4/22/17
Research paper
Two theories of Modern Human Origins (Regional Continuity and
Replacement)
There are two theories that discuss human origins they are called the
theories have different ideas on discussing the ideas of origin. They are two
explain about the human origin. The hypothesis is an alternative scientific model
that provides an explanation for the pattern of human evolution. The hypothesis
states that humans first arose near the beginning of the Pleistocene two million
years ago and subsequent human evolution has been within a single, continuous
human species. This kind of species has a form that is similar to that of Homo
erectus and Neanderthals as well as a modern form, and this species has also
theory resists the idea that humans evolve through a combination of adaptation
within various regions of the world and gene flow between those regions. There
are supporters of multiregional origin that support the fossil and genomic data
2001)
by Milford H. Wolpoff and colleagues, they used the theory to explain the
necessary balance between both local selection and overall evolution as a global
species, with Homo erectus, Neanderthals, Homo sapiens and other human
forms as subspecies.
The other theory that also explains the origins of humans is the
replacement theory or its called out of Africa. The Replacement model suggests
a more modern origin of Homo sapiens. Homo erectus migrated out of Africa by
1.8 mya and Archaic Homo sapiens which, most likely gave rise to Homo
Neandertals, have been found throughout Europe and the Middle East.
archaic humans 200,000-150,000 years ago only in the African region. Then
some migrated in to the rest of the Old World that replaces all of the Neandertals
and other late archaic humans beginning around 60,000-40,000 years ago or
earlier. If this explanation of the fossil record is correct, all people today share
some kind of African ancestry. All other lines of humans that had descended
from Homo erectus apparently became extinct. According to this, the regional
referred to as the "out of Africa", "Noah's ark", and "African replacement" model.
(Monroe M. H, 2011)
variation in modern human populations support this model. There are studies
homogeneous, with moderately little genetic variation. The low amount of genetic
variation in modern human populations suggests that our origins may reflect a
relatively small founding population for Homo sapiens. There is also fossil
evidence that support this model/ theory. There have been studies conducted
that have found out that burials lacked grave goods and signs of ritual or
ceremony. It has been found that hunting was usually limited to less dangerous
species and evidence for fishing is absent and population densities have been
regional model lacks significant evidence. The fossil records that are used to
support this theory are very weak and dont provide enough information about the
theory that Homo sapiens evolved outside of Arica (O'Neil, Dennis, 2013).
The kind of evidences that support of the Out of Africa model is very
would appear, African in the main. I think the recent best explanation for the
beginning of modern humans is the Out of Africa Model that postulates a single,
Humans: Early Modern Homo Sapiens. N.p., 20 Nov. 2013. Web. 22 Apr.
2017.
4. Stringer, C. African Archaeological Review (2001) 18: 67.
5. E-portfolio: http://sirwa12345.weebly.com/anthro.html