In common law countries, the traditional responsibility has
for the most part been with the judges; in civil law Civil law vs. Common Law (1997) countries, the task is primarily reposed on the lawmakers. How would you compare the Civil Law system in its Contemporary practices, however, so indicate a trend governance and trend with that of the Common Law towards centralizing that function to professional groups system? that may indeed, see the gradual assimilation in time of SUGGESTED ANSWER: both systems. [Vitug, Civil. Law and Jurisprudence, p. XX) As regards "governance": Governance in Civil Law is codal, 2. In Civil Law, the statutes theoretically take precedence statutory and written law. It is additionally derived from over court decisions interpreting them; while in case law. Common law is basically derived from case law. Common Law, the court decisions resolving specific cases As regards "trend": Civil law is now tending to rely more are regarded as law rather than the statutes themselves and more on decisions of the courts explaining the laws. which are, at the start, merely embodiments of case law. Common law is now codifying laws more and more. So they Civil Law is code law or written law, while Common Law is are now merging towards similar systems. case law. Civil Law adopts the deductive method - from the Additional Answers: general to the particular, while the Common Law uses the 1. COMMON LAW refers to the traditional part of the law inductive approach from the particular to the general. as distinct from legislation; it refers to the universal part of Common Law relies on equity. Civil Law anchors itself on law as distinct from particular local customs (Encyclopedia the letter of the law. The civilists are for the judge-proof Americana, Vol. 7). law even as the Common Law Is judge-made law. Civil Law On the other hand, CIVIL LAW is understood to be that judges are merely supposed to apply laws and not interpret branch of law governing the relationship of persons in them. respect of their personal and private interests as distinguished from both public and international laws.