Anda di halaman 1dari 6

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol.

4, Issue 05, 2016 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613

Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns


Ashish. G. Pakmode1 Prof. Lakshmikant Vairagade2
1
M.Tech. Student 2Assistant Professor
1,2
Department of Civil Engineering
1,2
Institute of Technology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia
Abstract The objective of the present work is to study the earthquakes magnitude, its focus depth, distance from the
behavior of multistorey buildings with floating columns epicenter, characteristics of the pathway through which the
under earthquake excitations. Finite element method is used seismic waves moves, and the soil strata on which the
to solve the dynamic governing equation. Linear time history constructed structure stands. The major direction of ground
analysis is carried out for the multistorey buildings under vibration is usually flat or horizontal.
different earthquake loading of varying frequency content.
The base of the building frame is assumed to be fixed.
Newmarks direct integration scheme is used to advance the
solution in time. The project is aimed at arriving to suitable
configuration, modeling, developing models for analysis and
design of building with floating column. A through study of
relevant specifications is also aimed in the project. STAAD
PRO version 8 is used for analysis and design.
Key words: Floating Column, Multistorey Buildings,
STAAD PRO

I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1: Earthquakes


Many metropolitan cities multistorey buildings in India Reinforced concrete Special moment frames are
today have open first storey as an unavoidable feature. This used as fraction of seismic force resisting systems in
is primarily being adopted to hold parking or reception buildings that are planned to resist earthquakes. Beams and
lobbies in the first storey. Whereas the total seismic base columns in moment frames are proportioned and detailed in
shear as veteran by a building during an earthquake is reliant such a manner that they must oppose flexural, axial, and
on its natural period, the seismic force distribution is reliant shearing actions that effects as a building sways through
on the distribution of stiffness and mass along the height. multiple displacement cycles during strong earthquake
The behavior of a building during earthquakes ground shivering. Special proportioning and detailing
depends critically on its general shape, size and geometry, in requirements are liable for frame, competent of resisting
addition to how the earthquake forces are carried to the strong earthquake shaking without important loss of
ground. The earthquake forces developed at divergent floor stiffness or strength. These moment-resisting frame is called
levels in a building need to be brought down along the as Special Moment Frame cause of these additional
height to the ground by the shortest pathway; any deviation necessities, which improve the seismic resistance in contrast
or discontinuity in this load transfer path results in poor with less severely detailed Intermediate and Ordinary
performance of the building. Buildings with erect setbacks Moment Frames.
(like the hotel buildings with a few storey wider than the B. What is column?
rest) cause a abrupt jump in earthquake forces at the level of
discontinuity. Buildings that have less columns or walls in a A column is supposed to be a vertical part of a building
particular storey or with oddly tall storey tend to break or starting from foundation level and transferring the load to
collapse which is initiated in that storey. Many buildings the ground.
with an open ground storey proposed for parking collapsed
or were severely damaged in Gujarat during the 2001 Bhuj
earthquake. Buildings with columns that suspend or float on
beams at an intermediate storey and do not go all the means
to the foundation have discontinuities in the load transfer
path.
A. What is an earthquake?
Earthquakes are defined as a sudden vibration of the earth's
surface that occurs after a release of energy in the earth's
crust. Since the earth's crust is made up of several plates that Fig. 2: Column
are constantly moving slowly, vibrations can happen which
result in small earthquakes. The majority of earthquakes are C. What is a Floating Column?
small but are not eagerly felt. Superior and aggressive The term floating column is also a vertical part of a building
earthquakes are those which occur in a discharge of energy which (due to architectural plan/ site conditions) at its lower
as the plates slide past or crash into one another. The level or Termination Level rests on a beam which is a
characteristics such as strength, period, etc. of seismic horizontal part. The beams in turn transmit the load to other
ground shakes estimated at any location depend upon the columns below it.

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 219


Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/056)

Fig. 3: Hanging or Floating Columns Fig. 4: Plan of G+ 6 structures


There are a lot of projects in which floating A. Building Properties
columns are adopted, mainly above the ground floor, where 1) Site Properties
transfer girders are employed, so that extra open space is
Details of building:: G+6 RC structure
available in the ground floor. These open spaces may be
Outer wall thickness:: 230mm
necessary for assembly lobby or parking purpose. The
transfer girders have to be planned, designed and detailed Inner wall thickness:: 230mm
properly, mainly in earthquake zones. The column is an Floor height ::3 m
intense load on the beam which supports it. As far as Height of parapet wall ::0.8 m
analysis is concerned, the column is often assumed pinned at Thickness of parapet wall:: 230 mm
the base and is consequently taken as a point load on the 2) Seismic Properties
transfer beam. Floating columns are capable enough to take Seismic zone:: II
gravity loading but transfer girder must be of sufficient size Zone factor:: 0.1
(Stiffness) with very minor deflection. Importance factor:: 1.5
Looking further, of course, one will continue to Response Reduction factor R:: 3
make buildings attractive rather than repetitive. However, Soil Type:: medium
this need not be done at the cost of poor performance and Material Properties
earthquake safety of buildings. Architectural features that
Material grades of M25 & Fe415 were used for the
are unfavorable to earthquake reaction of buildings should
design.
be avoided. If not, they must be minimized. When irregular
features are incorporated in buildings, a significantly higher B. Loading on Structure
level of engineering effort is required in the structural design Dead load: self-weight of structure
and so far the building may not be as good as one with
Weight of 230mm wall: 14.25 kN/m
simple architectural features. Hence, the structures already
Weight of parapet wall: 3.5 kN/m
finished with these kinds of discontinuous members are rare
in seismic regions. But those structures cannot be Live load: 4 kN/m
demolished, rather study can be completed to strengthen the Roof Live load: 1.5 kN/m
structure or some corrective features can be suggested. The Wind load: Not considered
columns of the primary storey can be made stronger, the Seismic load: Seismic Zone II
rigidity of these columns can be increased by retrofitting or C. Preliminary Sizes of Members
these may be provided with bracing to reduce the lateral
deformation. Column:: 450mm x 600mm
Beam:: 250mm x 400mm
II. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE Slab thickness:: 125mm
To Analyze the behaviour of building for various D. Model Type
floating combinations by dynamic analysis. Type I: No float.
To compare normal and floating column building with Type II: float type I
parameter such as the displacement by considering I.S Type III: float type II
code loading and load combination. Type IV: float type III (mix of Type I & II).
1) No Float
III. MODELING AND ANALYSIS
The building considered in the present report is G+6
storied R.C framed building of symmetrical
rectangular plan configuration. Complete analysis is
carried out for dead load, live load & seismic load
using STAAD PRO. Response spectra method of
seismic analysis is used. All combinations are
Considered as per IS 1893:2002.
Typical plan of building is shown in Fig.3.1

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 220


Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/056)

4) Float 3

Fig. 5: No Float
2) Float 1

Fig. 8: Float 3

IV. RESULTS
The results are obtained and presented in terms of critical
structural response such as displacement in the building
structure with and without float Models due to the applied
seismic or earthquake load. The variations of the critical
structural response for column C1, C5, C9 & C13 due to I.S
code load combinations are presented below.
Fig. 6: Float 1
3) Float 2

Fig. 7: Float 2

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 221


Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/056)

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 222


Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/056)

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 223


Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building with Floating Columns
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/056)

[7] Sekulovic Miodrag, Salatic Ratko and Nefovska Marija,


Dynamic analysis of steel frames with flexible
connections, Journal of computer and structures,
Volume 80, Issue 11, Page no: 935-955, Volume 80,
2002.
[8] Vasilopoulosa A.A and Beskos D.E., Seismic design
of plane steel frames using advanced methods of
analysis, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 12, December 2006, Pages 1077-
Fig. 9: Results 1100.

V. DISCUSSIONS
Parametric study is carried out on Building structure with &
without floating columns for various I.S code load
combinations using Staad Pro. In this paper the change in
displacements of selected columns i.e. C1, C5, C9 & C13
are compared. The results obtained for C1, C5, C9 & C13
are presented in the form of graphs.

VI. CONCLUSIONS
The comparative study for the various columns
combinations i.e. C1, C5, C9 & C13 is done for various load
combinations given in I.S code. It has been seen that in the
load combinations where seismic or earthquake loadings are
not present the displacement of structure having no floating
columns is comparatively less than the structure having
floating columns. On the other hand where the earthquake or
seismic load are present in the combinations given in I.S
code the displacement of no float structure is comparatively
greater than the structure having floating columns.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The journalist would like to prompt their sincere thanks to
the G.H.R.A.E.T college of Engineering for giving
Guidance and technical support to get done this research.

REFERENCES
[1] Balsamoa A, Colombo A, Manfredi G, Negro P & Prota
P (2005), Seismic behavior of a full-scale RC frame
repaired using CFRP laminates. Engineering
Structures 27 (2005) 769780.
[2] Bardakis V.G., Dritsos S.E. (2007), Evaluating
assumptions for seismic assessment of existing
buildings .Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
27 (2007) 223233.
[3] Brodericka B.M., Elghazouli A.Y. and Goggins J,
Earthquake testing and response analysis of
concentrically-braced sub-frames, Journal of
Constructional Steel Research, Volume 64, Issue 9,
Page no: 997-1007,2008.
[4] Mortezaei A., Ronagh H.R., Kheyroddin A., (2009),
Seismic evaluation of FRP strengthened RC buildings
subjected to near-fault ground motions having fling
step. Composite Structures 92 (2010) 12001211.
[5] Niroomandia A., Maherib A, Maheric Mahmoud R.,
Mahini S.S. (2010) Seismic performance of ordinary
RC frames retrofitted at joints by FRP sheets.
Engineering Structures 32 (2010) 2326- 2336.
[6] Ozyigit H. Alper, Linear vibrations of frames carrying
a concentrated mass, Mathematical and Computational
Applications, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 197-206, 2009.

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 224