athlete becomes fatigued. It should be tion is held for more than 2 or 3 seconds.
summary noted that flexibility training, while an Additionally, the movements isolate the
important part of this warm-up pro- specific joints being used while incorpo-
A proper soccer warm-up should in- gram, is not the only component. Static rating a full range of motion. There are a
stretching has its place and purpose in multitude of movements that can ac-
clude components of both game-re- improving flexibility, but the instances complish the general mobility goal, but
lated skills and specific movements of stretching for 2030 minutes before a we have found the following move-
game as a means of warming up are very ments, listed in Table 1 and described in
to prepare the athlete for the opti- rare today. In recent years, the impor- detail here, to be time efficient while ac-
tance of stretching a muscle with move- complishing the task. Each exercise is re-
mum play. A warm-up that includes ment (dynamic stretching) has been em- peated 5 times, with each position held
dynamic stretching, transitional phasized (3, 7), and it has been noted for 23 seconds, before moving on to
that an active warm-up may improve the next exercise. Completion of the
movements and includes the entire certain types of performance by increas- general mobility phase of the warm-up
ing muscle contractile performance should take about 5 minutes.
body is presented. prior to use (1, 8, 10). The warm-up de-
scribed here has 3 distinct outcomes: Upper Extremities
roper preparation for a soccer general mobility, transit mobility, and The neck clock is performed in a series of
General Mobility
4 movements: neck flexion, lateral flex-
ion to the left, neck extension, and later-
al flexion to the right. This takes the
mum effort as soon as the whistle blows. You never want to start a warm-up total- place of the traditional rolling motion to
A warm-up should increase body and ly cold, so an easy jog across the soccer stretch the neck. The neck clock presents
muscle temperature, activate muscle field and back a couple of times will get a more active stretch than the passive cir-
groups, stimulate the nervous system, the heart pumping and the blood flow- cular movement of a relaxed neck. Fol-
and increase joint mobility thereby ing. Starting at the neck and working low the neck clock with the shoulder
preparing the player for optimal perfor- down through the body, general mobili- roll, moving the shoulders in large circu-
mance while minimizing risk of injury ty warm-ups begin with basic move- lar motions both forward and backward.
(5, 9). One way to help insure that this ments to loosen up the muscles and in-
occurs is through an active and dynamic crease isolated joint mobility. Most of The next movement is the arm hug.
warm-up. The warm-up should be in- these general mobility movements are Cross both arms across the front of the
tense enough to increase the bodys core closely associated with some typical stat- chest in horizontal adduction as far as
temperature but not so intense that the ic stretches, but in this instance, no posi- possible, and then swing back in hori-
References
1. B ISHOP, D. Warm up I: Potential
mechanisms and the effects of pas-
sive warm-up on exercise perfor- Devore
mance. Sports Med. 33(6):439454.
2003. Pam Devore is a former collegiate soccer
2. CASTAGNA, C., S. DOTTAVIO, AND G. player and current Sports Performance
ABT. Activity profile of young soccer Coach for Velocity Sports Performance in
players during actual match play. J. Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Strength Cond. Res. 17:775780. 2003.
3. FLETCHER, I.M., AND B. JONES. The
effect of different warm-up stretch
protocols on 20-meter sprint perfor-
mance in trained rugby union players.
J. Strength Cond. Res. 18:885888.
2004.
4. FORAN, B. High-Performance Sports
Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2001.
5. GRAY, S., AND S. NIMMO. Effects of ac- Hagerman
tive, passive or no warm--up on metab-
olism and performance during high- Patrick Hagerman is a clinical assistant
intensity exercise. J. Sports Sci. professor at the University of Tulsa.
19(9):693700. 2001.
6. H OLLOSZY, J.O., AND E.F. C OYLE .
Adaptations of skeletal muscle to en-
durance exercise and their metabolic
consequences. J. Appl. Physiol. 56(4):
831838. 1984.
7. MANN, D., AND C. WHEDON. Func-
tional stretching: Implementing a dy-
namic stretching program. Athl. Ther.
Today. 6(3):1013. 2001.
8. SALE, D.G. Postactivation potentia-
tion: Role in human performance.
Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 30(3):13843.
2002.
9. SCHMID, S, AND B. ALEJO. Complete