Sea-

Seven-
Po1nt-
4our
Dear EMPACT,
Re: Design and Construction of Mars Rover Prototype:
We are delighted to present you with our design package, fitting for the construction of your Mars
Rover Prototype. The following table summarises the documents in the package:
Document Name Document Title Revision
Drawing Package drawing_package_1.4 1.4
Design Specifications specifications_1.2 1.2
Risk Management Plan rmp_4 1.4
Tender Evaluation Criteria TEC_4 1.4
Project Schedule gannt_chart_2 1.2

With the submission of this package, we declare to meet all the requirements stated in the client
brief and that the documents in this package include all information required for the designing,
tendering and construction of the prototype. We also declare that this is all our own work and is not
copied from any external sources. If you have any questions regarding our work, do not hesitate to
contact us.

Kind regards,

Findlay Commins
Maxine Diciembre
Rory Steber
Peter Hill
Joshlynne Tjandra

1 of 1
cover_letter_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 Sea-
Seven-
Po1nt-
4our
Drawing Package:
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Prototype
Revision: 1.4
Date: 31/03/2017
1 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Drawings .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Assembled prototype ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Exploded view and parts list ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Body and bottle support detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Wheel and axle detail................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
1.0 Introduction:
This document contains the working drawings specific to the construction of the Mars Rover Prototype. Drawings include overall size and dimensions, as
well as detailed views of each individual component. The drawings are made to industry standard and so, they should be easily interpreted and understood
by competent contractors.
Note: All dimensions are in millimetres

3 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
 4 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
 5 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
 6 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
 7 of 7
drawing_package_1.4
 Sea-
Seven-
Po1nt-
4our

Design Specifications:
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Prototype
Revision: 1
Date: 30/03/2017

1 of 9
specifications_1 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction: 3
2.0 Dimensions Summary: 3
3.0 Materials: 4
4.0 Tools: 6
4.1 Contractor competency 6
4.2 Tools list 6
5.0 Construction: 8
5.1 Body 8
5.2 Bottle Holder 8
5.3 Bearing 8
5.4 Axle 8
5.5 Wheel 9
5.6 Spacer 9
5.7 Assembly of Body 9
5.8 Assembly of Axles 9
5.9 Assembly of bottle fastening system 9

Index of Tables:
Table 1: Summary of Dimensions 3

Table 2: Bill of Materials. 4

Table 3: Tools list..6

2
 1.0 Introduction:
This document contains detailed specifications for the construction of the Mars Rover Prototype. Included are a summary of the overall dimensions of the Rover, a bill of
materials, a list of tools required for construction, and a comprehensive construction sequence. Contractors should be able to follow the steps outlined in this document to
accurately produce the Mars Rover Prototype, according to the drawings provided in this design package.

2.0 Dimensions Summary:

The Drawing Package accurately details all dimensions, but below is a summary of overall sizes:

Table 1: Summary of Dimensions

Dimension: Size: (mm)

Overall length 250

Overall width 100

Overall height (excluding cargo) 115

Wheelbase 190

Ground Clearance 20

3
 3.0 Materials:
Derived from the drawings and parts list included in the Drawing Package, the Bill of Materials is as follows:

Table 2: Bill of Materials

Material: Purpose: Dimension: Quantity: Supplier: Cost:

(Width x Height x Length)
Pine Rover Body 100 x 25 x 250 mm 1 Bunnings

Pine Bottle Holder 100 x 25 x 50 mm 2 Bunnings

Pine Bearing 20 x 20 x 20 mm 4 Bunnings

Aluminium (any grade) Axle DIA 6mm, 150mm long 2 Bunnings

3D Printed plastic Wheel DIA 60mm, 10mm wide 4

3D printed plastic Spacer DIA 10mm, 5mm wide 4

Elastic Bands Securing bottle to Rover Any size can be used, but a 2 (or more) Any newsagent,
stretched circumference of Officeworks, etc.
around 220mm is preferred

4
Wood screws Fixing of elastic bands to bottle Any diameter between 2 3mm, 4 Bunnings
holder length between 10 15mm

Glue (any type suitable for Adhesive used to fix parts together Bunnings,
wooden surfaces, e.g. PVA, - - newsagent,
super glue, etc.) hardware store, etc.

5
 4.0 Tools:
4.1 Contractor competency
It is assumed that the successful contractor will have some knowledge of basic hand tools, as well as some power tools such as a cordless drill. The successful contractor will
also be required to use to 3D printing process for some parts.

4.2 Tools list

Outlined below are the recommended tools for the construction of the Mars Rover Prototype, although alternative methods may be used provided that both designers and
contractors can agree on their suitability.

Table 3: Tools List

Name: Purpose: Part to be used on: Dimension:

(If applicable)
Marking pencil/pen Clear and accurate marking on both wooden and aluminium All parts N/A

Steel rule or straight edge Accurate measuring and marking of straight lines All Parts N/A

Engineers square or try square Accurate measuring and marking of right angles Body, bottle holder, N/A
bearing.

Hand saw or hacksaw Used to cut materials by hand, including woods and metals All parts Must be able to cut
a depth of 100mm

File Coarse removal of metal material Axle Coarse file, (bastard

or second cut
preferred)
Sandpaper Fine removal of wooden material, finishing wooden parts All wooden parts, wheels fine sandpaper (120
grit or higher)

6
Screwdriver (to suit screws chosen Tightening appropriate screws for that screwdriver (Phillips Screws in bottle holder N/A
in Bill of Materials) head or flat head)

Spatula or scrap piece of material Spreading glue on parts All glued parts N/A

Electric Drill fitted with hole saw Cutting circular holes in wooden materials Bottle holder, bearing Approx. 75mm
and 6.5mm twist drill bit diameter

7
5.0 Construction:
5.1 Body
From the appropriate material in the Bill of Materials, mark out the required length according to the drawings using the marking tools (pencil/pen, steel
rule/straight edge and try/engineers square).
Cut the body to length using the hand saw or hacksaw, and smooth off any rough edges using sandpaper.
Although the length of the body is not critical, it should be within 1-2mm of the required length.

5.2 Bottle Holder

Note: The simplest way to construct the bottle holders is to make them as a pair, then cut this in half to form two identical parts. When using a hole saw on a small sized
piece, it is safest to remove excess material after, leaving more material to hold or secure.

Mark out from the appropriate sized pine a length that is twice that of one bottle holder (i.e. 100mm) using the marking tools.
Proceed to mark the centre of this area using the marking tools, which is done most accurately by forming an X between opposite corners, revealing the centre at
the intersection.
With caution, proceed to saw out the centre of the marked area using the drill equipped with the hole saw, aligning the centre of the hole saw with the centre
marked.
Cut this piece (which should resemble a square with a large circular hole cut from the centre) from the excess material using the hacksaw, again smoothing off
rough edges with sandpaper.
Proceed to cut this piece exactly in half with the hacksaw, leaving two identical u shaped wooden parts. These should be within millimetre tolerance of each other,
as this is vital to the balancing of the Rover during freefall.

5.3 Bearing
Using the appropriate material and tools, mark and cut out four identical blocks to make the bearings.
Using a similar method as the bottle holder, mark the centre of each of the bearings
Using the 6.5mm twist drill bit in the electric drill, drill one hold through the centre of each of the bearings. Each of the bearings need to be identical, within 0.5mm
tolerance, to ensure free rotation of the axles.

5.4 Axle
From the appropriate sized aluminium, mark and cut two lengths to form the axles.
Clean up the edges of each axle using the coarse file.

8
5.5 Wheel
Following the dimensions in the Drawing Package and suitable software, 3D print 4 wheels using and kind of rigid plastic.

5.6 Spacer
In a similar fashion to the wheels, 3D print 4 spacers from rigid plastic, to the dimensions shown in the drawings.

5.7 Assembly of Body

Adhesives tend to work most effectively when spread evenly over both surfaces, which can be done using a spatula or scrap piece of material
Using a suitable adhesive, glue each of the 4 bearings to the bottom of the body in the locations specified in the working drawings, ensuring that their orientation is
correct.
Use a similar method to join the two bottle holders to the top side of the body.
Clean up any excess glue as this may cause issues in terms of fitment of other parts and balance while in freefall.
Depending on the adhesive used, parts may need to be clamped together temporarily, or left to cure.

5.8 Assembly of Axles

Using the file, roughen the surface of the axle that will be glued to each of the wheels.
After passing each axle through the bearings (now attached to the body), thread a spacer on each end.
Apply adhesive to each of the rough surfaces of the axles and fit the wheels.
Upon curing each wheel should be fixed to an axle. The axles should be able to spin freely within the bearings, but they should not move more than 1mm in any
direction.

5.9 Assembly of bottle fastening system

In the locations shown on the drawings, install 4 screws into the bottle holders using an appropriate screw driver, leaving a few millimetres protruding.
The bottle can then be placed, centred both fore and aft and left to right, on the bottle holders
An elastic band can then be stretched over the bottle, secured at either end to the screws in the bottle holders. The rover should be able to be picked up from the
bottle as if they were permanently joined. More elastic bands can be to achieve desired rigidity.
Bottle can be later removed by removing elastic bands

9
 Sea-
Seven-
Po1nt-
4our
Risk Management Plan:
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Prototype
Revision: 1.4
Date: 1/05/2017
1 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 Design Stage: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 1 Design Stage Risk Management ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Hazard: Poor Time Management ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Hazard Ambiguous Specification and Inconsistent Information ........................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Hazard: Unmet Client Brief Constraints ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
2.4 Hazard: Poor Research ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.0 Construction Stage: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 2 Construction Stage Risk Management ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Hazard: Inexperienced Contractors ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Hazard: Poor Time Management ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
3.3 Hazard: Contractors Unfamiliar With Specification Terminologies and Procedures ............................................................................................................. 9
4.0 Testing Stage: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 3 Testing Stage Risk Management.............................................................................................................................................................................. 10
4.0 Testing Stage: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
4.1 Hazard: Pre-Testing Damage................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
4.2 Hazard: Injury during Testing ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
4.3 Hazard: Failure to bring to the prototype for the testing. ................................................................................................................................................... 11
References: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

2 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
1.0 Introduction:
This document contains the Risks and Hazards that are involved within the construction of Mars Rover Prototype. This document includes the actions that
the people involved in different stages must part take in and/or do in order to improve the overall design and procedure of the project. In result, lessen the
risk that are involved within the planning, constructing and testing phase of the project.

2.0 Design Stage:

During the design stage, it is the designers responsibility to design the Mars Rover Prototype that is in accordance to the client brief. During this stage the
designers must research, design and plan the construction of the Mars Rover Prototype which is marked by completing a design package that includes
specifications, drawings, risk management and Tender Evaluation Criteria (TEC) form.

Figure 1 Design Stage Risk Management shows the summary and the severity of the risks involved during the design stage.

Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Further Mitigation Residual

Fail assessment Poor time Possible Major Concerns with time management
due to management can be mitigated by a GANTT
incomplete skills chart. A GANTT chart will break
Design Package down the design package task
into smaller ones that are
allocated across the start (i.e.
Mars Rover Prototype drafts
should be refined during week 4)
until the assessments due date.
This will keep the team on track
as it shows the schedule of the
project and what needs to be
done and when, which then can
Risk Risk
Moderate It is recommended that all Low
members consistently attend
the workshops. Attending the
workshops can further mitigate
the risk, as supervision will be
provided by the tutors. Through
the weekly meeting minutes,
they can monitor the progress
of the group. Supervision from
the tutors will keep the group
on track to finish the package in
time and up to standards.

3 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 be discussed during the
compulsory weekly meetings.
Failure to Ambiguous Likely Major The difficult negotiation between Moderate The risk can be further Low
Negotiate with and poorly planners and contractors can be mitigated by having an outsider
the Contractors written avoided by having the designer (preferably someone who is
to Build the specifications package proof read by a member, experienced or at least familiar
Design and drawings. or better yet proof read by the with the terminologies) try to
whole group. It is also advised comprehend (or build; but
that dimensions are only written building it wont be practical
on the drawings to avoid especially as the project has a
inconsistencies between the budget) the instructions. The
drawings and specification. feedback would be used to
refine the drawings and
specifications to be
unambiguous.
Fail or low mark Unmet Possible Major Failure to meet the constraints Moderate Moreover, we can further Low
for the constraints can be mitigated by breaking minimise this risk by a brief
assessment down the client brief even before group discussion of the client
the design plan starts. brief during one of the
meetings, this will eliminate the
details the person in-charge of
breaking down the client brief
might have missed but more
importantly makes sure
everyones is aware of the
constraints.
Failure to Pass Poorly Likely Modera Thorough research for the best Moderate To further lessen the risk, the Low
the Testing researched te materials to use and how to put research can also include
Stage materials and them together to build the Mars consulting the technical tutor or
procedure Rover Prototype will make the other professionals for advice.
4 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 used in prototypes failure at the testing
specifications. stage less likely to happen.
Research should include the
comparison of shapes (frame
type), materials use (i.e pine
wood, 3D printed) and axles for
the wheels (how many wheels,
type of axle, etc) that can be used
for the Mars Rover Prototype.

2.1 Hazard: Poor Time Management

It is possible that poor time management can put the group at risk of failing the assessment. Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4our aims to receive a High Distinction (as
discussed on 28/02/17s meeting). Incomplete Design Package at the end of Week 5 will result to a major consequence, which is failing the assessment.
Hence, jeopardising the teams goal and the members chance of passing the unit.

Concerns with time management can be mitigated by a GANTT chart. A GANTT chart will break down the design package task into smaller ones that are
allocated across the start (i.e. Mars Rover Prototype drafts should be refined during week 4) until the assessments due date. This will keep the team on
track as it shows the schedule of the project and what needs to be done and when, which then can be discussed during the compulsory weekly meetings.

Although a GANTT chart will significantly decrease the risk of the team failing to complete the design, it is recommended that all members consistently
attend the workshops. Attending the workshops can further mitigate the risk, as supervision will be provided by the tutors. Through the weekly meeting
minutes, they can monitor the progress of the group. Supervision from the tutors will keep the group on track to finish the package in time and up to
standards..

2.2 Hazard Ambiguous Specification and Inconsistent Information

Ambiguous and poorly written Design Package drawings and specifications can make the communication between the planners and contactors difficult,
hence can lead to contractors not delivering to complete the project in time for submission. Albeit be inconsistencies from the drawings to ambiguous
specification, these issues risks the possible occurrence of the project not being made in time for submission.

5 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
The difficult negotiation between planners and contractors can be avoided by having the designer package proof read by a member, or better yet proof
read by the whole group. It is also advised that dimensions are only written on the drawings to avoid inconsistencies between the drawings and
specification. The risk can be further mitigated by having an outsider (preferably someone who is experienced or at least familiar with the terminologies) try
to comprehend (or build; but building it wont be practical especially as the project has a budget) the instructions. The feedback would be used to refine the
drawings and specifications to be unambiguous.

2.3 Hazard: Unmet Client Brief Constraints

Failure to meet the Client Briefs constraints risks the group underachieving the assessments requirements for a passing grade. The Mars Rover Prototype
should not be bigger than an A3 piece of paper and not taller than 210 mm. It is possible that may designers overlook these constraints and create the
design package that ignores the client briefs restriction.

The risk of failing to meet the constraints may be mitigated by breaking down the client brief even before the design plan starts. Moreover, we can further
minimise this risk by a brief group discussion of the client brief during one of the meetings, this will eliminate the details the person in-charge of breaking
down the client brief might have missed but more importantly makes sure everyones is aware of the constraints.

2.4 Hazard: Poor Research

Failure to design the Mars Rover Prototype to overcome the slope and vertical test puts the group at risk of receiving a fail grade. The prototype is required
to be intact with at least one set of wheels attached after the slope and vertical test. It is a likely event to occur, especially for first year students.

Thorough research for the best materials to use and how to put them together to build the Mars Rover Prototype will make the prototypes failure at the
testing stage less likely to happen. Research should include the comparison of shapes (frame type), materials use (i.e pine wood, 3D printed) and axles for
the wheels (how many wheels, type of axle, etc) that can be used for the Mars Rover Prototype. The research can also include consulting the technical tutor
or other professionals for advice.

6 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
3.0 Construction Stage:
The contractors are responsible to negotiate with the planners to make the design of the Mars Rover Prototype that is with the accordance to the
designers Design Package (assuming that the tendered Design Package is derived from the client brief). Contractors are also expected to make
modifications regarding the designers plan, in order to make the project successful for the testing phase.

Figure 2 Construction Stage Risk Management shows the summary and the severity of the risks involved during the construction stage

Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Further Mitigation Residual

(Impact)
Physical Injury Inexperienced Almost High Physical injury may be mitigated
Contractors Certain by requiring the contractors in
the Tender Evaluation Criteria
(TEC) to have previous
experience with such tools. This
will lessen the risk of physical
injuries (cuts, laceration,
scrapes, incision etc.) due to
mishandling of tools from a
major to a minor risk.
Failure to have Poor time Likely High This risk may be mitigated by
Mars Rover management having the planners supervise
Prototype ready the contractors during the
for testing construction of the product. The
planners will make sure which
stage of the construction the
contractors should be in and on
7 of 12
rmp_1.4
Risk Risk
Moderate We understand that previous Low
experience would be hard to
attain at this stage of our
course. The contractors may use
safer alternative techniques
that can achieve the same
outcome. The contractors can
have the wood pre-cut by a
professional or use alternative
tools which can be negotiated
with the planners during the
tendering stage.
Moderate Consistent attendance of all Low
members at the workshop will
further mitigate the risk of the
contractors missing the due
date, as additional supervision
and advice on how to keep the
C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 what time, therefore keeping prototypes standard high will
them on track to finish the be provided.
project before the due date.
Also, creating a construction
plan or a GANTT chart, can be a
good alternative/ extra
precaution if ever supervision
cannot be provided. The GANTT
chart will also benefit the team
as they can allocate the task in a
way where they can have time
for modification and/or last
minute adjustments.
Failure to have Contractors Likely High The planners can supervise the Low Including a quiz during the Low
Mars Rover unfamiliar contractors as they construct tender stage about the
Prototype ready with the project. This way they can specification of the design will
for testing specification assist if ever there are help the designers to choose
terminologies terminologies the contractors which contractors are able to
might not be familiar with. comprehend the instructions in
the specification. This will
lessen the likelihood of the
prototype not able to be
constructed for testing.

3.1 Hazard: Inexperienced Contractors

According to Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4ours design, the body of the prototype is made out of pine wood that is cut to the dimension that is indicated in the
drawings, it also requires a drill for the axles to go through. These procedures require the use of a drill and a handsaw which if used by inexperienced
contractors, can put them at risk of minor to major physical injury (i.e. laceration, cut, scrapes, incisions, etc.).

8 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Physical injury may be mitigated by requiring the contractors in the Tender Evaluation Criteria (TEC) to have previous experience with such tools. This will
lessen the risk of physical injuries (cuts, laceration, scrapes, incision etc.) due to mishandling of tools from a major to a minor risk.

However, we understand that previous experience would be hard to attain at this stage of our course. The contractors may use safer alternative techniques
that can achieve the same outcome. The contractors can have the wood pre-cut by a professional or use alternative tools which can be negotiated with the
planners during the tendering stage.

3.2 Hazard: Poor Time Management

Poor time management skills can put the contactors at risk of failing the assessment for not having the prototype ready for testing. Contractors might miss
this due date due to the incompletion of the prototype.

This risk may be mitigated by having the planners supervise the contractors during the construction of the product. The planners will make sure which stage
of the construction the contractors should be in and on what time, therefore keeping them on track to finish the project before the due date. Also, creating
a construction plan or a GANTT chart, can be a good alternative/ extra precaution if ever supervision cannot be provided. The GANTT chart will also benefit
the team as they can allocate the task in a way where they can have time for modification and/or last minute adjustments. Consistent attendance of all
members at the workshop will further mitigate the risk of the contractors missing the due date, as additional supervision and advice on how to keep the
prototypes standard high will be provided.

3.3 Hazard: Contractors Unfamiliar With Specification Terminologies and Procedures

Contractors that are unfamiliar terminologies used or the procedures in the Design Package specification are likely not to construct the project in time.
Hence, risking a fail grade for not having the prototype ready for testing or at least according to the original design.

The planners can supervise the contractors as they construct the project. This way they can assist if ever there are terminologies the contractors might not
be familiar with. Including a quiz during the tender stage about the specification of the design will help the designers to choose which contractors are able
to comprehend the instructions in the specification.

9 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
4.0 Testing Stage:
It is the designers responsibility to bring the Mars Rover Prototype to the testing on May 22, 2017. The prototype will be tested in accordance to the client
constraints as well as its ability to overcome and/or meet the slope and vertical drop test requirements.

Figure 3 Testing Stage Risk Management shows the summary and the severity of the risks involved during the testing stage.

Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity Mitigation Residual Further Mitigation Residual

(Impact) Risk Risk
Fail slope and Pre-Testing Possible High This risk can be mitigated by Low Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4our design is 0
vertical test. Damage handling the prototype with just slightly bigger than the
care and avoid placing it on water bottle, having a bag to
places where it might be carry the prototype is practical
obstructed from a persons as it will assist with proper
vision. Proper placement and handling, which will make the
handling will make the risk of pre-testing damage risk 0.
pre-testing damage unlikely to
happen.
Injury testing Prototypes Less Likely Moderat Injury during testing would be 0 n/a n/a
Falling e prevented if the assessor test
the prototypes in a position
where they, the assessor(s), are
away from the impact point.
Miss the testing Forgot to bring Rare High This event can be avoided by 0 n/a n/a
stage in prototype. having a checklist of what to
bring during the testing stage.
This will make the residual risk
of leaving the prototype behind,
including other paper work, 0.
10 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
4.0 Testing Stage:
It is the designers responsibility to bring the Mars Rover Prototype to the testing on May 22, 2017. The prototype will be tested in accordance to the client
constraints as well as its ability to overcome and/or meet the slope and vertical drop test requirements.

4.1 Hazard: Pre-Testing Damage

During the period between the construction and testing the phase, it is a likely risk that the design will suffer from damages. Although the design is planned
to be robust to withstand a vertical drop test without collapsing, it is still fundamental that it is handled in such as a way that it wont garner unnecessary
damage due to mishandling. Mishandling damages can have a major or minor impact on the prototypes performance during the testing stage, depending
on the severity of the damage. This includes dropping or stepping on the project.

This risk can be mitigated by handling the prototype with care and avoid placing it on places where it might be obstructed from a persons vision. Proper
placement and handling will make the risk of pre-testing damage unlikely to happen. To take it one step further, since Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4our design is just
slightly bigger than the water bottle, having a bag to carry the prototype is practical as it will assist with proper handling, which will make the pre-testing
damage risk 0.

4.2 Hazard: Injury during Testing

Since it is required for the object to drop 1 m, it is possible that the person conducting the test is at risk of the prototypes falling on their feet. It would be
prevented if the assessor test the prototypes in a position where they, the assessor(s), are away from the impact point. This will make the residual risk 0
and no further mitigation is required.

4.3 Hazard: Failure to bring to the prototype for the testing.

It is the responsibility of the designers to bring the prototype to the testing stage. However, it is possible that the designers might forget to bring it in. The
assignment handbook advices the contractors to bring a hand over form to show that the prototype was made and was handed over back to designers, if
such cases happen.

This event can be avoided by having a checklist of what to bring during the testing stage. This will make the residual risk of leaving the prototype behind,
including other paper work, 0. Therefore, no more further mitigation is needed.

11 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
References:

Risk matrix used from: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/2/15/941531/- (Sunday 26 March 2017)

12 of 12
rmp_1.4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 Sea-
Seven-
Po1nt-
4our
Project Schedule:
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Prototype
Revision: 1.2
Date: 1/05/2017
1 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Table 1 GANTT chart (Week 5-8) ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Table 2 GANTT chart (Week 9- 12) .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7

2 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
1.0 Introduction
This document details both Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4ours designers and contractors action plan for Weeks 5 until Week 12 (end of the unit). This document
includes the assessments task due dates. These tasks are broken down into smaller tasks that are allocated on different times, as well as important events
that needs to be attended by the members.

3 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table 1 GANTT chart shows Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4our Plan for Week 5 to 8
Week 5 Week 6 Tuition Free Week Tuition Free Week Week 7 Week 8

EFPC Deadlines April 2, 2017 Due Contractors Tender Designers Tender

Date for Design Application Evaluation7 May,
Package Plan Submission19 2017 23:59
April, 2017 23:59
March 27, 2017--
Team Action Plan
Presentation

Engineering Joint Networking Senior First Aid

Identity Reflection: Event 2017- hosted Course12 April,
Events both by WIECD3 April, 2017, 9 Am hosted
contractors and 2017 (6pm) by Association of
designers can Chemical
attend for Yara Technical Engineering
Assignment 8. Challenge Students.
Information
Session3 April,
2017 (12 pm)
hosted by
Association of
Chemical
Engineering
Students

4 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 MEET & Greet
Sundowner- hosted
by SPE student
chapter. April
5,2017
Designers Before Due date Meet-up with other company End of Week 8
(Maxine and Weekly Meeting Designers should
contractors, to make
Joshlynne) finish the review of
modifications/arrangements to Sea-
Everyone will make companies with
final adjustments Seven-Po1nt-4our Design Package. rankings according
and corrections to to preference
Design Package Designers must evaluate each meeting (which is
through Google with company contractors using TEC. determined by Sea-
Drive (file sharing). Seven-Po1nt-4ours
Once Tender Weekly Meeting TEC).
Joshlynne will Applications are
compile the received, designers Submit Review to
components of the can start evaluating the companies.
Design Package to tender applications.
PDF version. Weekly Meeting
Weekly Meeting Maxine and
Joshlynne would
have different
companies, but
since theres 3
company
application one can
do 2 (this can be
discussed during

5 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 the next weekly
meeting).
Contractors Findlay will create Start of Week 6 TFW (Exact date Weekly Meeting Weekly Meeting
(Peter, Rory and Team Action Plan Receive Design TBA).
Findlay) Power-Point Packages from Contractors should End of Week 8
presentation which other groups. finish Tender Each contractors
Peter and Rory will Application (which should receive
use to present in Peter, Rory and Findlay will make their addresses the Tender Evaluation
class. Tender Applications which addresses the companies TEC from other
companies TEC and include an Executive through an companies
Everyone will make Summary. Each one will have a company executive designers.
final adjustments assigned to them. (The companies the summary). Therefore, should
and corrections to contractors are assigned to be is still have a design to
Design Package predetermined during this stage and will Have the Tender build.
through Google be in the agenda on the next weekly Application
Drive (file sharing). meeting.) Submitted to the
other companies
Weekly Meeting Weekly Meeting designers.

Each contractor will meet up with the

company they are assigned to. They will
be assessed according to each
companies TEC and will negotiate with
other company designers, to make
modifications/arrangements to the
companies Design Package.

6 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table 2 GANTT chart shows Sea-Seven-Po1nt-4our Plan for Week 9 to 12.
Week 9 Week 10` Week 11 Week 12

EFPC Deadlines Handovers EngIdentity Oral PresentationMay 29,

Reflection 2017 (Monday)

Presentation Unit Reflection

Review

Testing StageMay 22, 2017

Exact date TBA

Engineering Identity
Reflection: Events both
contractors and designers
can attend for Assignment 8.

Designers Supervise tendered contractors during the construction 11 minute presentation to

(Maxine and Joshlynne) Prototype Testing Panel.
stage.
Weekly Meeting Designers will bring in the
product.
End of Week10The
designers should receive the Weekly Meeting
prototype from the
contractors ready to be
tested.

The designers will then hand

7 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 the product over to the
client.

Prepare for Unit Reflection Oral Presentation (Assignment

10)

Contractors Peter, Rory and Findlay will build the tendered Mars Rover Product Testing 11 minute presentation to
(Peter, Rory and Findlay) Prototype design. Panel.
Weekly Meeting

End of Week 10-- Handover

the finished prototype to the
company designers.

Weekly Meeting Weekly Meeting

Prepare for Oral Presentation (Assignment 10).

8 of 8
gannt_chart_2 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
 Sea-
Seven-
Po1nt-
4our

Tender Evaluation Criteria:

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Prototype
Revision: 1.4
Date: 22/03/17

1 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 SELECTION.............................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Relevant Experience ...................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Method.......................................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Knowledge .................................................................................................................................... 5
2.4 Workplace Health and Safety........................................................................................................ 5
2.5 Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 WEIGHTING ............................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Relevant Experience ...................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Method.......................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 Knowledge..................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4 Workplace Health and Safety........................................................................................................ 7
3.5 Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Overall Mark.................................................................................................................................. 8

Index of Tables
Table 1.0...................................................................................................................................... 3
Table 2.1...................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 2.2...................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 2.3...................................................................................................................................... 7
Table 2.4...................................................................................................................................... 7
Table 2.5...................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 2.6...................................................................................................................................... 8

2 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
1.0 Introduction:
This document outlines the criteria that we would like tenderers to demonstrate that they possess.
It will provide information about the criteria we desire as well as a weighting of each criteria that
shows how important each criteria is. Tenderer that scores the highest score will be chosen to build
the Mars Rover prototype.

2.0 Criteria:
Criteria is summarised below and later explained in more detail. How marks are awards is
later explained specifically at the end of this document.

Criteria Title Criteria Details Maximum Marks

Relevant experience Experience with woodwork 3

Experience with 3D printing.

Method Able to work efficiently to achieve 3

desired outcome.

Knowledge Ability to understand instructions, 3

drawings and certain terminology.

Workplace Health Able to work safely around hazards and 3

and Safety avoid risks.

Resources Has access to needed resources such as 3

drills and woodworking material.

Table 1.0

3 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
2.1 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (Max. 3 marks)

It is desirable for the tenderer to have relevant experience that could benefit achieving the
intended outcome of the project. Relevant experience includes, but is not limited to,
experience in woodworking, using a handsaw and 3D printing.
Information required could be displayed in a list that provides:
Description of experience
o Includes how long ago the experience was
o What experience was
o Why experience is relevant
o Example: Completed Year 12 woodwork in 2016. This is relevant because
the body of the prototype is made from wood, hence my experience will be
useful in the making of the body.
If tenderer has experience with a project similar to this, details of the project
including:
Role of tenderer
Duration of project
Description and relevance to this project

2.2 METHOD (Max. 3 marks):

How the tenderer is planning to achieve desired outcome. Tenderer must be able to show
its ability to bring a contract to an acceptable conclusion by describing the procedure that
the tenderer wishes to take to accomplish projects desired outcome. This must include a
detailed timeline that the tenderer plans to use with achievable deadlines and goals clearly
stated on it.
Information required could include the following:
Key performance indicators
Goals indicating when contractors aim to have certain objectives completed
Delegation of work with contractors
Innovative procedures meaning to be used

4 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
2.3 KNOWLEDGE (Max. 3 marks):

Tenderer must be able to demonstrate that they understand instructions given to make the
prototype and offer relevant improvements. This will be evaluated according to the
weightings in table 2.3 by the designers during the first meeting.

2.4 WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY (MAX 3 MARKS):

Tenderer should demonstrate an understanding about hazards and risks involved with this
task and prove they know what to do should a risk arise. Information on this can be found
on the risk management plan documents. The tenderer will be given a risk and asked what
mitigation they would employ to reduce the risk which will be assessed along with their
understanding of hazards and risks according to the weighings in table 2.4 during the first
meeting with designers.

2.5 RESOURCES (MAX. 3 MARKS):

Equipment and facilities that the tenderer intends to use in the making of this project.
Information required include the following:
Equipment
How access to equipment will be gained
Who will use the equipment

5 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
3.0 WEIGHTING:

3.1 Relevant Experience:

Assessment Description Score

Excellent Exceeds the standard required 3

Provides examples and evidence of previous experience in similar projects and with
tools that will be used in this project. Provides examples of other experience that will
prove beneficial in this project.

Acceptable Meets the standard required 2

Provides examples and evidence of previous experience in similar projects and with
tools that will be used in this project.

Inadequate Significantly fails to meet the standard required 1

Does not provide examples and evidence of previous experience but provides evidence
of experience with tools used in this project.

Table 2.1

3.2 Method:

Assessment Description Score

Excellent Exceeds the standard required 3

Provides a detailed timeline of achievable deadlines and goals clearly stated. Provides
examples of innovative procedures meaning to be used.

Acceptable Meets the standard required 2

Provides a detailed timeline of achievable deadlines and goals clearly stated.

Inadequate Significantly fails to meet the standard required 1

Provides a non-detailed timeline of achievable deadlines.

Table 2.2

6 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
3.3 Knowledge:

Assessment Description Score

Excellent Exceeds the standard required 3

Demonstrates understanding of the design package and what they need to accomplish.
Offers more than 3 relevant improvements to the prototype

Acceptable Meets the standard required 2

Demonstrates understanding of the design package and what they need to accomplish.
Offers less than 3 relevant improvements to the prototype

Inadequate Significantly fails to meet the standard required 1

Demonstrates understanding of the design package and what they need to accomplish.

Table 2.3

3.4 Workplace Health and Safety

3.4 Workplace Health and Safety:

Assessment Description Score

Excellent Exceeds the standard required 3

Demonstrates and understanding of risks involved in the task by providing at least 3
examples to the designers. Provides an excellent answer to the risk given.

Acceptable Meets the standard required 2

Demonstrates and understanding of risks involved in the task by providing at least 2
examples to the designers. Provides an acceptable answer to the risk given.

Inadequate Significantly fails to meet the standard required 1

Demonstrates and understanding of risks involved in the task by providing at least 1
example to the designers. Provides an adequate answer to the risk given.

Table 2.4

7 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666
3.5 Resources:

Assessment Description Score

Excellent Exceeds the standard required 3

Provides a list of equipment that they have available and how this equipment will create
the best prototype possible. Equipment will provide the best prototype possible

Acceptable Meets the standard required 2

Provides a list of equipment that is available and how this equipment will be used to
create the prototype. Equipment is adequate to make the prototype

Inadequate Significantly fails to meet the standard required 1

Provides a list of equipment available. Equipment is not adequate to create the
prototype

Table 2.5

3.6 Overall Mark

Area of Assessment Mark Achieved

Relevant Experience 1 2 3
Method 1 2 3
Knowledge 1 2 3
Workplace Health and Safety 1 2 3
Resources 1 2 3
Total out of a possible 15
Table 2.6

8 of 8
TEC_4 C7.4
Blah blah Lane
With Lots of Love
Phone: (04) 6666 6666