2. This proceedtng waa heard .1 followl X Oef.utt Of unanested 8y ~ under Farntty Code leetton 23Je
    - ContestAtlG 0 9 2007
    a Date Depl G Room l t\ oa'/Id J. Cowan
    b Judto8l offu:er (n'rM) : , / Temportty judge Judge Pro 'ten'
    c =. PetrtiOner present in court c.,; Attorney present in 00UI1 (name)
    d._ Respondent present In court
    r .. - AIIomey pretent II'l court (name)
    e ~.'., Claimant prnent in court (nMne) , AltO!l'l4tY present in court (name)

    f " Other ($p«ify name)

    3 The couM acqulf8d juriadtctlon of the respondent on (dere} 12 11 3 I 0 3


    • . X The resp<lfl(Mnt wei served WIth process

    b The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARINQ


    4 a 1. Judgment of dlssolutlOfl II entered Marital or dc>melbc l*tner5hlp statU$ II tennlnated and the partlel ar. fhtored to the
    slatus of lIngle peraons AUG 0 9 2007
    (t) X on (speedy dB/e)
    (2~ on. date to be determIned on notlCttlS motlOl'l of either party or on stipulat,on
    b Judgment of legal separallon IS entered
    C Judgment of nUllity IS entered The partlel are dedared to be I,ngle per5001 on the ground of (SPecIfy)

    d ThiS jUdgment Will be entered nunc pro tunc as of (datel

    e Judgment on reserved ISSueS

    f Hie pelllloner's responden!'s former name IS restored to (specIfy)

    9 Jur,sd,cl,on IS reserved over all other Issues. and all present orders remain In effect except as prOlllded below
    h 1 il,~ Judgment conta,ns prOlllSlons for child support or famll~ support Each party must complete and file WIth the court a
    '-'Wi Support Case RegIstry FornI (form Fl- '91) wlth,n 10 days d the date of th,s Judgment The parents must notify the
    a"''· :' a"y change In tre ,n!orn'al,on submll1ed WIthin '0 day!) ot the change b~ filing an updated form The Notice
    [I;;. 'J"!" ,vld Resp0l1srt,,{,f'f's-HPiltr!1 Care Costs and Rp/l1lt"I1~el')f'1I1 Procedures 1l/l(I'nro,mrltlon Slloet on Changmg a

    ij,p,)!1 OrU"r ItOlm f, '92 IS al1act1£>Cl


    ~ . . . ' O4J
    ,)tW ~n~4--~"-

    '" J\~;)?~II,
    fa"
    JUDGMENT W .. .;.1.0;'>
    (Family Law)
    ,,~ [~lh
    332 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p332/679
    • AnOflNrYQRPARnWl'ntOUlAnOllH£V

    IUCHAR[) E. MASSON, f:SQ.


    ~DEHNAOI " HASSON, LLP
    ONE PARK PLAZA
    ~ -

    $1"'''''
    (SBN 198331'1
    _ -_.
    ~______
    RJIt~, VII OM "
    F~

    ~
    SIXTH FLOOR , I
    IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 ~
    TRff'tOoI(MO (949) B52-4482 "AlIMO~""" (949) 852-4483 'tJi'''tJKt''.Jt.U c.;UP

    ADDAfSS~ rma!lson@dehnadirnasson.com
    It.Wl
    ATTOINYFQfl~ GENNARO DU TERROIL
    SUPERKm COURT Of' CAUFORNtA. COUNTY Of LOS ANGELES
    ,
    OfORrGTNAL AlED

    A I •

    ,n, nrc r\ <lunrrior Court


    -<
    STllf.JUDI_as I72!> MAIN STREET ~"r, °9 7007
    ADlKIS
    t.WllN('; SAME
    CllHICH1f'oca S1\NTA MONICA, C1\ 90401 J hllA,l.lol1"C.l.:.~"wuwclJl~IQCtk
    I IlAAHCJl N!M WEST __ -- .. ~
    MAJUtlAGE Of
    PETITIONER: JACQUELYN SAMS
    fI\' f) Oeler,O'l"utv

    I RESPONDENT: GENNARO DU TERROIL -_. I .___ ~


    JUDGMENT CASl_"
    I X) OlSSOlUllON I 'LEGAL SEPARATlON i NULUTY
    ! !Statu, onl)' ~; I}( I;' \ 1 ' 4
    ) Re..mng 'urtld6ction ower tenNnMkwI of
    martUI or domestic ~'P stMua
    X 1Judgment on rHetVed 'SlUeS
    I D..el'M~ or domestic; ~ I p .tatus end,: . ..L-l _

    nllljudgment : : contalM penoneI c:ondIuct restnIinIng orderI ! J modiflea existing restraining oroera,
    The rntrainlng orders ani contained on page(1) 0( the attachment. They ellplre on (dale)

    2 ThIs proceeding was heard al foIIow& X iOefMllt Ol' uncontested I By declaottJon undef f 8mI1y Code Mdicn 2338
    : Contested
    8 Date AUG 0 9 2007 Dept.. Room. II! E lJaVIO J Cowan
    b JudlCSal oftk:er (name) : "rT~ judge II lOOP Pro Tem
    c P8lltioner present In court Attorney pretent In court (name)

    d Rnpondent pretent In court . Atlorney pntMntIn court (name)

    e Oaimant present In court (name). I AIIomay Pf1l18tll1n court (name'

    Othef (sp«:Jfy name)

    3 The COlJt1 acquired jurisdtctJon of the respondent on {date) Allqus t ') q, 700')
    a X ; The respondent was served wtth proc.eu.
    b i The respondent appeared.

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    "il :~ Jujgment of dll>soIutlOO 1$ entered MantalOf dO'nfl!itlc partnonihip statua II temwnated itOd the partiq we reItored 1o the
    st;atus of single persons
    (1) X on (spec.Jf;- dale) Mar (' hI, .' U0 f,
    (7) 00 a date to be d91emllned on nobc6d motlOfl of eIther party Of 00 stJpulatJon
    I. Judgment of I"\lal S(jparatton 1& entered
    Judgment of nullity I!> ontere<1 The parties are decl.lre<110 be single pNSOOS on the qround of (specAfy)

    11 r hiS Judgment WIll bl~ pnlere<l nunc pro tUlnc ali- of ((1 •• /0
    Jud?ment on ms'·rvn.1IS5Uel>
    "
    '11" petrtlooMs rt!!>pOOdont's fOI1Tler flame l!t restored 10 (specify)
    .Junsdlctlon IS w!><',r.-o(j ', .. m all other Il;sue& and .tli pHl!><'m\ Ofders remain In eH.,..-t I)_copt itS rxoVlded below
    r hiS Judgment "ont-flns prvV'!>lOfll> fur ctllld suppo!1 Of r'lnllly support [ach pdrty must lomplote and ~Ie with the court a
    Ol/Ia Support Cd"" «"</1'/', F Ofm (form r I -191, ",,'\11111 , I) days of the date of tim. lU(j'lmont 100 parents must notify the
    , I,un uf ,my l.h,II'· i'- If' ttlll Hlfo,ma\l()f1 c,ul' I1l'"I'I' ",'It-un 1,,) (lay~ 01 the chanqtl b~ fillllq an updated form. The Nobce
    " j '<,,)1,,:; d(1(1 /.:""'!" '''','/Hli/If',\ /-foalltl C ,'II 0 , p' t, ,.".1 1,..
    "lJtll)/S''nlOll/I'/o(:t'<!w,·, ,lIkl'nl,,,-nliilIOfI Sheel 011 Ch.lnqmg a
    . ,,' JI,,'),wl (~I ' •• ; ~,'" '. 1~~2J'~ dn.-t. ~H:(~
    "eye 1 ""
    H--i"rl;·r~-;;,; .'{,,'4·:'~\.to

    ...: ~. JUDGMENT
    r ,~n-,>ly l ....... )

    .~,
    i J~"d
    ,; .... \ ;\1

    I ~:l"
    333 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p333/679
    ,0,
    Fl·180
    "rTORN[V OR PI\RT>" 'MT><O\)T ""ORNEY ("e"", Sr•• IW~, _ _"I fOR COURT USE ON!. T

    -Franklin Olayemi

    14044 Panay Way, Apt. 229

    Rey,
    Marina Del
    T'£L£I'HOHE NO
    CA 902°2
    (310)574-9409 FAX NO (Op/lOtlalJ
    CON~'U"L\'l~.lJ~UP\'
    e.MAJl. AIlDIIf$$ (OjllJoIIoII OF ORIGINALFILED

    ATTOROfEY FOA_ ltl~ AI\~el~ I\nnemfnu,",

    SUPERIOR COURT Of CAUFORNlA, COUNTY Of Los Ange 1 e s

    STR££TACORfSl 1725 Main Street SMSHLAC AUG 09 2007

    MAILIIG ACORfSl

    JobD A. Clarke. t.xccutlvC VlhCC(/Ucrk


    ClTYAHOZlPCOOE Santa Monica, California 90401

    ~ ~ West District

    MARRIAGE OF ByO. Geter,Deputy


    PETITIONER: Franklin Olayemi

    RESPONDENT: Linda Bryant-Olavemi


    JUDGMENT
    CAS!; NUlAl!E R

    00 DISSOLUTION o
    LEGAl SEPARATI()N NULUTY
    o
    o
    Status only
    o
    Reserving jurisdiction over tennlnatlon of

    marital or domestic partnership status

    5D024948

    D Judgment on rHerved issues

    Date marital or domestic partnership status ends: All" n n 'lnn,

    1. 0 Thls judgment 0
    contains pe!'Sonal conduct restraining Ofd.ers D modifies existing restraining orders.
    The restraining orders are contained on pagels) of the attachment. They expire on (date)·

    2, This proceeding was heard as follows· 00 Default or uncontested CJ By declaration under Family Code section 2336
    o Contested AUG 0 9 2007
    a Date"
    -­
    Dept.: t;:;. R~:(~J
    b Judicial officer (name): [_J Temporary judge David J. Cowan
    c, 0 Petrtioner present in coul1 o Attorney present in court (name) Judge Pro Tem
    d. 0 Respondent present in court o Attorney present in cool1 (name).

    e, CJ Claimant present in court (name): o Attorney present in court (name).'

    f. D Other (specify name).

    3 The coort acquired jurisdiction of the respondent on (date)' June 12, 2007
    a [lU The respondent was served with process.
    b L~ The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a [}[] Judgment of dissolutIon is entered, Marital or domestiC partnership status is terminated and the parties are restored to the
    status of single persons
    (1) [K] on (specify date) AUG 0 9 2007
    (2) I _J on a date to be determined on notil::ed motion of either party or on stipulation
    b '-:"j Judgment of legal separatIOn is entered
    c l Judgment of nUllity is entered The parties are dedared to be single persons on the ground of (specify):

    d This Judgment Wlll be entered nunc pro tunc as of (date)

    e Judgment on reserved Issues.

    f The ~:~:! petitione(s respondenfs former name is restored to (specify)

    9 -, Jurisdlctton IS reserved over all other issues. and all present orders remain In effect except as provided below.
    h ThIS jUdgment contains prOVIsions for child support or family support. Each party must complete and life WIth the court a
    Child Support Case RegIstry Form (form FL.·191) within 10 days of the date of this Judgment Th~ parents must notIfy the
    court of any change In the Information submitted Wlth,n 10 days of the change, by fihng an updated form The Notice
    of Rights and ResponSltJililies-Health CanfJ Costs and ReimblJrsement Proceduff!s and Infonnation Sheet on Changing a
    Child Support Order (form Fl-192) IS attached Page' of 1

    ;----;:: "~;'-;;;~-y ".,...,.."., '~,.


    • ,'C,'/ :,,-,,,-a
    JUDGMENT. ~ .
    . S< ut ns-
    r"""r Cooe "262. 23-40.
    2~3 2346
    '., 'C.·.· (Family Law) ~ I ~~

    334 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p334/679


    FL·180
    "nORNfY OIl PAIITY W1THQIJT AnORN(Y ill..... Stl/ftw """'lief .""_" FOI' COUltr VSf Ollrt Y

    _Carole Booth
    604 1/2 Venezia Ave
    Venice, Ca 90291 ( ~ONFOKMED COpy
    TUEPttOHt NO 310-301-4420 f oU NO fO/lllONlJ
    E_ "lXlItUS Io.-t/ OF ORIGINAL f1lED
    AnOll~~~ Self-Reoresented Lm An~elrs SufltriM eMl"
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 01 Lo s Ange le s
    S~l~a 1725 Main Street SMSHLAC AUG () 9 2001
    _lI>lO~SlI J( lul A. Clarke. Executive OfficerJCJerk
    CITYANOllPCOO£ Santa Monica, California 90401

    IIMHCH_ West District


    Bv D. Geter, Deputy
    MARRIAGE OF
    PETITIONER Carole Booth
    RESPONDENT Rick Prince
    JUDGMENT
    CAn NUMBER

    X· .-""
    ~ DISSOlUTION LEGAL SEPARATlC)N
    ,_.~. :~ ~ NULUTY

    C'

    ,
    , Statu. only 5002)030
    R..ervlng jurisdiction over ~Inatlon of

    ,'._­
    marital or domestic partnerahlp status

    ,. Judgment on reserved I.sues

    Date marital or domeatic p.rtnerahlD statu. end.: 11·;/" '(17

    This JUdgment __ . containS personal condud restraining orders , __ modifies existing restraining orderI
    The restraining orders are contained on page(s) of the ettactllnenl They exptre on (date)'

    2 This proceeding was heard as follows X i Default or uncontested )< By dedarahon under Family Code HCtion 2336
    Contested
    a Date Allr. Q 0
    Dept'2007 G Room ItI )3Vld J, CoWan

    b Judidal'iJl'll~r rndfneJ : /Temporary judge \ ,<i(1p'Pro Tem

    c ' _. Petitioner present in cour1 .. Attorney preMnt in court (name)

    d. Respondent present in court Attorney present in court (name).

    e Claimant present in court (name) Attorney present in court (name)

    f Other (specify name)

    3 The court acquired jurisdiction of the respondent on (da/e) 5/1 9/07


    a X· The rnpondent was served with process
    b The respondentappeared.

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a X Judgment of dissolution is entered. Marital or domestic partnership status is terminated and the partie. are re$lored to the
    status of single persons
    (1) X on (Specify date) //.-'().,,")
    (2) on a date to be determined on noticed motion of either party or on stipulation
    b Judgment of legal separallon IS entered
    c Judgment of nullity IS entered The parties Eire dedared to be Single persons on the ground of (Specify)

    d ThiS Judgment will be entered nunc pro tunc. as of (date)


    e Judgment on reserved Issues
    1 The petitioner's respondent's fClrmer name IS restored to (specIfy)
    9 JUflsdlc1lon IS reserved over all other Issues. and all present orders remain in effect except as provided below
    h ThiS judgment contains prOVisions lor child support or family sUPpOrt Each party must complete and file WIth the court a
    Child Support Case RegIstry Form (form FL-191) Within 10 days of the dale of thiS Judgment The parents must notify the
    court of any change In :he Information Sllbmilted Within 10 days of the change. by filing an updated form The NotIce
    of Rights and ResponSibIlities-Health Care Costs and Reimbursement Procedures and Information Sheet on Changing 8
    Clllid Support Order (form FL-' 92) IS attached P"O"'" Z
    .- --:.;-,.__--" · •.~.o,';,.... --- JUDGMENT t.(~al r...,,,,c_ ~§20'. i)4~
    . . A'.-' • (Famil v law) Suut \..IIlS n"] ; ­
    , ,." , ~ 'Ius

    335 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p335/679


    FL-180
    ITTORIEYQRPNlTYIMT><OUiATTORNEY {"'."'. 5!. . !lilt~ _ _ I FOR COuRT II$f 0Nl. y

    _Tatyana Podymova
    656 Indiana Ave. 111
    Venice, CA 90291

    TELfJ'HOIlE NO (310)452-2322 rAllNO I~

    (-MAIl ADOA£SS I~

    AT"TORlEY FOR ~I
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF Lo sAng e 1e s
    CONF()RME.fi COP\,
    SMSHLAC
    OFORIGINALflLED
    5TRfET AOORU5 1725 Main Street
    MA!l'1NCi I\OOR[ 55
    '.,M ""l!ell".C SuneriorCoun
    CliYNiOllPCOO£
    IlllANCHIIAMf
    Santa Monica, California 90401
    West District J'lJ~ t 9 2007
    MARRJAGEOF phn A. Clarke, executive: Ollicer/l:lerk
    PETITIONER Tatyana POdyrnOV3

    RESPONDENT Charles Waqner Rv D, Geter, Deputy


    CASE N\M8{R
    JUDGMENT

    X DISSOLUTION ,. LEGAL SEPARATION ~'-' NULUTY

    Status only
    SDQ2~)131
    _ Reserving jurisdiction OYer t.rmlnatlon of

    marital or dometltlc partnetshlp status

    :. _ Judgment on reserved Issun


    p1.
    Oate marital or domestic oartnershlD status ends: .I'!! "Uf.. rn

    This Judgment contains personal conduct restraining orders =-,-~ moolfies eXisting restraining orders.
    The restraining orders are contained on pagels) of the attachment They expIre on (date)

    2. This proceedIng was heard as follows X, Default or uncontested ~K; By declaration under Family Code section 2336
    - ': Contested
    a. 'Date AUG 0 9 2007 Dept , Room/II David J, cowan

    b JudIcial officer (name). __~ Temporary judge Judge Pro Tem

    c' Petitioner present in court Attorney present in court (name)

    d Respondent present in court Attorney presenl in court (name)

    e ClaImant present in court (name) . Attorney present in court (name)

    f. Other (specify name)'

    3 The court acquired jurisdiction of the respondent on (date) 6/20 I 0 7


    a X The respondent was served with process
    b The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4 a ;.: Judgment of dissolution is entered Mant~~; domeslic partnership status is terminated and the parties are restored 10 Ihe
    slatus of slOgle persons ~
    (1) i: on (specify date) /p·~t. d;')

    (2\ on a date to be deterrl1lned on nohead motion of either party or on stlpulalion

    b JUdgment of legal separation IS entered


    c Judgment of nullity IS entered The parties are dedared to be single persons on the ground of (speCIfy)

    d ThIS judgment Will be entered nunc pro tunc as of (dale)'

    e Judgment on reser'\led Issues

    f Tne pel,!Joners respondent's former name IS restored to (speedy)

    9 Jur'sd,ctlon IS resef\led over all other Issues and all present orders remain In effect except as provided below
    r' T~ls jl,(Jgrref't c.crlalrs prOviSions for ch,ld support or famIly support. Each par1y musl complete and file With the court a
    ChId S _reo'r Ca"t' Peglslry Form (fer'T\ ~L·191) wlthJr1 10 days of the dale of thiS judgment The parents must notify the
    CY.~ :' ar'Y rha"'Je ,n ~le information "ubmltled Within 10 days of the change by filing an updated form The Nottce
    , ,[; ;' ': 1"'1 rJp,,:>,)r,~:,I)dtl:'1~_HEa,rhCar" Costs and Reimbursement Procedur,?s anrl/nformatlon Sheet on ChanglrJg a
    ,,:~ "I'" 's"" rL 192):s a'tached P_O.' of 2
    ------------ ----_._-­ ~. _,'~A ~~ ."'):'4 ,: .~.t~
    ~AwJ
    I,," ,
    JUDGMENT :'3J.:':
    ')( ,llt)1 1I:~ :}4J)
    (Family Law)
    336 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p336/679 ~ ;~lIS
    FL·180
    ,nORNfY ()Il PARTY WiTt<OUT 4 nORNL ~ ,~ ...... 51.0 N-...- it"C..-.." F~ COUltT lISE ONI. y

    BRUNO B. GRANDZ:EL
    -C/O LAW OFFICE Of r M1LINE Y. f.C'BINE
    6500 WILSHIR~ BL~D.
    16TH FLOOR
    (C€
    LOS ANGELES, eA 0,~j048

    ( 323) 6:,',-3 Q 14
    Tl'L£PHOf'j£ NO
    £ '*A. AOMfSS (OprJonoI)
    fUNO (O~&'I

    CONFORMED COpy
    "TTOItHEYFOIl~'IN PRO PER
    OF ORIGINAL FILED
    SUPERIOR COURT Of CAlIFORNI.... COUNTY OF LOS ANG EL ES
    L~ An~l~ ~lll'(rin' I.OtJrl

    STREET AI:lOMSS 1725 M~IN STREET

    -.JHGAI:lOMSS SAME
    AUG 092007
    ClTYAflOZlPCOOE ShNTA MONICA, eA 90401-3299
    olln"" ~I.,"j '~"li~t Ulllml(lcr~
    IAAHCt4HAME WEST DISTRICT

    MARRIAGE Of

    ~R BRUNO B. GRANOZIEL
    By D, GeIer, V'''''h
    RESPONDENT, JOHANNA M. MUELLER
    JUDGMENT CA5I' H\Mll( A

    [iJ DISSOLUTION 1 LEGAL SEPARAnoN _; NUWTY


    [=J Status only SD 0,><)) ~2 I
    =.J Re.ervlng jurisdiction over termlMtion of
    marital or domestic partnership statu,

    i .. Judgment on reserved I.,ues

    Date marital or domestic Dartnenlhlp 'tatul ends: I ~ . .:l.tt. 6?

    1. L: This judgment contains personal conduct restraining orders modifies eXlshng restraining orders.
    The restraining orders are contained on page{s) of the attachment. They expire on (datel

    2. This proceeding was heard as fo/lows X Default or uocontested I ! By declaration under F8rrnly Code section 2336
    CJ Contested
    8. Date: Allr. Q n Dept.z001 G Room:! II David J. cowan
    b. Judicial o~rtn2f~) l' ~Temporary Judge Judge pro T9fY'
    c. CJ Petitioner present in court ! Attorney present in court (name)
    d. [-:J Respondent present in court Attorney present in court (name)
    e. CJ Claimant present in court (name) Attorney present in court (name)

    , C:::J Other (specify name)

    3. The court acquired jurisdiction of the respondent on (date) JUNE 27, 2007
    .J
    a. i":'. The respondent was &elVed with process.
    b. IX.l The respondent appeared

    THE COURT ORDERS. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    4. a. LX] Judgment of dissolution Is entered. Marital or domestic partnership slatus is terminated and the parties are restored to the
    status of single persons
    (1) 'X; on (specify date). / p ..ps- .tJ7
    (2)· on a date to be detemlined on noticed motion of either party or on stipulation
    b.' I Judgment of legal separation is entered
    c Jud;Jmenl of nullity is entered The parties :itre dedared to be Single persons on the ground of (specify).

    d. ThiS Judgment will be entered nunc pro tun,: as of (date)


    e. l ~_~,
    Judgment on reserved issues

    f. The ~litlone(s - respondent's former name is restored to (speCify)
    9 . __ JUrisdiction is reserved over all other issues. and all present orders remain in effect except as provided below.
    =
    h. : __ This judgment contains provisions for chikj support or family support Each party must complete and file Wllh the court a
    Child Support Case Registry Form (form FL-191) within 10 days of Ihe date of this judgment The parents must notify the
    court of any change in the information slJbmitted within 10 days 01 the change, by filing an updated form The Notice
    of Rights ana ResponSlb,lities-Health Care Costs and Reimtlursement Procedures and Information Sheet on ChangKIg a
    Child Support Order (form FL-192) is attal:hed. an ,..,.1
    Form I\dolllodf'" ~or, U.. , .....t, C_ «2024, 2340
    JUDGMENT

    *
    ~ C<:u'ol ~ C.h1'ey""a 2343.2346
    n·1!JJIR8"Y J~,' "7:".' (Family law)

    337 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p337/679


    FL·180
    ATTORNEY (II PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NwM sr. . a.. _ _ M I l _ I f'OIf COUtT USE 0Ill r

    BRUNO B. GRANOZIEL
    -C/O LAW OFFICE OF PAULINE Y. ROBINS
    6500 WILSHIRE BLVD. (f)
    16TH FLOOR
    CA 90048
    LOS ANGELES,
    Ta£PHONE NO (32 3 ) 655-3914 FAAtIO (~
    CON,14'OKMt:O COP~

    (-MAIl AOOIIfSI ~ OFORIGINALFlLED

    AnORNEYFOR".,..".,IN PRO PER r..o~ A,,~c Sunerior Court


    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    ITIlE£fAllORESS Ins MAIN STREET AUS 0 g 2007

    -...aADOllESS SAME

    .000 A. ",'arlc, execuuve otticcrlClcr


    ClTYAHDZPCOOE SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-3299

    ~ ~ WEST DISTRICT

    MARRIAGE OF By Dr Qeter, t1~tlfv


    PET1T1ONER' BRUNO B. GRANDZIEL

    RESPONDENT JOHANNA M. MUELLER


    JUDGMENT CASE NUUBEA

    rx~j DISSOLUTION
    l ~J LEGAL SEPARATION l __ " NULUTY

    [~] Status only


    so ()2S132 /
    c~~l Reserving Jurisdiction over tennlnatlon of

    marital or domestic partnef'lhlp statuI

    ~ __J
    Judgment on reserved Issues

    Date marital or domestic Dartnership status ends: /::J. :J-¥-,7

    1. C This judgment 0
    contains personal conduct restraining orders modifies existing restraining orde,..
    The restraining orders are contained on page(s) of the attachment They expire on (date)

    2 This proceeding was heard as followl: [):j Default or uncontested l_J


    By declaration under Family Code section 2336
    r:":-J
    Contested
    s.- Date:
    b. Judicialoflicer (name):
    AUG 0 9 2007
    Dept.' £,
    Temporary judge
    R~~'"
    L-.J
    David J. eowan
    Judge Pro Tem
    c. r-=:J
    Petitioner preSent in crort ,__J Attorney present in court (name)
    d. ['_-_J
    Respondent presen1 in court : Attorney present in court (name)
    e. [~ Claimant present in crort (name)
    Attorney present in court (name):
    f. : ~~J Other (spet;ify name):

    3 The court acquired jurisdiction oflhe respondent on (date). JUNE 27, 21)07
    a. i ~.~J The respondent was served with process.

    b. ! ){.1 The respondent appeared.

    THE COURT ORDERS, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING


    X Judgment of dissoMion i. entered. Marital or domestic partnership status is terminated and the parties are restored to the
    4. a. :
    status of single persons
    (1) X'on(specifydate) /~,';;r"
    (2) on a date to be determined on noticed motion of either party or on stipulatron
    b Judgment of legal separation is entered
    c Judgment of nullity is entered The parties are dedared to be sjng"~ persons on the ground of (specify).

    d ThiS Judgment will be entered nunc pro tunc as of (date)

    e Judgment on reserved issues

    f The petitioner's _ respondent's fomwr name is restored to (specify)

    9 Jur:sdlction IS reserved over all other Issues. and all present ofder~; remain In effect except as prOVided below
    h ThiS Judgment contalOs prOVISions for child support or family support Each party must complete and file with the court a
    Cfllfd Support Case RegIstry Form i torm FL·191) within 10 days of the date of thiS Judgment The parents must notify the
    cou" d any change In the Information subml~ed wilhlO 10 days of thf' change by filing an updated form The Notice
    rJ p'G/le .1f1() f-.esponslbIMles-Hcllrh Care C:Jsts and ReImbursement Procedures and InformatIOn Sheet on Changing a
    ,-, ! .!'Jrdertforrr F-L·1 Ci 2,·s atlached
    e ••
    :;
    POOl' 0( 2

    338 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p338/679


    SI{~:::
    I ¥·l,i.,.C~'J'je ~~ Z02". ]340
    JUDGMENT 2343 2346
    'I.. I _ ..... \

    I~ - .- -------_ .•. __..•..._------_. __._---_._._ ...


    _. -.- _ __ __ NC· no
    lfl ,
    -
    t-., ..""..,..... ..} ... "....,.,
    .,. .",.rTc:JIf#Y"...... • ~
    '0It1;~;;;~-;;;;,;'-;-'-- ----.-,
    [Ih'\.h.lrt:lh Jo~ph I'allllk,;~.c
    ~1I20 M.llh:~lfl Ave;1 ~O,

    I.", .\Ilgd..:s, ('i\ ')()066

    'IlH~ "0\ I O·.W7-nh I


    f ..... N.~"S' ,r.,­
    ruNO /0,.......
    F~ I tiE 0
    lOS \ 'td II .. " ,'I KlllK l"OI 10
    "1'..,..".,r<1ll,_ . I

    SuPERIOR COURT Of CAlFORNlA, COUNTY Of Los Anl~cs


    AIH~ n~ luUI
    "llf [T AIXlIlPS. I72 S Main St.
    - ..... AOOM sa JOHN A. CLAII"~ CLERK
    r.m A«DlIccot Santa Monica. CA 9().$OI 'n~~l--
    0RNtCH _ _ Santa Monica Courthouse BY "ASSY ~-\Bl :\(,,,, DEPUl
    PH lTION Of" (Nemttf 01.-:11 pet/flOtlen)

    Zc..'Chariah Joscp-h Paul Ocsc;e


    ~
    FOR CH.ANGE Of' NAME I CASI-.t
    I
    DECREE CHANGING NAME ~~~ 0 \ ~~ It 0
    1. The petition arne regu'-ty lot hearing on (dR}: AUG 0 9 lrJ1 in CoIa1room: It of the .~ COUIt.
    THE COURT FINOS

    2 •. AI notiCft required by law ~ been ~.

    b. E~ whoM name Is to be changed idInIifIed In dim 3 below


    (1) . not 0 II under lie ju1tdction of ltle 0epeI1rnent of COfTeCIonI. and
    (2) is not 0 is requAd to~ as. sex offender under MdIon 290 of the Pen. Code.
    These detemin8tIOnl we,.. midi ~ uSing; CLETSlCJIS 0 beaed on If\Joi lilfton provided to the deB of Itt.
    ~ . ~ law enbOllNl'lt agency.
    e. l ~ No ob;edionl to the proposed c:hanQe of Mm8 were nde.

    d 0 Objedionl 10 the proposed cMnge of name w... nwde ~ (namet

    • It appe.... 10 the satilfaction of the court !NIl .. the allegations In 1M petition .... true and IUfIdent and that the petition should
    be 'Pnted
    f. 0 Other lIndingI (I any}:

    THE COURT ORDERS


    3. The name of

    Prntnt n«DI NtwOWDl

    • lcchanah Joseph Paul Besse is d\anged to Zechariah Falcon


    b ilcNnglldlo ._------------_. - - - ­
    c ._- ...-._----­ II changed Ie --_. __._-­ .._-_.-._---­
    d II d'langed to

    Ild'I~lo
    "
    l __ ~ '\' l<III,Nl! name r.tIan9411 ~re ~s'~ Xl ,:tae:hrneIlt J

    1'" .j:., "

    ,~ ..;~
    .~~-;:l!
    ..J -{~; at~~ ".:;!"TRJQA
    '111: ...,
    t_ _
    fI' .. {" .t# ' '."J :. ('\W ~
    L eoua.
    _

    - ._----- ----­
    (~EC~~EE CliANGING ..,.\ \1E , ... " 1:'''1 ' ...

    ;'-:h~"'". ot 'I~,..,.}

    339 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p339/679


    ~t \
    ~\.~~~~
    NC-130,J
    """OfDIClltA""~ _ _ .. _
    _~u-. . .,.
    ----,
    MICHAEL DAVID Hl.JNTLEY. In Pro Per
    .0. Box 3082
    Los Angeles. CA 90078
    't~'Cl (310)288-4382 'AAIloO~
    FII.Jl~,9

    l ..M oICVl£U~ lashmeu~l.com

    An~"'(lIl ~ MICHAEL DAVID HUNnEY I'" \\l"ll\ ,I." '/:1,:/ _,. WI


    IUPlRlOR COUIIT CII CAL'OMIA. ceurrt CII LU~ ASGElES
    J72~ MaiD Sb'Cd
    ITlI(fT ACOIIa ~1Ir, (, luul
    172' Main Street
    "AUG lIDllIIIU
    r_~'.vcll.cxa Sill" Monica. CA 9040I·32~~
    ~ __ West DiJtrict JOHN A. (LA." E., CLERK
    N,~~'--
    PETITa. OF ".".. atNdl ~ •
    BY \1 ,'\'\\ '''''\!II '," \.111-1'\>1'
    I FCA C~E ~ NAME

    D!CRe~ NAME ~~ ''.'), 11556 t


    1. The peCIIon C8l7le reguIIIty tor IIeImg on (d*r. AOO 0 9 lfI1 In Cour1room: A- of lIle *"- Intad COUIt.

    lMI COURT , . .
    2 •. AJ ~,.quIrId by . . h8'fII been~.
    b. &dl~ wtIoM n8fM II .., be cNnged IlSentlled In bin 3 below
    (1) II nell 0
    II under U. ~ of 1fle 0epIrtmInI of 'Con'edIolIS. .,.,
    (2) II nell 0
    II , . . . ~ . . . . . on.nder undw MCIkln of ltle Penal CadI. m
    TheN .....riI.-.. . . . rnme ~." UIirlO CL.ETSICJlS C::J beNd on IntDrmIlIon pro'fIIded to tIllI dirt of U.
    ~ • IDc'AI . . IIIf1Drc11TtM1 -eaenc:r.
    t ~. to 1fle PRlIlOMd dI8nge of IUII'ne ..se.
    d ~. to lIle propoeed cNnge of,.,.. ..se by ('*'W)
    • It ~ to !tie .... ~ at IN muc11M1 .. 1M IlIIg8tionIII1 lie ,PeWOn ... ~ 8fld IUfIIdenl Ind lhtIIltle petIlon IftOuId
    be~.
    , 0 OINf"'(fMn

    THE COURT ottOERI

    3 The namt 01

    PrwHnIDMDI 'itt..nImI
    a \-UCHAEL DAVID m;NTlEY • dl8nged to \UCHAfl. ()A \'ID I.AStiMErr
    b IS dl8llQe'd1 10

    c 15 C1l~lto

    d ~ C1lanoed to
    !' 11 ctlaoQi!d to

    r"" --.,
    _.J A(jf!lltOt1a/ name cn~s Itt!' '6te-d on Anarl'IITlenl )

    I
    1'(
    ,',

    :-:J ...,.-...,. ,
    ., .... '~TRICtA
    "" '.
    ~
    L CJlt.....
    340 ATTACHMENTS
    ,,~ & EXHIBITS
    A"~r:.tt-..I'~· 'JAMF
    ""' ... p340/679
    ... -.;. -f"'LJ .... "'" ''\ .
    ..,
    NC·130
    -Pfrm.;;;-;o-AT'O'Ol(Y,_ .._ _ ..;::;,;;..-;:;~~--------------------------r--'-----
    F()#f eoutT lIV OM. r

    >-Ril:hard Peter Ollinn

    2144 Kelton A"c.

    los Angeh.-s. CA 90025

    Ttw..o.....o 31O.4715().l2

    f - . AOllIlUa /QIIONt
    H"1.I00(~
    FILED
    I o~ .\:-.olIU" \t.,"l·MIUlt t:Ol!M
    ATTOAN[Y rOIl (-.,
    ~ COURT OF CAUfORHlA. COUNTY OF Los Angcl~s
    IlIWIT~'" 1725 ~1ain Street

    bllr, fHlZOO7
    IN.IG AOOIIUt same
    OTfMlO~CODI Santa Monica. 90401 Jv. IN A. ClARKf CI ~K
    IIIWCHIOWIl: Santa Monica Courthou.~. West District
    PETITION Of ('*"- d HC1I petIIIotWI):
    B\ '."~~SGA. r'l:"HT

    Richard Peter Quinn


    FOR CHANGE OF NAME
    cASU&~~. ~?
    DeCREE CHANGING NAME
    .... ',i " ~f..(,,:,
    - - -
    1. The petition came regUarfy for hNring on (date): 1UJ 0 9 2007 in Courtroom: A of the aboYlHntitled court.

    THE COURT fINDS


    2. .. AI ~ ~ by law hlMt been gillen.
    b. Each whose name is 10 be ctw9d identilIed in item 3 below
    (1) ~nol 0
    is under the junIdidlon oIlhe Department of Corrections. and
    (2) ~~ 0
    is requinld to~ as 8 lell otIender under sec:tion 290 of the Penal Code.
    Thete ~ were made ~ USing ClfTSlCJIS 0 based on inform8tion provided 10 the clertl of the

    C.
    ,c:;t a<:Jb;ectiollS
    local enbcement
    to the
    law BgIIflCy.
    proposed c:t.lge of name were made.
    d. 0 ObjectionS 10 the ptopoeed c:hange of name 'MIrI made by (name):

    e. "eppeera to the SiOtisfaction of the ClUt 1h8t althe lIIIegalions in the pebliOn 81'8 !rue and suffICient and that the petition should
    be~.
    f. 0 0I!'0er findings (if any):

    THE COURT ORDERS


    3 The name of
    Pment!WlJl Newoaroe
    8. Richard Peter Quinn is d'langed 10 Richard Peter Ornstein
    b is changed 10

    c. is changed 10

    d IS changed to
    e is changed to

    ['-J AdljlflOllal name changes are IIS18d on At!achmEtnl 3

    Date ~- Cf ._ 0 1 ~tI-' /

    ~~'~~LlDlM
    (
    A ./
    V
    ~

    o SIGNA~EOF AJOGE 'OllOWSu.sT AnAC_NT

    _.. _- -"-_.- . -_.--- .. -~--

    rryrn~tcr~u..
    DECREE CHANGING tlAYE C..ooo aI c'" Proc«luto." 1271. '17e
    .~or'" c.o..n:. cA ~
    ..-: .Y'!"'Jrurt' ]G(l1] (Change of Name) ,,',:,!,,_~~~~r_"yX~_~.t.:~

    341 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p341/679


    ~
    ORIGINAL
    FILED ~,\.,
    lOS ANGfT F.~ ~\'rufO' rot""
    1
    MJG , Q ZOO7
    2
    JOHN ~ ~CLIIM

    \""~~
    3
    ...,d,.,~~
    ~C ~ 't\}~\
    4

    6
    5
    ~ \\)\." ./
    7 ~~/
    8
    SUPERIOR COURT OFT"E S'TATE OF CALIFORNIA
    9
    FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANt:;ELES - WEST DISTRICT
    10

    II
    12
    IFRANK NOWDESHA
    PlaintifT.
    CASE NO.: SC OQI1Qi
    ASSIGNED FOR ALl PURPOsrS TO
    JtJOOE JOE E. HILBFRMAN
    13
    1v. DEPARTMENTI'
    14 SEARS;, THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL t'PR9P~~Qt
    SERVILES GROUP. INC.. a Connecticut .lUDGMENT <U' DISMISSAL ASH
    IS I corporation: TWIN CITY FIRE COST AWARD IN FAVOR OF
    INSURANCE. CO.• a Minnesota DEFENDANT UBERTY MUTUAl.
    16 I corporation: LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE IFlRE INSURA~C": COMPA~"
    INSURANCE. CO.• a Massachul~etts
    17 I co~ration: KYLE LARSON. an
    individual; IAN SNYDER. an individual:
    18 I DOROlliY J. LEMKE. an individual:
    DEBORAH 1. LEMKE. an individuaL ,KTIOt\ F1U:[) q;~V2006
    19 I JONATHAN R. BENNET. an individual: TRIAL DAn: NOM
    MICHAEL 1. DIEHL. an individual:
    20 I KATHY KNOX-HARMAN. an
    individual: KATHLEEN M. HAR.\1A~.
    21 I an individual; JANE PETTIETTIl:. an
    individual; GLORIA TIBBEITS. an
    22
    23
    I individual: NANCY NEIRlCK. lin
    individual: CHARLES NEIRICK. an
    Hindividual: and DOES I through Ion.
    inclusive.
    !

    24
    Defendants.
    j

    25 Il- )

    26
    27
    2R

    !'h!~'rTH'111 III Dl\rtl'\\al

    342 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p342/679


    / NOFlIDUE
    '" -- GOV'T COOt 16J03

    M.e.
    RAYMOND G. FORTNER. JR., County Counsel

    ORIGI~L
    RALPH L. ROSATO, Assistant Coun~ Counsel
    21 MELISSA A. McCAVERTY, senior Associate County Counsel
    STATE BAR NO.: 21099S

    VI~!!l «1J-'
    3 I 648 Kenneth Hahn Hal! of Administration
    SOO West Temple Street
    4 Los Angeles, California 90012-2713

    qeCriVf-: Telephone: (213) 974-1206 \,,0' ""cu.- ~


    ~\)G \ 0 7.00 ..••ft'"

    Facsimile: (213) 687-8822


    Jut!" 7~1 U\Q.I1Hl~"""
    #-' ~~1 ~lpUTf
    I;:'" I 6 Attorneys for Defendant

    7
    COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
    ,'f'" \II,
    8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CAI~IFORNIA

    9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS AN(;ELES, WEST DISTRICT

    10
    II I PETER BERMAN, CASE NO. SC092131
    12 Plaintiff, ~PR8P98f!BI JUDGMENT" ORDER
    OF DISMISSAL
    13
    1 v. Assigned to the Hon. Lisa Hart Cole, Dept. X
    14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; and DOES I
    througb 20, inclusive,
    IS
    Defendant.
    16

    17
    Defendant County of Los Angeles' Demum:r to Plaintiffs Complaint carne on regularly for
    18
    hearing in Department X of the above.entitled court on July 23. 2007, at 9:00 a.m., ,n parties
    19
    appearing by and through their respective counsel.
    20
    After full consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, the Court SUSTAINS
    21
    Defendant County of Los Ange!c:s' Demurrer to Plaintiff Peter Bennan's Complaint, without leave
    22
    II to amend.
    23
    III
    24
    1'/
    I,

    25
    Ii I
    26
    '.

    ..,.,
    .. I

    f·

    ::::-:

    II
    ~! 1 \..; ""1 '" . : :

    lIIWI't)'''~ HI)( j\Il" I

    343 ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS p343/679

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai