Name
Institution
Date
The case between Holcomb and Jan Pro cleaning system of Southern Colorado is a very
crucial case in as far as business entities. Holcomb sued the business entity for committing
The parties that were involved in this case were Holcomb who was the petitioner and Jan
Pro cleaning System Company were the accused. However, at the first hearing of the case, the
district federal court had given out a verdict that was in favor of this business entity. The court
had found out that Jan Pro had never violated the act on Colorado no call list. This was because
callers had been defended (Kedron, 2013). The court verdict therefore brought about the whole
disagreements between these two parties. The court however, failed to recognize the fact that
Holcomb had withdrawn from the protected class as a residential subscriber. Therefore, they
Business law will provide for the correct response to the litigation that may arise. The
business law will form the basic rules and guidance to any other business case. The court must
therefore ensure that they prevent litigation that can arise from any case that is presented to them.
The court must also ensure that they give a verdict in favor of the right party (Skinner, 2015).
Conclusion
As for my case, I believe that the court verdict was correct. This is because the complaint
presented to the court is not legitimate. This is because most people do not want to be bothered at
the place of residence. If Holcomb was serious about his petition, he would have thought about it
in the essence of advertising his line of residence as line of business (Urien and Groshoff, 2013).
References
Case Law Analysis: Business Entities 3
Bayern, S. (2016). The Implications of Modern BusinessEntity Law for the Regulation of
Kedron, A. (2013). Stock Symbols, Street Signs and Other Color Lines: Capital and Subjectivity
Skinner, G. (2015). Rethinking Limited Liability of Parent Corporations for Foreign Subsidiaries'
Urien, K., & Groshoff, D. (2013). An Essay Inquiry: Will the Jobs Act's Transformative
Regulatory Regime for Equity Offerings Cost Investment Bankers' Jobs. Tex. A&M L.
Rev., 1, 559.