146887 ll/l98l
Japan . . . . . . . . . .. 204/290 F
CURENTEEFICENY
CEL TEclvgaRATU
1
> r
V .
l
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
ELECTROLYSIS PERIOD (DAYS)
UM Patant 0a. 30, 1984 Sheet 1 of 2 4,479,864
Fig. I
CURENT (0/0)
E
CEL VTEOFMLPICRAGNUYPo)
8
6 l I
CEL
).J>01
0 l
Am
I00 200 300 400 500 600 700
ELECTROLYSIS PERIOD (DAYS)
i1'*atent Oct. 30, 1984 Sheet 2 of 2 4,479,864
Fig. 2
@L 90
/
w
m
/.
Satisfactory results were obtained with Anode-l of Available chlorine of which the concentration was
which the coating composition was within the preferred 8,000 ppm was continuously obtained from 3% brine.
range. . No abnormal increase in the cell voltage and no
But with Anode-2 through 4 of which the coating change of surface was observed during the electrolysis
composition was outside the preferred range, only very which lasted for one year and it was possible to do
low current efficiencies were obtained. In particular, stable electrolysis.
Anode-2 showed a remarkable decrease in current effi 5
ciency at a low temperature and an increase in the cell EXAMPLE 4
voltage as well. A titanium sheet measuring 155 mm X400 mm X 3 mm
These experiments were conducted at an elevated was degreased in a degreasing apparatus containing
seawater flow rate of 0.8 m/s to accelerate the process trichloroethylene. The surface was roughened by sand
of mechanical deterioration. 20 blast treatment and then washed by immersion in a 5%
At this flow rate, Anode-4 showed traces of erosion hydro?uoric acid solution, followed by a water wash.
after 90 days. . A coating solution the composition of which is shown
EXAMPLE 3 below was prepared by mixing in the order listed.
The solution was applied to the titanium substrate
A titanium-palladium alloy sheet measuring 50 with a brush and then dried.
mm>< 150 mm><3 mm was degreased by ethylene chlo
ride. The surface was roughened by sandblast treat
ment. The sheet was then immersed in a hot oxalic acid Composition of coating solution
solution for 1 hour and washed with water. 1. Hexachloroplatinic acid 4.9 g
A coating solution the composition of which is shown 2. Hexachloroiridic acid 0.9 g
3. Ruthenium trichloride 2.5 g
below was prepared by mixing in the order listed. The 4. Hydrochloric acid 5.0 ml
solution was applied to the titanium-palladium alloy 5. Isopropyl alcohol 40 ml
substrate with a brush and then dried. 6. Lavender oil 10 l
Composition of coating solution 35 The unit was transferred into an electric oven where
1. Platinum tetrachloride 657 mg
it was heated in air at 500 C. for 1 hour. The cycle of
2. Hexachloroiridic acid 408 mg application, drying and heating was repeated seven
3. Ruthenium trichloride 381 mg times.
4. Hydrochloric acid 0.6 mg Analysis of the composition of the coating layer with
5. N-butyl alcohol 8.0 mg an X-ray diffractometer gave: 50 wt % metallic plati
6. Anise oil 1.0 mg
num, 10 wt % iridium dioxide and 40 wt % ruthenium
dioxide.
The unit was transferred into an electric oven where Measurement of the thickness of the coating with an
it was heated in air at 480 C. for 1.5 hours. The cycle RI ?uoresent X-ray spectrometer gave a metal loading
of application, drying and heating was repeated ten 45 of 30 g/m2.
times. This anode was used for electrolysis of seawater
Analysis of the composition of the coating layer with under the same conditions as Example 2.
an X-ray diffractometer gave: 40 wt % metallic plati No abnormal increase in the cell voltage was ob
num, 30 wt % iridium dioxide and 30 wt % ruthenium served during the electrolysis which lasted for one year
dioxide. 50 and six months. Likewise, no abnormal decrease in
Measurement of the thickness of the coating with an current efficiency took place.
RI fluorescent X-ray spectormeter gave a metal loading What is claimed is:
of 50 g/m2. 1. An anode for generating available chlorine from
This anode was used for electrogeneration of hypo seawater by electrolysis which comprises a titanium or
chlorite as a sterilization agent for a swimming pool. 55 titanium alloy substrate having an outer active anode
The results are shown in Table 3. For the purpose of coating on said substrate, said outer coating consisting
comparison, the results using a normal platinum-plated essentially of an active anode layer containing from 15
titanium anode are also shown in Table 3. to 85% by weight of platinum, from 5 to 35% by weight
TABLE 3
effec- current power
cell current cell tive efii- consump
Electro- temp. density voltage C12 ciency tion
lyte ("C) (A/dmz) (V) (ppm) (%) (kWh/ks - C12)
Anode of 3% 30 10 3.5 8,000 84 3.1
Example 3 NaCl
Pt-plated 3% " " 4.8 6,000 54 6.7
Ti anode NaCl
4,479,864
9 10
of iridium dioxide and from 10 to 50% by Weight of strate consists essentially of titanium and is integral with
ruthenium dioxide _ , _ _ said outer active coating.
2' The anode according to Glam 1 where! Said coat- 4. The anode according to claim 1 wherein said sub
ing is integral with said substrate and has a metal load- _ _ _ , _ _ .
ing of 5_60 g/mz expressed as the total weight of p1ati_ 5 strate consists essentially of titanium and is integral with
num group metals per unit active area of the anode. said outer ?ctiv? Coating
3. The anode according to claim 2 wherein said sub- * * * * *
10
2O
25
3O
35
45
so
55
60
65