ENG 282
25 April 2017
Big bookstore chains like Barnes and Noble all fall prey to the same hideous stereotyping
that has been going on for centuries. These chains take works of literature by African American
authors and tuck their stories away in the African American Literature section in their stores,
when many of them do not even relate to their ethnicity. The scene I chose in Percival Everetts
novel Erasure, is when Monk Ellison takes a trip to Borders, where he encounters firsthand his
books being stuffed away in the African American Literature section, when they have nothing
This scene in Erasure piqued my interest because I never really thought of the
potentially harmful qualities that categorizing and stereotyping books could have. I always
assumed that wherever a book remained on the shelves was where it was supposed to be- and
what it was actually about. Everett shows his readers through the eyes of the writer Ellisons
journey to Borders that even books are being racially biased against. Ellison upon his travels to
see his own books in the store recalls, I went to Literature and did not see me. I went to
Contemporary Fiction and did not find me, but when I fell back a couple of steps I found a
section called African American Studies and there, arranged alphabetically and neatly, read
undisturbed, were four of my books including my Persians of which the only thing ostensibly
African American was my jacket photograph. I became quickly irate, my pulse speeding up, my
brow furrowing. Someone interested in African American Studies would have little interest in my
books and would be confused by their presence in the section. Someone looking for an obscure
reworking of a Greek tragedy would not consider looking in that section any more than the
gardening section. The result in either case, no sale. That fucking store was taking food from my
table (Everett 38). It is absolutely disgusting that we are even racially stereotyping books based
on the race of the author. Dont judge a book by its cover should have more meaning to the store
owners.
The clear message that goes beyond the scene is that there seems to be an innate sense of
racism within most of the American population. Through that racism, they are unable to
distinguish between the topic of the novel, and the race of the author (if it is not white). Anything
that is done by a person of color is immediately camouflaged into a generalized sense of what
stereotypical novels by similar authors have done, regardless of what the work is actually about.
Camouflaging works and erasing the meaning inside of the novels definitely relates to
Passing by Nella Larsen. In Passing, Clare and Irene have chosen to live their lives as an
ambiguous race, both of which are African American of some sort, but they choose to be white in
order to have an easier life. By the end of the novel, Clare and Irene struggle with the people
they have become, due to their own erasure of their true identity. These bookstores like Barnes
and Noble hide the books away into unrelated sections, much like how Clare and Irene hide
away their true identity. It is easier for both Barnes and Noble, and Clare and Irene in that way.
experiencing another view on Black Art, and a parody of Black Art. In Erasure, Ellison is
completely against what Black Art stands for, and he hates how easily authors profit from it. He
writes his own rendition of Black Art, which ends up being published under the title Fuck, and
wins an award at the end of the novel. The injustices that African American authors have to deal
with on a daily basis through the innate racism rooted within big chain bookstores may not have
been the biggest part of Erasure, but it certainly made me wonder about my own Barnes and
Noble.
Works Cited