Fester EW, Murray PM, Sanders TG, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting
disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27(3):41824.
IMAGING TECHNIQUES
Longitudinal view
transversal view
Soubeyrand M et al. The muscular hernia sign: an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearms
interosseous membrane. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28(3):3728.
Intact membrane
Gong HS, Chung MS, Oh JH, Lee YH, Kim SH, Baek GH. Failure of the Interosseous Membrane to Heal With Immobilization, Pinning of the
Distal Radioulnar Joint, and Bipolar Radial Head Replacement in a Case of Essex-Lopresti Injury: Case Report. J Hand Surg 2010;35A:976980
CAN IT REALLY HEAL ?
Failla, in fresh injury, describes a widening of the
edges (like in ACL lesions) and a muscular
interposition (like in Steners lesion)
In which position ?
?
remodelling in some instances but erosion in others. removed from the frame and reversed. The pneumatic
be a better long-term solution for higher
Therefore a total prosthetic distal radioulnar joint may demand pa-deviceof the frame.
moves on twoTwo steel high
rods tension
parallel tobraided
the longsteel
axiswi
be atients,
betterbut good results
long-term willfor
solution only be achieved
higher demandby correctof thetached
pa- frame. to Twothehighpneumatic device pass
tension braided steel along the
wires at-
understanding
tients, but good results of joint biomechanics
will only be achieved and by reproduction
correct tachedparallel
to the to the steel device
pneumatic rods and passover pulleys
along at the
the frame
Three
Three cadaveric upper limbs were dissected to liga-were balanced
mentscadaveric
and boneupper from limbs were dissected
the proximal third oftothe
just covering
forearmto 1100
liga-
to 1100 on
grams,
tional
the sensing
were balanced
grams,
areapuck
on the
the puck
and tothe
and thelogarithm
to inverse
of the
load
to transducer.
load
load was of found
Weights
load the transducer
thewas
transducer
found to from
to be propor-
the resistance.
be0p
rotation
from
carpus.rotation
A the
A custom
and
proximal
custom
axial
third ofallowed
apparatus
andapparatus
axial loading
loading across
the forearm
allowedacross
measured
the
measuredtional to A
the wrist A 3lington,
wrist lington,
inverse
3 mmlogarithm
mm microminature
Vermont,
Vermont, USA)
USA) was
of the resistance.
microminature
DVRT"
sutured
DVRT" (Microstrain
(Microstrain,
was sutured
to the central
Bur-
to the centra
band
(Department of Clinical Engineering, Withington Hos- of the interosseous membrane on the dorsal surfa
(Department of Clinical Engineering, Withington
pital, Manchester, UK). The specimens were securely at- Hos- of the interosseous
parallel to themembrane
fibres (Fig. on2).
theThedorsal
DVRTsurface
wasandcon
pital,tached
Manchester, UK). The specimens were securely
to the frame at 90! of elbow flexion by a 5 mm at- parallel to the fibres (Fig. 2). The DVRT
to a PC via the Microstrain motherboard. The was connected
Rigidity:13,1 +/- 3,0 N/mm tached to the frame at 90! of elbow flexion
diameter threaded bolt into the olecranon of the ulna
diameter
by a 5 mm to a PC via the
strain Microstrain
software allowedmotherboard.
a continuousThe Micro-of
reading
and athreaded
pneumatic boltdevice
into the olecranon
to !grip" of the ulna (Fig.strain displacement
the metacarpals software allowed shown a continuous readingversus
as a displacement of linear
time
and 1).a pneumatic device to !grip" the metacarpals
A transverse 2 mm k-wire passed across the ulna, (Fig. displacement shown as a displacement
on the PC. The DVRT was calibrated by the ma versus time graph
1). A transverse 2 mm k-wire passed across the ulna, on the PC. The DVRT was calibrated by the manufac-
perpendicular to the olecranon bolt, and rested on two turer and the readings were in millimetres. The
Elastic modulus: 608,1 +/- 160,2 mPa perpendicular to the olecranon bolt, and rested on two
further 5mm bolts attached to the frame to prevent rota-
further 5mm bolts attached to the frame to prevent rota-
turer and the readings were in millimetres. The strain
was calculated as the change in length over the o
was calculated as the change in length over the original
tion of the ulna. length of the DVRT at the start of a set of readi
tion of the ulna. length of the DVRT at the start of a set of readings.
Clin 17:97110
THE CENTRAL BAND
Insertion site is larger on
the volar aspect of the
radius and dorsal aspect of
the ulna
Hotchkiss RN. Injuries to the interosseous ligament of the forearm. Hand Clin 1994;10:391398.
Skahen JR 3rd, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg
1997;22A:986 994.
WITH WHAT TO REPAIR THE IOM ?
Skahen JR 3rd, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the
forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg 1997;22A:986 994.
Pfaeffle HJ, Stabile KJ, Li ZM, Tomaino MM. Reconstruction of the interosseous ligament restores normal
forearm compressive load transfer in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(2):319-325.
WITH WHAT TO REPAIR THE IOM ?
The pronator teres tendon
is detached proximally, its
distal attachment left intact
whereas the proximal part
is rotated (this is
approximately the level at
which the IOL originates
on the radius
it is technically
challenging and requires
much surgical
experience however
no case is reported
Chloros GD, Wiesler ER, Stabile KJ, Papadonikolakis A, Ruch DS, Kuzma GR.. Reconstruction of Essex-
Lopresti Injury of the Forearm: Technical note. J Hand Surg 2008;33A:124130
WITH WHAT TO REPAIR THE IOM ?
A bone-tendon-
graft (patellar
ligament) is the
most frequently
reported
technique used
Ruch DS, Change DS, Koman LA. Reconstruction of longitudinal stability of the forearm after disruption of interosseous ligament and radial
head excision (Essex-Lopresti lesion). J South Orthop Assoc 1999;8:4752.
Marcotte AL, Osterman AL. Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation: identification and treatment of acute and chronic injuries. Hand Clin
2007;23:195-208
IOM RECONSTRUCTION USING A BONE-
TENDON-BONE GRAFT
78 months FU
Adams JE, Culp RW, Osterman AL. Interosseous membrane repair for the Essex-Lopresti injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:129-136.
SYNTHETIC MATERIAL
One acute case treated with the Tightrope with good results (Brin)
Adams and Osterman (as others) have replaced the BTBG by a mini
TightRope in 10 chronic cases.
Sabo MT, Watts AC. Reconstructing the interosseous membrane: a technique using synthetic graft and endobuttons. Tech Hand Up
Extrem Surg. 2012;16(4):187-193.
Brin YS, Palmanovich E, Bivas A, Sagiv P. Treating acute Essex-Lopresti injury with the tightrope device: a case study. Tech Hand Up
Extrem Surg 2014;18:51-5
Gaspar MP, Kane PM, Pflug EM, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL, Culp RW, Interosseous membrane reconstruction with a suture-button
construct for treatment of chronic forearm instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2016) 25, 14911500
TECHNICAL TIPS TO REMEMBER
Ulna shortening/leveling
Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J
Hand Surg Br 1999; 24(2):245-248.
Posterior view
length of insertion is 3 cm on both bones
1,1 to 2,6 cm
2,7-3,5 cm
7,7 cm 57%
25
13,2 cm 32%
Anterior view
POSITIONING OF THE GRAFT ?
Forster RI, Sharkey NA, Szabo RM. Forearm Interosseous Ligament Isometry. J Hand Surg 1999;24A:538545.
Farr LD, Werner FW, McGrattan ML, Zwerling SR, Harley BJ. Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Forearm Interosseous Membrane. J Hand
Surg Am. 2015;40(6):1145-1151.
TENSION OF THE GRAFT
CB length is greater in neutral
Skahen JR 3rd, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg
1997;22A:986 994.
Farr LD, Werner FW, McGrattan ML, Zwerling SR, Harley BJ. Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Forearm Interosseous Membrane. J Hand
Surg Am. 2015;40(6):1145-1151.
ULNA SHORTENING / LEVELLING
Most techniques include a
shortening of the ulna at
the level of the insertion of
the graft (to unload the
radius and avoid creating a
stress riser if it was placed
more proximal)
WE CHOOSE A DIFFERENT APPROACH
If the graft is not perfectly positioned, we
believe it cannot sustain the loads as it does
not fit with the axis of forearm rotation (from
the centre of the radial head and the base of
the styloid ulnar process at the insertion of
the TFCC)
THE TECHNIQUE SOUBEYRAND DESCRIBED
Soubeyrand M, Oberlin C, Dumontier C, et al. Ligamentoplasty of the forearm interosseous membrane using the semitendinosus tendon:
anatomical and surgical procedure. Surg Radio Anat. 2006;28:300-307.
IOM Reconstruction