11 2015 058
1.b.Etiologi
Semua infeksi pada neonatus dianggap oportunisitik dan setiap bakteri mampu
menyebabkan sepsis.
Mikroorganisme berupa bakteri, jamur, virus atau riketsia. Penyebab paling sering
dari sepsis : Escherichia Coli dan Streptococcus grup B (dengan angka kesakitan
sekitar 50 70 %. Diikuti dengan malaria, sifilis, dan toksoplasma. Streptococcus
grup A, dan streptococcus viridans, patogen lainnya gonokokus, candida alibicans,
virus herpes simpleks (tipe II) dan organisme listeria, rubella, sitomegalo, koksaki,
hepatitis, influenza, parotitis.
Pertolongan persalinan yang tidak higiene, partus lama, partus dengan tindakan.
Kelahiran kurang, BBLR, cacat bawaan
Etiologi terjadinya sepsis pada neonatus adalah dari bakteri, virus, jamur dan protozoa
(jarang). Penyebab yang paling sering dari sepsis awitan awal adalah Streptokokus grup B
dan bakteri enterik yang didapat dari saluran kelamin ibu. Sepsis awitan lanjut dapat
disebabkan oleh SGB, virus herpes simplek (HSV), enterovirus dan E.coli. Pada bayi dengan
berat badan lahir sangat rendah, Candida dan Stafilokokus koagulase-negatif (CONS),
merupakan patogen yang paling umum pada sepsis awitan lanjut.
Dosis antibiotik untuk sepsis neonatorum : Ampisislin 200 mg/kgBB/hari, dibagi 3 atau 4 kali
pemberian; Gentamisin 5 mg/kg BB/hari, dibagi dalam 2 pemberian; Kloramfenikol 25
mg/kg BB/hari, dibagi dalam 3 atau 4 kali pemberian; Sefalasporin 100 mg/kg BB/hari,
dibagi dalam 2 kali pemberian;Eritromisin500 mg/kg BB/hari, dibagi dalam 3 dosis.
Walaupun telah dilakukan pengisapan trakea, bayi yang mengalami distres intrapartum masih
berisiko mengalami MAS dan harus dipantau secara ketat.
o Perawatan rutin. Distres sering mengakibatkan abnormalitas metabolik seperti
hipoksia, asidosis, hipoglikemia, dan hipokalsemia. Koreksi abnormalitas metabolik
bila diperlukan. Cairan harus direstriksi untuk mencegah edema serebri dan paru.
o Pemantauan saturasi oksigen. Pulse oxymetri dapat dijadikan pemeriksaan
awal untuk mendeteksi PPHN dengan membandingkan saturasi oksigen pada
lengan kanan dengan saturasi oksigen pada ekstremitas bawah.
o Obstruksi. Pada bayi dengan aspirasi mekonium berat, dapat terjadi obstruksi mekanik
saluran napas danbpneumonitis kimia. Atelektasis dan inflamasi yang terus berjalan
serta terbentuknya pirau ekstrapulmonar akan memperburuk mismatch ventilasi-
perfusi dan mengakibatkan hipoksemia berat.
o Hipoksemia. Tata laksana hipoksemia adalah meningkatkan konsentrasi oksigen
inspirasi dengan pemantauan analisis gas darah dan pH. Bayi harus mendapat oksigen
yang adekuat karena hipoksia berulang mengakibatkan vasokonstriksi
paru dan selanjutnya dapatbmenyebabkan PPHN.
o Ventilasi mekanik. Ventilasi mekanik terindikasi bila PaCO2 >60 mmHg atau terdapat
hipoksemia persisten (PaO2 <50 mmHg). Pada kasus berat, seringkali dibutuhkan
inspiratory pressure yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan kasus sindrom gawat napas.
Waktu ekspirasi yang cukup harus diberikan untuk mencegah air trapping akibat
obstruksi parsial saluran napas. Bayi dengan MAS berat yang tidak
berespons dengan ventilator konvensional dan yang mengalami air leak syndrome
mungkin membutuhkan high frequency oscillatory ventilator.
Medikamentosa.
o Antibiotik. Seringkali sulit untuk membedakan antara pneumonia bakterial dan MAS
hanya berdasarkan temuan klinis dan foto toraks. Walaupun beberapa bayi dengan
MAS juga mengalami infeksi, penggunaan antibiotik spektrum luas terindikasi hanya
pada kasus dengan infiltrat pada foto toraks. Kultur darah darus dilakukan untuk
mengidentifikasi etiologi dan mengevaluasi keberhasilan terapi antibiotik.
o Surfaktan. Mekonium menghambat aktivitas surfaktan endogen. Terapi surfaktan
dapat meningkatkan oksigenasi, menurunkan komplikasi pulmonal, dan menurunkan
kebutuhan ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Surfaktan tidak rutin
diberikan untuk kasus MAS, tetapi dapat dipertimbangkan untuk kasus yang berat dan
tidak berespons terhadap terapi standar.
o Kortikosteroid. Penggunaan kortikosteroid pada MAS tidak dianjurkan.
5. Dosis Obat
Rifampisin: 10-20 mg/kgBB/hari, dosis maksimal 600 mg/hari.
Etambutol: 15-20 mg/kgBB/hari, dosis maksimal 1 250 mg/hari
Ranitidin : 2-4 mg/kg bb dua kali sehari. Dosis maksimal untuk anak-anak ialah 300
mg sehari.
Digoksin : Untuk digitalisasi cepat : 25 mcg/kg berat badan dengan selang waktu
tertentu sampai kompensasi tercapai. Pemeliharaan : 10-20 mcg/kg berat badan/hari.
Imunoglobulin : Intra vena imunodefisiensi primer dan atau sekunder dosis bulanan :
100 - 200 mg/kg BB. Maksimal : 300 - 400 mg/kg BB. Purpura trombositopenia
idiopatik (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura) induksi : 400 mg mg/kg BB per hari
selama 5 hari. pemeliharaan : 400 mg/kg BB, 1 kali seminggu. sindrom kawasaki : 2
g/kg BB
Cefadroxil: 30 mg / kg BB / hari dalam dosis terbagi tiap 12 jam
Background
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality. All women who
carry a pregnancy beyond 20 weeks gestation are at risk for PPH and its sequelae. Although
maternal mortality rates have declined greatly in the developed world, PPH remains a leading
cause of maternal mortality elsewhere.
The direct pregnancy-related maternal mortality rate in the United States is approximately 7-
10 women per 100,000 live births. National statistics suggest that approximately 8% of these
deaths are caused by PPH.[1] In industrialized countries, PPH usually ranks in the top 3
causes of maternal mortality, along with embolism and hypertension. In the developing
world, several countries have maternal mortality rates in excess of 1000 women per 100,000
live births, and World Health Organization statistics suggest that 25% of maternal deaths are
due to PPH, accounting for more than 100,000 maternal deaths per year.[2] The most recent
Practice Bulletin from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places the
estimate at 140,000 maternal deaths per year or 1 woman every 4 minutes.[3]
The rate of PPH increased from 1.5% in 1999 to 4.1% in 2009, and the rate of atonic PPH
rose from 1% in 1999 to 3.4% in 2009. The risk of total PPH with a morbidly adherent
placenta was markedly higher.[4]
Problem
The definition of PPH is somewhat arbitrary and problematic. PPH is defined as blood loss of
more than 500 mL following vaginal delivery or more than 1000 mL following cesarean
delivery.[5, 6] A loss of these amounts within 24 hours of delivery is termed early or primary
PPH, whereas such losses are termed late or secondary PPH if they occur 24 hours after
delivery. This article focuses on early PPH.
Estimates of blood loss at delivery are subjective and generally inaccurate. Studies have
suggested that caregivers consistently underestimate actual blood loss. Another proposal
suggests using a 10% fall in hematocrit value to define PPH, but this change is dependent on
the timing of the test and the amount of fluid resuscitation given.[7] More importantly, the
diagnosis would be retrospective, perhaps useful for research but not so in the clinical setting.
Another consideration is the differing capacities of individual patients to cope with blood
loss. A healthy woman has a 30-50% increase in blood volume in a normal singleton
pregnancy and is much more tolerant of blood loss than a woman who has preexisting
anemia, an underlying cardiac condition, or a volume-contracted condition secondary to
dehydration or preeclampsia. For these reasons, various authors have suggested that PPH
should be diagnosed with any amount of blood loss that threatens the hemodynamic stability
of the woman.
The diagnosis of PPH is usually reserved for pregnancies that have progressed beyond 20
weeks gestation. Deliveries at less than 20 weeks gestational age are spontaneous abortions.
Bleeding related to spontaneous abortion may have etiologies and management in common
with those for PPH.
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States and industrialized countries
The frequency of PPH is related to the management of the third stage of labor. This is the
period from the completed delivery of the baby until the completed delivery of the placenta.
Data from several sources, including several large randomized trials performed in
industrialized countries, indicate that the prevalence rate of PPH of more than 500 mL is
approximately 5% when active management is used versus 13% when expectant management
is used. The prevalence rate of PPH of more than 1000 mL is approximately 1% when active
management is used versus 3% when expectant management is used.[8, 9] See Medscape
Reference article Management of the Third Stage of Labor.
Developing countries
The increased frequency of PPH in the developing world is more likely reflected by the rates
given above for expectant management because of the lack of widespread availability of
medications used in the active management of the third stage.[2] A number of factors also
contribute to much less favorable outcomes of PPH in developing countries. The first is a
lack of experienced caregivers who might be able to successfully manage PPH if it occurred.
Additionally, the same drugs used for prophylaxis against PPH in active management of the
third stage are also the primary agents in the treatment of PPH. Lack of blood transfusion
services, anesthetic services, and operating capabilities also plays a role. Finally, the
previously mentioned comorbidities are more commonly observed in developing countries
and combine to decrease a woman's tolerance of blood loss.
Etiology
PPH has many potential causes, but the most common, by a wide margin, is uterine atony, ie,
failure of the uterus to contract and retract following delivery of the baby. PPH in a previous
pregnancy is a major risk factor and every effort should be made to determine its severity and
cause. In a recent randomized trial in the United States, birthweight, labor induction and
augmentation, chorioamnionitis, magnesium sulfate use, and previous PPH were all
positively associated with increased risk of PPH.[10]
Failure to progress during the second stage of labor (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.4-4.7)
PPH is also associated with obesity. In a study by Blomberg, the risk of atonic uterine
hemorrhage rapidly increased with increasing BMI; in women with a BMI over 40, the risk
was 5.2% with normal delivery and 13.6% with instrumental delivery.[12]
As a way of remembering the causes of PPH, several sources have suggested using the 4 T
s as a mnemonic: tone, tissue, trauma, and thrombosis.[15]
Tone
Uterine atony and failure of contraction and retraction of myometrial muscle fibers can lead
to rapid and severe hemorrhage and hypovolemic shock. Overdistension of the uterus, either
absolute or relative, is a major risk factor for atony. Overdistension of the uterus can be
caused by multifetal gestation, fetal macrosomia, polyhydramnios, or fetal abnormality (eg,
severe hydrocephalus); a uterine structural abnormality; or a failure to deliver the placenta or
distension with blood before or after placental delivery.
Poor myometrial contraction can result from fatigue due to prolonged labor or rapid forceful
labor, especially if stimulated. It can also result from the inhibition of contractions by drugs
such as halogenated anesthetic agents, nitrates, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
magnesium sulfate, beta-sympathomimetics, and nifedipine. Other causes include placental
implantation site in the lower uterine segment, bacterial toxins (eg, chorioamnionitis,
endomyometritis, septicemia), hypoxia due to hypoperfusion or Couvelaire uterus in abruptio
placentae, and hypothermia due to massive resuscitation or prolonged uterine exteriorization.
Recent data suggest that grand multiparity is not an independent risk factor for PPH.
Tissue
Uterine contraction and retraction leads to detachment and expulsion of the placenta.
Complete detachment and expulsion of the placenta permits continued retraction and optimal
occlusion of blood vessels.
Retention of a portion of the placenta is more common if the placenta has developed with a
succenturiate or accessory lobe. Following delivery of the placenta and when minimal
bleeding is present, the placenta should be inspected for evidence of fetal vessels coursing to
the placental edge and abruptly ending at a tear in the membranes. Such a finding suggests a
retained succenturiate lobe.
The placenta is more likely to be retained at extreme preterm gestations (especially < 24 wk),
and significant bleeding can occur. This should be a consideration in all deliveries at very
early gestations, whether they are spontaneous or induced. Recent trials suggest that the use
of misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy leads to a marked reduction in
the rate of retained placenta when compared to techniques using the intrauterine instillation
of prostaglandin or hypertonic saline.[16] One such trial reported rates of retained placenta
requiring D&C of 3.4% with oral misoprostol compared to 22.4% using intra-amniotic
prostaglandin (p=0.002).[17]
Failure of complete separation of the placenta occurs in placenta accreta and its variants. In
this condition, the placenta has invaded beyond the normal cleavage plane and is abnormally
adherent. Significant bleeding from the area where normal attachment (and now detachment)
has occurred may mark partial accreta. Complete accreta in which the entire surface of the
placenta is abnormally attached, or more severe invasion (placenta increta or percreta), may
not initially cause severe bleeding, but it may develop as more aggressive efforts are made to
remove the placenta. This condition should be considered possible whenever the placenta is
implanted over a previous uterine scar, especially if associated with placenta previa.
All patients with placenta previa should be informed of the risk of severe PPH, including the
possible need for transfusion and hysterectomy.
Finally, retained blood may cause uterine distension and prevent effective contraction.
Trauma
Damage to the genital tract may occur spontaneously or through manipulations used to
deliver the baby. Cesarean delivery results in twice the average blood loss of vaginal delivery.
Incisions in the poorly contractile lower segment heal well but are more reliant on suturing,
vasospasm, and clotting for hemostasis.
Uterine rupture is most common in patients with previous cesarean delivery scars. Routine
transvaginal palpation of such scars is no longer recommended. Any uterus that has
undergone a procedure resulting in a total or thick partial disruption of the uterine wall should
be considered at risk for rupture in a future pregnancy. This admonition includes
fibroidectomy; uteroplasty for congenital abnormality; cornual or cervical ectopic resection;
and perforation of the uterus during dilatation, curettage, biopsy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy,
or intrauterine contraceptive device placement.
Trauma may occur following very prolonged or vigorous labor, especially if the patient has
relative or absolute cephalopelvic disproportion and the uterus has been stimulated with
oxytocin or prostaglandins. Using intrauterine pressure monitoring may lessen this risk.
Trauma also may occur following extrauterine or intrauterine manipulation of the fetus. The
highest risk is probably associated with internal version and extraction of a second twin;
however, uterine rupture may also occur secondary to external version. Finally, trauma may
result secondary to attempts to remove a retained placenta manually or with instrumentation.
The uterus should always be controlled with a hand on the abdomen during any such
procedure. An intraumbilical vein saline/oxytocin or saline/misoprostol injection may reduce
the need for more invasive removal techniques.[8]
Cervical laceration is most commonly associated with forceps delivery, and the cervix should
be inspected following all such deliveries. Assisted vaginal delivery (forceps or vacuum)
should never be attempted without the cervix being fully dilated. Cervical laceration may
occur spontaneously. In these cases, mothers have often been unable to resist bearing down
before full cervical dilatation. Rarely, manual exploration or instrumentation of the uterus
may result in cervical damage. Very rarely, the cervix is purposefully incised at the 2- and/or
10-oclock positions to facilitate delivery of an entrapped fetal head during a breech delivery
(Dhrssen incision).
Vaginal sidewall laceration is also most commonly associated with operative vaginal delivery,
but it may occur spontaneously, especially if a fetal hand presents with the head. Lacerations
may occur during manipulations to resolve shoulder dystocia. Lacerations often occur in the
region overlying the ischial spines. The frequency of sidewall and cervical lacerations has
probably decreased in recent years because of the reduction in the use of midpelvic forceps
and, especially, midpelvic rotational procedures.
Thrombosis
In the immediate postpartum period, disorders of the coagulation system and platelets do not
usually result in excessive bleeding; this emphasizes the efficiency of uterine contraction and
retraction for preventing hemorrhage.[5] Fibrin deposition over the placental site and clots
within supplying vessels play a significant role in the hours and days following delivery, and
abnormalities in these areas can lead to late PPH or exacerbate bleeding from other causes,
most notably, trauma.
Acquired abnormalities are more commonly problematic. DIC related to abruptio placentae,
HELLP syndrome, intrauterine fetal demise, amniotic fluid embolism, and sepsis may occur.
Fibrinogen levels are markedly elevated during pregnancy, and a fibrinogen level that would
be in the reference range in the nonpregnant state should be viewed with suspicion in the
aforementioned clinical scenarios.
Finally, dilutional coagulopathy may occur following massive PPH and resuscitation with
crystalloid and packed red blood cells (PRBCs).
Risk factors and associated conditions for PPH are listed above; however, a large number of
women experiencing PPH have no risk factors. Different etiologies may have common risk
factors, and this is especially true of uterine atony and trauma of the lower genital tract. PPH
usually has a single cause, but more than one cause is also possible, most likely following a
prolonged labor that ultimately ends in an operative vaginal birth.
Prevention
High-quality evidence suggests that active management of the third stage of labor reduces the
incidence and severity of PPH.[9] Active management is the combination of (1) uterotonic
administration (preferably oxytocin) immediately upon delivery of the baby, (2) early cord
clamping and cutting, and (3) gentle cord traction with uterine countertraction when the
uterus is well contracted (ie, Brandt-Andrews maneuver).
The value of active management in the prevention of PPH cannot be overstated (see
Management of the Third Stage of Labor). The use of active versus expectant management in
the third stage was the subject of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a Cochrane meta-
analysis.[19, 8, 9] These trials included more than 6000 women, and the findings are
summarized in Table 1.
The findings show a conclusive benefit for active management, with an approximate 60%
reduction in the occurrence of PPH greater than or equal to 500 mL and 1000 mL,
hemoglobin concentration of less than 9 g/dL at 24-48 hours after delivery, and the need for
blood transfusion. An 80% reduction in the need for therapeutic uterotonic agents was noted.
These results were all highly significant as indicated by the 95% confidence interval figures.
The results indicate that for every 12 patients receiving active rather than physiological
management, one PPH would be prevented. For every 67 patients so treated, one patient
would avoid transfusion with blood products.
One concern regarding active management is that retained placenta may occur more
frequently. This concern is not supported by the trials. This is especially true if oxytocin is
used as the uterotonic.[20, 21] The US RCTs mentioned above compared the use of active
management protocols in which the oxytocin was administered either immediately after
delivery of the baby or immediately after delivery of the placenta. The authors stated that no
statistically significant difference was noted in the PPH rate and that delaying administration
until after placental delivery was justified.
Noteworthy is the finding that early administration of oxytocin (before placental delivery) did
not increase the rate of retained placenta. Additionally, the trial showed trends toward a
benefit for early administration of oxytocin, including a 25% reduction in PPH and a 50%
reduction in the need for transfusion.[10] These findings are clearly consistent with the
previous RCTs and the early administration of oxytocin with delivery of the baby is strongly
recommended.
They also stated that administration with delivery of the baby did not increase the rate of
retained placenta, but they did not point out that this finding clearly supports early
administration. Additionally, the trial showed trends toward a benefit for early administration
of oxytocin, including a 25% reduction in PPH and a 50% reduction in the need for
transfusion.[10] These differences may be due to chance, but, given the results of the
previous RCTs, the administration of oxytocin with delivery of the baby would seem to be
strongly warranted.
Following delivery, administering a uterotonic drug that lasts at least 2-3 hours is reasonable.
[3] This could be 10 U of oxytocin in 500 mL of intravenous fluid by continuous drip, 200-
250 mcg of ergonovine intramuscularly, or 250 mcg of 15-methyl prostaglandin F2-alpha
(carboprost [Hemabate]) intramuscularly. The use of misoprostol and a long-acting oxytocin
analogue (carbetocin) is being studied for this use.[22] It has been suggested that distribution
of misoprostol ahead of childbirth in communities where home birth is unavoidable can be an
effective approach. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this and there are
concerns that the drug might be used for starting labor or terminating pregnancy.[23]
Pathophysiology
Over the course of a pregnancy, maternal blood volume increases by approximately 50%
(from 4 L to 6 L). The plasma volume increases somewhat more than the total RBC volume,
leading to a fall in the hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit value. The increase in blood
volume serves to fulfill the perfusion demands of the low-resistance uteroplacental unit and
to provide a reserve for the blood loss that occurs at delivery.[7]
At term, the estimated blood flow to the uterus is 500-800 mL/min, which constitutes 10-15%
of cardiac output. Most of this flow traverses the low-resistance placental bed. The uterine
blood vessels that supply the placental site traverse a weave of myometrial fibers. As these
fibers contract following delivery, myometrial retraction occurs. Retraction is the unique
characteristic of the uterine muscle to maintain its shortened length following each successive
contraction. The blood vessels are compressed and kinked by this crisscross latticework, and,
normally, blood flow is quickly occluded. This arrangement of muscle bundles has been
referred to as the "living ligatures" or "physiologic sutures" of the uterus.[5]
Uterine atony is a failure of the uterine myometrial fibers to contract and retract. This is the
most important cause of PPH and usually occurs immediately following delivery of the baby,
up to 4 hours after the delivery. Trauma to the genital tract (ie, uterus, uterine cervix, vagina,
labia, clitoris) in pregnancy results in significantly more bleeding than would occur in the
nonpregnant state because of increased blood supply to these tissues. The trauma specifically
related to the delivery of the baby, either vaginally in a spontaneous or assisted manner or by
cesarean delivery, can also be substantial and can lead to significant disruption of soft tissue
and tearing of blood vessels.
Presentation
Although the presentation of PPH is most often dramatic, bleeding may be slower and
seemingly less noteworthy but may still ultimately result in critical loss and shock. This is
more likely to be true of bleeding secondary to retained tissue or trauma. Nursing practices
for routine care in the postpartum period should include close observation and documentation
of maternal vital signs and condition, vaginal blood loss, and uterine tone and size. The uterus
should be periodically massaged to express any clots that have accumulated in the uterus or
vagina.[24]
The usual presentation of PPH is one of heavy vaginal bleeding that can quickly lead to signs
and symptoms of hypovolemic shock. This rapid blood loss reflects the combination of high
uterine blood flow and the most common cause of PPH, ie, uterine atony. Blood loss is
usually visible at the introitus, and this is especially true if the placenta has delivered. If the
placenta remains in situ, then a significant amount of blood can be retained in the uterus
behind a partially separated placenta, the membranes, or both.
Even after placental delivery, blood may collect in an atonic uterus. For this reason, the
uterine size and tone should be monitored throughout the third stage and in the so-called
fourth stage, following delivery of the placenta. This is accomplished by gently palpating the
uterine fundus. If the cause of bleeding is not uterine atony, then blood loss may be slower
and clinical signs and symptoms of hypovolemia may develop over a longer time frame.
Bleeding from trauma may be concealed in the form of hematomas of the retroperitoneum,
broad ligament or lower genital tract, or abdominal cavity. The clinical findings in
hypovolemia are listed in Table 2.
Contraindications
Other than nonconsent, absence of surgical expertise or allergy to specific agents, the
techniques used in the management of PPH have no absolute contraindications. The vast
majority of cases (>99%) are handled without what would traditionally be considered surgical
intervention. In most cases, surgical intervention is a last resort. An exception is those cases
in which uterine rupture or genital tract trauma has occurred and surgical repair is clearly
indicated.
Transfusion of packed RBC and other blood products may be necessary in the management
of severe PPH. Some women may refuse such an intervention on personal or religious
grounds. The most widely known group that does not accept blood transfusion are Jehovahs
Witnesses. The wishes of the patient must be respected in this matter. Significant increased
risk of maternal mortality due to obstetric hemorrhage has been noted in the Jehovahs
Witness population. The increased risk of death was found to be 6-fold in a recent national
review of 23 years experience in the Netherlands and 44-fold in a much smaller study of 391
deliveries in a US tertiary level center.[27, 28] Discussion regarding the implications of such
prohibitions should be undertaken early in the pregnancy whenever possible and
subsequently reviewed.
In almost all cases in which surgical management is chosen after medical management has
failed, not attempting surgery would lead to maternal death. Even an unstable condition
cannot be considered a true contraindication. One type of surgery may be chosen over
another, but when medical management has failed, surgery is most likely the only life-saving
option.
Workup
ABOUT
About Medscape
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Advertising Policy
Help Center
MEMBERSHIP
Become a Member
Email Newsletters
Manage My Account
APPS
Medscape
MedPulse News
WebMD NETWORK
WebMD
MedicineNet
eMedicineHealth
RxList
WebMD Corporate
EDITIONS
English
Deutsch
Espaol
Franais
Portugus
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright 1994-2016 by WebMD
LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.