good

© All Rights Reserved

58 tayangan

good

© All Rights Reserved

- Principles of Hydraulics
- oslonci-Technip
- Horizontal Separator_V1.12 ERG PB 1
- Technip PCV
- cap HSE
- Incresing NGL Recovery
- P8383-TS-2000-J-0067 DP Flow Elements.pdf
- Technip_Floating_Production.pdf
- 5691-GEN-SA-RPT-0017-0
- Cryogenic Techniques - Jt vs Expander Limitations & Benefits
- Turboexpander-compressorTechnologyForEthylenePlants
- DS-21-J-0026_2 TPCDR Approved.pdf
- Benzene XyleneChemicals 30052012
- Final Hazop Nocl Dhds Sei
- Fired Heater Design
- Presentation Projet Qgii
- Thesis Compression cooling vs Absorption cooling (Jos Slotema Wu8 0832917).pdf
- Design_and_Rating__of_Trayed_Distillation_Columns.pdf
- LNG an Introduction
- KEVIN Tray Column Packing

Anda di halaman 1dari 6

to the minimum area to the minimum area required considerations suggest that it is best to use the

for vapour}liquid disengagement. The DCBUSF de- smallest column diameter and height that satisfy the

termines the approach of the downcomer froth height process requirements within reasonable safety allow-

to the downcomer depth ("tray spacing#outlet ances. Process requirements include accommodation

weir height). Safety factors in the range of 1.5}2.0 are of the expected liquid and vapour Sow ranges and the

recommended. optimization of tray efRciency.

Pressure Drop

See also: II/Distillation: Packed Columns: Design and

The pressure drop across an operating tray should be

Performance; Theory of Distillation; Tray Columns: Perfor-

speciRed if it affects the number of equilibrium stage mance.

requirements for the separation. This is often the case

for vacuum applications. Stable operation can be

obtained at a pressure drop of 1}3 in (2.5}7.6 cm) of

liquid per tray for vacuum and 2}5 in (5.1}12.7 cm) Further Reading

for pressure operations. Billet R (1979) Distillation Engineering. New York: Chem-

ical Publishing Co.

Fair JR (1963) In: Smith BD (ed.) Design of Equilibrium

Design Calculations Stage Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fair JR (1987) In: Rousseau RW (ed.) Handbook of

Tray Hydraulics

Separation Process Technology, ch. 5. New York: John

The hydraulic performance of a sieve tray for a given Wiley.

layout may be calculated using the methods presented Fair JR, Steinmeyer DE, Peuney WR and Crocker BB

in Distillation/Tray Columns: Performance. (1997). In: Perry RH and Green D (eds) Perrys Chem-

ical Engineers Handbook, 7th edn, sect. 14. New York:

Tray Ef\ciency McGraw-Hill.

Humphrey JL and Keller GE II (1997) Separation Process

Tray efRciency is a strong function of the physical Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

properties of the vapour and liquid streams. It is also Kister HZ, (1992) Distillation Design. New York

affected, to a lesser extent, by the Sow rates and tray McGraw-Hill.

layout. In the latter case, only hole diameter, hole Lockett MJ (1986) Distillation Tray Fundamentals. Cam-

area and weir height have a small inSuence on the bridge: Cambridge University Press.

tray efRciency. The optimum design, which gives the Lygeros AI and Magoulas KG (1986) Column Sooding

maximum number of equilibrium stages in a column, and entrainment. Hydrocarbon Processing 65:

is often obtained at minimum tray spacing and min- 43}44.

McCabe WL, Smith JC and Harriott P (1993) Unit Opera-

imum number of Sow paths that satisfy the hydraulic

tions of Chemical Engineering, 5th edn. New York:

design criteria. McGraw-Hill.

Ogboja O and Kuye A (1991) A procedure for the design

Conclusions and optimization of sieve trays. Transactions of the

Institution of Chemical Engineers 445.

A well-designed tray should be economical while Rose LM (1985) Distillation Design in Practice. Amster-

meeting all process design requirements. Economic dam: Elsevier.

K. Nandakumar and K. T. Chuang, University of Alberta, ber of objectives in mind. They include: (i) achieving

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada high efRciency of contact between the liquid and the

Copyright ^ 2000 Academic Press vapour so that the phases leaving a tray are as close to

equilibrium conditions as possible; (ii) balancing the

tray deck area provided for vapour/liquid contact

with the downcomer area provided for disengage-

Introduction ment of the two phases so that neither limits the

As pointed out in the article entitled distillation tray capacity of the column to process large amounts

columns: design, a sieve tray is designed with a num- of feed; and (iii) avoiding detrimental operating

II / DISTILLATION / Tray Columns: Performance 1141

high vapour entrainment.

Numerous geometrical factors have to be selected

by the designer such as: (i) column diameter; (ii) tray

spacing; (iii) top and bottom downcomer area; (iv)

number of Sow passes; (v) hole diameter and density;

(vi) tray thickness; and (vii) weir design. This is

a highly empirical process which depends on empiri-

cal design equations that describe the tray hydraulics

and rule-of-thumb guidelines that have evolved over

several decades of operating experience. Thus, the

design of sieve tray columns has remained an art,

although commercial process simulation software

packages such as ASPEN, PRO II, HYSIM, etc., are Figure 1 (A) Murphree tray efficiency. (B) Head in the down-

trying to codify these procedures into their design comer.

packages. The conceptual steps in the design proced-

ure together with the rule-of-thumb guidelines have

been presented in the Tray Columns: Design article. Figure 1A illustrates various compositions. yn is the

Since frequent reference will be made to that article, actual composition of the vapour stream leaving tray

we will henceforth refer to it simply as Part I. n, while yHn is the composition that is in equilibrium

In contrast, the performance analysis problem is with the exit liquid stream.

relatively more scientiRc, in the sense that a series These two compositions would be the same, if and

of well-deRned steps leads to the estimation of the only if the condition of ideal equilibrium tray is satis-

Murphree tray efRciency, the column efTciency and Red. Since it is never satisRed in practice, it is impor-

the actual number of trays. The overall column efR- tant to be able to predict the tray efRciency. In fact,

ciency, Eo, is deRned as: the compositions are not even uniform across the tray

deck. Hence the above deRnition is applied at a local

Nequilibrium point on the tray and the point efRciency is integrated

Eo" [1]

Nactual with the variations in Uow conditions to predict a tray

efRciency. The relationship between the inputs and

where Nequilibrium is obtained from stagewise equilib- the sequence of calculations is shown in Figure 2.

rium design calculations. Performance evaluation In Figure 2 the point efTciency is a function of local

boils down to estimating Eo so that the actual number Sow conditions such as local mass transfer coefR-

of trays, Nactual, can be determined. The overall col- cients in the liquid and vapour phases. The dry Mur-

umn efRciency, Eo, is related to the Murphree tray phree tray efRciency incorporates the effects of liquid

efRciency, EMV, through the Lewis relationship (as- and vapour distribution on the point efTciency, while

suming constant slopes of equilibrium and operating the wet Murphree tray efRciency incorporates the

lines), given by: additional effects of entrainment and weeping.

ln [1#EMV(!1)]

Eo"

ln

slope of the equilibrium line, and (G, L) are the

vapour and liquid Sow rates in kmol s\1. Thus the

Murphree tray efRciency, EMV, must be estimated in

order to determine the column efRciency. The urphree

tray efRciency is deRned to provide a measure of

departure from the assumption of ideal equilibrium

tray that is used to determine the number of ideal

stages required to achieve a given separation. It is

deRned as:

yn!yn 1

EMV" \ [2]

yHn !yn 1 Figure 2 Steps in performance evaluation.

\

1142 II / DISTILLATION / Tray Columns: Performance

The tray efRciency, EMV, clearly depends on: (i) the weir geometry. One such equation that predicts the

geometrical design parameters chosen as outlined in liquid height is given by:

Part I; (ii) the physical properties of the system such as

density, viscosity, surface tension, etc.; and (iii) the hl"0.6H0.5

w p

0.25

(FP/b)0.25 25 mm(Hw(100 mm

operating conditions like the vapour/liquid Sow

[5]

rates.

Having selected the design parameters identiRed in

Here, Hw is the weir height in metres, p is the pitch

Part I, the objective of the performance analysis step

of the holes in the sieve plate in metres,

is to predict: (i) the tray hydraulics (including the

pressure drop, the Sow regime, the froth density, the FP"(ul/ug)((l/g) is the Sow parameter, b is the

entrainment and weeping factors); (ii) the point efR- weir length per unit bubbling area in metres\1.

ciency; (iii) the Murphree tray efRciency; and (iv) the The discharge coefRcient, CD in eqn [4] is a

column efRciency. In the initial stages of designing function of the Sow conditions near a hole. It is in fact

a new tray column, there is feedback between the dependent on the liquid present on the tray. It is

design and performance analysis steps to arrive at correlated by:

a set of optimal design parameters, as outlined in the

Sow chart (Figure 5 of part I). But the performance ghll 2/3

CD"0.7 1!0.14 [6]

analysis steps to be outlined in this part, are also u2g,hg

useful in analysing the performance of an existing

tray column, although the opportunity to pick opti- All of the quantities appearing on the right-hand side

mal design conditions is not present as one is forced have been deRned previously.

to deal with an existing tray.

Pressure Drop Calculation in the Liquid Phase

An excellent summary of the equations used to

study the performance of a sieve tray column can be The liquid is transported down through the down-

found in Zuiderweg (1982), Lockett (1986) and Kis- comer. The capacity of the downcomer should be

ter (1992) (see Further Reading). The detailed steps sufRcient to handle the liquid load without becoming

involved in the performance analysis include: (i) the the rate limiting factor, i.e. without the liquid backing

pressure drop prediction; (ii) froth height and density up the downcomer to a signiRcant extent. Figure 1B

calculations; (iii) point efRciency prediction; and (iv) shows the pressure differential components making

tray efRciency prediction. The inputs required are: (i) up the total head differential on the liquid side as the

tray geometry; (ii) physical properties; and liquid backs up the downcomer to a height of hdc. The

(iii) Sow conditions. extent of liquid back-up can be estimated from:

hdc"ht#hda#hL [7]

Steps in Performance Analysis

Pressure Drop Calculation in Vapour Phase where ht is the pressure difference between points

a and b in the vapour phase that is necessary to keep

The pressure drop in the vapour phase across a sieve the vapour Sowing upwards, hL refers to the effective

tray is modelled as (Zuiderweg, 1982): clear liquid height on the tray deck that must be

overcome by the liquid in the downcomer, and

P"Pdry#l ghl [3] hda refers to the pressure loss due to the liquid Sow

under the downcomer apron. Note that ht is necessary

where the dry pressure drop is given by: to keep the upward Sow of vapour, but acts as a pres-

sure differential that works against the natural liquid

2

1 ug,h Sow in the downcomer. If this pressure differential is

Pdry" G [4]

2 CD large, the liquid will back up more in the downcomer.

This points out the coupling between the pressure

Here, g is the acceleration due to gravity, hl is the loss in the vapour phase through the tray deck area

liquid height or hold-up in metres, ug,h is the vapour and the liquid Sow in the downcomer. An optimal

velocity in the hole in metres per second, CD is the design must balance these two factors carefully.

drag coefRcient, and (G, l) are the densities of the hL and ht can be estimated from the correlations

vapour and liquid, respectively. The second term in provided in the previous section. hda can be estimated

eqn [3] represents the static head due to the liquid from:

hold-up on the tray. Hence the liquid height, hl must

be predicted from correlations that depend on the hda"165.2U2da

II / DISTILLATION / Tray Columns: Performance 1143

where hda is in millimetres of liquid and Uda is the ciency is related to the overall number of transfer

velocity under the downcomer apron in metres per units by:

second.

EOG"1!e\NOG [9]

Froth Height and Density Calculation

Chen and Chuang present the following correlation for

The froth density (or the two-phase density) has been NOG using data free of weeping and entrainment. But

measured using gamma ray techniques. The average the data set spans both the froth and spray regimes:

liquid volume fraction on a sieve tray, deRned as

1 LF2s 1/3

N l"hl/hb, is correlated by: 11 0.1 0.14 (DGtG)0.5

2

NOG" [10]

1 ug G 0.5 n

!1"c1 [8] 11 DGG 0.5 MGL

N l (ghl) 0.5

L #1

14 DLL MLG

Here, hb is the froth or bed height in metres and ug is

Here "mG/L is the separation factor, Fs"us(G

the vapour velocity on bubbling area in metres per

is the superRcial F-factor in kg0.5/m0.5s, tG"hf/us is

second. The constants c1 and n depend on the type of

the vapour-phase contact time in seconds, and hf is

Sow regimes. In the spray regime, they take on the

the froth height in metres. Note that this correlation

values of c1"265 and n"1.7, while in the

combines the geometrical parameters such as , the

mixed/emulsion regime, they are 40 and 0.8. This

fractional perforated area, Ab the bubbling area, the

requires one to estimate the Sow regime to be ex-

system properties such as densities (L, G), diffusivi-

pected under a given set of operating conditions. In

ties (DL, DG) viscosity (), the interfacial tension ()

Figure 3 of Part I, we identiRed the limits of operation

in newtons per metre, the molecular weights

to lie between the weeping and Sooding conditions

(ML, MG), and operating conditions such as (L, G),

as the vapour rate is increased. Even within this

Sow rates. This correlation appears to predict the

permissible range of operation, the Sow condition has

point efRciencies to within 5% of experimental data

been observed to change from spray to froth to emul-

over a wide range of pressures.

sion to bubble Uow regimes. The transition into

the spray regime is given by the capacity factor de- Murphree Tray Ef\ciency Calculation

Rned as: The point efRciency model presented above is based

g 0.5

g h )F

0.5 1.5

l

on a detailed examination of mass transfer at the

CF"ug "0.85 vapour/liquid interface. The ideal equilibrium tray

l dh

assumption used in the McCabe}Thiele method as-

Here, CF is the capacity factor deRned as ug((G/L) serts that the Sow condition on a tray is homogeneous

in metres per second, ug is the vapour velocity in the everywhere. If that were true, the point efRciency

bubbling area in metres per second, F is the fractional would be the same everywhere on the tray. But there

hole area per unit bubbling area and dh is the hole is strong evidence that the Sow is not homogeneous,

diameter in metres. The transition from the the degree of inhomogeneity being larger in large

spray/froth to emulsion/bubble Sow regime is con- diameter columns. Several researchers have tried to

trolled by the ratio of horizontal liquid momentum to measure the velocity proRles across a sieve tray and

vertical vapour momentum and is given by: increasingly computational Suid dynamics is being

used as a tool to predict such Sow Relds. (See for

ul l 0.5

FP

" '3.0 example Solari and Bell (1986) and Mehta et al.

ug G b ) hl (1998)). This information on Sow proRle must be

where ul is the horizontal liquid velocity, ug is the integrated with the point efRciency calculations in

vapour velocity on bubbling area in metres per second, order to predict a Murphree tray efRciency. One such

and FP is the Sow parameter deRned in eqn [5], b is the method is given below as an illustration. This model

weir length per unit bubbling area in metres\1, hl is the considers only the effect of longitudinal mixing.

liquid height or hold-up in metres. A measure of the effective diffusivity, DE is needed in

this model. Models of other Sow conRguration are

Point Ef\ciency Calculation discussed in Lockett (1986):

There are many empirical correlations for predicting EMV 1!e\(E#Pe)

the mass transfer efRciencies on sieve trays. The most "

EOG (#Pe)1#[(#Pe)/]

recent one is that proposed by Chen and Chuang

(1993). It is based on data from industrial sized col- e\E!1

# [11]

umns of Fractionation Research Inc. The point efR- 1#[/(#Pe)]

1144 II / DISTILLATION / Tray Columns: Performance

preferred path for the liquid. If weeping is signiRcant,

1/2

Pe 4EOG

" 1# !1 then it results in mixing of liquid streams between

2 Pe two neighbouring trays, thus degrading the perfor-

and Pe is the Peclet number, deRned as Pe"Z2l/DEtl. mance of the column. The need to avoid weeping

Here Zl is the length of liquid travel, or the distance places a limit on the minimum vapour velocity.

between the two weirs and tl is the liquid residence Zuiderweg presents the following correlations to pre-

time. The effective diffusivity is given by: dict the minimum operating limit.

[12] FP

CFw"F(ghl 1!0.15

where DE is in square feet per second, uG is superRcial bhl

gas velocity, expressed as cubic feet per second

divided by the active bubbling area in square feet. As

the Peclet number becomes large, this model predicts Emulsion Uow regime

efRciency enhancement much large than unity. In

large diameter columns (large Zl) the Peclet number CFw"0.45F(ghl

can tend to take a large value which would suggest

signiRcant efRciency enhancements. But it should be

remembered that the above model considers only the where CFw"ug(G/(L!G) is the capacity factor

longitudinal mixing process. In large diameter col- at the weep point in metres per second, and F is the

umns, the liquid Sow structure can be much more fractional hole area per unit bubbling area. Correla-

complicated as documented by Solari and Bell (1986). tions to estimate the type of Sow regime are given by

Hence, predicted values of EMV/EOG greater than 1.2 Zuiderweg. Note that weeping will seldom occur in

by the longitudinal mixing model should be viewed the spray regime as vapour velocities are sufRciently

with caution, as they may not be realized in the Reld. large under design conditions. The effect of weeping

on the tray efRciency calculation has been studied by

Effect of Entrainment on Murphree Kageyama (1969).

Tray Ef\ciency

The effect of entrainment on the Murphree tray efR- Extensions to Multicomponent

ciency is estimated from: Systems

1 The methods outlined above have been developed

EMV,entrain"EMV [13]

1#EMV

/(1!

) largely using experimental data for binary, two-phase

systems. The question of whether they can be applied

where: to multicomponent systems can be examined as fol-

e absolute entrainment lows. Tray hydraulics factors such as pressure drops,

" " Sow regimes, froth densities, etc., depend only on the

L#e total liquid flow rate

Suid mechanics of the two-phase mixture on sieve

where e is the entrained liquid in moles per hour. trays; hence one can expect the correlations to be

Zuiderweg presents the following empirical equation useful for multicomponent mixtures as long as mix-

to predict the liquid entrainment in the spray regime: ture properties for densities, viscosities, interfacial

tensions, etc., are used. On the other hand, the point

3

hb ug,h hb efRciency (and hence the Murphree tray efRciency)

"1.0;10\8 for 0.3( (0.9

Hs ul Hs depends on the mass transfer resistance of each

component species in each phase. Since the diffusivi-

Here Hs is the tray spacing in metres, hb is the bed ties and the equilibrium ratios (or the slope of the

height as deRned in eqn [8], ug,h is the vapour velocity equilibrium curve, m) could vary for each species, the

in the hole in metres per second and ul is the horizon- point efRciency will be different for each species. The

tal liquid velocity. correlation given in eqn [10] is based on binary mass

transfer data.

Weeping Point Determination

In the pseudo binary method of calculation (see

When the vapour velocity is too small, the liquid on Kister, 1992) two components are identiRed as

a tray deck can Sow down through the holes on the the light key and heavy key components and the

II / DISTILLATION / Vapour}Liquid Equilibrium: Correlation and Prediction 1145

Murphree tray efRciency is determined for such a bi- a cost function that includes the capital cost of the

nary pair. One then has the option of either using the equipment (which determines the column diameter,

efRciency so calculated for all of the remaining com- tray spacing, etc.) and operating costs (which deter-

ponents or repeating the procedure for all possible mine the reSux and reboil rates and the number of

binary pairs. Such detailed estimates of com- ideal stages).

ponent efRciencies are then used as inputs to ad-

vanced process simulators such as ASPEN. See also: II/Distillation: Historical Development; Instru-

mentation and Control Systems; Theory of Distillation;

Tray Columns: Design; Packed Columns: Design and Per-

Issues Relating to Scale-up formance; Vapour-Liquid Equilibrium: Correlation and Pre-

of Ef\ciency Data diction; Vapour-Liquid Equilibrium: Theory.

Since the point efRciency data and correlations (like

eqn [10] are (or should be) based on local conditions, Further Reading

they should, in principle, remain valid on all scales.

They are then integrated with Sow conditions to Chen GX and Chuang KT (1993) Prediction of Point EfT-

predict the overall tray efRciency. Correlations such ciency for Sieve Trays in Distillation. I & EC Research,

as eqn [11], which provide this function of integrat- vol. 32, p. 701.

Fair JR et al. (1997) In: Perry RH and Green D (eds.),

ing the point efRciency to provide tray efRciency, do

Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook } Section 14,

not remain valid at all scales. It has been well 7th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

documented that the liquid Sow patterns change Kageyama, O. Plate efRciency in distillation towers with

quite dramatically depending on the diameter of the weeping and entrainment, I. Chem. E. Symposium Series

column and the location of the weirs near the down- No. 32.

comer. In future one can expect computational Uuid Kister HZ (1992) Distillation Design. New York:

dynamics to provide detailed Sow information using McGraw-Hill.

models that remain scale invariant over a wide range Lockett MJ (1986) Distillation Tray Fundamentals. Cam-

of diameters. bridge University Press.

Mehta B, Chuang KT and Nandakumar K (1998) Model

for liquid phase Sow on sieve trays. Transactions of the

Concluding Remarks Institute of Chemical Engineers, part A (in press).

A series of correlations taken from the literature are Rose LM (1985) Distillation Design in Practice. Amster-

presented. They permit the evaluation of the perfor- dam: Elsevier.

Rousseau RW (1987) Handbook of Separation Process

mance of a sieve tray, once a set of design parameters

Technology, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

has been chosen as outlined in Part I. At the design Solari RB and Bell RL (1986) Fluid Sow patterns and

stage of a new sieve tray column, one can embed this velocity distributions on commercial scale sieve trays.

design and performance analysis steps into an optim- American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal 32:

ization procedure, in such a way that the design 640.

parameters may be altered until a speciRed objective Zuiderweg FJ (1982) Sieve trays: A view of the state of the

function is satisRed. The objective function could be art. Chemical Engineering Science 37: 1441.

B. C.-Y. Lu, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, original mixture. The process involves both the va-

Ontario, Canada, porization of the original liquid in order to

D.-Y. Peng, University of Saskatchewan, generate the vapours and the subsequent condensa-

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada tion of the vapours to form the desired liquid

Copyright ^ 2000 Academic Press products. It is evident that vapour}liquid equilibria

(VLE) are essential to this separation process.

Typical temperature}composition (T}x}y) diagrams,

Introduction pressure}composition (P}x}y) diagrams, and va-

Distillation is a process used to separate liquid mix- pour}liquid composition (x}y) diagrams for com-

tures into two or more streams, each of which has pletely miscible binary systems are depicted in

a composition that is different from that of the Figure 1.

- Principles of HydraulicsDiunggah olehspandelit
- oslonci-TechnipDiunggah olehkemo10
- Horizontal Separator_V1.12 ERG PB 1Diunggah olehAnonymous AtAGVssJ
- Technip PCVDiunggah olehsumant.c.singh1694
- cap HSEDiunggah olehRiccardo Gastaldo
- Incresing NGL RecoveryDiunggah olehOgenioja
- P8383-TS-2000-J-0067 DP Flow Elements.pdfDiunggah olehsvnaik14
- Technip_Floating_Production.pdfDiunggah olehP.Karthi
- 5691-GEN-SA-RPT-0017-0Diunggah olehĐiệnBiênNhâm
- Cryogenic Techniques - Jt vs Expander Limitations & BenefitsDiunggah olehkhoula
- Turboexpander-compressorTechnologyForEthylenePlantsDiunggah olehpatrickzluo
- DS-21-J-0026_2 TPCDR Approved.pdfDiunggah olehsumant.c.singh1694
- Benzene XyleneChemicals 30052012Diunggah olehChakravarthy Bharath
- Final Hazop Nocl Dhds SeiDiunggah olehPrashanthMNair
- Fired Heater DesignDiunggah olehBladimir Soliz Pardo
- Presentation Projet QgiiDiunggah olehvermaakash22
- Thesis Compression cooling vs Absorption cooling (Jos Slotema Wu8 0832917).pdfDiunggah olehbldp03
- Design_and_Rating__of_Trayed_Distillation_Columns.pdfDiunggah olehaliarbi
- LNG an IntroductionDiunggah olehsyafiq
- KEVIN Tray Column PackingDiunggah olehAbhishek Chaudhary
- Vidal. Thermo. App. in Chem. EngDiunggah olehMustafa Demircioğlu
- Hazop-Procedures-Kenny-Sample.pdfDiunggah olehthawdar
- PED_Technip.pdfDiunggah olehsavan
- Column Internals Regarding-EnDiunggah olehmansih457
- IFP-EnSPM Tarining BookDiunggah olehthomask11
- PSVs calculationDiunggah olehionutlaur86
- 2539-00-JSD-1300-01_0 Piping class.pdfDiunggah olehdang2172014
- Corrosion Mechanisms - Material Selection and Corrosion Control (Technip Italy)Diunggah olehah1525
- RAPID-FE1-TPX-CMM-SPN-0001-0927, Rev 0Diunggah olehĐình Nam
- 0_0_07_oct_2014_1918471501dfrnew.pdfDiunggah olehkalaiselvan0707

- Chemical Composition of a Permanent Prassland of Nardus stricta L. and Festuca rubra L. Under Influence of Organic FertilizationDiunggah olehLucian Ciprian MELUT
- Comparative study of the biochemical changes and volatile compound formations during the production of novel whey-based kefir beverages and traditional milk kefirDiunggah olehAziz mitrovic
- Report 5 calculate viscosityDiunggah olehEZWAN
- qftMT2012Diunggah olehDavid Danky
- scc aplicationDiunggah olehTeguh Farid Nurul Iman
- Air CompressorDiunggah olehsalicurri
- Design and Specification of a Compressed Air SystemDiunggah olehCarlosLéo
- A New Approach to Ductile Iron InoculationDiunggah olehZody Ytu
- ReviewerDiunggah olehrhea marie lanayon
- Estimate of Turbulent Fluxes With Eddy Covariance Technique in a Complex TopographyDiunggah olehDương Ánh
- 117AD - ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DESIGN.pdfDiunggah olehvenkiscribd444
- Introduction to Radiation Curing Chemistry and TechnologyDiunggah olehViky Gordon
- Formação Bacia JaibarasDiunggah olehBeiby Leguminho
- Aalco Datasheet St St PipeDiunggah olehVivek Rathod
- Transistors_tutorial_Nir_Tessler.pdfDiunggah olehIsrati Valeriu
- Compaction 1Diunggah olehGopal Sudhir
- Microsoft PowerPoint - Surface Finish Metrology Iss3Diunggah olehnfstrey
- Askeland Chapter (20)Diunggah olehjuegyi
- Floor hardener & densifierDiunggah olehLauw Tjun Nji
- Vapor Compression Refrigeration System With Diffuser at Condenser InletDiunggah olehmhdmk
- Diap Optimizacion LER, IpgcrsDiunggah olehFlor Hernandez Tiscareño
- Product Range Monoline 2012.pdfDiunggah olehFernando Gutierrez Cohecha
- Surface Effects and Contact Mechanics IXDiunggah olehbetween3ternity
- DESIGN SPECIFI.pdfDiunggah olehbinay kumar
- Hose Handling Doc ISS-059Diunggah olehQHSE Manager
- p n cycle activity notes lpDiunggah olehapi-271737972
- PW BRO MagicWave TransTig 4000 5000 EnDiunggah olehKara White
- XE_F_GATE_2015Diunggah olehVimal Aathithan
- 5890 Site preparationDiunggah olehmardonioandrade
- Gold Refining Forum Handbook Vol 2 ( 6-24-09 )Diunggah olehAFLAC ............

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.