Tveit Siv Anni

Uu Universitetet i Stavanger DET TEKNISK-NATURVITENSKAPELIGE FAKULTET MASTEROPPGAVE ‘Studieprogram/spesialisering: Var semesteret, 2015..... Construction and materials Offshore construction Forfatter: Siv-anni Tveit Fagansvarlig: Sudath C Siriwardane Veileder(e): Ali Shariatpanahi Neil J. Foster Tittel pi masteroppgaven: Piping og strukturel interaksjon Engelsk tittel: Piping and structural interaction Studiepoeng: 30 Emneord: Pipe stress Sidetall: ...93... Reaction forces Utilization + vedlegg/annet: ...130........ Deflection STAAD.Pro CAESAR IL Stavanger, ...15/06/15... dato/irSr IMT OSENBERS PREFACE This thesis marks the end of my master program in offshore construction and materials at the University of Stavanger. I would like to thank WorleyParsons Rosenberg for having offices and software at my disposal, | also want to thank my instructor at UiS, Sudath C. Siriwardane for his support on this work, Morten Nilssen for coming up with an idea for my thesis, Neil J. Foster for all guidance related to piping analysis in Caesar II and Ali Shariatpanahi for all guidance related to structural analysis in STAAD.Pro during my work. Hundvag, 15. June 2015 Siv-Anni Tveit 15 June 2015 ISom. ID ROSENBERG SUMMARY Structural and piping stress analyses are generally conducted separately in most of the situations. A pipe stress analysis is performed based on loads caused by pressure, temperature variations, weight of the pipe (with contents) and blast. The pipes are analysed for several load cases separated into different design types like sustained, expansion and occasional. Established practice in piping design and calculation does not specifically account for structural flexibility, It is assumed that flexibility in the structure is minimal and that the structure is stiff relative to the piping load and in comparison with the piping itself. The objective of this thesis is to evaluate the conservatism of the established practice. Run different types of sensitivity analysis regarding stiffness of pipe versus stiffness of the supporting structure, i.e pipe-structure interaction. Limitations for this thesis I have chosen to look at a 20 inch pipe in a simplified system and is supported in ten equally spaced locations of Sm. Three pipe thicknesses are chosen, 4.73mm, 12.70mm and 20.62mm. For caleulations of piping stress and restraint support loads Caesar II has been used, Four pipe supports has been modeled using the structural analysis program STAAD.Pro. Pipe support in node 70 and 90 (Caesar ref.) is set as fixed to a concrete deck and pipe support in node 110 and 130 (Caesar ref.) is set as sliding restraints fixed to a steel beam deck. For design loads the vertical load is the weight of the operating pipe span carried by the supports, the horizontal load will be assumed equal to the frietion force. The pipe line and the pipe support are also to be calculated to withstand explosion loads directed from 6 locations. ‘This model for pipeline and supports will be tested in four cases. The first case: The established practice where structural and piping stress analyses are run separately. The second case: Structural and piping stress analyses will be runned combined by implementing the deck deflection calculated in the first case for pipe support in node 110 and 130. The supports for node 70 and 90 are fixed to conerete deck and are assumed to have zero deflection. The third case: Structural and piping stress analyses will be runned combined by implementing the max acceptable deck deflection (L/200) for pipe support in node 110 and 15 June 2015 UlUY nee [EO ROSENBERG node 130. ‘The fourth case: In this case the pipe support for node 110 and 130 are set to fail, which ‘means that these two pipe supports will not take any loads from the pipe, only direct blast loads. ‘These four cases will be compared with respect to changes in pipeline restraint forces, utilization of pipe line stress, pipe line deflection, structural deck deflection, utilization of support beam, displacements in the pipe support. Figure 1 Model for piping and structural ‘As a conclusion on the results from this thesis it can be stated that pipe lines with large stiffiness can have a very big impact on the pipe supports when included the variation in deck deflection. On the other hand deflection did not seem to have any large impact on the pipe stress other than expansion in this thesis. A flexible pipe line seems to be more beneficial for a pipe support considering the restraint loads, thus leading to a higher utilization and deflection in pipe stress analysis. As I experienced in performing this thesis, interacting piping and structural is very time consuming and as current engineering schedule often means that structural deflection are not available at the time of pipe stress analysis, it will result in additional analysis, where the results might not give a result that makes any significance in the end. As a guide it is important to take in to consideration possible large deck deflections that can occur and have an impact on piping as vell as structural. 15 June 2015 ISoe, [ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROBLEM STATED 1 1.3 OBJECTIVE 2 2.0 THEORY AND METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 BLASTIC LIMIT 4 2.2 FLEXIBILITY 6 2.3 CASTIGLIANOS METHOD 7 2.4 BEAM DEFLECTION THEORY 7 2.5 PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS 8 9 2.5.2 LONGITUDINAL STRESS 9 2.5.3 RADIAL STRESS 10 2.5.4 SHEAR AND TORSIONAL STRESS 10 2.6 THERMAL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION, 2 2.7 FRICTION 2 2.8 PIPE WALL THICKNESS 3 2.9 PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN 15 2.10 LIMIT STATE DESIGN 16 2.11 EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS 18 2.12 STRESS ANALYSIS PROGRAMS 19 2.12.1 CAESAR Il 19 2.12.2 STAAD.Pro 19 3.0 DESIGN BASIS 20 3.1 APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS, 20 3.2 ORIENTATION 20 3.3 PIPE DESIGN BASIS 21 15 June 2015 VvSox. [Eg ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Grou, 33.1 MATERIAL AND DATA 21 33.2 MATERIAL BASIC ALLOWABLE STRESSES 2 3.3.3. PIPING DIMENSIONS 2 3.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE 2 3.3.5 DESIGN PARAMETERS 2 3.3.6 WEIGHT OF CONTENT 2 33.7 BLAST CONSIDERATIONS 2B 3.3.8 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, 4 3.4 STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS 26 34,1 MATERIAL AND DATA 26 34.2 LOAD AND MATERIAL FACTORS 27 343. PIPELINE LOADS. 28 344 BLAST CONSIDERATIONS 28 34,5 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 29 4.0 LOADS AND LOAD CASES. 30 4.1 DESIGN LOADS 30 4.2 OCCASIONAL LOADS 31 4.3, HYDROSTATIC TEST LOAD 3 44 OTHER LOADS 34 4.5 DEFINITION OF LOAD TYPES, 34 4.6 DESIGN LOAD CASE DESCRIPTION AND CAESAR II LOAD IDE 35 4.7 LOAD CASES AND COMBINATION RUN THROUGH CAESAR IL 36 48 LOAD CASE DESCRIPTION AND STAAD.PRO LOAD IDENTIFICATION 38 4,9 LOAD CASES AND COMBINATIONS RUN THROUGH STAAD.PRO 38 4.10 INPUT UNITS FOR CAESAR IL 39 5.0 MODEL AND CASE STUDIES 41 5.1 MODEL IN CAESAR I 4l 5.2 MODEL IN STAAD.PRO 6 5.3 CASE STUDIES 46 15 June 2015 varty or seansee u 6.0 COMPARISON OF RESULTS 6.1 PIPE STRESS RESULT AND UTILIZATION 62 RESTRAINT FORCE IN Y-DIRECTION 6.3. DISPLACEMENTS IN Y-DIRECTION 6.4 STRUCTURAL DECK DEFLECTION 6.5 PIPE SUPPORT UTILIZATION 6.6 STRUCTURAL PIPE SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS, 7.0 THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS 7.1 PIPE ANALYSIS. 7.2 PIPE STRESS CALCULATIONS, 72.1 FIRST CASE 722 SECOND CASE 723 THIRD CASE 724 FOURTH CASE 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 9.0 REFERENCE 10.0 APPENDIX [EJ ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group 48 48 s4 58 61 a 66 69 Cr) 70 70 n 4 7 82 15 June 2015 viUD) of ietan @ ROSENBERG LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Model for piping and structural Figure 2: Stress strain behavior of ductile materia! Figure 3 Intersection ofthe von Mises yield criterion Figure 2 Max shear stress Figure 5 Limit state design Figure 6 Rectangular Rosette strain gage mounted on pipe Figure 3 Orientation Figure 4: Inputin STAAD.Pro for HP280K12 with effective width of deck plate Figure 9: Partial action factor forthe limit states, ref. NORSOK N-001 Figure 10: Material factors for ULS, Ref, NORSOK N-004 Figure 5 -Limiting values for vertical deflections, ref. NORSOK N-001 Figure 12:STAAD.Pro load case 101. Design load Figure 13: Blast load direction on piping Figure 14: STAAD.Pr0 Load case 301.Design and blast loads Figure 15 Blas loads on support in direction Figure 16 Blas loads on support in X direction Figure 17 Blast loads on support in Y direction Figure 18: Caesar Il model Figure 19: Caesar input Figure 20: Caesar! input forced deflection Figure 21: STAAD.Pro. Beam numbers Figure 22: STAAD.Pro, Nodes onthe supports Figure 23: STAAD.Pro material and dimension Figure 24: Pipe SO8x4.78.The third case, LC.9 (OPE) W+D14T24P1-WIN2 Figure 25; Displacements in pipe support Load case 20: STAAD.Pro Figure 26: Displacements In pipe support. Load case 202: STAAD.Pro 15 June 2015 VII[GD ROSENBERG LIST OF TABLES ‘Table 1: Piping material data, Reference to APPENDIX A. ASME- Table 2: Material basic allowable stresses, Reference to APPENDIX A. ASME B31.3 and BPV Code ‘Table 3: Piping dimensions. Reference to APPENDIX A. Table of dimensions of seamless and welded ste! pipes 31.3. Table A-T ‘Table 4: Piping design parameters Table 5: Structural material data able 6: structural material properties Table 7: Piping parameters Table 8: Caesar I oad identification Table 9: Caesar I load case deseription Table 10: Caesar load case description with deflection ‘Table 11: STAAD.Pro load case description Table 12: STAD Pro load ease combinations ‘Table 13: Reference APPENDIX C. $08.4.78. Without structural influence, sress report ‘Table 14: Reference APPENDIX C. 508.4.78. With structural influence, stress report Table 15: Reference APPENDIX C. 508.4.78, With structural influence, max deflection. Stress report ‘Table 16: Reference APPENDIX C. $08.4.78, Failing support in node 110 and 130, stress report ‘Table 17: $08.12.70, Without structural influence, tress report ‘Table 18: $08.12.70. With strucrural influence, stress report ‘Table 19: $08.12.70. With structural influence, max deflection. Siress report Table 20: 508.12.70, Falling support in node 110 and 130, stress report Table 21: $08.20.62, Without structural influence, stress report Table 22: $08.20.62, With strcrural influence, stress report Table 23: 508.20.62. With structural influence, max deflection, Stress report ‘Table 24: 508.20.62, Failing suppor in node 110 and 130, sess report “Table 25: Pipe size S08x4.78, Deck deflection Table 26: Pipe size $08x32.70. Deck deflection Table 27: Pipe size 508x20.62. Deck deflection Table 28: Displacements in connection between pipe S08XA.78 and pipe support ‘Table 29: Displacements in connection between pipe S08X!2.70 and pipe support ‘Table 30; Displacements in connection between pipe 508x20.62 and pipe support ————— 15 June 2015 villSeat [ROSENBERG WorleyParvons Group LIST OF GRAPHS Graph 4 Utilization of pipe in hydro test stress Graph 2: Utilization of pipe in sustained stress Graph 3: Utlization of pipe in occasional stress Graph 4: Utilization of pipe in expansion stress Graph 5: Reference APPENDIX Cfor design restraint force in y-direction, pipe S084. 78 Graph 6: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508x12.70, Graph 7: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe $08x20.62 Graph 8: Reference APPENDIX Cfor designsblat restraint force in y-direction, pipe S08x4.78 Graph 9: fordesignsblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe SOBx12.70 Graph 10: designtbiast restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508x20.62, Graph 11: Reference APPENDIX C for design restraint force in y-direction, pipe SOBx4.78 Graph 12: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508x12.70 Graph 13: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508%20.62 Graph 14: Reference APPENDIX C for designsblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe 5088.78 Graph 15: designsblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508x12.70 Graph 16: designsblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508x20.62, Graph 17: Reference APPENDIX C for design displacement in y-direction, pipe SOBx.78, Graph 18: design displacement in y-direction, pipe 508x12.70 Graph 19: design displacement in y-direction, pipe 508120.62 Graph 20: Reference APPENDIX C for designsbiast displacement in y-direction, pipe S08x4.78 Graph 21: designsblast displacement in y-direction, pipe SO8X12.70 Graph 22: designsblast displacement in y-direction, pipe 508%20.62 Graph 23: Deck deflection development for diferent pipe sizes Graph 24: Utilization of pipe support, pipe SO8xA.78 ‘Graph 25: Utilization of pipe support, pipe SOBx12.70 Graph 26: Utilization of pipe support, pipe $08%20.62 ‘Graph 27: Displacements in connection between pipe SOBxs.78 and pipe support ‘Graph 28: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x12.70 and pipe support Graph 28: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x20.62 and pipe support 15 June 2015 Ixa. [ROSENBERG 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Structural and piping stress analyses are generally conducted separately in most of the situations. The piping engineers perform pipe stress analysis using the software CAESAR IL in accordance with design codes like ASME B31.3 and EN 13480. A pipe stress analysis is performed based on loads caused by pressure, temperature variations, weight of the pipe (with contents) and possibly seismic, wind, ice or blast. The pipes are analysed for several load cases separated into different design load type like sustained, expansion and occasional. The limits for these stresses from each design load type are set by the piping codes in ASME B31.3 and BPV, section II, Part D. As long as there are no overstressed lines in the piping system, the pipe line system are therefore acceptable. The location and type of pipe support also has an impact in the pipe stress analysis. Established practice in piping design and calculation does not specifically account for structural flexibility. It is assumed that flexibility in the structure is minimal and that the structure is stiff relative to the piping load and in comparison with the piping itself. In normal practice all loads in piping stress calculation are run as static loads in CAESAR IL. The pipe support loads generated at the pipe lines restraint positions is passed over to the structural engineers, in order for them to make design and calculation for the pipe support/module structure interface. 1.2 PROBLEM STATED The effect from deck deflections and flexibility in structures and heavy equipment such as storage tanks can be considered relevant in design/calculation and therefore also necessary to be reported back to piping for additional calculation. Some piping systems can be very critical and difficult to design, due to loads that can be caused by internal pressure, temperature variations, weight of the pipe (with contents), vibrations, fatigue and connection to sensitive equipment. A badly designed piping system as well as a bad positioning of supports can have an enormous and detrimental impact on sensitive connected equipment. Flanges may separate, gases or fluids escape and detonate, start a fire, and people may be exposed to toxic fluids and gases. 15 June 2015 1aoe [EW ROSENBERG UY st sateer Wortypasons Groue Limitations for this thesis I have chosen to look at a 20 inch pipe in a simplified system supported in ten equally spaced locations. For calculations of piping stress and restraint support loads Caesar II has been used. Four pipe supports has been modeled using the structural analysis program STAAD.Pro. Pipe support in node 70 and 90 (Caesar ref.) is set as fixed to a concrete deck and pipe support in node 110 and 130 (Caesar ref.) is set as sliding restraints fixed to a steel beam deck. For design loads the vertical load is the weight of the operating pipe span carried by the supports, the horizontal load will be assumed equal to the friction force. The pipe line and the pipe support are also to be calculated to withstand explosion loads directed from 6 locations. This model for pipeline and supports will be tested in four cases. The first case: The established practice where structural and piping stress analyses are run separately. The second case: Structural and piping stress analyses will be runned combined by implementing the deck deflection calculated in the first case for pipe support in node 110 and 130. The supports for node 70 and 90 are fixed to conerete deck and are assumed to have zero deflection. The third case: Structural and piping stress analyses will be runned combined by implementing the max acceptable deck deflection (1/200) for pipe support in node 110 and node 130. The fourth case: In this case the pipe support for node 110 and 130 are set to fail, which means that these two pipe supports will not take any loads from the pipe, only direct blast loads. These four cases will be compared with respect to changes in pipeline restraint forces, utilization of pipe line stress, pipe line deflection, structural deck deflection, utilization of support beam, displacements in the pipe support The procedure of implementing structural deflection in Caesar II has been executed as demonstrated by the piping department and in the Caesar manual. [19] 1.3 OBJECTIVE, ‘The objective of this thesis is to evaluate the conservatism of the established practice. Run different types of sensitivity analysis regarding stiffhess of pipe versus stiffness of the supporting structure, i.e pipe-structure interaction, Establish final recommendations for 15 June 2015 2Sh I ROSENBERG procedures or methods for performing this type of interaction analysis. NODE 70, NODE 110 NODE 130 | Figure 1 Mode! for piping and structural 15 June 2015 3bynt [Bj ROSENBERG UN sf sanaer on 2.0 THEORY AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 ELASTIC LIMIT The stress at the yield point is the elastic limit at which a material begins to deform plastically, Prior to the yield point the material will deform elastically. Beyond the elastic limit, deformation will occur permanent and non-reversible. Elastic deformation will return to its original shape when the applied stress is removed. Up to the yield point, the stress is proportional to strain (Hooke's law). [1] 4 Maximum oad 1s Fracture Piast regen Stress, 6 (ln *) Elastic region | 02% Offset Stain, ¢ Figure 2: Stress strain behavior of ductile material [2] Von Mises yield criterion suggests that yielding of material starts when its von Mises stress ‘ical value known as the yield strength, 7¥ . Ov reaches a The criterion is expressed as: h=K? Where Jz is the second deviatoric stress invariant and K is the yield stress of the material in pure shear. In the case of pure shear stresso 12 = 62) # 0, while all otheroij = 0, von Mises criterion becomes: enek= 15 June 2015 4Sr Ii ROSENBERG Where 7¥ is the yield strength of the material. The von Mises stress is set equal to the yield strength and combined with the equations above, the von Mises yield criterion can be expresses as: oy =oy= 3h Substituting J; with terms of the Cauchy stress tensor components. ‘(er -e2)?+ (c2-e3)?+ (03-21) Inserting this into the von Mises yield criterion equation and the following von Mises stress equation is obtained: Figure 3 Intersection of the von Mises yield criterion ‘The tresca maximum shear stress criterion predicts plastic yielding for stress states that are still elastic according to the von Mises criterion, Tresca criterion is therefore more conservative. [3] 15 June 2015 5See. [EB ROSENBERG sone Grou, 2.2 FLEXIBILITY ‘The stiffness of a material is the extent to which it resists deformation in response to an applied force. For an elastic body with a single degree of freedom (DOF) (for example, stretching or compression of a rod), the FE Kee x iffiness is defined as Where, K is stiffness of the beam representing the beam between two nodes F is the force applied on the body X is the resulting position of these nodes ‘Temperature expansion/contraction or other imposed displacements like deck deflections or settlement can cause altemating bending moments that might be detrimental for the pipe itself, flanges, branch connections, pipe supports and connected equipment such as pumps and compressors. The design of pipe systems should be executed in such a way that parts of the piping itself act as a spring and release or reduce the internal bending stresses or longitudinal stresses that otherwise can be detrimental. Local loads on the pipe are calculated based on this final position (X) of each point in the system. Code — defined stresses (sustained, expansion range and occasional) are calculated using these loads. [14] The flexibility in pipe systems can be improved by: © Use a material lower Young’s Modulus. It should however be noted that materials with lower Young’s Modulus will in general have lower allowable basic stress. © Use a material with a higher yield-or tensile strength © Use a material quality that does not need additional corrosion and erosion allowance, and thereby obtains a reduction in the wall thickness which again gives more flexibility since the moment of inertia is reduced with a reduction of the pipe wall thickness. Use of thinner wall could result in greater vibration. © Changes in the run direction (offsets, bends and loops) or by use of expansion joints or flexible couplings of the slip joint, ball joint or bellow type. © Changing the spacing of pipe-supports and their function (e.g. removal of a guide close to a bend to add flexibility). [14] 15 June 2015 6st Sas. [ROSENBERG 2.3 CASTIGLIANOS METHOD: Most pipe analysis programs use the theorems of Castigliano as the basis for their calculations. Castiglianos second theorem applies to find deformation of linearly elastic systems. If the strain energy of a linearly elastic structure can be expressed as a function of generalised force Q,, then the partial derivative of the strain energy with respect to generalised force gives the generalised displacement qin the direction of Q. [5] =a gi= aQi 2.4 BEAM DEFLECTION THEORY To determine beam deflection a standard fundamental formula is used. R = the radius of curvature at a distance x from the origin. E= the elastic modulus of the material 1 =the second moment of area of the beam cross-section. M= the bending moment at the section, distance x from the origin. y-~ the vertical deflection at the section distance x from the origin. By integrating the above expression twice will give an expression for the deflection y. [6] 15 June 2015 7Sree [ED ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group 2.5 PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS Pipe stress analysis addresses the loading resulting from the effects of weight, temperature changes, internal pressures, seismic, wind, ice settlement etc. Codes and standards establish the minimum requirements of stress analysis. [4] ‘The stresses acting on the pipe in sustain condition are: Due to internal pressure: ‘0 = Hoop stress, (N/mm) 01 = Longitudinal stress, (N/mm?) ‘o= Radial stress, (N/mm?) ‘or = Shear or torsional stress, (N/mm*) Due to weight: Axial stress, bending stress and torsion shear stress. These can be controlled by proper supporting and weight distributions. [7] The walls of a pipe line exposed to pressure, generally undergoes triaxial loading, From the symmetry of the circular cross secti , there are two principal directions of stresses, axial and circumferential, developed uniformly along the circumference of the pipe wall. Stress and pressure is in the term of units of force over area. To include stress and pressure in force equilibrium equation, one must multiply the stress and pressure times the area on which it acts. In reality the stress is not uniform across the pipe thickness. The stress is greater near the inner surface and lower at the outside surface. The formulas for stresses are given by thin wall calculations. 15 June 2015 8See [ROSENBERG 2.5.1 HOOP STRESS ‘The stress in circumferential direction being perpendicular both to the axial and the radius of the pipe is called hoop stress and is caused primarily by internal pressure. Hoop stress is statically determinate. [8] Pressure force = projected area x Pressure = 4 -L -P Stress force = 21toH Pressure force = Stress force cuz 2S 24 2.5.2. LONGITUDINAL STRESS ‘The longitudinal stress works in the axial direction and is not statically determinate, and depends on whether the pipeline moves longitudinally. Longitudinal stress depends on the summation of the following three components [71[8]: © Longitudinal stress induced by internal pressure. © Bending stress induced by the weight of the pipe. © Bending stress induced by thermal expansion or contraction. Stress due to internal pressure 2 Pressure force = projected area x Pressure =x (3) P 2 Stress force = : (2) sn 2 Pressure force = Stress force 15 June 2015 9SPE [ROSENBERG Bending stress Pipe section modulus: = 4 af ae) 2.53 RADIAL STRE! ‘The radial stress is in the direction towards or away from the central axis of the pipe, acting parallel to the pipe radius. Radial stress is caused by internal pressure and gives zero radial stress at the outer radius of the pipe, where bending stresses are maximizes. For this reason, radial stress is neglected during stress calculations, The hoop stress is roughly twice the value of the longitudinal stresses. Radial stresses are usually much smaller than hoop stress and longitudinal stresses. For thin walled pipe the radial stress is negligible. [8] 2.54 SHEAR OR TORSIONAL STRESS Torsion is twisting of a structural member, when it is exposed to loads producing a rotation about its longitudinal axis. [9] During twisting the element rotate a small angle dp a “dx Represent the rate of change of the angle of twist @ is constant along the length 0 zt Consider a bar subjected to pure torsion, the shear force acting on an element dA is t dA, the moment of this force about the axis of bar is t p dA 15 June 2015 10Sey [Gi ROSENBERG UY ersten WorteyPartons Group dM =< -p-dA Equation of moment equilibrium " ° 2 2 T=| cpdA Gop dA=G0-) p'dA=G01p A A A 1=G0-p E 20+) pis the polar moment of inertia fea ‘Area torque is then dA= (2np) dp For thin wall pipes t< Ces Figure 4 Max hear stress 15 June 2015 nsent See [ROSENBERG 2.6 THERMAL EXPANSION OR CONTRACTION For most materials, thermal strain is proportional to the temperature change AT er =aAT ‘Thermal strain usually is reversible, expand when heated and contract when cooled. For a pipe with length L the temperature-displacement relation will be 5; =a (AT) L Displacements due to restraint forces is 5 = RLIEA 8=8r-8R=0 The presence of temperature drives the friction RL a-(4T)-L= (aT )L= = 2.7 FRICTION Friction occurs between two bodies in contact with each other and counteracts with the relative motion between them. Friction is proportional to the perpendicular normal force (N) which presses the surfaces together as well as the coefficient of friction, #4. The coefficient of friction describes the ratio of the force of friction between two bodies and depends on the materials used. [12] R HN Friction force Friction will accur in piping system exposed to temperature movements. The friction will act, in direct opposite direction of the temperature expansion or contraction. The normal force is very decisive for the thermal expansion to create a friction resistance. Sometimes the friction at one support can completely change the acceptability of the piping system. Support friction in a piping system can create a higher stress in the pipe and a higher load on the connecting equipment, but can prevent the pipe from free expansion. The friction tends to prevent the pipe from moving in the lateral direction, which leads to a stiffer system thus resulting in higher bending moment at the bend. In certain instances the friction can help stabilize the system and dampens out potential vibration. [13] 15 June 2015, 12Som. (pR0s 2.8 PIPE WALL THICKNESS ENBERG ions Greur This analysis is limited to «Thin walled pressure pipen. For a cylinder to be qualify as «Thin walled» the ratio of the pipe inside radius r, to walll thickness t must be ri/t= 10, according to the ASME B31.3. Most of the piping of standard schedules is of the sort «Thin walled», Piping with small diameter or specially made thick walls are the exceptions. The pipe wall can be treated as a surface when the «Thin walled» assumption has been made, and can thereby use the Young-Laplace equation for estimating the hoop stress. Hoop stress is governing since it is roughly twice the longitudinal stress, and is therefore used for pipe wall thickness calculation. The piping is then supported sufficiently, such that the longitudinal axial stress is within the limits of the required code and the deflection also remains within acceptable limits. The deflection limits between supports is usually company defined. To prevent overstress, damage, collapse, or buckling due to superimposed loads from supports, -kness shall when necessary be increased. The formation or transportation, the wall intemal pressure and corrosion allowance decides the minimum required wall thickness of the pipe. Corrosion or erosion can occur internal and/or external and adds ad jonal required thickness to the total pipe thickness. The nature, temperature and velocity of the product in contact with the wall determine the corrosion / erosion allowance. Pipe thickness is selected in three steps: © From the design pressure, the minimum required net thickness is calculated. * The net thickness is then added with allowances, such as corrosion and erosion allowance, thread allowance, and manufacturing mill- tolerance, to become the minimum nominal thickness. The final step is to select a commercially available nominal thickness that provides this minimum required nominal thickness. [4] ‘Nominal thicknesses are standardized and represented by weight grades as standard (Std), extra strong (Xs), double extra strong (Xxs) and by schedule numbers ranging from schedule 10 (Sch-10) to schedule 160 (Sch-160). Stainless steel pipes have separate schedule numbers appended with letter «S» such as Sch-Ss, sch-10s ete. 15 June 2015 13Sank IEPROSENBERG rion Grow According to ASME B31.3 section 304.1.2 ‘The required wall thickness for a straight pipe under internal pressure shall not be less than the Lame’s equations (1) or (2): For t intemal design pressure D= Pipe outside diameter = the pipe material allowable stress, S is for the listed pipe material at hot temperature Tabel Ai E = quality factor based on the method of manufacture of the pipe and will have a value ranging from E=0.6 for furnace butt welded to E= 1.0 for seamless pipe. Table A-1B W= Weld joint strength reduction factor (not required for this thesis) Y= Stress-temperature compensating factor is included to account for effects of ereep. Table 304.1.1 15 June 2015 14Som. [ROSENBERG ROSENBERG 2.9 PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN All pipe lines shall be routed in such a way that a simple, neat and economical layout allowing for easy support and adequate flexibility is provided. No pipe supports shall be placed in a location likely to be a safety hazard to personnel e.g, tripping hazard, restricted headroom or blocking escape routes. ‘The function of the pipe support is to carry the weight and control the movement of the pipe as well as any equipment connected to the pipe. The job of the pipe support is to transfer the loads from the pipe to the surrounding structure, and generally remove or restrain one or more of the six degrees of freedom (3 translational and 3 rotational) at particular points on the pipe The positioning and the design of the pipe support shall be based on preventing: Excess piping stress * Deflection of piping greater than the acceptance criterium, to avoid liquid pockets or leakage at joints Resonance from wind forces or contained fluid induced vibrations, wave forces etc. © Resonance from mechanical or acoustically induced vibrations from reciprocating machines. © Interference with free thermal expansion or contraction. © Disconnection between pipe and support In selection of supports the effect of deck deflections, platform sway and flexibility in structures and equipment must be considered and incorporated in design/calculation whene relevant, Magnitude of deflection and sway shall be obtained from the structural disciplines. [10] Where increased flexibility is required within the pipe system, but can not be obtained by normal pipe route changes, gaps may be incorporated in the pipe support restraint, allowing the pipe to move within the incorperated gap. 15 June 2015 15Eas, [ROSENBERG 2.10 LIMIT STATE DESIGN A limit state is a condition of a structure beyond which it no longer fulfills the relevant design criteria. A structure designed by LSD is proportioned to sustain all actions likely to occur during its design life, and to remain fit for use, with an appropriate level of reliability for each limit state, Required reliability depends on consequence of failure: Risk = Probability x Consequence. Limit state design requires the structure to satisfy two principal criteria: the ultimate limit state (ULS) and the serviceability limit state (SLS). The ultimate limit state (ULS) involves the structural integrity or strength, as such the structure is designed to have a very low probability reaching this limit state since the consequences are severe. This includes collapse due to fracture, rupture, instability, excessive inelastic deformation, and so on. In considering ULS, plastic theory could be used. The serviceability limit state (SLS) involves the structure remaining functional for its intended use subjected to routine everyday loading and human comfort achieved. This include excessive elastic deformation and possible consequential damage to non-structural elements such as panels, excessive localized deformation such as cracking and spalling of concrete, excessive vibration and so on. In considering SLS, elastic theory should be used. ‘The accidental limit state (ALS) involves damage or failure due to unusual, accidental, or unplanned loading conditions such as incidental overpressure, explosion, fire or earthquake, The fatigue limit state (FLS) involves the fatigue damage resulting from cyclic dynamic loads and accumulated throughout its life. The structure is designed sueh that its life, accounting for fatigue damage from all sources, meets or exceeds the design life. FLS will not be included in this thesis. [11] 15 June 2015 16Ud ort [ED ROSENBERG ‘The general form of the limit state design can be given as: @ Rez Y (viSe) im LOL is the strength factor R, Characteristic strength 1; Load factor rs S_ Characteristic value reat yet SUR, Figure S Limit state design ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN The allowable stress in which the stresses caused by nominal or characteristic design loads, shall not exceed an allowable or limiting stress. The allowable stress is the yield stress or failure stress of the material divided by a safety factor. The factor of safety FS accounts for the entire variability. [11] R resistance strength L load effect FS factor of safety 15 June 2015 ”7rt. [ROSENBERG 2.11 EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS, ‘There are several methods of measuring strain, Numerical or experimental methods can be used to obtain approximate results, for instance when members of complex shape subjected to loads, makes it mathematically difficult to derive analytical load-stress relations. Strain gages are used practical to measure expansion strains on the free surface of a member, but cannot be used to measure internal strain of a member. To measure internal strain (or stresses), other techniques such as photo elasticity, holographic or Moiré techniques can be used. The gages are made of very fine wire, where three gages arranged in three different directions are cluster together in a point forming a strain rosette. A single gage is capable only of measuring the extensional strain in the direction that the gage is orientated in that point. Forces are applied to the object and as the object deforms, the gage deforms by elongation or contraction, causing the electrical resistance to change. The electrical resistance varies in proportion to the amount of strain in the device. The change in resistance can be measured using a Wheatstone bridge, and calibrated to indicate the average extensional strain over a gage length. Two common forms of rosettes are the delta rosette with three gages spaced at 60° angles and the rectangular rosette with three gages spaced at 45° angles. (18] (a) ” Rosette strain gages. (a) Delta rosette. (b) Rectangular rosette. Figure 6 Rectangular Rosette strain gage mounted on pipe 15 June 2015 18woe So. [ED ROSENBERG 2.12 STRESS ANALYSIS PROGRAMS To be able to conduct this objective, different set of programs had to be used. Below the different programs are described. 2.121 CAESAR IL CAESAR II is pipe stress analysis software program used for designing and analysis of piping systems. The program creates a model of the pi 1g system using simple beam elements and defines the loading conditions imposed on the system. With this input it produces results in the form of displacements, loads, and stresses throughout the system. ‘Additionally the program then compares these results to limits specified by recognized codes and standards, For this case that will be ASME B31.3. [19] 2.122 STAADPro STAAD Pro is a structural analysis and design computer program that supports several steel, concrete and timber design codes. It can make use of various forms of analysis from the traditional 1st order static analysis, 2nd or a buckling anal use of various forms of dynamic analysis from modal extraction to time history and response It can also make order p-delta analysis, geometric nonlinear anal spectrum analysis. 15 June 2015 19Sek [ROSENBERG 3.0 DESIGN BASIS 3.1 APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS, The piping and structural design must be based on the requirements given in: ASME B31.3: Process Piping BPV, section II, Part D NS-EN 13480-3:2012 Metalliske industrielle rorsystemer Del 3: Konstruksjon og berekning, BDO01-AK-P-06042. Pipe Support Procedure (AkerSolution) BDO1-AK-P-06043. Pipe Support Detail Standard (AkerSolution) DNV-RP-D101: Structural analysis of piping systems EN 1993-1-1: 2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures EN 1993-1-4: 2006. Eurocode 3: upplementary rules for stainless steel NORSOK L-002, rev.3: Piping system layout, design and structural analysis NORSOK N-001, Rev.7: Integrity of offshore structures, NORSOK N-003, Rev.2: Actions and action effects. NORSOK N-004, Rev. 4: Design of steel structures. EN 1993-1-8:2005 Eurocode 3: Design of structures. Part 1-8: Design of job. EN 1991-1-4:2005 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Part 1-4: Wind actions ASME B31.3: Process Piping ASME - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers The basic design code for engineers working with topside offshore projects is the ASME B31.3 Process Piping Code, originally a design code for process plants to be placed on land. ASME B31.3 piping code has some basic requirements regarding the integrity of the piping but leaves all other aspects of the functional design of the system to the designer/pipe stress engineer. [4] MF 3.2 ORIENTAION % —voWN Figure 7 Orientation 15 June 2015, 20S Uonorety ia] ROSENBERG or Stare WerleyParsons Group 3.3 PIPE DESIGN BASIS ‘The pipe line has been analyzed by using CAESAR II, and checked according to ASME B31.3, For hand calculations MathCAD has been used. 3.3.1 MATERIAL AND DATA ‘The pipe specifications used are AD20. The material is A790 UNS $31803. Reference to piping and valve specification in the appendix. ‘The following material properties will be used for piping calculations: ‘SMYS (Specified Minimum Yield Strength) 448MPa” ‘SMTS (Specified Minimum Tensile Strength) 621 MPa” ‘Youngs modulus E: 195830 Nimm’ Density p: 8027 kein Poisson ratio 0:03 “Table i: Piping material data, Reference to APPENDIKA. ASME 831.3, Table ALT 3.3.2. MATERIAL BASIC ALLOWABLE STRESSES ‘Allowable stress ‘A790 UNS 831803 “Allowable stress at max (100°C) metal temperature, S, | 205,9 MPa” (29,87ksi) ‘Allowable stress min (-7°C) metal temperature, S. 206,84 MPa” (30ksi) Yield Strength amb, Sye 448 MPa” (65ksi) ‘Yield Strength at temp Sy100 395 MPa” (57,25ksi) “Table 2; Material basi alowable stresses, Reference to APPENDIK A, ASME 831.3 and BV Code 1) ASME B31.3. Table A-1. Basic Allowable Stresses in Tension for Metals. Ref. Appendix A 2) BPV Code, section Il, Part D. Table Y-1. Yield strength values Sy. Ref. Appendix A. _— 15 June 2015 21See II ROSENBERG 3.3.3 PIPING DIMENSIONS Pipe sizes chosen for testing. Nominal Pipe Size | OD(mm) | Wthk | Sch | Com. | Mill. Tol, (inch) (mm) Allow. 20 308 478 | 58 0 12.5% 20 308 12.70 | 30 0 12.5% 20 308 20.62 | 60 0 12.35% Table 3: Piping dimensions, Reference to APPENDIX A. Table of dimensions of seamless and welded steel pipes 3.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE According to NORSOK ~ L002. Seetion 6.6, The minimum/maximum environmental temperature for the North Sea shall unless otherwise specified in the project be: 4) Installation temperature: 4 °C b) Minimum ambient temperature: -7 °C ¢) Maximum ambient temperature: 22 °C Calculation of expansion stress shall be based on maximum/minimum design temperatures. ‘The maximum design temperature shall not be lower than the maximum ambient temperature, 3.3.5 DESIGN PARAMETERS ‘Max design temperature 100°C ‘Min design temperature FC Installation temperature FC Max design pressure 12.1 bar Table & Piping design parameters 3.3.6 WEIGHT OF CONTENT Calculations were run with pipe contents of water with density of 1000 kg/m? No insulation is included 15 June 2015, 2(See [EI ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group 33.7 BLAST CONSIDERATIONS According to DNV-RP-D101: Structural analysis of piping system Section 3.11.2.2 Blast drag loads. Calculations of the blast drag load per unit length of the pipe Fp (Nim) can be calculated as follows: 1 Fp= zor Dep DLF 1 2 27°” Equals the dynamic drag pressure from table 3.1 in DNV-RP-D101 For this thesis the dynamic drag pressure is set to 0.3 bars Drag coefficient for blast Cpis set to 1.0 Dynamic Load Factor DLF is set to 1.5 Dis for the outside diameter (m) of the pipe — 15 June 2015 23See. [El ROSENBERG WorteyParsons Group 3.3.8 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The limits for these code defined stresses (sustained, expansion range and occasional) are set by the piping codes. The computed displacement stress range, Sx < Allowable Displacement Stress Range, Sa Stresses Due to Sustained Loads, $1 < Allowable stress at max. metal temp. expected during the displ. Cycle, Sy. See chapter for hand calculations for more info, According to ASME B31.3. Section: 320.2 ‘The equation for the stress due to sustained loads, such as pressure and weight, Sz, is given: SL = J ( [Sa] +80)? + (2-8)? According to ASME B31.3. Section: 319.4.4 ‘The equation for the stress due to expansion loads, due to purely thermal loads, Sx, is given: Se = (|Sal + 8)° + (2-8)? According to ASME B31.3. Section: 302.3.5 The Allowable Displacement Stress Range, Sais given: Sa = £(1.25-8¢ + 0.25-Sp) IS) is greater than Sy Sa = f{1.25-(Se + Sy) - St] Sq= axial stress range Sy = bending stress range S,= torsional stress range S_= basic allowable stress at min metal temperature expected during the displacement cycle Sy= basic allowable stress at max metal temperature expected during the displacement cycle £= stress range factor. Set to 1.0 from fig. 302.3.5 in ASME B31.3. a 15 June 2015, 24UD) otter [ED ROSENBERG rons rooe ASME B31,3 does not consider the operating load cases a "stress allowance case", and therefore provides no equation for the allowable stress. For ASME B31.3, the "stress allowance cases" are: Sustained, expansion, and occasional. The operating case is used for generating structural restraint loads, overall displacement limits, and as a component to the expansion case determination. Pipe stresses for operating load cases can be generated in Caesar II but gives no result for the allowable stress. Operating load cases are therefore not used in any sort of pass/fail criterion. According to NORSOK L-002. Section: 6.8. Explosion loads Maximum allowable stress in blast case shall be the minimum of 2.4xS or 15x Sy ‘Where Sy is the ASME B 31.3 allowable stress limit and Sy is the pipe material yield stress. In this case 2.4 x S, is relevant. For this thesis the deflection limit for pipe span is set to L/600. [17] ‘The deflection limit is usually determined by the company project procedures. 15 June 2015 25Sees, IM ROSENBERG or Sense SENBERC 3.4 STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS The pipe support has been analyzed by using STAAD.Pro, and checked according to Eurocode 3. The load directions for the pipe supports calculations have the same coordinates as for the pipe stress calculations. 3.4.1 MATERIAL AND DATA. steel profiles for pipe supports Sections Product type Steel grade Min. yield Min. tensile | strength (Mpa) | Strength (Mpa) Pipe support SHS200x16 S355 355 310 Deck siringet | HP280X12 3355 355 310 Table 5: Structural material data FI Oeptel Secon st Sat Node) 0288 Paqveino a Wa) owe Font Secon tr) 028 my Fettanet Teoh) 0D sem cost Tp Pegs) 0088 ® ete let HP2BOK12 Fo¢ttahot Baton Range) 0052 7k eto Farge) Figure & Input in STAAD.Pro for HP2B0KI2 with efectve width of deck plate The following material properties will be used for structural calculations: ‘Young's modulus] E: 210000N/mnr Shear modulus © 80000Nimn Poisson ratio 0:03 Density [P: 7681.95 kg/m™ "Table 6 Sructural material properties 15 June 2015 26Sa [ROSENBERG 3.4.2 LOAD AND MATERIAL FACTORS Pipe supports shall be proven to satisfy the limit states outlined in NORSOK Standard N-001. The actions are to be combined in the most unfavorable way, provided the combination is physically feasible and permitted according to the action specifications. The design condition considered is: Ultimate limit states, ULS Serviceability limit states, SLS (e.g. deflections) Accidental limit states, ALS (e.g, blast) Material factor: ‘© ULS: Material factor for the selected pipe support material shall be set to 1.15 for steel material. Material factors for welds and bolt connections shall be 1.3 ¢ SLS/ALS: Material factor for the selected pipe support material shall be set to 1.0 Load factor: © ULS: Load factor of 1.3 for design loads © SLS/ALS: All combinations shall apply a load factor of 1.0. Self-weight has a load factor of 1.2 because of connection plates, bolts, ete ‘Retion Variable] Environmental | Deformation combinations. actions ()*_| actions (D)* 13) OF 7.0) ULS: 7.0 13 7.0) SLs: 1.0 7.0) 7.0) ALS ‘Abnormal 7.0 10 70) effect” ALS Damaged To To To To condition © FLS 10 To 70 io | *Forpermanent actors andlor varabie acTons, an acion Tacior oT 10 shall bo used whore Wis gves fe Most unfavOUTEBTE 1 acbon effect, Actions wth annual probably of exceedance = 104 ‘Environmental actions vith annual probably of exceedance = 107 ‘4 Eethquako hol be handed as envmont action within heli stto desig for ULS and ALS (ebronmat effet) ‘Apglcable for concrete structures Figuce 9: Partial action factor for the limit states, ref. NORSOK N-001 15 June 2015 27sc [EU ROSENBERG UY ofS rons Group Type of calculation Waterial factor 4) Value Resistance of Class 1.2 or 3 cross-sections the 145; Resistance of Class 4 cross-sections Ym 115) Resistance of member to bucking ‘hn TS Resistance of net section at bolt holes: we iE) we two Resistance of filet and partial penetration welds 13 Resistance of bolted connections. 13 Figure 10: Material factor for ULS, Ref, NORSOK N-004 3.4.3 PIPE LINE LOADS The reaction forces for pipe line loads are taken from operation loads in Caesar II and implemented into STAAD.Pro 3.44 BLAST CONSIDERATIONS According to DNV-RP-D101: Structural analysis of piping system Section 3.1.2.2 Blast drag loads. Calculations of the blast drag load per unit length of SHS (N/m) can be calculated as follows: -v?-B-Cp-DLF 2°” Equals the dynamic drag pressure from table 3.1 in DNV-RP-D101 For this thesis the dynamic drag pressure is set to 0.3 bars Dynamic Load Factor DLF is set to 1 Bis the width of the pipe support member The shape factor for SHS, Czis set to 1.4 according to Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 1-4: Wind actions, Section 7.6: Structural elements with rectangular sections Ce = Cee,0)-wrewa = 2:0.75-0.93 = 1.395 Cio is the force coefficient of rectangular sections with sharp comers and without free-end flow vvcis the reduction factor for square sections with rounded comers ris the end-effect factor for elements with free-end flow 15 June 2015 28Sa [ROSENBERG 3.4.5 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ‘The main criteria for the pipe supports reliability are the yield stress of material and deflection. The calculated stress of pipe supports from the applied (factored) loads must be ‘under the limit of the material yield stress, all limit states included. ULS: Material yield strength 355 / 1.15 material factors. SLS/ALS: Material yield strength 355 / 1.0 Deflection limit in pipe support: ‘According to ConocoPhillips pipe support procedure, document number BDO1-AK-P-06042: Deflection shall not exceed the most conservative of L/360 or 3mm, where L is the span of the pipe support member in the restrained directions. Deflection limit in the deck stringer (HP): Condition Limit for Deck beams 1/200 ‘Deck beams supporting plaster or other brite finish 250 350 ‘or non-flexible partitions, Figure 11 Limiting values for vertical deflections, ref. NORSOK N-O01 —_ 15 June 2015 29[Ej ROSENBERG WrlayPertons Group 4.0 LOADS AND LOAD CASES A short summary of the design loads is given in the following. The following loads have been considered: ® Design loads ( pressure, temperature, weigh) ‘* Occasional loads (blast Loads) 4.1 DESIGN LOADS ‘The following parameters have been used to calculate design loads on pipe: LINE [Max. Design | Min. design | Inst. Temp | Max. design No. Temp. (°C) | Temp.(°)_ | (°C) Pressure (barg) 20" 700 7 4 721 Table 7: Piping parameters The pipe support loads should be based on the following: Vertical load: The weight of the pipe span carried by the actual support. Horizontal load: For rest supports, the horizontal load may be assumed equal to the friction force. The friction coefficient set to 0.3 for surfaces steel to steel, shall be used to determine forces at sliding surfaces. | we Figure 12: STAAD.Pro load case 101. Design load i i ._ 15 June 2015 30Seite BPROSENBERG 4.2 OCCASIONAL LOADS Blast drag loads per unit length of the pipe is set to: Fp= ; p-v2.D-Cp-DLF Fp = 0.3bar-D:1,0-1.5 = 0.45bar-D Fp = 0.45bar-D = 48000 .p=45000-0.508 = 2.28610" Nim m Blast loads on pipe line system is set from 6 directions a | mt "ot Figure 13: Blast load direction on piping Figure 14: STAAD.Pro Load case 301. Design and blast loads 15 June 2015 31Sete ROSENBERG Blast drag loads per unit length of the support is set to: Fp= ze +? BCe-DLF Fp = 0.3bar-B-1.4-1.5 = 30S oami41s= 12.648 m Figure 16: Blast loads on support inx direction I ~ a 4 Figure 17: Blast loads on support in ¥ direction ——— 15 June 2015 32See [ROSENBERG 4,3 HYDROSTATIC TEST LOADS ‘A hydrostatic test is a way in which pressure vessels such as pipelines, plumbing, gas cylinders, boilers and fuel tanks can be tested for strength and leaks. The test involves filling the vessel or pipe system with a liquid. Water is commonly used because it is cheap and easily available, and is usually harmless to the system to be tested. Water is a nearly incompressible liquid and therefore requiring relatively little work to develop a high pressure, and only a small volume will escape under high pressure in case of a failure. The location of a leak can more easily be visually detected if the water contains a red or fluorescent dye. To give a factor of safety the test pressure is always considerably higher than the operating pressure. This factor of safety is typically 16.66%, 143% or 150% of the designed working pressure, depending on the regulations that apply. Pressure tightness can be tested by shutting off the supply valve and observing whether there is a pressure loss. Strength is usually tested by ‘measuring permanent deformation or changes in the shape. Hydrotesting of pipes, pipelines and vessels is performed to expose defective materials that have missed prior detection, ensure that any remaining defects are insignificant enough to allow operation at design pressures, expose possible leaks, maintain safety standards and durability of a vessel over time and serve as a final validation of the integrity of the constructed system. Legislation requires pressure vessels to be regularly tested. ASME B31.3 requires this testing to ensure tightness and strength. [16] Max. Design Pressure: 12.1 bar 2.1 bar x 1.50 = 18.15 bar => rounded up to 20 bar ee 15 June 2015 33Sie [EM ROSENBERG 4.4 OTHER LOADS Other loads that may occur, but are not taken into considerations in this thesis. Dynamic loads such as slug loads, density variations in two-phase flow, water hammer or earth quake. ‘These dynamic loads may be taken into account by either estimating an equivalent static load combined with a conservative dynamic amplification factor. Other loads that might occur are wind, snow/ice, lifting and transportation. In order to reduce the potential for dynamic movements, the lowest eigen frequency of the flow line should preferably be above 4 Hz. A too stiff supporting may on the other hand lead to unacceptable load and stress levels. If the system is too flexible it may be detrimental, because it vibrates at low frequency that can be induced by e.g. wind. [15] It may not be sufficient to just use the design loads from the piping stress report. When pipe supports are designed, possible loads from the piping construction, erection, installation, testing and demolition shall be included in the design.(10] 4.5 DEFINITION OF LOAD TYPES: SUS = Sustained loads: These loads are always present and will allways be present in the system throughout its operating cycle. Weight of piping system and pressure inside the pipe are examples of sustained loads which generate sustained stresses. OCC = Cee operation, ¢,g. earthquake, explosion, wind, etc. nal loads: These loads are present at infrequent intervals during plant EXP = Expansion loads: These are loads due to thermal displacements of piping. OPE= Operational loads: These loads are restraint forces for structural supports. They include all the above load cases but are not code cases for stress. =< i i i i i — 15 June 2015 34Se. ROSENBERG 4.6 DESIGN LOAD CASE DESCRIPTION AND CAESAR II LOAD IDENTIFICATION Blast loads in CAESAR II are named WIN (as in wind) as a default. Toad Description CAESAR 2 Loads identifier HYD Hy4rostatic pressure test Hydrostatic test WNC ___| Weight with no contents Weight of pipe only ww Weight with water content Weight of Water | Ww (Weight) Normal operating weight with contents | Weight with Fluid contents TI (Thermal 1) Thermal expansion from ambient to | Temp I maximum temperature +4° : +100°C T2 (Thermal 1) Thermal expansion from ambient to | Temp 2 maximum temperature +4° : -7°C PI (Pressure) Design Pressure Pressure 1 WINT __ | (Blast 1) Blast load in the +X direction Wind load #1 WIN2 | (Blast 2) Blast load in the -X direction Wind load #2 WIN3 | (Blast 3) Blast load in the +Y direction Wind load #3 WIN4 | (Blast 4) Blast load in the -Y direction Wind load #4 WINS _| (Blast 5) Blast load in the ¥Z direction Wind load #5 WING | (Blast 6) Blast load in the -Z direction Wind load #6 Di Imposed deflection “Table &: Caesar Toad identification ee 15 June 2015 35§ Urtorsty anor 4.7 LOAD CASES AND COMBINATION RUN THROUGH CAES [By ROSENBERG WoreyParsone Group AR IT For calculation of pipe line stress and loads created separate from structural influence. LC. [Load case Comb. [Type _| Description 1__|WWsHP HYD _| Hydro test Load case 2__| WNC SUS _ | Weight of pipe only 3__| WsPI SUS | Sustained Stress 4__| W=TPI OPE__| Max Design Temp. Load case 3__ | WrT2#PT OPE _ | Min Design Temp. Load case 6 | WETISPIFWINT | OPE __| Design case with blast in +X direction 7__| W#TI+PI-WINT [OPE _ | Design case with blast in -X direction 8 | WHTI+PIHWIN2 | OPE _| Design case with last in +Y direction 9 | WeTTPI-WIN2 [OPE __| Design case with blast in -Y direction 10 | WeTT+PIFWIN3 | OPE _| Design case with blast in +Z direction i W+TI4+P1-WIN3 OPE _| Design case with blast in -Z direction 12 | W#T2#PIFWINT [OPE _| Design case with blast in +X direction 13__ | W#T2#PI-WINI__| OPE _| Design case with blast in -X direction 14 [W+T24P1+WIN2 | OPE __| Design case with blast in FY direction 15 [W+T24PI-WIN2 | OPE __| Design case with blast in -Y direction 16 | W+T2+PIWIN3__| OPE __| Design case with blast in +Z direction 17_ | W#T2+PI-WIN3 | OPE __| Design case with blast in ~Z direction 18 ‘OCC_| Blast in +X direction 19 ‘OCC_| Blast in -X direction [20 OCC_| Blast in +Y direction 21 OCC _| Blast in-¥ direction 22 OCC__| Blast in 3Z direction 23 OCC_| Blast in-Z direction 24 ‘OCC_| Blast in +X direction + Sustained load Ln.3 25 ‘OCC_| Blast in -X direction + Sustained load Ln.3 26 OCC_| Blast in+Y direction + Sustained load Ln.3 27 OCC_| Blast in-¥ direction + Sustained load Ln.3 28 ‘OCC _| Blast in+Z direction ¥ Sustained load Ln.3 29 OCC_| Blast in-Z direction + Sustained load Ln.3 30_ | 1.30=L4-L3, EXP _ | Expansion Stress; Temp Max Design-Temp installation 31_[ L31=15-L3 EXP _| Expansion Stress; Temp Min Design-Temp installation “Table 9: Caesar load case description Ss 15 June 2015 36UY otro [ROSENBERG For calculation of pipe line stress and loads created with forced deflections from structural influence Tn,_| Load case Comb. Type _ | Description 1 _|WW-HP HYD_| Hydro test Load case 2__| WNC SUS _ | Weight of pipe onl; 3_|WsPI SUS | Sustained Stress 4_[WTlPisDi ‘OPE | Max Design Temp. Load case 3__|W#T2+PI+DI ‘OPE _| Min Design Temp. Load case 6 | WSTI+PI+WINID1 | OPE _| Design case with blast in +X direction 7___ | W#TI+PI-WINI+D1 [OPE __| Design case with blast in -X direction 8 | WHTT=PI+WIN2+D1 | OPE _| Design case with blast in +Y direction’ 9 _| W+TIPI-WIN2+D1_| OPE _| Design case with blast in -¥ direction 10__| W+TI+PI+WIN3+DI | OPE | Design case with blast in +Z direction T1__| W*T1+PI-WIN3+D1_| OPE _| Design case with blast in -Z direction 12 | W+T2+P1+WINI+DI [OPE _ | Design case with blast in +X direction 13__ | W+T2+PI-WINI+D1 | OPE _ | Design case with blast in -X direction 14 | W+T2+PI+WIN2*D1 | OPE _| Design case with blast in ¥¥ direction 15__| W+T2+P1-WIN2+D1 | OPE _| Design case with blast in -Y direction 16 | W+T2+PI+WIN3+D1 | OPE _| Design case with blast in +Z direction 17_ | W¥T2+P1-WIN3+DI_[ OPE _| Design case with blast in -Z direction 18 [Li8=16-14 ‘OCC_| Blast in +X direction 19_|LI9=L7-14 OCC_| Blast in -X direction 20 [L20=L8-L4 OCC_| Blast in +¥ direction 21 [L21=19-L4 ‘OCC_| Blast in-¥ direction 22_|L22=L10-14 ‘OCC _| Blast in ¥Z direction 23 [23-11-14 ‘OCC _| Blast in-Z direction 24 [L24=L181L3 OCC_| Blast in +X direction + Sustained load Ln.3 25_ | L25=L19+L3 ‘occ =X direction ¥ Sustained load Ln.3 26 |L26=L20+L3 ‘occ +Y direction + Sustained load Ln.3 27 |L27=L21+L3 occ =¥ direction + Sustained load Ln.3 28 | L28=L22+03 ‘OCC _| Blast in +Z direction + Sustained load Ln.3 29 | L29=L23+13 ‘OCC _| Blast in -Z direction + Sustained load Ln.3 30_ | L30=14-13 EXP _ | Expansion Stress; Temp Max Design-Temp installation 31_ | L31=15-13 EXP __| Expansion Stress; Temp Min Design-Temp installation “Table 10: Caesar Ilload case description with deflection ee 15 June 2015 37Upnarty ROSENBERG WiorlsyPartons Group 4.8 LOAD CASE DESCRIPTION AND STAAD PRO LOAD IDENTIFICATION Toad [Load Type] Description Load factors Direction Case coordinates 1 Self-weight 13ULS/10SLS =I.2y 2___ [Design Toad _| Vertical rest Toad 13 ¥ 3 Design load | Line stop west load 13 1Fz 4 [Design load [Line stop east load 13 “Fz. 3 Blast'Design | Rest load 1.0 Fi 6 __| Blast+Design | Hold down rest load 1.0 Fy 7 [Blast load | Blast load Line guide N 1.0 “Fx 8 | Blast load | Blast load Line guide S 1.0 +Fx 9 | Blast load | Blast Toad on members Z 1.0 z 10 | Blast load | Blast load on members X 10 x 11 | Blastload | Blast load on members Y 1.0 y Table Ii: STAAD.Pro load case description 4.9 LOAD CASES AND COMBINATIONS RUN THROUGH STAAD.Pro Load Case [Load Case Comb. [Load Type | Description 101 12,3 ULS 102 12,4 ULS 201 123 SLS 202 12,4 SLS 301 1579 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 302 15,79 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 303 15,740 ALS (DESIGN* BLAST) 304 15,710 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 305 157,11 ‘ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 306 457-41 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 307 1589 ALS. (DESIGN+ BLAST) 308 1589 ALS (DESIGN® BLAST) 309 15,810 ‘ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 310 158-10 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 311 15841 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 312 1,5,8,-11 ALS: (DESIGN+ BLAST) 313 1679 [ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 314 167-9 ‘ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 315 1,6,7,10 ALS: (DESIGN+ BLAST) 316 1,6,7,-10 ‘ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) _| 317 1,6,7,11 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 318 167,11 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 319 1,6,8,9 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 320__—*(1.68-9 ‘ALS (DESIGN* BLAST) 321 168,10 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 322 1,68,-10 _ | ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 323 1,6,8,11 ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) 324 168-11 ‘ALS (DESIGN+ BLAST) ‘Table 12: STAAD.Pro load case combinations ee 15 June 2015 38Urry or Satna S 4,10 INPUT UNITS FOR CAES. INPUT UNITS USED... UNITS= ELDFISK- NOM/SCH INPUT ON LENGTH inches FORCE pounds MASS (dynamics) pounds MOMENTS (INPUT) inch-pou MOMENTS (OUTPUT) inch~pou STRESS lbs. /sa. TEMP. SCALE degrees PRESSURE psig ELASTIC MODULUS ibs. /sq. PLPE DENSITY Ibs. /ou INSULATION DENS. Ibs. /eu FLUID DENSITY Ibs. /eu. TRANSL. STIF Abs. /in. ROTATIONAL STIF — in.1b./d UNTFORM LOAD Ub. /in. G LOAD gts WIND LOAD lbs. /sa. ELEVATION inches COMPOUND LENGTK inches DIAMETER inches WALL THICKNESS inches SETUP FILE PARAMETERS [Bl ROSENBERG WortyPersons Grove SAR IL x 25.400 = mm, x 4.448 N. x 0.454 kg. nds x 0.113 = Nam, nds x 0.1130 = Nm in. x 0.007 N./sq.mm, Fox 0.556 c x 0.069 bars in, x 0.007 = N./sq-mm. in. x 27680.000 kg/cu.m. in. x 27680.000 = —kg/cu.m. in, x 27680.000 kg/cu.m. x 0.175 = N/m. eg. x 0.113 = Nim./deg x 0.175 = N/mm. x 1.000 ais in, x 6.895 = KN./sq.m. x 25.400 mm. x 25.400 = mm. x 25.400 = mm. x 25.400 = mm. CONNECT GEOMETRY THRU CNODES = MIN ALLOWED BEND ANGLE MAX ALLOWED BEND ANGLE BEND LENGTH ATTACHMENT PERCENT MIN ANGLE 70 ADJACENT BEND PT LOOP CLOSURE TOLERANCE = THERMAL BOWING HORZ TOLERANCE = AUTO NODE NUMBER INCREMENT= Z AXIS U USE PRESSURE STIFFENING = ALPHA TOLERANCE = RESLD-FORCE = HGR DEP RESWGT STIF DECOMP SNG TOL = BEND AXIAL SHAPE = FRICT STIF = FRICT NORM FORCE VAR = RICT ANGLE VAR FRICT SLIDE MULT = ROD TOLERANCE ROD INC = INCORE NUMERICAL CHECK = OUTCORE NUMERICAL CHECK = DEFAULT TRANS RESTRAINT STIFF= DEFAULT ROT RESTRAINT STIFI IGNORE SPRING HANGER STIFFNESS = MISSING MASS 2PA = MIN WALL MILL TOLERANCE WRC-107 VERSION WRC-107 INTERPOLATION = YES 5.00000 95.0000 1.00000 5.00000 25.4000 9.1000008-03 10.0000 xo No 0.5000008-01 No 0.1751208+12 N. /mm. 0.100000E+11 YES. 175120. 0.150000 15.0000 1.00000 1.00000 2.00000 No) No 0.175120E+12 —N. /nm. 0,1129808+12 N.m./deg No EXTRACTED. 12.5000 wR 79 181/281 LAST VALUE mn. N/m. Sa 15 June 2015 39onary UD orate DEFAULT AMBIENT TEMPERATURE= BOURDON PRESSURE: COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION (MU) = INCLUDE SPRG STIF IN HGR OPE = INCLUDE INSULATION IN AYDROTEST REDUCED INTERSECTION USE wRC329 NO REDUCED SIF FOR RET AND WLT B31.1 REDUCED 2 FIX = CLASS 1 BRANCH FLEX ALL STRESS CASES CORRODED ADD TORSION IN SL STRESS = ADD F/A IN STRESS = OCCASIONAL LOAD FACTOR = DEFAULT CODE = B31.3 SUS CASE SIF FACTOR = ALLOW USERS BEND SIF = USE SCHNEIDER YIELD CRITERION STRESS = use pD/aT BASE HOOP STRESS ON ? = EN13480 USE IN OUTPLANE STF: LIBERAL EXPANSION ALLOWABLE B31.3 SEC 319.2.3C SAKIAL- [ED ROSENBERG 4.00174 c NONE, 0.000000 No No B31.1(POST1980) nO, No YES No Yes. DEEAULT DEEAULT 0.000000 B31.3 1.00000 No No MAX 3D SHEAR No 1D yes YES No B31.3 WELDING/CONTOUR TEE ISB16.9 FALSE PRESSURE VARIATION IN EX? CASI IMPLEMENT B313 APP-P IMPLEMEN? B313 CODE CASE 178 IGNORE B31.1/B31.3 We FACTO: OSE PRP SIF = USE FRE FLEX = BS 7159 Pressure Stiffenin Bmod (axial) Ratio Gnod/Emod (axial) = Ea/Eh*Vh/a Laminate Type Alpha = Density EXCLUDE £2 FROM UKOOA BENDING = EXECUTION CONTROL PARAMETERS Rigid/Expyt Print Flag . Bourdon Option ....+.+ Loop Closure Flag : ‘Thermal Bowing Delta Temp .. Liberal Allowable Flag . Uniform Load Option .... Anbient Plastic Temperature (FRE) Alpha : Plastic (FRP) GMOD/EMODa ... Plastic (FRP) Laminate Type. Eqn Optimizer . sees Node Selection . Eqn Ordering . collins Degree Determination ....... User Eqn Control DEFAULT No No YES YES YES Design strain 22062.7 0.250000 0.152730 THREE, 21.5983 © 1660.80 kg/cu.m. no N./sq.mn. 1,000 +000 2.000 +000 1.000 +000 4.000 ¢ 21.598, +250 3.000 +000 +000 +000 +000 +000 +000 15 June 2015 40So 5.0 MODEL AND CASE STUDIES @ ROSENBERG WonteyParsons Group 5.1 MODEL IN CAESAR IL ‘woDe 130 | NODETHO | NODEISO | NODEW7® [ woDe ISO Figure 18: Caesar ll model ‘A pipe of size 20-inch and material A790 U pipeline system of total length 50m. Three pips JNS $31803 is used in a simplified straight ¢ thicknesses are chosen, the smallest for pipe size 20 inch, 4.73mm and the biggest thickness approved for thin wall calculations, 20.62mm and the size in between the two, 12.70mm. The pipe line dimensions, densities, nodes and parameters are set in an input sheet in Caesar. The pipe line is modeled in the ~Z direction and is supported in ten equally spaced locations of Sm. The pipelines restraint positions for the locations of pipe supports are by piping calculations named as node 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130, 150, 170 and 190, Before node 10 and after node 190 there is a 2,Sm long pipe length to simulate the behavior of a long pipe length with evenly distributed restraint loads. Figure 19: Caesar! input SSS 15 June 2015 aSum [ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group Alll of the restraint nodes are set as sliding restraints with reactions in x and y directions. The restraints used are called double~ cting restraints, because they act in both directions along the line of action. The reaction force in the y direction is multiplied with 0.3 to give friction force in z direction. For the nodes exposed to forced deflection, friction is set for these nodes in Caesar but gives zero in results, Since there is a restraint force in the Y direction, friction has been calculated manualy and given in STAAD.Pro. The function in Caesar II is that the friction coefficient is set on the nodes, and therefore is applied to all load cases, The friction force is only applicable for load cases where thermal expansion accurse. Friction is of course not relevant for blast loads, since the blast is an overly rapid load to be developing friction. The piping analysis will be run with friction, to simplicity and avoid dividing the load cases into multiple runs. Friction is in other words included in Caesar results for restraint loads, but is not included in STAAD.Pro for further calculations of blast loads. For pipe stress and utilization, friction is not required and is therefore run in separate files. For the cases of forced deflections a connection node called Cnode is used. A unique node number for the Cnode and the forced displacement is entered and the restraint node connected to the Cnode. i aa fet Tes Sina NB me Jone) Sit c— |p = | Bo aoee |B =. ER 2 SWE Sores toe (ee fl = ; Figure 20: Caesar input forced deflection ‘The design parameters for the pipe line refer to as T1 for 100C°, T2 for -7C°, PI for 12.1bar. For the temperature it gives different modulus of elasticity that the load cases that includes temperature needs to be connected to in the program. The blast load is implemented on the pipe in 6 different directions, refered to as +WINI for X , -WINI for -X, +WIN2 for Y,- WIN? for ~Y, +WIN3 for Z and -WINS for ~Z. Other factors that needs to be implemented are the Yield Strength at temp Sy100 ~395 Mpa. — 15 June 2015, 42See TEI ROSENBERG ‘The pipe weight with content (W), design parameters and blast loads are then combined into load cases as for different purposes. The load cases marked as operating cases are the cases from where restraint forces are generated from. In this case we need design loads and design+blast loads. The combination of W + T + P are the design loads, which generaly are the vertical load of the operating pipe. In this case we have two temperatures T] and T2 which gives two load cases refered to as LC.4 and LC.S. These load cases also has friction force in the z direction. The pipe support also requires to be designed to withstand blast loads. For explosion in the +y direction the restraint y force will be blast load minus design load of the pipe. For the explosion in the ~y direction the restraint y force will be negative blast load minus design load of the pipe. The highest restraint force will of cource be used further in STAAD.Pro calculations. 5.2 MODEL IN STAAD.PRO With reference to Caesar II, for the restraint force created at node 70 and 90 the support is, fixed to a conerete deck, and for the restraint force created at node 110 and 130 the support is fixed to a steel deck supported by stringers. Sections used in all four pipe support are 200X16SHS for all members. The design loads and design*blast loads for these nodes are taken from Caesar files and put in to STAAD.Pro. The deflection is based from load type of limit state SLS. EET 15 June 2015 43Sime [ROSENBERG a ‘BEAM No.=Lenght (m) NODE 70 7 a 206-11m —= i6-13m | 4 > NODE 90 ie iS6-192m Rann isy-igzm sar2ooacis | 7 (TYP. ALL / SECTIONS) f am ‘REF. PIPE i d i67-t82m z 1%, NODE 130 | 462<0.6m y se \ i 7 inizosm -\"n / z ~ 4 2h wes ee el oe Figure 21:STAAD Pro, Beam numbers ts ¥ «= | ba 1 @ » by e ae Z 4Y we 7? vy a 7 jor Xen realise Xdvetonto, \ soit a) 7) 05 mm Figure 22: STAAD.Pro. Nodes on the supports 15 June 2015 44Seek. ROSENBERG % *n os WOH om tenet tinge be snouonsein Fy ge \ ta y eo 4 140x8SHS =3.91m ah (OFF) 4 Figure 23: STAAD.Pro material and dimension Eel 15 June 2015 45Sr. [ROSENBERG sons Grou, 5.3 CASE STUDIES This thesis will be separated into four cases. the first ease: The established practice where structural and piping stress analyses are run separately. Pipe analysis: For the calculation of pipe stress and loads on the pipe lines restraint positions, the s! like deflection. ng supports are assumed without considering the structural stiffness, ‘Structural analysis: The pipe support loads generated at the pipe lines restraints in Caesar in the first case will be used for analyzing the supports in Staad.Pro 2. The second ease: Structural and piping stress analyses will be run combined Pipe analysis: For the calculation of pipe stress and loads on the pipe lines restraint positions, the deck deflection calculated in the first case in node 110 and 130, for structural analysis will be taken into considerations. The supports for node 70 and 90 are fixed to concrete deck and are assumed to be zero. Structural analysis: The pipe support loads generated at the pipe lines restraints in ‘Caesar in the second case will be used for analyzing the supports in Staad.Pro The third ease: Structural and piping stress analyses will be run combined Pipe analysis: For the calculation of pipe stress and loads on the pipe lines restraint positions, the max acceptable deck deflection (1/200) for structural analysis will be taken into considerations in node 110 and node 130. ‘Structural analysis: The pipe support loads generated at the pipe lines restraints in Caesar in the third case will be used for analyzing the supports in Staad,Pro. 4. ‘The fourth case: In this case the pipe support for node 110 and 130 are set to fail, which means that these two pipe supports will not take any loads from the pipe. Pipe analysis: For the calculation of pipe stress and loads on the pipe lines restraint positions, the sliding supports are assumed without considering the structural stiffness, like deflection, Structural analysis: The pipe support loads generated at the pipe lines restraints in Caesar in the fourth case will be used for analyzing the supports in Staad.Pro hv 15 June 2015 46sewer WorityParsons Group Soe. [BW ROSENBERG Piping analysis Reaction forces on the pipe line restraints Utilization of the pipe line for load cases hydro test, sustained, occasional and expansion stress. Deflection between supports. Structural analysis: Deck deflection to be checked for node 92, 93, 100 and 102 (STAAD.Pro reference). Utilization of support beams. Displacements in the pipe support connection between support and pipe line. Nodes to be checked are node 129, 128, 127 and 126 (STAAD. pro reference) 15 June 2015 a7Soe. 6.0 COMPARISON OF RESULTS [EB ROSENBERG ‘erloyPersans Grow 6.1 PIPE STRESS RESULT AND UTILIZATION © Pipe size: 508mm, 4.78mm wall thickness. Table 13 - 16 Table 13: The first case: Without structural influence. Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) [Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 60 395 10 15.2 Li (max overall) Sustained Stress 396 205.9 10 192 13 (max overall) Occasional Tis 42 70 Ba 24-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 0 479.9 0 (max overall) "Table 13: Reference APPENDIK C. 5OB.A,78. Without tr Table 14: The seco Forced deflection -2,23mm in node 110 and -2,24mm in node 130. Reference table 25 nd case: With structure al influence. ructural influence, sess report Cheek Code Siress (MPa) [ Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 0 395 10 15,2 Ul (max overall) Sustained Stress 396 205.9 10 192 3 (max overall) Occasional 115.4 494.2 10 234 124-L27 (max overall) Expansion Stress 87 80,1 150 18 131 (max overall) Table 1: Reference APPENDIX, 50B..78, With structural influence, Hess report Table 15: The third case: With structural influence. Max forced deflection -24mm in node 110 and node 130, Cheek Code Stress (MPa) [ Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 60 395 10 15,2 ia (max overall) ‘Sustained Stress 39,6 — 205,9 10 19,2 13 (max overall) Occasional 134 4942 10 24 124-027 (max overall) Expansion Stress 36 480.3 90 195 T3t (max overall) “Table 15: Reference APPENDIX C. 508.4.78, With structural influence, max deflection, Stress report 15 June 2015 48Soe. ‘Table 16: The fourth cas [ED ROSENBERG The support in node 110 and 130 is failing / removed. {Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 94,2 395 150 BS Tl (max overall) Sustained Stress BS 2059 150 358 13 (max overall) Occasional 416 442 150 34 L24127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 0 BI 0 (max overall) “Table 16: Reference APPENDIKC. 5084.78, Fling suppor ih node 110 and 120, stress report «Pipe size: SO8mm, 12.70 mm wall thickness. Table 17-20, Table 17: The first case: Without structural influence. Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 22,9 395 10 38 UI (max overall) ‘Sustained Stress 15,6 2059 10 76 13 (max overall) ‘Occasional aS 4942 10 2 24-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 0 302.2 0 (max overall) “able 17, 508.12.70, Without sractral fluence, ess repor Table 18: The second case: With structural influence. Forced deflection -2.5mm in node 110 and -2.5mm in node 130. Reference table 26 Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 2,9 395 10 58 LI (max overall) Sustained Stress 15,6 205.9 10 76 13 (max overall) ‘Occasional 5 4942 10 92 24-127 (max overall) ‘Expansion Stress 38 303 90 19 TSI (max overall) ‘Table 18: 08.12.70, With strucrural influence, stress report 15 June 2015 49onersity UD et stornger Table 19: The third case: With structural influence. Max forced deflection -24mm in node 110 and node 130. ROSENBERG ‘WorleyParsons Grove, Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) _| Node | Utilization % [ Load case Hydro test Stress 29 395 10 38 LI (max overall) Sustained Stress 156 205.9 10 76 3 (max overall) ‘Occasional BS 442 10 92 124-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 93,7 503 90 18,6 L31 (max overall) “able 19; 50812, 70, With siructral uence, max deflection, Stress report Table 20: The fourth case: The support in node 110 and 130 is failing / removed, Check ‘Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 40.9 395 150 10,4 i (max overall) Sustained Stress 33,6 205,9 150 16,3 3 (max overall) ‘Occasional 186,6 4942 150 378 124-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 0 3039 0 (imax overall) Table 20: 508.12.70, Fling suppartin rode 110 and 130, stress report © Pipe size: SO8mm, 20.62 mm wall thickness. Table 21- 24 Table 21: The first case: Without structural influence Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa)_| Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 144 395 10 3.6 Li (max overall) ‘Sustained Stress 10,1 2059 | 10 49 13 (max overall) — Occasional 24 494.2 10 39 124-027 (max overall) | Expansion Stress 0 0 (max overall) 3508.5 | Table 21 508.20.62. Without structural influence, stress report 15 June 2015 50ae, ir} ROSENBERG UY era ROSENBERC Table 22: The second case: With structural influence Forced deflection -2.75mm in node 110 and node 130. Reference table 27 Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hydro test Stress 144 395 10 3,6 LI (max overall) Sustained Stress 10,1 205,9 10 49 13 (max overall) Occasional 29.4 4942 10 359 124-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 10.7 508,2 90 21 Lt (max overall) Table 22: 508 20.67, With srucrural fluence, stress repor Table 23: The third case: With structural influence Max forced deflection -24mm in node 110 and node 130 Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) _| Node Toad case_| Hydro test Stress 144 395 10 ia (max overall) Sustained Stress 10,1 205.9 10 a9 13 (max overall) Occasional DA 42 70 39 24-127 (max overall) | Expansion Stress BS 3082 90 185 13t (max overall) “Table 23: S08.20.6, With structural influence, max deflection, Stress report ‘Table 24: The fourth case: The support in node 110 and 130 is failing / removed Check Code Stress (MPa) | Allow. (MPa) | Node | Utilization % | Load case Hyaro test Stress 288 395 150 73 LI (max overall) L ‘Sustained Stress 246 205.9 150 119 13 (max overall) ‘Occasional 1234 42 150 25 124-127 (max overall) Expansion Stress 0 508.9 0 (max overall) "Table 28; 508.20.62, Falling support i node 110 and 130, stress report The results of utilizations in table 13-24 is presented in graphs 1-4 for hydro test, sustained, occasional and expansion stress, for all four case studies and all three pipe wall thicknesses. — 15 June 2015 51Sok [ROSENBERG ‘WorteyParsons UTILIZATION IN HYDRO TEST STRESS 5 20 z 15 g 10 —s0a%a.78 —s0902.70 5 i —s0x20.62 ot Fist case | Secondease | Thidease | Fourth case sonar 352 152 152 238 som 70 s8 58 58 108 —s0e2062, 36 36 36 73 cases raph 2: Utilization of pipe in hydro test stress UTILIZATION IN SUSTAINED STRESS 40 35 20 z 25 § 20 5 15 508x478 10 —s0en12.70 5 a= —soex20.62 Firstease | Secondcase | Third cate | Fourthease soars 192 192 192 358 5080270 76 76 76 163 —soaa062, 49 as a9 ng casts Graph 2: Utlization of pipe in sustained stress 15 June 2015 52UD Strate ROSENBERG UTILZATION IN OCCASIONAL STRESS x0 - 0 ® 0 3 60 5 “0 —s00K4.78 2» —508x12.70 » sess wo pe ° First case ‘Second case ‘Third case Fourth case sie eee 8a som) 52 aaa css UTILIZATION IN EXPANSION STRESS » 8 ts * & 2 5 8 —s08x8.78 6 —508x12.70 4 —— 508x20.62 2 2 First case ‘Second case Third case Fourth case 508x478 ° 18 19,5 I 0 ee ee sosanse 6 a oes Graph 4: Utilization of pipe in expansion stress ee 15 June 2015 53et, [EDROSENBERG WioreyParsons Group 6.2 RESTRAINT FORCES IN Y-DIRECTION Graph 5-7 is restraining forces in y-direction due to design load (W+T+P), for comparison of first case and second case. Ref. LC.4 and LC.S in appendix for restrain loads Desi RESTRAINT FORCEIN DIRECTION, PPE SOBx4 78 SoS oe boom — _ a Ti |5 |S eae ae ae ae Graph 5: Reference APPENDIX C for design restraint force in y-direction, pipe SOBXA.78 DESIGN RESTRAINT FORCE IN ¥-DRECTION, PPE 508%12.70 fs As ix — =a he ae SSS Soe Graph 6: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe S08x12.70 DESIGN RESTRAINT FORCE! V-DIRECTION, PPE SoBK20.62 om 000 2000 = som0 rte scant 0m ASTRANT once NY DRECTION os) russ nig 96 a6 aon | ow aOw | a9 as | ass | a0 SSsondcie 2202 | 3075207 470 | asm 70656 | 4530 439 | 2977 Graph 7: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508%20.62 15 June 2015 54@ ROSENBERG WoneyParsona Groue Graph 8-10 is restraining forces in y-direction due to design with blast load (W+T+P-WIN2), for comparison of first case and second case. Ref. LC.9 and LC.15 in appendix for restrain loads. DESIGNSBLAST RESTRAINT FORCE! V-DIRECTION, PPE 5088.78 22000 sa00 SFratae —anaas/ ssese sagso 93 gat 2504 12539 12490 TIRE 13285 Ssecendeae 19307 -11R0 12986 ANIM ABIL ata aA sR IR2e 1M sTRANT FORGE YORECTION Graph 8: Reference APPENDIX for design+blast restraint force in y-direction, pipe SOBx.78 DESIGNSBLAST RESTRAINT FORCEIN DIRECTION, PIPE SO8K12.70 21500 22900 12590 13000 23500 24000 seein —Sreitene iar tea aaae ast anise aay1e 9st asaas 12s0_as787 seconbaie 13794 “12200 42501 12347 44536 12309, a2RAK 26728 1590 13897 Graph 9: designsblast restraint force in y-ection, pipe S08x12.70 DrSIGNSSLST RESTRANT FORCEIN-OECTION, PPE SoHtzO.62 ss sas ‘ae same se tee ‘seo estan FRE -ORECTION Sfistexe tate -tnaq0 to tase Aisa? as7 ase ara A690 eA Sseindenie -ez6 12589 -t4gae 42259 48946 12498 12479 0437 1509-24003 Graph 10: designsblast restraint force in y-direction, plpe 508%20.62 —_——— 15 June 2015 55ater ROSENBERG § IH ROSENBERG Graph 11-13 is restraining forces in y-direction due to design load (W+T+P), for comparison of all four case studies. Ref. LC.4 and LC.5 in appendix for restrain loads. DESIGN RESTRAINT FORCE IN V-OIRECTION, PPE SOB¥4.78 2 sm B s000 5 ow 2 sow Bom sce B soo secant 5 20000 — Wied cae tae (mw un as ue ns ns ae pe an 20 Sseandeawe 1372 158 1538 | soon Vs S76 900 IM 938 ns SMirdcse 186 [toa tas 3505 | 6550 | 189 ABI oe sO 4738 SFoutheae 950 00 | 356 | 360) m0 om om aa 4st 4am Graph 11: Reference APPENDIX C for design restraint force in y-dtection, pipe S08x4.78 DESIGN RESTRAINT FORCEIN V-OIRECTION, PPE S06x12.70, Z st00 gow 3 sage 5 owe E —rstene 2 aco —secontene Fa en Bp oo sam mw 1 two | Pome Fiseoe 2 a8 arm aoe 1676 3676 A6H8 7.02 asH8 a idene 28 ate est aan ISI aM ee aE GN aR Sfommnese 1776 a) rose 2424534 Ono 400 4547 -2m aL Graph 12: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe S08x12,70 DESIGN RESTRAINT FORCE IN Y-DIRECTON, PPE Soaxa0.s2 i san 5 som gt —Festeme su seconde a) thi case Race zig aoe aus aon som ae aon |i aes Sentero ayn | ar 1508700456 | 870-459 77 Sthidease ras ae | anos anal owes sonst (20999) wk 3H routhase | z0r i839 | 50 S62 060 0m | 3535 | 209 | 2482 Graph 13: design restraint force in y-direction, pipe S08x21 15 June 2015 56rere § ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group Graph 14-16 is restraining forces in y-direction due to design with blast load (W+T+P-WIN2) for comparison of all four case studies. Ref. LC.9 and LC.15 in appendix for restrain loads. DESIGNSGLAST RESTRAINT FORCE IN Y-OIRECTN, PPE S08%4.78, 260 16494 37698 9570 38089 S620 00 sept 162 aa 11958 us 158 —Fecie Graph 14: Reference APPENDIX C for designéblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe SOBxS.78 DESIGNIBLAST RESTRAINT FORCE IN Y-ORECTION, PIPE S8x12.70 0 sooo 0000 2oa00 3400 | Bi aos past sas 0787 31590 13897 5930 14838 157715498 sass 11578 508 seins asa Graph 15: designsblast restraint force in y-direction, pipe 508%12.70 DOESIGNOLAST RESTRAINT FORCEIN VOIRECTION, PPE 5082062 soo 2000 soano san 458 M69 1407 145 35808 2558 22008 saa 10452 3028 so routheae 30.27 Graph 16; designsblast restraint force in y-drection, pipe 508%20.62 rece seconde insect 15 June 2015 57st IB ROSENBERG 6.3 DISPLACEMENTS IN Y-DIRECTION For design loads, LC.4 gives the highest deflections and is described in graphs 17-19 for comparison of all four case studies for the pipe wall sizes. OAD CASE 4.O/SPLACEMENT RY-DIRECTION, PPE 0834.78, LS PACEMENT Secon 030s aan ome -ai77 "298 a1 28 -Lnl Ooe as| iScie O45 O05 O60 Oss 29M) 145) 24 28M_-34 4156 207 07 |O3E ark 8401 000 in a309 79 47e4 3817 Eas aati Are 0778 932/035] Graph 17: Reference APPENDIX Cfor design displacement in y-direction, pipe 5088.78 LOAD CASE 6, ISPLACEMENT IN Y-ORECTION, PIE 508%32.70, 7 I 5 i» secondo a026 O07 O06 996-002 0 O06 0 06 a07i om, -OMT Seonscase 0264 201 0056 0.7 0467 125 25 3051, 25 |. 0182 0158-0378 Sida on oor opr agar 207 sho) a aK7s 24 a 236 OnE ass Fewase|0258 4036, Oot gare datt 2507 56 5205 448) 4516 01 087] OOH Graph 18: design displacement in y-direction, pipe S08x22.70 LOAD CASE 4, DISPLACEMENT IN DIRECTION, PIPE 508%20.62 Bos : —seondene tisrase ane omm a0e aoe ans|9p0, 9 G08 0 too ane oan om senda 021 ame 008 94s Oat2 1356 275 33m 275 ase 02 os 0am dee 036 065 ones dem 2351 s248| 26 2475 2A Le 29970 0573 tearnet 0207 me 402036) 033 2007 4339 499/439 go 0329) 010 008 Graph 19: for design displacement in y-direction, pipe 508%20.62, 15 June 2015, 58nse i} ROSENBERG 1D) ot Sratver BERG For design with blast loads, LC.9 gives the highest deflections and is described in graphs 20- 22 for comparison of all four case studies for the pipe wall sizes. LOAD CAS 9, ISPLACEMENT IN-IRECTON, PPE 0834.78 g ° iene GGraph 20: Reference APPENDIX Cfor designtbiast displacement in y-direction, pipe S08x4.78 {OAD CASE 9 DISPLACEMENT INY-ORECTION IPE 50811270 ioe — 5 ees istcoe 211 0108 0589 oak cast oant 0 9488 008 055) O20 28 some 2407-021 0598-0513 0399/44) -25 3477-25 48 432 037 291 Graph 21: designsblast displacement in y-direction, pipe 508%12.70 LOAD CASE 9, DISPLACEMENT IN V-DIRECTION, PIPE S08120.62, Ait 108 a38/93e O208|0an9 o3%8] 0 93s 0 O38 a3 015 1408 seconds 1997 014 035 GaMi| 987 ARS) 27S 36H 27S 466 G41 Oe I90 Std gears |oas eam] sare 3,79, 24202241173 4489 O87 4518 teartase 34 aane|a2e8 9m 236k 409 2687 9146 I6e sn 2506 081 8 Graph 22: design+blastdisplacement.n y-direction, pipe 508%20.62 —— 15 June 2015 59So. [ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group “¢ igure 24: Pipe S08x4.78.qThe third case. LC.9 (OPE) W+D1+T1+PI-WIN2 15 June 2015 60ve i I ROSENDERS 6.4 STRUCTURAL DECK DEFLECTION Deck deflection is taken from load type SLS for nodes #92, #93, #100 and #102. Reference figure 22 in chapter 5.2 for locations of nodes. Table 25-27 and graph 23 describes deck deflection result from STAAD.Pro. © Pipe size: 508mm, 4.78 mm wall thk Feooe [row] | tomo | Mev Tne | uc [amr | SSS | pettmcae wan fe fm fos | am fm pm | ae | an mo ‘5Otie 78 Cy Ea 2,088 va | ao | 28 Firs oe 50th 78 8 2 2258 7 soo | 201 226 Fit cae saa ff |e we [ae |e re wan [= | a | en | aw fm fo | a7 | am | sate wen [= | |e mpm | ox cee wa | @ | |e @ [= | 2 mee sein [= [| 98 @ [= | ies = ‘able Pipe se 50a TE. Deak aeiecion © Pipe size: 508mm, 12.70 mm wall thk ree [aoe] ve | Ante | ee ve [aomwom] Sel] neat ‘soni270 | 92 ED 2.496 “280 war | 201 2498 20 ‘Fintewe Er ce a vw [| a7 Te sn [=| mae ve [= | 8 Face sna [= [| ane vo | me | am Tae wenn [a [| en [ae [mpm | | amo | Sade waa [= | | ian ve [a | ie Semieue waa [=| | om vw | a | to — re ec woo [a0 [aoe = "Tabi 26: Pipe sire S082 70. Deck defection © Pipe size: 508mm, 20.62 mm wall thk eve [one | te | Amt | Mel Tos | uc [amet] Savona, | teases sama fe [mfp [we perp a | aes Fanon sama [| 2 | 2s @ | | a Fae seme _[ = | m | 2 ve |= ae ra mae |» | me | ass vw [mr | ae rao wae [= fmf iam | ae [@ | |i | ae | sate wane | | ma we [am [as = same [= | mr | ise Ce = same |» [me [ ian wwe [ae [as Sota ‘Table 27: Pipe size 508520 62. Deck deflection ee 15 June 2015 61ee IB ROSENBERG DEFLECTION DEVELOPMENT FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES Festeate secondcave 05 —sona78 —s00a2.70 —son20.62 DEFLECTION (men) 2s | J a Graph 23: Deck deflection development for cfferent pipe sizes 6.5 PIPE SUPPORT UTILIZATION Graph 24-26 is utilization of all beam members in all four pipe supports for comparison of all four case studies for the pipe wall sizes. The pipe supports are exposed to design and blast loads from the pipe and direct blast loads on the supports. Reference figure 21 in chapter 5.2 for locations of beam numbers. 15 June 2015, 62ROSENBERG I ROSENBERG ja. 180 v0 v9.0 aso 0e iW" tsr0 | 980'0 | sav | stro evo 790 | ¢9e'0 | Y9¥'0 vivo e9e0 €9'0 | 90 Lio v9e'0 v9e'O aH! wt sor Tor vero gu’o sco s9€'0 see'0 | t6c'0 Tee ceo te EEO ees G80 68r'0 EVO ES ‘90 1£0 WO Em EHO Ge GO Luro LUO BVO ao 6sr' 680 | Gav Gm’ zavo €1'0 ELD S9E'0 s9e'0 | c6C'O 6D UO zUe'O wuO wLyO Leo LUO Te'O LUvO ze Gi 3589 yunoy BSE PIL @ ase pUODeE MT aseD 8 mL oN Kv 0 | var | vivo | cov | 1av0 | zor |zov0 v0 | s¥Z0) ves't | vest sso S800 | eRY0 | gar [ase uunod w ao piu T vox | S| ist 9st TSE Ost | Soe Syl bet vt soz set vet 8LPX80S Adld ‘IMOddAS Adld JO NOLLWZTTLLA, ‘se2 pu02as mt rr) ° ot et Nowvarnin Graph 24: Utilization of pipe support, pipe 5084.78 63 15 June 20152 & a = a a eee 2 ce “ON WS Sse |e [ate fer favo et [nebo [ero {are Le [ee [em [ewe [eww [ere fee [ee Soon eo eho ory ey eh Ged xd eo ath ath a sud eh an et end SORE ‘Tz9'0_| ¥29'0 | 99e’0 vov'0 vav'0 eLv'0 LuL'0 9960 99E'0 _ 90 940 GLO GLv0 SIZ GLO 9ev'0 oew'O | ASE NEA a ahetetetet- a | 1 I we vo — = = —1 8 ———— n . _ aan z OL71¥80S AdId ‘IMOddNS Add 10 NOLLVZITLLN u EB 64 GGraph 25: Utllzation of pipe suppor, pipe 508%12.70 15 June 2015Bm Rosensene erst § ase \uunogm 2se> pum ase>puod9sm aseD SIR oN Waa Ts'o |¥s¥'0 |siv0 | 9s00 stv [stro | ero [vero | 1000 (000 [ovo [oro ero | 60 exci | aiet | s00 | sa Zoro 200 |S6E0 850 TIS TIF |6w"O 68 S60 SECO vevO vevO Ger Giro 8wo ao exo vO v0" Tivo TSO TSO 65" 65VO (90 C0 ForO exCD GED oO TOLD TLD IO 50 |s9r0 BHO |EOrO HOF v25'0 290 L9€'0 490 Lov’ LaO TeL'O TeL'0 9"'0 L9e'O 96E'O 6e'0 vO BO vav'O vay’ Biz’ B70 | TavO TevO cor | zor | co SOL WOT GST BOL USE_| GEOG EST OSE soe cyt owt ev_| soz ser | ver zer Teeny pee 0 0 79 OCX80S Adld ‘IUOddNS Add 40 NOLVZITLLA "0 | 68V0 | aseoyunos ase pas 970 89¥'0 | 85e2 pucras| sents ° 2 3 5 Graph 26: Utilization of pipe support, pipe 508x20.62 65 15 June 2015S22. [ED ROSENBERG Parsons Grow 6.6 STRUCTURAL PIPE SUPPORT DISPLACEMENT Pipe support displacements are taken from load type SLS for nodes #129, #128, #127 and #126. The nodes are in the location of connection between pipe and pipe supports. Reference figure 22 in chapter 5.2 for locations of nodes. The pipe supports are exposed to design and last loads from the pipe and direct blast loads on the supports. Table 28-30 and graph 27-29 describes the pipe support displacement results from STAAD.Pro comparing all four case studies for the pipe wall sizes. =a 3 . est —| dar ‘Table 28: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x478 and pipe support Node | ue xctransmm | y-transmm | z-transmm | absolute mm case am 3s 3 Sor 2507 3 nese ‘Table 25: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x12.70 and pipe Suppor. Neat we | ereanemm | veteansmm | 2rranzmm | Avseiuce mm cose 9208 3 3a 335 27 Fist a2¢—| aor 2 2.363 “a7 257 a7 [30 2 2785. pecs esr aa [—30r 3 B08 a2 De 201 7 “isi i936 3] ar o 37 co Tsar as _| 02 2. 30,267 77 7] er ° S208 a8 | 200 2. Tourn ae ag8_| 208 a a7 [a7 % ae [20 2 sas. 1.86 Table 30: Displacements in connection between pipe 508%20.62 and pipe suppor. 15 June 2015 661) erat ROSENBERG u “WorleyParsons Group Dirac ne LOR FE 7 iS it i ‘ ssteordeae | in =o = a steutrene a cas om os foe = 7 = et — a 7 is aa cron 27 bene incracon eee pe 478 and pe po DisLACEMENT PE SPP 9 * zoo i: Bos tence ° 129) 128 W 26 mfemtncer See| — iw a a i => in ar = Graph 28: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x12.70 and pipe support bisuacesenr nse sro ee Boe : i: Fooree g 2 atid case 2 oo pFourth case 2 25 a Be ane [mFistease an as 2882 298 se| — tar —| — Sar ar om os = 7 o Sareea Graph 29: Displacements in connection between pipe 508x20.62 and pipe support 15 June 2015 67I ROSENBERG Sate. pipe support. Load case 201: STAD. Figure 25: Displacements in In pipe support. Load case 202: STAAD.Pro 15 June 2015Sa I ROSENBERG 7.0 THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS 7.1 PIPE ANALYSIS Thin wall qualifications. + > 10 t ‘Smallest wall thickness chosen, 508 x 4.78: a2 = 52.138 Biggest wall thickness chosen 508 x 20.62: 233.38 _ 11 318 20.62 Minimum required net thickness calculated: 1210-508 = 1.489 mm 2-(205946-1 + 1210-0.4) Pipe size chosen for calculations: 508x4.78 (mm): Cross sectional area of pipe A =p -@)= 7 (sos? — 498.442) = 7.557% 10° mm? Section modulus of pipe 0.508* — 0.49844") = 9.418 10 = 4 _gt)= —_ 32D 32-0.508 Area moment of inertia of pipe (0.5084 0.498444) = 2.302% 1074 Weight of pipe 508 x 4.78: 0.508 — 0.498442).8027-9.81 = 595.056 Nim Weight of water: =(e) pipe 5 0.498447 1000-9.81 = 1.914% 10° Nim 595.056 + 1914 = 2.509 10° N/m ae 15 June 2015 69Seem. [BU ROSENBERG \eyParvons Grows 7.2 PIPE STRESS CALCULATIONS Calculations done for pipe 508 x 4.78: N Sonn Pd _ mm 1.21-498.44 7 Hoop stress: oj = — = ——_ = 63.087 N/mm’ u 2 mm 2.4.78 7.2.1 FIRST CASE Without structural influence. For data reference to APPENDIX C Max bending stress due to design load. occur in node 10 and 190, ref Appendix kN-m = 8.32 N/mm? HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST Axial stress induced by internal pressure in hydrostatic condition: Case 1 (HYD) WW+HP No mn! s eb Pe mm | 2049848 Syd A pg? mm? 508? — 498.447 Code stress in hydrostatic pressure test node 10 and 190 Shyd = (|Sapal + Se)? (2-8,)°= ¥([51.643] + 8.32)" + (2-0) = 59.963 Nimm? Hydrostatic code stress: 59.963 N/mm? < Allowable stress: Sy = 395 N/mm? 15 June 2015 70Sete TEROSENBERG WorleyParsons SUSTAINED CONDITION Axial stress induced by internal pressure in sustained condition: Case 3 (SUS) W+P1 N 2 2 3™m 2 Ped mm : = = TM N29 51 244 Nimm? pa 2 2 2 -d mm 508° — 498.44" Code stress in sustained condition node 10 and 190 SL= (|Ss, + se)? +(28)?= 4([31.244] + 8:32)? + 2-0)" = 39.564 Nimm? Sustained code stress: 39.6 Nimm? < Allowable stress: S, = 205.9 N/mm? OPERATIONAL CONDITION ASME B31.3 does not consider the operating load case a "stress compliance case", and therefore provides no equation for the allowable stress. The pipe stresses determined for operating load cases are not "code" stresses and are therefore not used in any sort of pass/fail criterion. OCCASIONAL CONDITION Occasional load cases taken into consideration of stress compliance is L18 ~ L29 From the result in chapter 6.1.1, the highest stress occurs in load case L24-L27 Reference to APPENSIX C: Load Case 27 (OCC) L27=L21+L3 (W+P1-WIN2) ‘Max bending stress due to design and blast load occur in node 10 and 190 S, Moce _ KN: 94.17 Nim? eco W my Axial stress induced by internal pressure in sustained condition: Case 3 (SUS) W+P1 N 2 nm 1.21.498.447 508” ~ 498.447 = 31.244 N/mm? 15 June 2015 nnSven. IEPROSENBERG Code stress in occasional condition node 10 and 190 - 5 )?s(28)*= Jca12a4] « B41T2s O02 2 So= (|Saus * Sboce) (2-81) ( [31.244] + 84.17)" + (2-0)" = 115.414 Némm’ According to NORSOK L-002. Section: 6.8. Explosion loads Maximum allowable stress in blast case shall be the minimum of 2.4.x Spor 1.5 x Sy Where Sy is the ASME B 31.3 allowable stress limit and Sy is the pipe material yield stress. In this case 2,4 x Sy is relevant. ‘The Allowable stress in blast case is given: 2,4-205.9 = 494.16 N/mm? Occasional code stress: 115.4N/mm? < Allowable stress: 494.2 N/mm2 EXPANSION CONDITION For this case the pipe is straight and without any bends leading to bending stress for the expansion condition. There is also no axial stress occurring in expansion condition. 7.2.2. SECOND CASE With structural influence in the form of forced deflection -2.23mm in node 110 and -2.24mm in node 130 for pipe size 508x4.78 Max bending stress still occurs in node 10 and node 190 for hydrostatic, sustained and occasional condition. The forced deflection is small and located almost in the middle of the pipe and has no impact on the bending stress and axial stress for hydrostatic, sustained and occasional condition. For data reference to APPENDIX C. Sw 15 June 2015 2Some [ROSENBERG ‘WeorieyPartons Grove EXPANSION CONDITION Because the deflection is forced and widespread from a point on the pipe creating a sharper bend than for a natural deflection, bending stress will occur. Max bending stress will occurs in node 150 of the pipe for case 31 (EXP) L5-L3 (=T2) se= [([S.4l +55,,,) #28) [jo} + 8.71? + 2.07 8.71 N/mm? The Allowable Displacement Stress Range, S, is given: Sy 28. 8. is code stress in sustained condition for node 150 2 2 (|S + $5...) + (2.8,)%= y{({31.244) + 5.72) + 2-0) Sq = £-[1.25-(Se + Sp) ~ Si|= 1.0:]1.25-(206.84 + 205.9) - 36.964] = 478.961 N/mm? 36.964 N/mm? Expansion code stress Sp: 8.71 N/mm? < Allowable stress Sq: 479N/mm2 —__——— 15 June 2015 3te Bi ROSENBERG 7.2.3. THIRD CASE With structural influence in the form of maximum forced deflection -24mm in node 110/111 and -24mm in node 130/131 for pipe size 508x4.78 Max bending stress still occurs in node 10 and node 190 for hydrostatic, sustained and occasional condition. The forced deflection has no impact on the bending stress and axial stress for hydrostatic, sustained and occasional condition. For data reference to APPENDIX. EXPANSION CONDITION Max bending stress will occurs in node 90 of the pipe for case 31 (EXP) LS-L3 (=T2) +S, yr (2-8)7= ¥clol + 93.55)? + 2.0)" exp) SE= ([Sog 13.55. N/mm’ The Allowable Displacement Stress Range, Sq is given: Sy 2S. Si is code stress in sustained condition for node 90 - 2 2 csi24d » 55024002 = 2 SL= (|Soux + Spas) + (28) ( [31.244] + 5.56)° + (2-0) = 36.804 N/mm’ Sq = f-|1,25-(S_ + Sq) — S_|= 1.0-|1.25-(206.84 + 205.9) — 36.804] = 479.121 N/mm? Expansion code stress Sp: 93.55 N/mm? < Allowable stress S4: 479N/mm? SS 15 June 2015 4So. [ROSENBERG 7.2.4 FOURTH CASE The contact between supports in node 110 and and pipe is failing. The support in node 110 and 130 is experiencing deflection, leading to a gap between support and pipe For data reference to APPENDIX C. HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST Axial stress induced by internal pressure in hydrostatic condition: Case 1 (HYD) WW+HP Code stress in hydrostatic pressure test node 10 and 190 Shya = ( [Saal + Se) + (2:8)? ¥({s1.643] + 42.54)" + (2-0) = 94.183 Nimm? Hydrostatic code stress: 94.2 N/mm? < Allowable stre: 395 Nimm? SUSTAINED CONDITION Axial stress induced by internal pressure in sustained condition: Case 3 (SUS) W+P1 _1.21-498.447 508” ~ 498,447 31.244 Nimm* 15 June 2015 75UY Sire [Eg ROSENBERG WorteyPartons Group Code stress in sustained condition node 150 _ 2 S22 2 0). = 2. SL= (|Seusl + So) + (2-8) /([31.244] + 42.56)? + (2-0) = 73.804 N/mm’ Sustained code stress: 73.8 N/mm? < Allowable stress: Sy = 205.9 N/mm? OCCASIONAL CONDITION Occasional load cases taken into consideration of stress compliance is L18 ~ L29 From the result in chapter 6.1.1, the highest stress occurs in load case L24-L27 Reference to appendix: Load Case 27 (OCC) L27=L21+L3 (=WIN4+W+P1) ‘Max bending stress due to design and blast load occur in node 150 s, = Mee So =430.4 Nimm? < OW m Axial stress induced by internal pressure in sustained condition: Case 3 (SUS) W+P1 = 31.244 N/mm? Code stress in occasional condition node 150 So= ( s, | +S, ys (2-8)?= y((31.244] + 430.4) + (2-0) = 461.644 Nimm? sus] ” "Poo Occasional code stress: 461.64 N/mm? < Allowable stress: 494.2 N/mm? EXPANSION CONDITION For this case the pipe is straight and without any bends leading to bending stress for the expansion condition. There is also no axial stress occurring in expansion condition, 15 June 2015, 6ROSENBERG S Unversity of Savage RYSENDE 8.0 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION PIPE STRESS UTILIZATION For the results of pipe stress utilization the thinnest wall size has a significantly higher utilization for all cases in hydro test stress, sustained stress and occasional stress, compared to the two larger wall sizes. Especially there is an increase in the fourth case, where the smallest pipe size has almost twice as high incline than the two large pipe sizes that behaves more parallel to each other. The expectation was that the three pipe wall thicknesses would behave more by the ratio of the area, but the combination of the different stiffhesses of the pipe wall sizes, weight of content and pressure is decisive for the results, In the occasional stress where both design load and blast load has an impact on the case of two failing supports (node 110 and node 130), gives a high 93,4% utilization for pipe thickness 4.79mm, compared to a much less utilization of 35,8% for sustained stress. The fourth case is not necessarily a realistic situation, but it shows that an increase in the bending moment which in this case is due to the addition of blast load can have a huge effect on pipe stress for lines with small wall thicknesses. In general comparing the first, second and third case for hydrotest stress, sustained stress and occasional stress within the pipe thickness sizes there is not any changes on the utilization, For expansion stress to occur, a change in direction in the form of an elbow needs to be included. For expansion stress, the only cases that give any results are the forced deflection cases. The fourth case that has large natural deflection gives zero results for expansion. The results for expansion stress are not very high, and give little difference between the pipe sizes. The dri ing influence is the size of the deflection. 15 June 2015 7Ses [EU ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Grow RESTRAINT FORCES AND DISPLACEMENT IN Y-DIRECTION FOR PIPELINE In graphs 5-10 the results shows that in the second case, the restraint forces in the nodes exposed to forced deflection are decreasing as the pipe thickness is increasing. This leads to a higher fluctuating restraint forces for the nodes next to the nodes exposed to the forced deflection. By using ten supports in this thesis the results showes the impact radius from the forced deflection in node 110 and 130. The restraint load in node 10 which is the fifth support from node 110 has no impact from the deflection. Graphs 11-13 shows that an input of maximum accepted structural deck deflection limit in node 110 and 130 (the third case) leads to large hold down loads in node 110 and 130, and the larger the pipe wall thickness the more increasing is the hold down force. This leads to a higher fluctuating restraint forces for the nodes next to node 110 and 130. By comparing the third case results in graphs 11-13 with grafs 17-19 in chapter 6.3, the design restraint force in y-direction for node 110 and 130 will be zero for approximately: -I1 mm deck deflection for pipe wall thickness 4.78mm, ~5,5mm deck deflection for pipe wall thickness 12.70mm and -4,Smm deck deflection for pipe wall thickness 20.62mm Larger forced deflection for these pipe wall thicknesses will lead to hold down restraint force for node 110 and 130 and eventually for node 70 and 170. The smallest pipe wall thickness in this thesis can then handle almost twice as much deck deflection as the two largest pipe wall thicknesses before node 110 and 130 becomes hold down restraints. From the graphs in chapter 6.2 and 6.3 the results shows the connection between the increasing fluctuations in the restraint forces and the reduction in natural deflection that unfolds with regard to increasing wall thickness. A larger pipe wall thickness has a larger moment of inertia, which reduces the flexibility. A small pipe wall thickness is flexible and will therfore experience a larger deflection in the pipe span than thicker wall pipes. The lack of flexiblity in a pipe line will lead to higher restraint forces. —_——— 15 June 2015 78Sze ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group As an acceptance criterion, the deflection limit for pipe span is set to: For the first and the second case: Lomm) _ 5000 600 = 8.333 mm Smax = For the fourth case: 15000 _ 95 sam 600 For LC. 4, the first, second and fourth case is below the deflection limit for all pipe wall nesses. For LC. 9, the first and the second case is below the deflection limit for all pipe wall ‘kn s. The third case is not acceptable in any load case or for any pipe wall thickness because the deflection in node 120 is higher than 25mm. Reference graph 17-22. STRUCTURAL DECK DEFLECTION For a straight pipe line divided over ten supports, the first case gives restraint loads that are very even for the pipe supports located at the four nodes in the middle of the pipe. The two supports located at steel deck structure, reference node 110 and node 130 is experiencing deflection, the larger the pipe thickness the greater weight and thus greater deflection. These deflections which are then inserted into node 110 and node 130 for case two will then lead to a reduction of the restraint forces and thus reduce the deflection in these nodes. The nodes next to the nodes experiencing forced deflection will increase in reaction force and maybe deflection, depending on what surface the support is mounted on. In this case of testing, the two supports next to the nodes exposed to forced deflection, reference node 70 and node 90 is mounted to a concrete deck. Lo 4800 200° 200 ~ Smax = All the deflections are below the deflection limit. 15 June 2015 79Seen [ROSENBERG WorteyParsons Group PIPE SUPPORT UTILIZATION In the first case and the second case there is not much differences in the utilization of the pipe support members. But when comparing the first case with the third case there is an increasing utilization as the pipe wall thickness is increasing, especially for the pipe support in node 90, but not by much. The highest increase in utilization is approxametly 27% for beam number 143 and 144 (node 90) with loads from pipe wall size 20.62mm. Since the utilization of the pipe supports are calculated based on design and blast loads from the pipe and direct blast loads on the supports, the utilization of the beam members in node 90 in the fourth case will lead to failure, because pipe support in node 110 and 130 are not taking any load from the pipe, only direct blast load on the pipe support members. STRUCTURAL PIPE SUPPORT DISPLACEMENT ‘Comparing the first case and the second case the differences in the displacements in the nodes are increasing as the pipe wall thickness is increasing. In the third case the displacements are increasing for all nodes as the pipe wall thickness is increasing. Especially for node 128 where the displacements increases with 15mm from first to third case with loads from pipe wall size 20.62mm, Deflection limit in pipe support shall not exceed the most conservative of 1/360 or 3mm, In this case 3mm is the most conserative The first case: All pipe supports are below the deflection limit for all three pipe wall si The second case: All pipe supports are below the deflection limit for pipe wall size 4.78 and 12.70. Fore pipe wall size 20.62 the pipe support node 129, 127 and 126 are below the deflection limit ‘The third case: Pipe support node 129, 127 and 126 are below the deflection limit for pipe wall size 4.78 ‘The fourth case: All pipe supports are below the deflection limit for pipe wall size 4.78. Fore pipe wall size 12.70 and 20.62 the pipe support node 129, 127 and 126 are below the deflection limit —— 15 June 2015 80Sa [ROSENBERG WorleyParsons Group ‘As a conclusion on the results from this thesis it can be stated that pipe lines with large stiffness can have a very big impact on the pipe supports when included the variation in deck deflection. On the other hand deflection did not seem to have any large impact on the pipe stress other than expansion in this thesis. If a bend was put in, maybe the results would have been different which is a problem that could have been looked into further. A flexible pipe line seems 10 be more beneficial for a pipe support considering the restraint loads, thus leading to a higher utilization and deflection in pipe stress analysis. Pipe lines of lesser wall size are very prone to local buckling, The Caesar II software does not check for buckling, and finite clement software such as ANSYS or ABAQUS should be used for this type of check. For future studies and research it could be worth looking at variation of the pipe span between, the supports, different pipe sizes, temperature and pressure, ‘As I experienced in performing this thesis, interacting piping and structural is very time consuming and as current engineering schedule often means that structural deflection are not available at the time of pipe stress analysis, it will result in additional analysis, where the results might not give a result that makes any significance in the end. As a guide it is important to take in to consideration possible large deck deflections that can occur and have an impact on piping as vell as structural. 15 June 2015 81a ROSENBERG os Saree ND U 9.0 REFERENCES [1] Wikipedia, Yield (engineering). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_(engineering) [2] Pictutre: Stress/strain curve. Available: http://www enggpedia.convimages!stories/engineering-stress-strain-curve jpg [3] Wikipedi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Mises_yield_criterion . von Mises (engineering). Available: [4] ASME B31. [5] Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castigliano's_method : Process piping Castigliano method (engineering). Available: [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%€2%80%93Bernoulli_beam_theory [7] Piping and pipeline assessment guide / A. Keith Escoe [8] Wikipedia. Cylinder stress (engineering). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylinder_stress [9] NTNU. Lecture. Torsion. Available: http://ocw.nthu.edu.tw/ocw/upload/8/252/Chapter_3-98.pdf [10] 8D01-AK-P-06042. Pipe Support Procedure (AkerSolution) [11] Lecture notes from the course Life extension of structures at UIS [12] Wikipedia, Friction (engineering). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction [13] Paper. The American Sosiety of Mechanical enginering. Reprint from:PVP-Vol. 169 Design and analysis of piping and components. Editors: Q.N. Truong, E.C. Goodling, Book No. H00484-1989, Treatment of support friction in pipe stress analysis, Liang Chuang Peng. Houston, Texas. Page 143-148 Available:http://www.pipestress.com/papers/Friction.pdf 14] DNV-RP-D101 Structural analysis of piping systems [15] NORSOK L-002, rev.3: Piping system layout, design and structural analysis [16] Wikipedia. Hydrostatic test (engineering). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatic_test [17] Paper: Internal journal of recent trends in engineering, vol 1, No.6, May 2009 15 June 2015 82Sr ID ROSENBERG Determination of maximum span between pipe support using maximum bending stress theory. Page 46-49. Dr. D.P. Vakharia, Mohd. Farooq. S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat - 395 007, Gujarat, India. Available:http://ijrte.academypublisher.com/vol01/n006/ijrte0106046049.pdf [18] Advanced Mechanics of materials. 6ed. Arthur P. Boresi & Richard J. Schmidt. John Wiley & Sons, ine COMPUTER PROGRAM LEARNING [19] Slideshare. Caesar learning manual. Available: http://www.slideshare.net/manuedif/tutorial-caesars-ii —————— 15 June 2015 83Sa ROSENBERG 10.0 APPENDIX APPENDIX A, PIPING AND VALVE SPECIFICATION ‘TABLE A-l BASIC ALLOWABLE STRESSES IN TENSION. ASME B31.3 TABLE Yol YIELD STRENGTH VALUES SY, SECTION II PART D. TABLE DIMENSIONS OF SEAMLESS AND WELDED STEEL PIPES APPENDIX B INPUT FILE STAADPRO $08.4.78 FU APPENDIX C 508.4.78, WITHOUT STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, RESTRAINT LOADS, 508.4.78, WITHOUT STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, STRESS REPORT. 508.4.78. WITH STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, RESTRAINT LOADS 5084.78. WITH STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, STRESS REPORT '508.4.78, WITH STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, MAX DEFLECTION, RESTRAINT LOADS. '508.4.78, WITH STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, MAX DEFLECTION, STRESS REPORT '508.4.78. FAILING SUPPORT IN NODE 110 AND 130, RESTRAINT LOADS. 508.4.78, FAILING SUPPORT IN NODE 110 AND 130, STRESS REPORT. oe 15 June 2015 84APPENDIX Aem pa fe Sitios and Valve Specifies 5060 3 Freer a rae OF Class Sheet:_AD20 cso ot _foxso2010 12 (DESIGN CODE ASME BITS [Corr Allow: 0.0 mim [Material Selection 10D 4050, —] [Maximum Design Pressures [arg [00 Pool ws[ 7] as [apn [At Temperature: ec [TOO] Ts [200 | 90 IE SIZE AND WALL. THICKNESS. fontaine es] is[2 [>] e]e[* [=] = [u[e[e[ =] =] =» Dicom — Jars |aoof 302 fas] |aea] na [ran nan | 30 [ase|eea [ora] sno [ene | na | Frat manf7 2M] 9 pe areas] aos favo] sve [as | oor [ere] om ere] se | os | om | rm [sete a 18. 1 WALL THICKNESS UNDER TOLERAN seenote) LONGITUDINAL WELD EFFICIENCY: [ELEMENT — [DIMENSION STANDARDS NOW SIZTYFE [MATERIAL IDs ]DS INAME lrRow To] IName ine int PPE [ASHE a6. 19M 03 8|Seamos, PE [ATo0 SIRO _DaT [ASME B36.19M 1] 30|Welded, >8"BE — |928:$31803 CL 1,3 or|D42 [Asmat 836.10M 36 [4928 $31803 CL 1,3 or[D42 [BENDING [Made from pipe INBET IFrrrINGS [ASME BIG9 % Janis Sreos SW [Deaf [BRANCHES [Otes, lightweight jarezest [bas ]EBRST }out lasMe m16.9 Las tings lasts saisosswx [pws __[enes [PDENIPPLE JASTM A733 03 14SGR TED HOWTOS Jao ssi8c3 SMS |baT SPI Ibev to match sch 408 IREINFORCED [Dailedo (cLisoRF WN JAIE2TST bas [BRST IIPOFLANGE |ASME B16 bout FLANGES [ASM Bic Oa DaICLISORF WN [AIS2FST bay |NAFT [ASME B16.47 Series A 30] 36fcuisoRe wn |ais2Fs1 Ipes__ nari IFEG.BLIND [ASME BIG 05 24)CL150 RF jars2 P51 Iba |NAFT [ASME B16.£7 Series A 30|_36/cL150 RF. lais2 31 Ibas__INArL [ORIEFLANGHASME B16.36 1] 24]G300 RF NPT) [A182 FST [baa [NAFL IRED.THRD [ASME BIG Blo7s]2|cLisoRFNPT) [A182 Fst [pas |NAFL lrLance [CINE BLINDS [Spoor 04 Ta|CLs0RF ATF bar [NBT Ispect bi, 03 12|CL130 RF |a2do saiso3 las xB Kspadespacer a] 36fct.10RF Jais2 si Iba (NLD [Spade/spacer 4] _36,CL1s0 RF |azdo sa1sos lbes INL [BOLTING [ASME BIG.S7DIGA7 Sees A | 0.4 36|Stud bots gal, —_[A320L7 jcio0 — JNBor 0 26|iex.nuts gay, |A1947 Icio por 0, 36{Stud bots lazre ssz7soir60 — |ps7x__|NBOL 0.5, 36[Hex. Nuts Jazze sx2750%60__|ps7x_|NBOI (GASKET [ASME BT620 105] 36|45 mun tik: SPW SOL w/Exp.. lEGAT |Geaphite invent. rng 316 [PLUGS __[ASMEBIGIT 04 1/fex. bead [ais2 P51 baseman SAFETY Op 0ga73] NPT OM, [peas Noses feria [BLEED PLUG Jannealed eri NOTES: See page?a ASME 991.3-2014 Table A-1 Basic Allowable Stresses in Tension for Metals (Cont’é) Numbers in Parentheses Refer to Notes for Appendix A Table Specifications Are ASTM Unless Otherwise indicated as in, Sete Hg, Product Spec. Type! UNS Condition! Pato. Yeap, SHOE ISL Tenp, sata Ton, We Cie ia Temper Sli, (5) Naes_—*F (Tele Yin Yo 100 200 300 400 Stainless Steet (3a) Cont'd) Pipes and Tubes 2 Con's) 1-8 ‘ee A213 TOE S040 aueamenga 0s 75 30 200 200 700186 c-8 Tabe iS 30k SHED GuRAaRENGa 5 75 290 700200 186 ea Foe NID TO S300 ro) cas 75 9 100 200 200 186 24a pe 04 pe SB 304 S50000 * § pagmencg — “257-50 200 790 ma18 seeratt Fre soo GaoeesGIEs “425 75-30 200 790 0186 pe sou pases 3 (75:90 00 700200 186 oe soso * § ea0acnca “as 30. ma m0 m0 186 Poe S009 9, B75 3 M0 30200186 9390 8 Gace “as 70 90 m9 200 189170 Ae 2Ne-21C-Mo be AB SOMLMIBSOL 6 3 ot Bor mor meses Eefesieriteo Ape OIRO MOBO 6 Sen a7 dormer 200-0 ee ee rr 20 0 0 73 BIBI ae Tube ARSE TRANG Suto S30 03) 0 0 3 BIDS N9 ne Wipe ar053 50 SHt003 7 -» 9 m2 namsne 2ceanin st ON 8 6509) Sw 0 M67 267 26767 ett a0 S200 ease 1H OS) o/b m0 19% WT BONEN S90 smo 4 05) “we @ 58 90 179261267 200-10 foe. sonst 5 @ 1s 9k 193 293-289 267 deerme Pe ate sonst 8 “2M 3 93 289267 her re oka 180 © Gans 0 9 6 300 2-583 8 S180 108 025) -@ 9 6 500 0 m9 718 esto 90 sue sh 08) “a & 500 30049778 206-16 ube as sais ath & 6 bbe gt £09 z we | oo | = | = | 88 | 88 | Be | = [et | ee] ee] = | = | = | ee} st yee | we Rey ot] = | = | Se fae pee | = pas | Be | se | — | = | — | we | sor fee | me ws | - | - | - | se foe fee fo foe [ee] ee] - | - | = | ee] erie |e SP] = | = | = | Be fee LE = |e | Be | ee) = | = | = | we) st lee |g | = | = | = | ee [ae jae | = fae | ae] me) — | -— | — | me | sr jen | * -~ |= | = | = |oe Jas joe | = Jue fee} ez] - | > | = | gt] = le le = |=] =] = | Be fae pat | = [we | ee | ee) - | = | = jer) x jel } ZS] ro] Sl] = |B pee pee | — pat lat | at | — | = | = [et] — Jeo | 4, a = |_| wr | om | oct | oot | oe | ens | acon | oe fae sar) ss. aobtes | anBbtes | antes | avtins | amples | tina fatitts James [eros avis [anbeias i =e ——— ——| mame} 28 SSTNXOMILL TIVA\ TYNEWON: PTO | peujwoN, «ola fala fou fw fala lu fo fo fe fe fo fst ef et el § GACT GNV SSIIWVAS HO SNOISNETINICL 22 fC arn 29) — 7/9 [BS 1600 : Part 2: 1970APPENDIX B1. Rednesday, June 10, 2015, 10:33 AN PAGE WO. 2 . SURAD.Pro VBi SELECTseries? . Version 20.07.07.32 . Proprietary Progran of . Bentley Systems, Ine. * Date= JUN 10, 2015 * Times 10:27:58 USER ID: Bergen Group STAAD SPACE INPUT BILE: Pipesupport 508.4.78-FIRST CASE.STD 21s D2 1 30 Ds 2 62 art 2 80 = Lad S90 3.62. 96 1191. ‘START JOB INFORMATION ENGINEER DATE 23-MAR-15 END JOB INFORMATION INPUT WIDTA 79 UNIT METER 1 JOINT COORDINATES: 11 -0,5 0 07 2 -0.5 0 57 3 -0.5 -3 OF 4 -0.5 -3 ~5; 5 -0.5 0-10 7-015 -3 “10 9-05 057 10 -0.5 ~3 5: 12.5.5 0 0; 13 5.5.0 ~5; 14 5.5 -3 0 515-3 -5; 165.5 0-107 18 5.8 ~3 10; 205.5 05; 21.5.5 -3§ 515 0-7.5; 24 -0.5 0 -7.5; 26 2.5 0 0 27.0.1 00; 28 0.1 0-5 on 0.70 0; 33.0.7 0-57 35.0.7 0-10; 37 2.3.0 0; 381.30 -5 40.1.3 1190 0; 43 1.9 0 -S2 45 1.9.0 -20; 47 2.5 0-5; 49 2.5 0 ~10 3 -10 “8; $4 3.1 0-10; 56 3.7 0 07 57 3.7.0 ~5; 593.7 0 ~10 a3 130-5; 64 4.30 -10; 66 4.9 0 0; 67 4.9 0-5; 69 4.9 0 ~10 - 0.5 -2 10; 74 5.5 0 10; 75 5.5 -3 107 78 2.5 0 -2.5 5; 81.5.5 07.5; 82 3.60 7.57 83 3,6 1.5 7.5) 84 1407.5 85 157,57 86 -0.5 02.57 07 1,4 02.5; 88 3,6 0 2,5; 895.5 02.5 57 52 5 : 2.52 97 3.1 0 -3.77 98 1,9 0 -3.7; 99 1.9 3,5 -7.57 100 1.9 0 ~7.5, 201 3.1 1.5 7.57 102 3.1 0 -7.5; 104 1.9 0 -8.77 105 3.1 0 -8.7 115 ~0,5 0 -0.27 116 0.1 0 -0.2; 117 0.7 0 ~0.2; 118 1.3 0 ~0.2 119 1.90 -0.2; 120 2.5 0 0.2; 121 3.1 0 -0.2; 122 3.7 0 -0.2; 123 4.3 0 -0.2 i 2 13) 91 1.4 1,5 2.97 92 3.1 0-2,87 931.9 0 2.57 95 3.1 1.5 -2.5 ay 2 1124 419 0 -0.27 125 $.5 0 -0.2; 126 2.5 1,5 7.57 127 2.5 1.5 -2.5 1128 2.5 1,5 2.5; 129 2.5 1.9.7.5 MEMBER INCIDENCES Dba as; 213; 9.2 4; 42 24 65.72 89 10; 99 86; 12.1 277 12.2 28 [15 5 30; 19 9 207 22 12 14z 23 13 15; 24 19 297 26 16 187 28 20 21; 29 20 89 32 12 125; 32 23 16; 33.15 23; 34 23 1 43-27 327 44 20 937 46 28 30; 47 30 357 52 32 977 52 33 387 54 33 351 55 35 40 1 59 37 42; 60 38 3; 62 38 40; 63 40 45; 67 42 267 68 43 477 70 43 100 71 aS a9; 75:47 5: 1 86 54 59; 90 56 61; 91.57 62; 93 57 59 94 59 64s 90 61 667 99 62 67 101 62 6&7 102 64 67 106 66 12; 107 67 13; 109 67 69; 120 69 16; 114 71-72, [ans 71 74; 116 74 75; 118 73 80; 129 74 8. 35 24 5; 36 4 24; 37 24 7; 39 26 52 77 47 49; 78 49 547 82 51 56; 83.52 57; 85 52 102 125 78 47; 127 80 9; 128 61 20 129 80 84; 130 82 847 131 82 81; 132 82 83; 134 84 AS; 125 89 129; 130 86 1 139 86 87; 140 88 877 141 89 12; 142 68 89; 143 BB 90; 140 87 92 145 91 128 | 14s 92 97; 149 43 98; 150 96 93; 151 95 925 152 95 127; 154 97 52s 156 96 98 | 157 95 97; 18 100 104; 159 99 100; 160 102 105; 161 101 1027 162 101 126 164 104 45; 165 99 1047 166 105 $4; 167 102 105; 180 115, ei 116 28 (Ci \NASTER\STAAD\508x4. 78\New folder \Pipesupport 508.4. 78-FIRST CASE.anl Fage 1 of 290Wednesday, June 10, 2015, 10:33 aN SURAD SEACE PAGE WO. 2 41, 182 115 116; 183 117 33; 184 136 117; 185 118 387 1e6 127 1287 188 118 219 42, 189 120 787 190 219 120; 191 121 927 192 120 121; 193 122 577 194 121 122 43. 195 123 62; 196 122 123; 197 124 67; 196 123 1247 199 125 13, 200 124 125 44, 201 93 119; 202 98 93; 203 126 99; 204 127 96; 205 128 907 206 129 83 45. ELEMENT INCIDENCES SHELL. 46, 136 71 74 81 80; 137 80 9 20 1; 146 9 20 09 BG; 147 86 1 12 89 47. ELEMENT PROPERTY 48, 136 137 146 147 TAICKNESS 0.2 49. DEFINE MATERIAL START 50, ISOTROPIC CONCRETE 51. B 2.171858+007 52. POISSON 0.17 53. DENSITY 23.5616 54. ALPHA 12-008 55. DAMP 0.05 56. TYPE CONCRETE 57. STRENGTH CU 27579 58, ISOTROPIC STEEL 59. 2 2.052008 60. POISSON 0.3 G1. DeNsiTy 76.3195 62. ALPHA 1.28-005 63. DAMP 0.03 6¢. Type STEEL 65. STRENGTH FY 355000 FU 510000 RY 1.5 RE 1.2 66. END DEFINE MATERIAL 67. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN 68. 289 11 19 22 28 29 39 43 51 59 67 82 90 9B 106 114 TO 116 28 119 - 69. 127 70 131 138 To 142 PRIS XD 0.35 20 0.35, 70. MEMBER PROPERTY EUROPEAN 71. 14 12 15 24 31 32 35 44 47 52.55 60 63 68-71 75 78 83 G6 91 94 99 202 107 - 72. 110 180 182 184 186 188 190 192 194 196 198 TO 200 TABLE ST HEAOOB 73. 3 6 23 26 TABLE ST 200x10SHS ‘74. MEMBER PROPERTY EUROPEAN 75. 46 94 62 70 77 85 93 101 108 158 160 164 266 161 183 185 193 195 - 76. 197 TAPERED 0.288 0.012 0.288 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 77. 125 TAPERED 0.288 0.012 0.288 0.3 0-008 0.052 0.034 78. 189 TAPERED 0.288 0.012 0.288 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 79. 132 134 135 143 70 145 150 TO 152 256 157 159 161 162 165 167 203 TO 205 - 80. 206 TABLE ST 200xL6sHS 81. 148 154 TAPERED 0.288 0.012 0.285 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 82. 191 TAPERED 0.268 0.012 0.286 0,3 0.009 0.052 0.034 83, 149 TAPERED 0.288 0.012 0.288 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 84. 33 34 36 37 TABLE ST 1aoxBsns 85. 201 TAPERED 0.286 0.012 0.288 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 86. 202 TAPERED 0.286 0.012 0.28 0.3 0.008 0.052 0.034 87. conszants. 88. MATERIAL CONCRETE MEME 2 8 9 11 19 22 29 29 39 43 51 59 67 82 90 98 106 114 ~ 89. 115 To 116 118 119 127 70 131 136 0 142 246 147 90. MATERIAL STEEL MEMB 13 4 6 12 15 23 24 26 31 70 37 44 46 47 52.54 55 60 62 - 91. 63 68 70 71.75 77 78 €3 85 86 1 93 94 99 101 102 107 109 120 125 132 136 - 92. 135 143 70 145 148 70 152 154 156 70 162 164 70 167 180 TO 186 188 TO 208 93. suePoRTs 94. 3 10 14 21 72 75 FIXED 95. 4.7 15 18 exRWED 96. 92 93 97 98 100 02 104 105 FIXED BUT FY Fo MK MY MZ (CHlWASTBR\STAAD\500x4. 70\new Folder\Pipesuppoxt 508.4. 78-FIRST CASE.ani Page 2 of 290Wednesday, June 10, 2015, 10:33 AM ‘SEARD SPACE PAGE WO. 97, eaesentaneneas sees 98, TOAD 1 LOADTYEE DEAD TXTLE SELP-WETGHT 99, SELEWEIGHT ¥ -1.2 200. = 201, LORD 2 LOADIYER NOWE TITLE VERTICAL REST LORD 102, JOINT LOAD 103. 126 129 FY -12.5 os. 127 120 EY -12.55 1105. LORD 3 LOADIYEE NONE TITLE LINE STOP WEST LOAD 106. JOINT LOAD 107, 126 129 Fz 3.75 108, 127 Fa 3.76 10g, 128 Fz 2.6 120, LOAD 4 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE LINE STOP EAS? LOAD 111. gonyr LOAD 112, 126 129 Fa -3.75 423, 127 128 Fx -3.76 114. LOAD § LOADIYEE NONE TITLE DESTGNSBIAST REST LOAD is. gorwr LORD 116, 126 129 FY -126.3 aa) 127 128 FY -127 118, LOAD 6 LOADIYPE NONE TITLE DBSTGNEBLAST HOLD DOMN LOAD aug. gorwr top 120. 126 129 FY 101.35 221, 127 128 Fy 101.8 122. LOAD 7 MOADIYPE NONE TITLE BLAST LOAD LINE GUIDE S 323. JOINT LOAD 124. 126 129 Fx -113.86 325. 127 120 Fx -114.4 126. LOAD ® LOADIYPE NONE TITLE BLAST LOAD LINE GUIDE W 327. gomNT LOAD 128. 126 129 Fx 113.84 329. 127 128 PK A144 130. WOAD 9 LORDTYPZ NONE TITLE BLAST LORD ON MEMBERS Z 131. MEMBER LOAD 232, 132 134 135 143 TO 145 150 TO 152 156 157 159 161 162 165 167 203 TO 205 - 133, 206 UNI Gz 12.6 234, LOAD 10 LORDTYPE NONE TITLE BLAST LOAD ON MEMBERS x 135. MEMBER LOAD 36. 132 134 143 264 150 151 156 157 159 161 165 167 UNI Gx 12.5 137. TOAD 11 LOADEYPE NONE TITLE BLAST LOAD ON MEMBERS Y 138. MEMBER LOAD 139, 135 145 152 156 157 162 165 167 203 70 206 UNE GY 12.6 140. LOAD CoMB 101 LC. UL 101 aan, 11,9.2.1,332.3 142. LOAD coms 102 uc. Ls 102 143,11,321.3 42.3 144, LOAD COMB’ 201 16. S18 201 445. 11.02 1,0 3.1.0 146, LOAD coms 202 1C. StS 202 447. 12.0.2.1,0 4.1.0 148. LORD coms 301 1C. ALS 301 143, 11.05 1,07 1.09 1.0 4190. LORD coms 302 LC. ALS. 302 agi. 11.05 .1,07 1.09 -1.0 152. LOAD coms 303 LC. ALS 303 Gr \WASTER\STAAD\S00x4, 7@\New Folder\Pipesupport 508. 4.70-PIRST CASE. onl age 3 of 290Wednesday, June 10, 2015, 10:33 AM ‘STAAD SEACE 153, 11.05 1.07 1.0 ass. 155. 156. ast. 158. 159 160. nel. 162. 163. 168. 165. 166. ast. 168. 169, 10. m. 12. 173. 18 vs. a6 un, ae. 179 250. ion. 3e2) 183. ase. 185. a6. ae. aes. 109. 190. ia. 192 193. 198. 195. 196. ‘LOAD COMB dias OAD coms 11.051 LORD coms: 11.051, LOAD coms 11,051 OAD come 11051 oR cous 11051 ORD coma 11051, OAD coms, 11051, OAD come, 11.052 LOAD cous 11062 OX coms 21061 ORD coma 11.061, LOAD come 11.061 ‘LORD cous 11,061 LORD cous 21061 ORD come, 11061, OAD cons) 11.061 OAD cous 11061 TOAD cous 11061 LORD coup Lio61 LORD coma 11061 PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT STATICS CHECK 304 07 305 107 306 07 307 08 308 08 309 08 310 08 an 08 312 08 313 07 ou 07 315 07 316 07 317 07 318 07 319 08 320 08 a2 108 322 08 323 08 224 08 BEBERESEREREBERCEER: 1.0 10 1.0 aus 304 10 -1.0 ALS 305 to ALS 306 i -Lo - ALS 307 91.0 = ALS 308 9 -1.0 aus 309 10 1.0 ats 310 10 -1.0 ALS 311 uo ats 312 a -1.0 - ALS 313, 91.0 - ALS 314 9-10 aus 315 10 1.0 ALS 316 10 -1.0 - ALS 317 11.0 - ALS 518. 1 -1.0 ais 319 91.0 ats 320 9 -1.0 aus 321 10 1.0 aus 322, 10 -1.0 - RS 323; 1.0 aus 324 1-10 PAGE WO. 7 (C:\MASTER\STAAD\ 508x4.78\Wew folder\Pipesupport 508.4. 76-FIRST CASE. anl “age 4 of 290APPENDIX CCAESAR II 2011 R1 Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 Job Description: Pipe S08x4.78 PROJECT: MASTER THESIS CLIENT : ANALYST: S.TVEIT NOTES : WITHOUT STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, WITH FRICTION PIPE DATA From 1 To 10 Di PIPE, Dia+ 508,000 mm. Wall= 4.780 mm. Cor= .0000 mm. GENERAL, T= 100C 12=-7C Pl= 12.1000 bars Piyd= 20.0000 bars Mat= (338)A790 $31803 E= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH1= 189,795 N./sq-mm. EH2= 196,280 N./sq.nm. 195,825 N./sq.mm. 195,825 N./sq-mm. EHS= 195,825 N./sq.nm. 195,825 N./sq-nm. 195,825 N./sq-mm. EHB= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH9= 195,825 N./sq.mm. v= .292 Pipe Den-8027.0000000 kg/cu.m. Fluid Den=1000.0000000 kg/cu.m. Insul Thk= -000 mm, WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = ON Sc= 207 N./sq.mim. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Shd= 207 N./sqemm, Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. — Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh?= 207 N./sa-nm, Sh= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. sy= 395 N./sa-mm. =2,500.000 mm. From 10 To 20 Dz= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 10 x Node 10 Y Mu = .30 wind Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = ON Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi- 206 N./sa.nm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm, Sh5= 207 N./sa.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mmn, 207 N./sq.mm. Sh@= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh9= 207 N./sq.mmn. 395 N./sq-mm. From 20 GENERAL, B= 195,825 N./sq.mm. FH1= 189,795 N./sq.mm. EH2= 196,280 N./sq.mm. BH3= 195,825 N./sq.mm. 195,825 N./sq.mm. BHS= 195,825 N./sq.mn. EHE= 195,825 N./sq-mm. 195,825 N./sq.mm. BH8= 195,825 N./sq.nm EA9= 195/825 N./sq-mm. v= 292 Pipe Den=8027.0000000 kg/cu.m. =2,500.000 mn.CAESAR Il 2011 R1 Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4, 78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #81 RESTRAINTS Node 30 x Node 30 ¥ Mu = .30 WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch Sh1= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./aq.am. Sh7= 207 N./sq.nm. Sy= 395 N./sq.am. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm -2,500.000 mm. Wall~ 4.780 mm. Insul Thk= ,000 mm. 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 531.3 (2008) Shi= 206 N./eq.mm, —Sh2. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. She Sy= 395 N./sq.mm. Cycle Max Switch = 207 N./sq.mn. ShS= 207 N./squm 207 N./sq.mm. com 40 To 50 Dz» -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 50 x Node 50 Y Mu = .30 WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max switch Sh1= 206 N./sq.mm. $h2= 207 N. /sq.mm. Shd= 207 N./ag.mm. Sh Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. From 50 To GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 WABLE STRESSES 331.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch Shl= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. — Sh! Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. — Shi 60 Dz ALU From 60 To 70 DZ= -2,500.000 mm, GENERAL, RESTRAINTS Node 70 x Node 70 ¥ D 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mn. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.im. 207 N./sq.mm. Sc= 207 N./aq.mm. sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mn, Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N. /squnm Shé= 207 N./sq.mn. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mn. Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. sh3= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh6= 207 W./sq.mm Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. si 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.nm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mn,CAESAR II 2011 R1 Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADS\CASE 1\508X4.78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 'B31.3 (2008) shi= 206 N./sq.mm. shd= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq-mm. From 70 To GENERAL, WIND Wind Shape- 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 31.3 (2008) shi= 206 N./sq-mm. sh4= 207 N./sq.mn. Sh7= 207 N./sq-mm. From 80 To GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 90 x Node 90 Y Mu = WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 31.3 (2008) shl= 206 N./sq.mn. shd= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. From 90 To 100 Di GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 31.3 (2008) shi= 206 N./sq.nm. sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq-mm, From 100 To GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 110 xX Node 110 Y Mu WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Shl= 206 N./sq-nm. Sh4= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh7= 207 N./sqmm. 110 by PIPE DATA cycle Max Switch = 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 80 DZ= -2,500.000 mm. cycle Max Switch = sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sa.mm. 90 Da= -2,500.000 mm. 30 cycle Max Switch = 207 207 N./sq-mn. N./sq.mn. 000 switeh = N./sq.mm. N./sq.mm N./sq.mm. Max 207 207 207 cycle ‘sn2= shS= sha= 2, 500.000 mm, cycle Max Switch = ‘sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm, 207 N./sq.mm, Se= 207 N./sq-mum. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq-nm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.nm. Sh6= 207 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq-mm, Se= 207 N./sq.mmn. 207 N./sq.nm, 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. So= 207 N./sq.nm. sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq-nm. Se= 207 N./sq.mm. ‘Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq-mm. sh9= 207 N./sa.mm.CAESAR II 2011 R1_Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTER\CAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4,78WITH FRICTION. Licensed To: Seat - ID #61 From 110 To 120 Dz= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N,/sa.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. From 120 To 130 D&= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 130 x Node 130 Y Mu = .30 WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Shl= 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sg.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. $h8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. From 130 To 140 bi GENERAL, WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq-mm, Sh4= 207 N./aq.mm, Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm_ Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. $h8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm, -2,500.000 mm. From 140 To 150 Di GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 150 x Node 150 Y Mu = .30 wrND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.nm. Shl= 206 N./sq.mm, 8h2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. sh4= 207 N./sq.mm, $h5= 207 N./sq.mm. | Sh6= 207 N./sq.mn. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm, $h9= 207 N./sq.mm. -2,500.000 mm. From 150 To 160 Dz= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL ain Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 531.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mn. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3e 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.m. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm.CAESAR II 2011 R1_Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTERICAESAR\PIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 From 160 To 170 D: GENERAL RESTRATNTS Node 170 x Node 170 ¥ Mu= .30 WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq-mm. 206 N./sq.mm. $h2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. -2,500.000 mm. From 170 To 180 DZ= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL, WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N, Shl= 206 N./sq.nm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq-nm. Sh5= 207 N./sq-mm, Shi Sh7= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq-mm, Shi From 180 To 190 DZ» -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 190 x Node 190 Y Mu = .30 WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 531.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = Sce= 207 N./sq-mm. 206 N./sq.mm. $h2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh6= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. From 190 To 200 Dz» -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = c= 207 N./sq.mm. Shl- 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.nm. Shd= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq-nm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm.Tewoooo | s10005 — = wn Ooze 0000" ‘0000 0 a as6e- sere | 0 (aaolzt ove ‘000'0- ‘0000 0 0 0 8s6e- sole [0 (@ao)91 eee ‘000°0- ‘0000 0 0 0 veoor | Srrcer- [0 (EFTO ely ‘0000 ‘0000 0 0 To Livze= | S020 | 0 (ao}rl Ose ‘000°0- ‘000°0- 0 0 fo 8S6E- selei- | isz0zi- | (doles Oroe- ‘000°0- ‘0000 8568 Sele | iszozb (ad0)zi EL9EZ ‘000-0 0000 0 0 0 ‘8S6E S6LEL 0 (30) ELOEZ (000°0- ‘000°0 0 0 0 asec, Solel o (ao}or yest | 0000 ‘0000 0 0 0 ‘ye00r grees [0 Ga0i6 sorzz | 0000 ‘o00'0 0 0 0 LiZe zs0L01 | 0 (Gaoie e1gez | 0000" ‘000°0- eS6e seler- | iszozi- | (aaolz eig¢z | 0000- 0000 0 0 0 8S6E seer | iszozt | (aaois Ovo'e- 000'0- 000° 0 0 oO ‘S68 ‘S6LEL= (3d0)5 €1gez | 0000 ‘0000 0 o 0 es68 SeLei- Gaol on waza [ww xa uuxa [WNZN | WNAN | WNXW | NZa NA @se9 peor | SON ENIN-La+2a+6 t aso eNIn+La+2u+4 aswo zNIm—Ta+2i-+M asw> 2NIMHLa¥2a+M asWo INIM-Ta+23, asvo ININ+Ta+2I+M (B40) ZT aSwD ENIN-Ta+tl4M (840) TT as¥O ENTN+TE+TE+M (340) OT aS¥O ZNIN-Ta+TL+m (240) 6 aSWO 2NIM+Ta+TL+H S¥o ININ-TS+ToeH L as¥o INIM*Ta+TL+m (240) 9 as¥o Ta+2L+m (840) 6 SS¥> TarLoen SYD BM NOTLINTEC aswo vot seseg peo] snouen, SjuleRSeY UO SPEC) “1 NOdIY GSGNSLXA AMVININS LNIVELSSY Lo# GI ~ 129g °01 pasusor NOLLOIH HLIMBZ'PX80S\ ASVO\SAVOT Adid\NVSAVOWALSYIN\'D ‘Gor LE1Z OWL SLOZ LE AWN -@1@G_(SZSOZL PING) ‘0000°00'LE'S48A LY LLOZ II HWSOELS 0" 000°0 000°0 o 0 ve0Le- ELvEO! o Gaolwr 09 000°0- 000°0- 0 0 vee OvLZh- 6St9h [EFT ogr - ‘0000- 0000 eee ‘eplel- [asian | (ado)et ZgLb 000°0- 0000, 0 vest, ‘vlc (3dO)}F ZBL tb | 0000" 0000) 0 eee Ole (ao)o1 Lezes | 0000" 0000) LL98¢ ‘voeszi- {ad0)6 Oost ‘000°0 000°0 0 0 ¥eOLE EbvEOL (3g0)8 ZL bb | 0000- ‘0000- 0 0 eee ‘grlel- | 6Si9bi | (ado) zen bh 0000" 0000 0 0 vest, Splzi- 6SLSLL (3d0)9. O9y t= 000'0- 000°0 yee Oplel- 0 (340)5 ISL 1h (0000- 000 0 0 eee siz | 0 (ad0)" ‘APR 08 ‘x pibr BVEEETZ | yoo | evo0o00 SVELSEE | SULIGET | SVESEGO | yyy voor 0000" 000°0 0 0 0 Zise- pele 0 (gd 0)ZE vO 0000" 000°0 LbSe- pelt 0 (Gao)st 8yL0- ‘00'0- 000) 0 0 0 eusse- | Z/S841= (Gao)st 16.0" ‘0000 (000'0) 0 0 0 eesez—___| 8256 0 Gao} yvOe ‘0000 ‘000°0- 0 0 Lise" PELL | 2se90i- | (ado)eL veO'e 000°0- ‘000°0 0 0 use" 7s ‘238901 Gaojet Oo LE 000°0- 0000 oO 0 0 LISE pelt 10 (Gao) 69 L) ‘00'0- 0000. o 0 0 Lise reli [0 (@g0)01 v6.6) | 0000" 0000 esse Lisaii= [0 Gals BEE bz 0000 (000°0 oO 0 0 Besez, 82136 oO (Ggol8 veg s, —_| 0000" ‘0000 0 0 o LUSE. vel | eas | (do)z vesLt | 0000" ‘0000 o 0 oO Lie. velwi- | 2ge901 | (ad0)8 ‘vv0 2 000°0- 000°0 LuSe= vel (EF 69 Lb 0000" 0000 0 0 0 LUSE vel (ag0)y oe sUseh Ie, euveooy | everreet | SssZoZL wwzd | wad [wwxo PUNZW [ew N AW [WNXW | NZ4 NAS NXa 35e5 peoT_| SGON seseQ peo] snouen, SUIENS®Y UO SPECT :L HOdSY GIGNSLX3 ANVIWNS LNIVHLSSY Lo#a ye9g ‘01 pasusor NOWLOR4 HLIMBL'PX80S\L ISVOISAVOT Adid\YvVSAVOWSLSYIN'9 ‘Gor Lez WIL gL0z LE AV eA (SZS0Z! PING) ‘000000 LE'S48A 14 LLOZ Il YYSAVO.S100 000%" 000 a 0 Ze. ieee 0 (a0}or Ble ‘000°0- 0000 0 0 18086 seeozi- 0 (c0)6 zor 0000 0000 0 0 ossoe vess0 0. (Gaole SLO0 000°0- ‘000°0- you. bsszL- yeephi (ad O)L SLO ‘000'0- 000° 0 0 oO cyoz. usszb- veEbLL (3d0)9 1ze 0 00010" 0000 0 0 0 ‘sole isszi= [0 (aos S100. 0000 ‘00'0 0 0 0 zoe. wsszi- [0 (EF ‘A pI i x pi6ra eusees |evooc | evoo00 [Svessze | eveceect | oTeeeett | ay 8880- 0000" ‘00070 0 o 0 Zvie- level |0 (Sa00z1 e880" | 0000" 000° 0 0 0 Lyle b6rzl- oO (ad0)91. ‘OLL0- 00'0- ‘0000 0 ‘yvese | 6ze9zh- (Gaolst €1Z0- 000° 000°0 o oO ‘Ove ZveLOL oO (adO)}eh ‘888'0- ‘000'0- ‘000'0- o o o LpLe- Lepzl- seeeli- | (@do)eb 8880" ‘000'0= ‘0000 oO 0 O Lele berzi=Teegers | (adoveb 68's ‘000'0- 00'0. Lyle Level- [0 (3d0)Lb 68'S 00°" ‘0000 0 o 0 Lyle Lerel= 0 ‘Gaojor 8028 ‘o00'0- 000°0 0 0 0 668/E ezeaci- [0 (3d0)6 9866. 000°0 000'0 0 9 0 ‘pOvOE LVELOL 0 (3d0)8 [ves's ‘000'0- ‘000'0- 0 Lvl. levzi- | eegeri= | Geolz 68's ‘000'0- 000) 0 0 0 LYLE. revzi= | eesers | Gaol. [eae'o- ‘000'0- 000'0. 0 0 0 ‘LvLe= veri 10 (Ga0}s, 68S. ‘cooo- 0000) 0 0 Lvle, verzi= 10 Gaolr, ‘A pibag oF Xxpieny BVT | eoo00 | ev0000 SULL98e —/ EVwOSEZE | SVESIOT | oy ose 0000 ‘0000 0 0 o eee sr GeO as 000-0" ‘000°0 0 0 0 veee= ‘9bLeL 0 (Gaojgr 6E0- ‘o000- 0000 0 0 o Li9ge- | vosezi= [0 (Gao)s wu zg [ww xg wwxa wnzw | Ww NAW | WNXW | Nzd NAM NXa ‘280 peoT | SGON. ‘saseQ peo} snouen, SIUIENS®Y UO SPECT :LNOdAY GAGN3LXS ANVWNNS LNIVHLSSY 19# GI ~ Bag :o1 pesueor, NOLLOIM HLIMBZ'PXB0S\L ISVOISAVOT Jdid\YWVSAVO\NSLSWAN\'D ‘Gor 2e1Z OWIL SLOZ ‘LE AWW 2120 (S290! PING) ‘ODD0'00Le'SIEA TY LOZ II NYSAVOZeL- 000 0- 000°0 0 0 0 Lyle 6reh- ‘BESEL) (ad0}9 18z0 ‘000°0- 0000 0 0 Lyle vere [0 a0ls | Ze i= 000°" 0000 0 0 0 Lyle evel 0 (30) ‘A PIB ‘x pire oe Purses |evoooo |e V0000 eviaos | ewsceset | ZH VWEEPH | yy 120 0000" 0000 0 0 0 Ey tesei 0 (a0Vzt 1zz0 000'0- 0000. 0 sole tesei- (Gao)ar 2900 0000" ‘000 0 oO 0 zee seeozi- [0 (Gaolst 9100 000°0 ‘0000 0 o o Steel vesLoL 0 (ad0}rt 42z0 000°0- 000°0- 0 0 0 SOLE ysl veebh = (acoeb 42z0 ‘000°0- ‘000°0 SOLE 4sszl veerlt (ago}zt ¥s8's- 000°0- ‘00'0 0 0 0 Sole" isszi- [0 (Gao)Lb ses" 000°0- 00° 0 0 0 sove- ueszi- [0 (Gaolor 620'c- 0000" 0000 oO 0 0 1808E- sesozi- [0 (aa0)6 696 0- 0000 0000 lo ‘ossoe- vESLOL 0 (ag0)8 ses" 000°0- 000°0- 0 0 0 sove- igszl- | weep | Bde yse's- 000°0- 0000 0 0 0 ‘SoLe- 4SSZi- veeyLe (3d0)9. 4zz0 ‘o00'0- 000. 0 0 0 sole tase | 0 (Gaojs ses" 000°" 000 0 0 0 soue- weszi- [0 Gaolr ‘A Pro Sxpi6ng oF evr levoooo. |e V0000 sive [escset [SUPE | cy Lee-0- 0000" 0000 oO o 0 ‘Sole 1SSzi- 0 aojzt 120" 0000- 0000. sole Lesel= (Gaojar Lv00- 000°0- ‘0000 oO 0 0 zies- seeszi- [0 (Gao)st 9100" ‘0000 ‘0000. 0 0 0 seeei- | vesion [0 (Gdoyrh 2zE0- 000°0" 00°" 0 0 0 sole" usszi-_| vaerbi= | (ado)er LZ '0- (000°0- ‘000°0 sole SSZi- veerlh (agojzt | S100 0000" 0000) 0 0 0 Zye, ysszi= 0 (ago) wwizg—[wwad [ww xa wNZW Pw NAN [WNW | N Zs NAS NX ‘ese9 peol_| SGON Not seseg peo} snouen, ‘SJUIEASOY UO SPE07 | YOdIY GAGNALX AUWWWNS LNIVHLSY Lo# al ~- yes :01 pesuecr ld HLINGZ'X80S\ SSYOISAVOT Adid\HVSAVO\NALSYINN'O ‘gor ZELZ OWL SLOZ “LE AVN 2G (SZsOzI PlINa) “000000 1e'S4eA 14 L LOZ Il MYSaWOpow ozb FIRES | e090 | svo00%0 SULL9Re [EUPOGRL |SVESIIH | yy ese b ‘000°0- 000°0 0 o 0 veee oplel 0 (dO}Lt ese (000°0" 0000. 0 0 0 ese giz [0 ‘Gao}eb 76E0. ‘000°0- ‘00° 0 0 0 11986 vossei- [0 (ad0)s1 £50 ‘0000 00° 0 0 0 vee elveok [0 (Gao)r ese (0000 (000°0- o eee gvizi- | estori= |(adoler | ese ‘000°0 ‘00° 0 fo” 0 eee. sez [estou | (ad0)zh | eeOL- 000°0- 0000 0 0 0 veer Opleh- 0 (3dO} + eeoL- 000°0- 0000 0 0 0 yee ‘Oplzl- 0 (3g0)0F LOE 000°0- 000°0 0 0 0 12988- ‘yO6EZ1- 0 (g0}6 660721- | 0000 ‘000 0 0 vores. [erveor | 0 (aole Seo Zt 000°0- 000 0- 0 0 0 yeas ‘plz ‘65th (ad0}e Seo Li 000°0- ‘0000 0 0 0 ‘veoe gveek 6SLObL (3d0)9 ese 000°0- ‘0000 0 0 0 vee. grizi- [0 (Gols Ba-yis 00:0 0000 0 0 0 yeae- ‘plz 0 (ag0}r ‘A PIE pion ost VIET |e e900- | svooo%o [SVeSeLE | SVECEBET | BVREBETT Ty, vero 0000" ‘0000 o 0 0 [ele vere [0 (a0Nzt 1820 000°0- 0000 0 Lyle terer- LEFTO ST O40 | 000°0- 000°0 0 0 0 Yre6z. ‘6ze9zh- 0 (3g0)st £220 00°0 00°0 0 0 0 ‘POvOE Zvevor [0 (ado}rh 4820 000°0- 000°" 0 0 0 [le bevel” | eeeebi- | (adOleb 1eZ0 ‘000°0- 0000 0 0 0 Lyle bevel |eeger | (adlet LoL bb- 000°0- 000°0 Lvle- (iz 0 (3d O7b4 ZeL =| 0000" 0000 0 0 0 LvLe- vere [0 (@a0}01 espe (000'0- 0000 0 0 0 esse | 6zeaci- | 0 (EF ely o- ‘000° ‘000° 0 0 0 voor | zveLor | 0 (aaole ELH | 0000" 000°0- 0 0 0 Lyle bevel [eget | (aa0)z, wuz [ww AG [ww xa WN ZW NAW WN XW NZS NAS NXd ‘38e0 peoT_| SON on ‘89829 peo] snouen, SIUIENSOY UO SPEOT :LHOdTY GIGNILXS ANVINNS INIVHLSaY L9# dl ~ 18g :01 pasueor] NOLLORS HLIMBZPX80S\t ISVO\SAVOT Adid\VSAVONALSVIMN'D “Gor 2812 SUL SLO 'LE AV IQ (GZSOZE PING) ‘ODD0'DO'LE'S49A LY LL0Z Il YWS3VO.veSz ‘000°0- 0000 0 0 0 ‘96E s6rel- 0 Td0)2t ESS 0000" ‘000°0 0 0 0 ‘896, see 0 (ag0)91 ee 000°0- 0000 0 0 0 ‘yE00v ‘oprecl- 0 (3g0)s1 elvb 000° 000-0 0 0 oO Lube ZSOLO1 0 (ad0)rt vese 000'0 000°0- 0 0 0 ‘8968 ‘S6LEL- 4sz07zh- (ag0}er vesz 000'0- 000 0 ‘as6e Sélel= tszozt| (dover | eovez | 0000- 0000. 0 0 0 ‘8S6E- see [0 (go) eor6z- | 0000- 0000) 0 0 0 ‘8S68- sere [0 (3d0)Ob 26 be ‘000'0- ‘0000 0 0 0 E00 ‘opvetl (Gao)6 ‘evaez- | 0000 ‘0000 0 0 o Live | zs0z0, | 0 (ad0)8 e997 62- 000°0- 000°0- 0 0 896e- ‘S6LE1- yszozi- (3d0}L, £9n'62- 000'0- ‘0000 0 0 0 996e- ‘S6LEL- yszozb (3d0)9° veS% 0000" ‘0000 o 0 0 856 sere [0 Gols e9v6z | 0000" 0000 0 0 0 8s6e- sere [0 (Gaol ‘ABI Spire badd VISE | soo. | svoov SUES [EVIE |SVESEOL | yy Beer 000.0" ‘000°0 o 0 Lise velbe 0 Gaol ‘Beeb 000°0- 000°0 0 0 LSE veLi- 0 (G@g0)9r Ea | 000°0- 000°0 0 0 ELSE ziseti= [0 (@do)st 1160, 00;0 | 0000 0 0 0 eesez 82196 0 (Gao}rl 8e61 00'0- 000°" 0 0 0 Lise relii- | es890i- | (@dolet E61 ‘o00'0- 000 0 0 0 Lise pelii- | ese, | (adOlet zwSee= | 0000" ‘0000. 0 0 0 Lise vel [0 (Gg0}Lt [epsee- | 0000 ‘0000 0 ZISE- vel 10 ‘(Gaolob 269 8l- 000°0- 000°. 0 0 0 eLSSe- Zier | 0 (EFO SeBLi- [0000 ‘0000 0 0 0 gesez | 82/56 0 Gaols eyS'ee | 0000" ‘0000 0 0 0 LISS vel | es8901- | (@do)z zrs'ec__| 0000- ‘0000 0 0 0 Lise velli- | zse90r | (ado. 8e6) ‘0000 0000 0 Lise veLii= [0 Gaols eset | 0000" 0000. 0 oO 0 Lise vel [0 (EF ‘APIO waza [uur [wuxa [wNzw | wNaw | wNXW [NZS NAg Nxd 3589 801 _| SGON A ‘sese9 peo] snouen, ‘SqUIeNS®Y UO SPECT :1HOdTY GSGNALX AVWINNS LNIVHLSSY Lo# dl ~ 39S :01 pesueor NOLLORS HLIMBZ'PX80S\L ASVO\SAVO? Sdid\VSAVONSLSVM'D ‘or Le4z WIL SLOZ LE AWW eA (SZSOZI PING) ‘ODD0'OO"LE'S48A be LL0Z Il HVSAVO.viESy ez 610000 s/000'0 SvvE0OY | SvarPEEL | SVISZOZE | yy waza [ar xg, wuXa WN ZW WN AW | WNXW [NZ Nad NXG ‘3869 peoy | SGON zh saseg peo] snouen, ‘SIUIERSEY UO SPECT -LNOdIY GIGNSLXS ANVNNNS LNIVELSIY Lo# dl ~ 389g :01 pasusor NOLLOMM4 HLIMBZPX80S\L ISWO\SAVOT Sdld\VSAVONASWIN\'D “Gor LEZ WIL GLoz ‘LE AVI 81d (GzgOZb PME) ‘000'00'LE'S48A FY LL0z II HYSAVOCAESAR II 2011 R1 Ver.6.31.00,0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #64 DISPLACEMENTS REPORT: Nodal Movements CASE 4 (OPE) W+T1+P1 13 NODE DxXmm DYmm Dzmm. RX deg RY deg RZ deg. 1 0.000 “0.514 26.581 0.0132 0.0000 0.0000 10 0.000 0.000 23.613 0.0049 0.0000 0.0000 20 0.000 0.051 20.653 0.0007 (0.0000 0.0000 30 0.000 0.000 17.694 0.0012 0.0000 0.0000 40 0.000 0.136 14.740 (0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 50 0.000 0.000 11.787 ‘0.0003 (0.0000 0.0000 60 0.000 0.114 8.840, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 70 0.000 0.000 5.894 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 80 0.000 “0.119 2.954 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 90 0.000 0.000. 0.015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100 0.000 0.118 2.920 0.0000 (0.0000 0.0000 410 0.000 -0.000 5.854 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 120 0.000 0.119 “8.796 0.0000 (0.0000 0.0000 430 0.000 0.000 “4.737 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 140. 0.000 0.114 “14.685 (0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 150. 0.000 0.000 =17.633 0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 160. 0.000 0.135 20.587 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 170 0.000 0.000 23.542 0.0012 0.0000 0.0000 180 0.000 0.051 26.502 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 490 0.000 0.000; 29.463 0.0049 0.0000 0.0000 200 0.000 0.514 ~32.430 0.0132 0.0000 0.0000CAESAR II 2011 R1 Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 31, 2015 Time: 21:37 Job: C:\MASTER\CAESAR\PIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78WITH FRICTION Licensed To: Seat — ID #61 DISPLACEMENTS REPORT: Nodal Movements CASE 9 (OPE) W+T1+P1-WIN2 14 NODE DX mm. DY mm. DzZmm. RX deg. RY deg. RZ deg. 7 0.000 “5.195 28.711 0.1334 0.0000 0.0000 70 0.000) 0.000 25.744 0.0500 ‘0.0000 0.0000 20 0.000) 0.513 22.844 =0.0073 (0.0000 0.0000 30 0.000) 0.000 79.943 0.0125 (0.0000 0.0000 = 40 0.000. =1.366 47.402 (0.0018 (0.0000 ‘0.0000 50 0.000 -0.000 14.264 (0.0034 0.0000. (0.0000 60. 0.000 1.452 11.484 0.0005 0.0000 (0.0000 70 0.000) -0.000 8.708 0.0008 0.0000 (0.0000 80 (0.000 =1.206 5.993, 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 90 0.000 -0.000 3.278 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 700 (0.000 =1.790 0.624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 110 0.000 0.000 2.029 -0.0002 0.0000. 0.0000 120 0.000. 74.206 “4.743 -0.0001 ‘0.0000 0.0000 730. 0.000 -0.000 “7.458 0.0008 (0.0000 0.0000 140 0.000. “1.152 =10.234 (0.0005 (0.0000 ‘0.0000 150. 0.000 -0.000 13.011 0.0034 0.0000 0.0000 760 0.000 =1.366 715.854 0.0018 (0.0000 (0.0000 770 (0.000) -0.000 “18.692 0.0125 0.0000 (0.0000 180 0.000 0.513 -21,592 0.0073 0.0000 (0.0000 7190 0.000) 0.000 24.492 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 200 0.000. 5.195 27.458 0.1334 0.0000. 0.0000CAESAR II 2011 R1.Ver.6.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTER\CAESAR\PIPE LOADSICASE 1\608X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 Job Description: Pipe 508x4.78 PROJECT: MASTER THESTS CLIENT : ANALYST: 8. TVETT NOTES : WITHOUT STRUCTURAL INFLUENCE, NO FRICTION PIPE DATA From 1 To 10 DZ= -2,500.000 mn. PIPE, Dia= 508.000 mm. Wall= 4.780 mm. Cor= .0000 mm. GENERAL T= 100C 12+-7 C Pl= 12.1000 bars —Pllyd= 20.0000 bars Mat- (338)A790 $31803 = 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH1= 189,795 N./sq.nm. EH2= 196,280 N./sq.mm. EI3= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH4~ 195,825 N./sq.mm. EHS= 195/825 N./sqemm, EH6= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH7= 195,825 N./sa.mm. EHG= 195/825 N./sqemm. EH9= 195,825 N./sq.mm. v= «292 Pipe Den-8027.0000000 kg/cu.m. Fluid Den=1000.0000000 kg/cu.m. Insul Thk= .000 mm. WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 'B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = ON Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sa.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sa.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sg.mm, Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. sy= 395 N./sq.mm. From 10 To 20 Di GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 10 x Node 10 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE. STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = ON Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. 206 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mn. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.nm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. 07 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq.mm. | Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. Sy= 395 N./sq.mm. 2, 500.000 mm. From 20 To 30 D% GENERAL Ee 195,825 N./sqemm. EH1= 169,795 N./sq-mm, EH2= 196,280 N./sq.nm. EH3= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EHd= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EHS= 195,825 N./sq.nm. EH6- 195,825 N./sq.mm. FH?= 195,825 N./sq.mm. EH@= 195,825 N./sq.mm. BH9= 195/825 N./sqemm. v= .292 Pipe Den=8027.0000000 kg/cu.m. =2,500.000 mm.CAESAR II 2011 R1_Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat — ID #61 RESTRAINTS Node 30 xX Node 30 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = ON So= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. $h3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 W./sq-mm. 207 N./sq.mn. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh?= 207 N./sq 207 N./sq.mn. $h9= 207 N./sq.mm. Sy= 395 N./sq.nm. From 30 To 40 DZ= -2,500.000 mm. PIPE Dia= $08,000 mm. Wall= 4.780 mm. GENERAL Insul Thk= .000 mm. WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq-nm. Shl= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./squnm. Sh4~ 207 N./sq.mm. ShS= 207 N,/sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi 395 N./sq.mmn. 207 Jsq.mm. From 40 To 50 Dz= GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 50 x Node 50 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31,3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Shl= 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 sh6= 207 N./sq.mn. Sh7= 207 N./sq-mn. Sh8= 207 Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. Fron 50 To GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = So= 207 N./sq.mm, Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. $h2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9~ 207 N./sq.nm, From 60 To 70 Dz= -2,500.000 mm GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 70 x Node 70 ¥ WINDCAESAR II 2011 R1Ver.5.31.00,0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Ti Job: C:\MASTER\CAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 122 Wind shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = So= 207 N./sq-mm. shiz 206 N./sq.me, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh3= 207 N./sq.mim, 207 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. | Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. From 70 To @0 GENERAL, WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. 206 N./eq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 W./sq.mm, Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sqcmm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2, 500.000 mm. From 80 To 90 Da -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 90 x Node 90 ¥ ‘WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = Sc 207 N./sq.mm. Shl- 206 N./sq-mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm, Shi= 207 N./sqemm. ShS= 207 N./sq.nm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. sh?= 207 N./sa-mm, Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq-mm, From 90 To 100 DZ= 2,500,000 mm, GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = Sc 207 N./sq.mm, Shl- 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sqemm. ShS= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mmn, ‘Sh?= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh@= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. From 100 To 110 DZ= -2,500.000 mm, GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 110 x Node 110 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE. STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.mm. Shiz 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mn. Shé= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh?= 207 N./sqemm. Sh@= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm, PIPE DATACAESAR II 2011 R1_Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 ob: C:\MASTER\CAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat -- ID #61 From 110 To 120 Di GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./aqumm. Shd= 207 N./sq.mm. $h5= 207 N./sq.mm. $h6= 207 N./sq.nm, Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm, ShB= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2, 500.000 mm, From 120 To 130 D: GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 130 x Node 130 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 831.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = c= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./eq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.am, Sh4~ 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Shé= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2,500.000 mm, From 130 To 140 bz GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 331.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc» 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.nm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.nm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6~ 207 N./sq.nm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2,500,000 mm. From 140 To 150 Di GENERAL, RESTRAINTS Node 150 x Node 150 Y wrND Wind Shape= 1,000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 831.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Sc= 207 N./sq.mmn. Sh1= 206 N./sq.mn, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4- 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./squnm, Sh?= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2,500,000 mm. From 150 To 160 Di GENERAL WIND Wind shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./aq.mm. Sh4~ 207 N./sa.mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.mn. Sh6= 207 N./sq.nm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 2, 500.000 mm,CAESAR Il 2011 R1 Ver-5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTER\CAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4,78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat — ID #61 From 160 To 170 Dz= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL, RESTRAINTS Node 170 x Node 170 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = i 207 N./sq.mm. Sh1= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq-mm, Sh3= 207 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq-mm. ShS= 207 N./sq.-nm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq-mm. N./sq.mm, From 170 To 180 Dz= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL, WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. shi= 206 N./sq.mm, Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mn. ShS= 207 N./sq.mm, 207 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq-mm. 207 N./sq-mm. From 180 To 190 DZ= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL RESTRAINTS Node 190 x Node 190 ¥ WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES B31.3 (2008) cycle Max Switch = Se= 207 N./sq.mm. Shi= 206 N./sq.mm. Sh2= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh3= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh4= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh5= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mn. From 190 To 200 DZ= -2,500.000 mm. GENERAL WIND Wind Shape= 1.000 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 831.3 (2008) Cycle Max Switch = i shl= 206 N./sq.mm, 8h: Shd= 207 N./sq.mm, Sh5= 207 N./sa.mm, Sh6= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh7= 207 N./sq.mm. Sh8= 207 N./sq-mm. Sh9= 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm. 207 N./sq.mm, Sh3= 207 N./sq.am.CAESAR Il 2011 R1_ Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ 1D #61 STRESS SUMMARY REPORT: Highest Stresses Mini Statement Various Load Cases LORD CASE DEFINITION KEY CASE 1 (HYD) WieHP CASE 2 (SUS) WNC CASE 3 (SUS) WHPL CASE 18 (OCC) L18#L6-L4 CASE 19 (OCC) CASE 20 (Occ) CASE 21 (OCC) CASE 22 (OCC) L22=110-L4 CASE 23 (OCC) L23-L11-Lé CASE 24 (OCC) L24=L18+L3 CASE 25 (OCC) L25=L19+L3 CASE 26 (OCC) CASE 27 (occ) CASE 28 (OCC) 22413 CASE 29 (OCC) L29+L23+L3 CASE 30 (EXP) 130=14-13 CASE 31 (EXP) L31*L5-13 Piping Code: B31.3 = B31.3 -2008, December 31, 2008 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 1 (HYD) wit+HP Highest Stresses: (N./sq-mu. ) LOADCASE 1 (HYD) Wi+HP CodeStress Ratio (8): 15.2 @Node 10 Code Stress: 60.0 Allowable: 395.0 Axial Stress: 51.6 @Node 10 Bending Stress: 8.3 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 104.3 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 107.3 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 2 (SUS) WNC Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm, ) LOADCASE 2 (SUS) WNC Codestress Ratio (% 1.0 @Node 10 Code Stress: 2.0 Allowable: 205.9 Axial Stress: 0.0 e@Node 10 Bending Stress: 2.0 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 2.0 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 3 (SUS) W+PL Highest Stresses: (N./sq-mm. ) LOADCASE 3 (SUS) W+P1 CodeStress Ratio (%): 19.2 @Node 10 Code Stress: 39.6 Allowable: 205.9 Axial Stress: 31.2 @Node 10 Bending Stress: 8.3 @Node 10CAESAR II 2011 R1 Ver.5.31.00.0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat ~ ID #61 STRESS SUMMARY REPORT: Highest Stresses Mini Statement Various Load Cases Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 63.1 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 64.9 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 18 (OCC) L1@=L6-L4 Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. ) LOADCASE 18 (OCC) L18-L6-L¢ CodeStress Ratio (8): 15.3 @Node 10 Code Stress: 75.9 Allowable: 494.2 Axial Stress 0.0 @Node = 10 Bending Stress 78.9 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 75.9 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 19 (OCC) 119 Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. ) LOADCASE 19 (OCC) L19=L7-L4 Codestress Ratio (¥): 19.3 @Node 10 Code Stress: 75.9 Allowable: 494.2 Axial Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Bending Stress: 75.9 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 75.9 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED + LOADCASE 20 (OCC) L20=L8-i4 Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm, ) LOADCASE 20 (OCC) L20=L8-14 Codestress Ratio (8): 15.3 @Node 10 Code Stress: 75.9 Allowable: 494.2 Axial Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Bending Stress: 75.9 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 75.9 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 21 (OCC) 121: Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. ) LOADCASE 21 (OCC) 121-1 CodeStress Ratio (%): 15.3 @Node 10 Code Stress: 75.9 Allowable: 494.2 Axial Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Bending Stress: 75.9 @Node 10 Torsion Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 Hoop Stress: 0.0 @Node 10 3D Max Intensity: 75.9 @Node 10 CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED : LOADCASE 22 (OCC) L22=110-L4 Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. } LOADCASE 22 (OCC) L22=L10-L4 CodeStress Ratio (8): 0.0 @Node 10 Code Strese: 0.0 Allowable: 494.2CAESAR II 2011 R1_Ver.5.31,00,0000, (Build 120525) Date: MAY 29, 2015 Time: 12:2 Job: C:\MASTERICAESARIPIPE LOADSICASE 1\508X4.78NO FRICTION Licensed To: Seat — ID #61 STRESS SUMMARY REPORT: Highest Stresses Mini Statement Various Load Cases Axial Stress: Bending Stress: Torsion Stress: Hoop Stress: 3D Max Intensity: CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. Codestress Ratio (%): Code Stress Axial Stress: Bending Stress: Torsion Stress: Hoop Stress: 3D Max Intensity: ) 0. 0. 0. oO. 0. 0. 0. CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mn. CodeStress Ratio ($}+ 23. Code Stress: 115. Axial Stres a1. Bending Stress Ba. Torsion Stress: o. Hoop Stress: 63. 3D Max Intensity: 140. CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED Highest Stresses: Codestress Ratio (%): 23. Code Stress: 115. Axial Stress: a1. Bending Stress: 84. Torsion Stress: oO. Hoop Stress: 63. 3D Max Intensity: 140.) CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. CodeStress Ratio (8 23. Code Stresa: 1s. Axial Stress: 31. Bending Stress: a4. Torsion Stress: 0. Hoop Stress: 6. 3D Max Intensity: 140. CODE STRESS CHECK PASSED Highest Stresses: (N./sq.mm. eNode 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 @ode 10 + LOADCASE 23 (OCC) L23=L11-L4 LOADCASE 23 (OCC) L23sL11-L4 4 4 2 2 0 1 8 4 4 2 2 0 1 8 4 4 2 2 a 1 8 @ode 10 Allowable: 494.2 @ode 10 @ode 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 LOADCASE 24 (OCC) L24=L18+L3 ) LOADCASE 24 (OCC) L24=118+L3 @Node 10 Allowable: 494.2 @Node 10 @Node 10 eNode 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 LORDCASE 25 (OCC) L25=19+13 (W./sq-mm. ) LOADCASE 25 (OCC) L25=119+13 @Node 10 Allowable: 494.2 @Node 10 @Node 10 @ode 10 @ode 10 @ode 10 LOADCASE 26 (OCC) L26=120+L3 ) LOADCASE 26 (OCC) L26=L20413 Node 10 Allowable: 494.2 Node 10 Node 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 @Node 10 : LOADCASE 27 (OCC) L27=121+L3 ) LOADCASE 27 (OCC) L27=21+13

Tveit Siv Anni

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Tveit Siv Anni

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Anda mungkin juga menyukai