Midterm Eval

4/23/2017 Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument
Responses About You - Details - "Level II Fieldwork Evaluation - Mid-term"

Print
1 of 2 1
Evaluation by: Fieldwork Educators (Hyde, Jonathan)

Evaluation of: Students (Stemmler, Brianna)
Evaluation Period: 2/10/2017
Survey Completed: 2/10/2017 11:50:18 AM ET
IMPORTANT:Please mark whether this is the Midterm or Final evaluation of your student. Additionally, please keep whether this is a Midterm or Final evaluation in
mind as you completethe rest of this evaluation.
NOTE: At the end of this evaluation, you will be asked to provide a total score for your student. Itwill be helpful to keep track of the points you give your student on
a spare piece of paper or on a calculatoras you ll-out the evaluation.
Midterm
Please complete the following:
Name of Student (Last, First, Middle) - Stemmler, Brianna

College or University of Student - Sacred Heart
Name of Organization/Facility - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Address - 330 Brookline Ave
City - Boston
State - MA
Zip - 02215
Type of Fieldwork - Psychosocial
Order of Placement (Options: 1, 2, 3, 4) out of (Options: 1, 2, 3, 4) - 1 out of 2
Dates of Placement - 01/03/2017 to 03/24/2017
Number of Hours Completed - 240
Number of Persons Contributing to this Report - 1
Name of Rater #1 - Jonathan Hyde, MS, OTR/L
Name of Rater #2 (if applicable) - No response
https://www.typhongroup.net/eval/analyze/studentdetails.asp?r=0&facility=9283&survey=38889 1/8
I. FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:
All items in this area must be scored at a #3 or above on the nal evaluation in order to pass eldwork.
RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE
4 Exceeds Standards: Performance is highly skilled and self-initiated. This rating is rarely given and would represent the top 5% of all the students you have
supervised.
3 Meets Standards: Performance is consistent with entry-level practice. This rating is infrequently given at midterm and is a strong rating at nal.
2 Needs Improvement: Performance is progressing but still needs improvement for entry-level practice. This is a realistic rating of performance at midterm, and
some ratings of 2 may be reasonable at the nal.
1 Unsatisfactory: Performance is below standards and requires development for entry-level practice. This rating is given when there is a concern about
performance.
Adheres to ethics: Adheres consistently to the American Occupational Therapy Association Code of Ethics and sites policies and procedures
including, when relevant, those related to human subject research. - 3[3 pts]
Adheres to safety regulations: Adheres consistently to safety regulations. Anticipates potentially hazardous situations and takes steps to
prevent accidents. - 3[3 pts]
Uses judgement in safety: Uses sound judgement in regard to safety of self and others during all eldwork-related activities. - 3[3 pts]
MEAN: 3.00 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 9, % SCORE: 75.0%
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:
Strengths: Brianna consistently demonstrates awareness of safety issues and ethical issues related to treatment. Goals: Continue to
demonstrate good awareness of ethical concerns and safety issues, including group appropriateness, and convey relevant observations with
the treatment team.
II.BASIC TENETS:
supervised.
performance.
Clearly and con dently articulates the values and beliefs of the occupational therapy profession to clients, families, signi cant others,
colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 2[2 pts]
Clearly, con dently, and accurately articulates the value of occupation as a method and desired outcome of occupational therapy to clients,
families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 2[2 pts]
Clearly, con dently, and accurately communicates the roles of the occupational therapist and occupational therapy assistant to clients,
families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 2[2 pts]
Collaborates with client, family, and signi cant others throughout the occupational therapy process. - 3[3 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in BASIC TENENTS:
Strengths: Brianna demonstrates good knowledge of Occupational Therapy theories and values. She also actively collaborates with patients
throughout the course of their treatment. Goals: More actively educate patients and members of the treatment team on the roles and values of
Occupational Therapy in Mental Health during patient interviews and treatment interventions, as well as during multidisciplinary treatment team
meetings.
III. EVALUATION AND SCREENING:
supervised.
performance.
Articulates a clear and logical rationale for the evaluation process. - 2[2 pts]
Selects relevant screening and assessment methods while considering such factors as clients priorities, context(s), theories, and evidence-
based practice. - 2[2 pts]
Determines clients occupational pro le and performance through appropriate assessment methods. - 2[2 pts]
Assesses client factors and context(s) that support or hinder occupational performance. - 2[2 pts]
Obtains su cient and necessary information from relevant resources such as client, families, signi cant others, service providers, and records
prior to and during the evaluation process. - 3[3 pts]
Administers assessments in a uniform manner to ensure ndings are valid and reliable. - 2[2 pts]
Adjusts/modi es the assessment procedures based on clients needs, behaviors, and culture. - 2[2 pts]
Interprets evaluation results to determine clients occupational performance strengths and challenges. - 2[2 pts]
Establishes an accurate and appropriate plan based on the evaluation results, through integrating multiple factors such as clients priorities,
context(s), theories, and evidence-based practice. - 2[2 pts]
Documents the results of the evaluation process that demonstrates objective measurement of clients occupational performance. - 2[2 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in EVALUATION AND SCREENING:
Strengths: Brianna consistently utilizes multiple sources to obtain relevant data for initial evaluations. She provides clear, concise
documentation and modi es her approach based on patient response. Goals: -To demonstrate improved pro ciency in interpreting patient data
to establish a clearer picture of patient functioning. - To further incorporate the interpretation of functioning into treatment interventions by
addressing speci c areas of impairment.
IV. INTERVENTION:
supervised.
performance.
Articulates a clear and logical rationale for the evaluation process. - 2[2 pts]
Utilizes evidence from published research and relevant resources to make informed intervention decisions. - 2[2 pts]
Chooses occupations that motivate and challenge clients. - 2[2 pts]
Selects relevant occupations to facilitate clients meeting established goals. - 2[2 pts]
Implements intervention plans that are client centered. - 2[2 pts]
Implements intervention plans that are occupation-based. - 2[2 pts]
Modi es task approach, occupations, and the environment to maximize client performance. - 2[2 pts]
Updates, modi es, or terminates the intervention plan based upon careful monitoring of the clients status. - 3[3 pts]
Documents clients response to services in a manner that demonstrates the e cacy of interventions. - 2[2 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in INTERVENTION:
Strengths: Brianna demonstrates awareness of the e cacy of treatment interventions through good clinical observations of patient response.
She shows good exibility in selecting and modifying treatment interventions. Goals: -To further articulate the purposes of group interventions
to improve patients understanding and retention of the skills taught.
V. MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:
supervised.
performance.
Demonstrates through practice or discussion the ability to assign appropriate responsibilities to the to the occupational therapy assistant and
occupational therapy aide. - 2[2 pts]
Demonstrates through practice or discussion the ability to actively collaborate with the occupational therapy assistant. - 2[2 pts]
Demonstrates understanding of the costs and funding related to occupational therapy services at this site. - 2[2 pts]
Accomplishes organizational goals by establishing priorities, developing strategies, and meeting deadlines. - 2[2 pts]
Produces the volume of work required in the expected time frame. - 3[3 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:
Strengths: Brianna consistently completes documentation in a timely manner and frequently seeks out increased responsibilities. She also
collaborates well with peer Occupational Therapy students and Occupational Therapy staff. Goals: To increase the volume of work to re ect a
typical entry-level Occupational Therapist work load (1-3 evaluations per day as census allows, in addition to daily groups and documentation).
VI. COMMUNICATION:
supervised.
performance.
Clearly and effectively communicates verbally and nonverbally with clients, families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the
public. - 3[3 pts]
Produces clear and accurate documentation according to site requirements. - 2[2 pts]
All written communication is legible, using proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. - 2[2 pts]
Uses language appropriate to the recipient of the information, including but not limited to funding agencies and regulatory agencies. - 2[2
pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvements in COMMUNICATION:
Strengths: Brianna communicates effectively with patients and colleagues, and demonstrates good rapport-building skills. Her documentation
is clear and well-written. Goals: To demonstrate increased initiative in team discussions by further contributing clinical observations and
recommendations.
VII. PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:
supervised.
performance.
Collaborates with supervisor(s) to maximize the learning experience. - 2[2 pts]

Takes responsibility for attaining professional competence by seeking out learning opportunities and interactions with supervisor(s) and
others. - 2[2 pts]
Responds constructively to feedback. - 3[3 pts]
Demonstrates consistent work behaviors including initiative, preparedness, dependability, and work site maintenance. - 3[3 pts]
Demonstrates effective time management. - 3[3 pts]
Demonstrates positive interpersonal skills including but not limited to cooperation, exibility, tact, and empathy. - 2[2 pts]
Demonstrates respect for diversity factors of others including but not limited to socio-cultural, socioeconomic, spiritual, and lifestyle choices. -
3[3 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:
Strengths: Brianna consistently shows a positive, professional attitude. She is diligent and demonstrates good time management. She seeks
out and utilizes constructive feedback well, and shows a strong sense of respect and empathy. Goals: To further develop autonomy as a
clinician in terms of group planning/facilitating and in implementing individualized treatment interventions.
Please add up your student's total number of points (for MIDTERM andFINAL)and provide a pass or no pass rating (for FINAL ONLY)based on the following scoring
guidelines:

OVERALL MIDTERM SCORE
Satisfactory Performance..........90 and above
Unsatisfactory Performance......89 and below
OVERALL FINAL SCORE

Pass................................................122 points and above
No Pass..........................................121 points and below
Total Score - 96
Pass or No Pass - Pass
SUMMARY COMMENTS:
(ADDRESS STUDENT"S OVERALL CLINICAL COMPETENCE)
Brianna demonstrates a good clinical competence overall. She is a motivated, intelligent student and consistently utilizes constructive
feedback. She makes good clinical observations and has made progress in developing clinical reasoning in preparation of implementing
interventions.
Electronic Signature Status of Reviewer:
Signature Validated
No additional comments
Total points for all rating scale questions: 96

Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 58.9%
(Each main question equally weighted)
Responses as of 4/23/2017 9:09:11 PM ET

Midterm Eval

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Midterm Eval

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

4/23/2017 Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Responses About You - Details - "Level II Fieldwork Evaluation - Mid-term"

Evaluation by: Fieldwork Educators (Hyde, Jonathan)

Please complete the following:

Name of Student (Last, First, Middle) - Stemmler, Brianna

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.00 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 9, % SCORE: 75.0%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 2.25 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 9, % SCORE: 56.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in BASIC TENENTS:

III. EVALUATION AND SCREENING:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 2.10 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 21, % SCORE: 52.5%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in EVALUATION AND SCREENING:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 2.11 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 19, % SCORE: 52.8%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in INTERVENTION:

V. MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 2.20 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 11, % SCORE: 55.0%

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 2.25 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 9, % SCORE: 56.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvements in COMMUNICATION:

VII. PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Collaborates with supervisor(s) to maximize the learning experience. - 2[2 pts]

MEAN: 2.57 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 18, % SCORE: 64.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:

OVERALL MIDTERM SCORE

Satisfactory Performance..........90 and above

Unsatisfactory Performance......89 and below

OVERALL FINAL SCORE

No Pass..........................................121 points and below

(ADDRESS STUDENT"S OVERALL CLINICAL COMPETENCE)

Electronic Signature Status of Reviewer:

Total points for all rating scale questions: 96

Responses as of 4/23/2017 9:09:11 PM ET

Anda mungkin juga menyukai