ANALYSIS
600
50~~04~~~~~IO~3~~~-~IO~2~-L~L--I~oULLL~L--J
(t + L:.t)/L:.t
Fig. 2-Pressure build-up showing boundary effect (from
Mead2 ) .
7r--------------------~
(t+l>!l/l>t
6
Fig. 4-Pressure build-up showing effect of wellbore dam-
age and after-production.
:C5
.>t: BORE
"-
m
;'4 ------=~-_p~~~~IJRE
'"0
....
~3
G SKIN
PRESSURE IN
FORMATION
la. OR
I ZONE OF
52 DAMAGE
p PRESSURE DROP
~
t; 0
1800
3000 -
~
~ 2800
f0-
800 b<D
l:! 1700
method of interpretation is based on superposition of the
0.. effects of each of the producing wells at the well in ques-
'"c!x 1600 tion. When the boundary of the reservoir is near, it also
needs to be taken into account (for example, by imaging
2 the producing wells). Collins" has described a method for
~ 1500
b analysis of interference tests. Another method is given as
ID follows.
1400
When the outer boundary effect can be neglected, the
1300L-~-L~~~--~-LLU~--~~~~L-~~~~W
pressure at the observation well is given by
.1 1.0 10 100 1000 162.6q/-t B I t +!::..t 70.6/-t B
CLOSED-IN T1 ME, l> t, hours
P = Pi - kh og~+kh
Fig. 9-Build-up in a fissured limestone reservoir (from
Pollard")
[q, E{ ~O~~~:;)+ q, E{~O;;; ~::)+ 1(8)
6t, hours
.B2~-------------------------------,
.BO - 1400
~.7B 1200
;:: iii
l.)
<I 0-
:::76 1000 _
UJ
n:
:::>
(f1
BOO ~
n:
0..
-- 600
400
!'jEPTEMRER, 19fil
where q, is the production rate of Well No.1, q, the pro- Interference tests require considerably mo.re time than
duction rate of Well No.2, etc.; t, and t, are production pressure build-up tests, especially in low-permeability reser-
times of these wells; a, and a2 are distances from Wells 1 voirs. Note that a minimum of two mo.nths was required
and 2 to the observation well. Variations in rates q, and q, for the case shown in Figs. 13 and 14. This reservoir had
may be taken into account by the principle of superposi- a permeability o.f a few millidarcies.
tion. ' Eq. 8 is strictly applicable only to single-phase flow
Flow Tests
and, thus, is best used when reservoirs are above the
bubble point. The log term in this equation gives the effect Flow tests can be interpreted in much the same manner
of producing and shutting-in the o.bservatio.n well itself. as pressure build-up tests. In particular, the slo.pe o.f the
The Ei terms give the pressure drop at the distance a1 or a, curve o.f flowing pressure vs flo.wing time is the same as
fro.m the pro.duction Wells 1 o.r 2. Elkins" has presented the slope o.f the curve o.f shut-in pressure vs shut-in time.
a go.o.d example of u&e o.f interference tests. In tight rocks Wellbo.re damage can also. be determined in a similar
it may be necessary to. shut-in a well fo.r a Io.ng time to. manner. A metho.d fo.r determining reservoir size from a
observe the eflects o.f interference. An example is sho.wn flow test has been described by Jo.nes." The method de-
in Fig. 13. The do.tted line in this figure was o.btained pends o.n determining the point at which the plo.t o.f pres-
by extrapolating the linear portio.n o.n the log [(t+ M)/b.t] sure vs Io.g (flowing time) departs from linearity. The
plo.t, as shown o.n Fig. 14. To. determine the magnitude o.f method is useful for estimating minimum size of o.il ac-
cpp.c/k by this proposed metho.d, it is necessary that the cumulatio.ns without sacrifice o.f pro.duction, as is necessary
difference between the extrapolated curve and the observed if a well is clo.sed in fo.r determinatio.n of average pres-
points be measurabIe with reasonable accuracy - the sure.
magnitude o.f this diflerence is equal to. the interference
terms (the Ei terms) in Eq. 8. If the difference is zero, Discussion
then the co.ntribution o.f the Ei terms is zero and cpp.c/k Time Required for Build-up
canno.t be determined. A difference o.f 40 to. 50 psi is and Interference Tests
necessary in order for .cpp,c/k to. be determined with some A well should be clo.sed in fo.r pressure build-up Io.ng
reliability. enough to. allow the straight-line section indicated o.n Fig.
The quantitycpp.c/k can be o.btained by assuming values 6 to. be clearly delineated. The longest time will be re-
fo.r this quantity, substituting in Eq. 8 and computing the quired fo.r deep, low-productivity, pumping wells no.t
o.bserved pressures. The value o.fcpp.c/k which gives the equipped with packers, because in these a Io.ng period o.f
best fit to. the observed pressures is assumed to. be ap- "after-production" will be needed to. fill the wellbore with
plicable to the reservoir. From known values o.f p, and c, liquid and co.mpressed gas. Only after the influx into. the
a value fo.r cp/k can be o.btained. Since kh can be o.btained
from the slo.pe o.f the pressure build-up curve, a value fo.r
cph can be o.btained as the product o.f these two quantities.
'"a.2000
1000~----------------------------------------.
W
800
!3
I/)
1900
I/)
~ 1800
600 Q.
--
42 psi
400
b, = 360 psi
i3, =
(log 360-log 21) 2,303 .."',., ."' ."',
I
t!-
1
.."' ."'
,
,
"'"', "'
'?
~
250 x 10' T
m &; 2 ~ .'..
= 1.14 x 10- 0 sec-'
200 0,
" '0,
0, 40 80 120 160 20e
x,, CLOSED-IN TIME, days
0,
'00 x, '0 Fig. 13-Interference test in a low-permeability reservoir.
a. , ....
..::
,a. 100
x,, 0
I
a.
x, 'O'Q 2000r-----------------------------------------,
80 'x,, '0'0 CURVE B
.... 0 p = 200 psi 1900
60
'x\ "'0
"'0,0 EXTRAPOLATED BUILDUP PRESSURE .-
\
, '"'b'o
0>
'in
a. ~ ."""","-
x,, W 1800
, Q: ,,"
40 x,, :::>
I/)
.-"
, ~ 1700
x, Q:
Q.
1\ W
c5 1600
\ :r,
\
20 :::;;
X
\
, i? 1500
\
A
5
m
X CURVE
\
\ Ii = 260 psi
\
I
10
0 50
X
100 150 200 250
CLOSED-IN TIME, thousand seconds (t+~t)/llt
Fig. 12-Pressure fall-off in a water-injection well. Fig. 14--Interference test in a low-permeability reservoir.
and (3) lack of pressure. By taking a pressure build-up !J.p ,k;n = (70) X 0.87 (5.91) = 360 psi.
on a well prior to a well-stimulation treatment, it is possible III. Calculation of Productivity Index (BID/psi) and Flow Efficiency
to determine which of these three are causing the low J (actual) = -~q-. ) (;"'" I)
q
= -,-----C- - ; - -
productivity. If the trouble is a skin, then a wash treat- Pi - PI (Pi - PI) - ~p skin
~p skin 360 psi Pi 4585 psig
ment or a small-volume fracture treatment is in order. If q 250 B/D PI 3534 psig
the formation has a low average permeability then a deep- (250)
penetrating, large-volume fracture will be required. If the J (ootu.1) = (4585) ~ (3534) = 0.238 B/D/pSl
difficulty is due to lack of pressure, some type of injection (250)
) (;de.1) = (1051) ~ (360) =
.
0.362 B/D/pSl
such as of water or gas will be required to expel the oil.
. J (actual) 0.238
Because they aid in diagnosis of the difficulty, pressure Flow EffiCiency = J (i(Ical) = 0.362 = 0.657
build-up curves greatly aid those involved in selecting wells
for production-stimulation treatments. To check on whether the correct section of the build-up
curve was used, the maximum dimensionless time of shut-
Relative Importance of Various Types of Build-Ups in t:..t D is calculated.
So many variations from ideal behavior have been dis- 0.000264 (7.65) 136
cussed that the reader may begin to feel that the un- t:..t D = 0.039 (0.80) 6.8 X 10- 6 (2,640)" = 0.19.
tangling of real situations is hopeless. This is not true.
Most pressure build-up curves will look like that shown Since most of the points used in the analysis are within
the interval 0.005 to 0.1, it appears that the correct portion
in Fig. 4 and can be analyzed very simply on a form
sheet which will be explained in the next section. Far less of the build-up curve was analyzed. Casing and tubing
frequent are the "hump" build-ups shown in Fig. 7. This pressures were not taken during build-up, so it was not
type usually occurs in deep, permeable flowing wells equip- possible to compute by this method whether the correct
ped with packers. The heterogeneous type shown in Fig. 8 build-up section was analyzed.
may be mOT>e common than is generally supposed. To ob-
serve the tail, it is often necessary to shut-in the well for a
considerable portion of time. If reservoir pressures seem
to give incorrect results when used in the material balance,
it may be helpful to close-in one well for a week or two
to see whether low-permeability, relatively un depleted lay-
ers are present which may give a significant tail to the
build-up curve. The example calculations shown in the
following section and tables should help clarify the hand-
ling of actual pressure build-up curves.
Example Calculations
Oil Reservoir
A pressure build-up curve for an oil reservoir above the
bubble point is given in Fig. 4. After the slope of the curve
is measured and other pertinent data are entered on the
example calculation of Table 1, the calculations for k, S {I + L>tl / L>t
and flow efficiency can be carried out as shown. Fig. IS-Pressure build-up in a heterogeneous reservoir.
TABLE 3A-~XAMPLE
SHOWING CALCULATION OF
p ~ 3775 Bg , /La and c" FOR A GAS WEll
T p. Ta = 520 o R.
20 Bo = Z - - - - - -
Ta Pi + PI pa = 14.65 psia.
---2--
Pseudocritical temperature Tc = 420oR.
PseudocriticaI pressure pc = 663 psia.
Reservoir temperature T = 200 ;- 460 = 660<'R.
Pi + PI = (2910) + (2422) = 2666 psig = 2681 psia.
2 2
Til = T = 660
To 420 = 1.57 ~
Z = 0.809 (from Ref. 22).
pl/ = (Pi + P/)/2 =
2681 = 4.04 I
pc 663 ,
660 14.65
1o0L-------".O------,-'-0------,L- - - - - 0
O 4 50 60 70
Bo = 0.809 X 520 X 2681 = 0.005611.
t::. t, hours Us.ing TR and PR and a gas gravity of 0.8, J.Lg i'i obtained from Ref. 21, figs.
4 and 6, as /Lo = 1.7 X 0.01185 = 0.0201 cpo Also, Co is obtained from
Fig. 16--Pressure build-up in a heterogeneous reservoir. Trube'" as 0.23/663 = 0.000347 psi- ' .
{/" a, = distance between observation well and pro- ( -;) t = l!J.p~~~~~e) h [ Boqo + B'I ( qa - qvR, ) + Bwqm 1
duction well (No.1 or No.2), ft
162.6 [
B = oil formation volume factor = (135) 120) 1.2271924) + 12.9 X 10- 3 12.740 X 10 - 924
By = gas formation volume factor,
X 53.1) + 0] = 2159.
z-T ------p"
Bo dR, 1 dBo 1 2.9 X 10 3 1
T a (Pi+Pf)/2 c" = BodP - S;; dP = 1.227 (0.0455) -- 1227
C = compressibility, psi' (0.0001425) = 0.0003622.
h = formation thickness, ft Cg
0.55
= 644 = 0.000854 psio- 1
IRef. 131 .
.I = productivity index, B/D/psi
Cw = 10- 6 pSi-I.
k = formation permeability, md ct = S"C() + sgey + 5wCw.
p, = pressure obtained when linear portion of 01' = 0.546 (0.00036223) + 0.20410.000854) + 0.25110- 6 ) = 0.000372
pressure build-up curve, P vs log [( t + TABLE 4-SUBSURFACE PRESSURE CALCULATiONS FOR RESERVOIR
6.t)/6.t], is extrapolated to (t + 6.t)/6.t BELOW BUBBLE POINT.
Test Data:
6t, hours Hole Size (in.) 12
I
Cum. Prod. N p Ibbl) 33.300
Stabilized Daily Prod. q (bbl) 924 oil, 15.38 MMcf gas 12.740 MM bbl gas)
Effective Prod. Life t (hour) = 24N p /q 865
J. Calculation of kh (md-ft) and k (nHI)
h 20 It Ba 12.9 X 10-3 bbl/bbl
q 92~. B!'.D R, 298 cu ft/bbl or 53.1 bbl/bbl
1-'0 0.675 cp
80 1.227
!J.p 11 cycle) 135 psi
h _ 162.6 X 1924) X (0.675) X 11.227) 1922)
k -1135) 922 mdft; k '
120)
= 46.1 md.
II. Calculation of Skin Effect oS; and Pres~ul"e Loss Due to Skin
..'ll' skill (psi)
!-/I-' ~ ______ --"'<J fro 6 in.
~0~.1~5_____________ PI hour 1195 psig
cp PI 240 ~-=-- psig
0.000372 vol/vol/psi !J.p 11 cycle) 135 psi