0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
24 tayangan1 halaman
The document discusses the uncertainty around the origins of the Quran and whether Muhammad could read and write. It examines various traditions about Muhammad requesting something to write with on his deathbed and whether this was to appoint Abu Bakr as his successor. The document finds this tradition suspicious. It also analyzes passages in the Quran that mention Muhammad as "ummi", which nearly all commentators take to mean he could not read or write, but the document argues this instead meant he was unfamiliar with earlier scriptures. In the end, the evidence for Muhammad's literacy is deemed very weak.
The document discusses the uncertainty around the origins of the Quran and whether Muhammad could read and write. It examines various traditions about Muhammad requesting something to write with on his deathbed and whether this was to appoint Abu Bakr as his successor. The document finds this tradition suspicious. It also analyzes passages in the Quran that mention Muhammad as "ummi", which nearly all commentators take to mean he could not read or write, but the document argues this instead meant he was unfamiliar with earlier scriptures. In the end, the evidence for Muhammad's literacy is deemed very weak.
The document discusses the uncertainty around the origins of the Quran and whether Muhammad could read and write. It examines various traditions about Muhammad requesting something to write with on his deathbed and whether this was to appoint Abu Bakr as his successor. The document finds this tradition suspicious. It also analyzes passages in the Quran that mention Muhammad as "ummi", which nearly all commentators take to mean he could not read or write, but the document argues this instead meant he was unfamiliar with earlier scriptures. In the end, the evidence for Muhammad's literacy is deemed very weak.
69 mm 26.84 mm 19.92 mm 10 the origin of the koran
Another tradition is equally uncertain: On his death bed Muammad [i/13]
allegedly requested a reed and tablet in order to write down something that was to protect the Muslims from error.25 But this tradition going back to Abd Allh IBN ABBS (d. 68/687) 26 110.46 mm is suspicious when compared with another tradition, openly betraying its bias, in which isha tells the story that Muammad thus intended to fix in writing the appointment of Ab Bakr as his successor.27 It is consequently certain that this entire tradition, which is not found in Ibn Hishm, was forged to defend Ab Bakrs claim to succession. But even if this were not the case, also in this instance the words so that I write can be interpreted as so that I dictate; once again we would lack a sound argument. Even the Koran itself does not afford any more certainty, regardless of how one interprets the frequently occurring verb , particularly the passage in sra 96:1 and 3. If it simply means to lecture, to preach, it is a priori irrelevant. If, however, this means to read or to lecture on what has been read, even this interpretation does not contribute anything towards solving the problem since it is in the nature of heavenly textswhich are beyond human speech or writingand is therefore comprehensible only by divine inspiration. [i/14] We can see that the evidence for Muammads ability to read and write is very weak. But what about the evidence generally marshalled to prove the opposite? The main argument is that in sra 7:156 and 158 Muammad is called , words that nearly all commentators take to mean the Prophet who could neither read nor write. However, when we make a thorough investigation of all the Koranic passages that contain we find that it is used everywhere to mean the opposite of , namely, not a person capable of writing but the owner (or expert) of the Holy Scripture; sra 2:73 even says that there were who have a poor understanding of the Scriptures. In relation to Muammad, this word must mean that he was not familiar with ancient divine texts and knew the truth only from divine inspirationcharacteristics frequently mentioned on other occasions as
25 al-Bukhr, a, Bb mawt al-nab, appendix to , K. al-Ilm, 40; Muslim,
vol. 2, p. 78sq. (al-Qasalln. vol. 7, p. 95 sq., 4); al-Khab al-Tibrz, Mishct-ul-
3.32 mm or, A collection, p. 540 ( 548); cf. G. Weil, Das Leben Mohammeds, p. 329sq.; mabh; Caussin de Perceval, Essai sur l histoire des Arabes, vol. 3, p. 321. 26 EI2; G. Juynboll, Encyclopedia, pp. 12; Sezgin, GAS, vol. 8, pp. 2122. 27 Muslim, vol. 2, p. 457 (al-Qasalln, vol. 9, p. 257, ) , and later al-Khab
al-Tibrz, Mishct-ul-mabh; or, A collection, , fal 1, 3. But Ibn Sad, abaqt,
ed. I, IV, [sic] p. , 7, ( i.e. .) [This reference cannot be verified.] 27.36 mm