Drawing Package

Mars Lander Project

Client: Clive Maynard
Table of Contents
Side View ................................................................................................................................................ 3
Top View ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Front View .............................................................................................................................................. 4
3D Drawing ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Design Specification
Mars Lander Project
Client: Clive Maynard
Revision
Risk Management Plan
Mars Lander Project
Client: Clive Maynard
Table of Contents
Design Phase .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Construction Phase .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Testing Phase ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Risk Management Table................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Design Phase
Hazard Risk Involved Likelihood Consequence Mitigation Residual Risk
(Refer to Risk (Refer to Risk
Assessment Assessment
Table) Table)
Misinterpret the clients - Client doesnt - Ensure that all members - Miscommunication-
design requirements believe your understand the full brief, both the client
Examples company is not their individual component and miscommunicates
- If they require up to the the overall design an important
multiple, dont standard - Conduct design meetings at aspect, e.g. sizing,
design enough - May give Unlikely Major beginning and discuss all and the designers
prototypes company a aspects and limitations of the arent suitable for
- Dont understand negative review brief the desired
the design brief - Could potential - Contact the client by email, purpose
take the project phone call/text message or
away from your arrange follow up meetings to
company and give ask questions and queries
it to someone about the brief
else
Calculation/measurement - Delay the - Ensure the designers are 100% - Human error-
error construction and sure they have the correct scale whilst the strictest
Examples testing process as and measurements for the measures are in
- Create a the component component place to prevent
component that must be - Run the calculations several calculation errors,
is too small or too redesigned, times to confirm the number on incorrect digit in
large to fit the rebuilt and are correct and wont fail a measurement can
design retested to fit the immediately have catastrophic
- Miscalculate the required design Rare/Unlikely Catastrophic - Have an independent group effects. Mitigation
maximum load - Creates a review the measurements and strategies are in
capacity of the structure that calculations to ensure both are place are in place
structure and doesnt fulfil the 100% correct to reduce this
doesnt fit the design factor
 required load specification and
requirements cause the
structure to be
unfit for the task
it was designed
for
Dont have the expertise - Design a structure - Ensure your company is - Delay to schedule-
or skills to complete the that doesnt meet capable to complete the task Time will be lost if
task/project building before applying to the tender extra training is
Examples standards or proposal needed, which
- Client is asking clients standards - Collaboratively bid with other could be better
your company to - May take long to companies that have expertise spent on the
build a bridge but design as you and skills in other aspects of designing if the
your company learn the the build that your company is project
specializes in important aspects Rare Major weak at - Extra Costing-
skyscrapers of building that - Encourage designers to Money would be
- Your design team type of structure complete extra lost as team
is small and have - Cost your training/qualifications to members are taken
limited expertise company extra expand the expertise and skills away to do training,
on the project at time and money essentially paying
hand as they learn and people to not work
design a structure on the project
theyre not
competent in
Construction Phase
Hazard Risk Involved Likelihood Consequence Mitigation Residual risk
(Refer to Risk (Refer to Risk
Assessment Assessment
Table) Table)
Lack of Practical skills - Physical harm to - Have a TEC that specifies the - Human error- even
for construction themselves or contractor(s) have the require with the most
Examples other people practical skills to complete the qualified person
- Never used nearby. For task. For example, know how to and strictest safety
construction tools example, cutting use construction tools. measures, humans
before themselves with - Have the contractors complete can make mistakes
- Unsure how to the saw. Unlikely Moderate an Occupation Health and Safety and can lead to
build the model - Wasting materials. course for the required stages of personal injury,
from not For example, the build. mitigation
understanding the cutting the wood - Have the contractors supply the strategies can only
Drawings and to the incorrect correct Personal Protective reduce the
Specifications length and having Equipment for the tasks. For likelihood
to start again. example, Safety glasses when
drilling with a drill.
- Make the contractors aware of
the risk factor involved in the
build with regard using the tools.
Damage to/Late Arrival - Project cant be - Ensure the prototype is handled - Extra Costing-
of Materials completed on time with extreme care by both the whilst budgeting
Examples for the deadline designers and contractors for some minor
- Prototype is - The construction - Supply extra materials for those delays, some
dropped and the phase is delayed that take a long time to reach delays cant be
body cracks or and can impact on build site, for example a certain budgeted for and
splits other parts of the type of bolt that must come from can have serious
- The truck carrying build Unlikely Major over east impacts on the
wheels is delayed - Additional costings - Allow room in the budget for completion of the
due to driver to the contractors unforeseen circumstances, like build
 fatigue and building delay in materials or damage to - Delay in time-
company as they materials/prototype Deadline can be
must wait for the extended but can
materials to arrive put delays on the
completion of the
task and could
potential delay
other projects that
co-inside with this
build
Communication - The prototype - Make one of the Tender - Human error-
between the designers could be built Evaluation Criteria identify the contractors
and the contractors is incorrectly and not understanding of the design and employees dont
poor fit the clients or build is an important quality have a clear
Examples designers desired required from the contractors understanding of
- Contractors fail to design - Ensure the design package is the design and
understand the - Contractors dont complete and review all drawings build a part
design have a clear and specifications to ensure incorrectly
specifications indication on what theyre clear and cohesive - Miscommunication
- Designers provide the designers want - Have an independent source -certain
design package and may cause to view the package before showing specifications may
with unclear the project to be Unlikely Catastrophic to the contractors to give an be misinterpreted
drawings and delayed independent opinion of the between the
specifications - The contractors package parties, e.g. the
- Contractors and cant query the - Maintain regular contract designers
designers dont designers on any between both parties, whether drawings are in
communicate questions about through email, phone calls/text mm and
during the the design and the messages or regular meetings contractors work
construction phase designers cant in inches
keep track of the
build
Testing Phase
Hazard Risk Involved Likelihood Consequence Mitigation Residual Risk
(Refer to Risk (Refer to
Assessment Risk Assessment
Table) Table)
Prototype Fails Testing - Prototype could - Ensure the testing is done in an - Murphys law
Examples crash into a person area which has a wide berth from principal- whist
- Prototypes or structure all buildings murphys law is
wheel falls off nearby - For the people involved, ensure just a theoretical
- Prototype - Prototype would they maintain a safe distance proposition;
becomes out fail its desired brief away from the testing, e.g. not in engineers can only
of control and lost money for the direct line of the prototypes predict and
the company Possible Major planned direction attempt to
- Additional costings - Check all the nuts, bolts and mitigate potential
due to damage the screws are securely fastened and risks. Thus, whilst
prototype causes all glued components are every precaution is
and redoing the correctly cured before being taken, the
designing, commencing the test prototype testing
construction and could act in a
testing phases catastrophic
disaster despite
every precaution.
Manufacturing Defects - If the defect - Check all materials for signs of - Whilst all
Examples happens before fatigue or stress before assembly precautions are
- Axle snaps the test begins, - Monitor the condition of all taken to avoid
- Nut or Bolt result in the materials during both the fatigue and
doesnt fasten prototype not construction and testing phases mitigation, the
proper being fit for testing to avoid the possibility of a defects can be
- Wood splits - Defected part Rare Moderate defect hidden inside the
before the test could break during - Ensure all components are materials and
the test assembled correctly to avoid any wont be visible
- Could deem the unnecessary stress or strain on a until the material
 prototype as a component that it wasnt fails
failed attempt designed for
Incorrectly constructed - Prototype could - Have the designers assess the - Human error-
Examples break apart during prototype before commencing Whilst all
- Nuts, bolts or the testing the test to ensure the model is measures are
screws not - Could render the assembled correctly taken to prevent
securely prototype unfit for - Ensure all fixings are correctly the build falling
fastened testing fastened and all glued apart, people still
- Not allowing - Could result in the Unlikely Moderate components are cured properly make mistakes and
the glue not prototype - Ensure all people involved in the there is a small
cure correctly becoming testing are clear of the probability they
- Assembling a uncontrollable prototypes planned trajectory in could fail to follow
section - One component or case the prototype becomes the specifications
incorrectly section could fail uncontrollable and drawings
before testing - If any doubt the prototype
begins fitness, dont run the test as it
could become a larger hazard if
unfit
Risk Management Table
Consequence
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic

Almost Certain Medium Medium High High High

Likelihood Likely Medium Medium Medium High High

Possible Low Medium Medium Medium High

Unlikely Low Low Medium Medium Medium

Rare Low Low Low Medium Medium

Table Adapted from NSW Business Centre Risk Register Table

http://www.nswbusinesschamber.com.au/Media-Centre/Resources/How-to-assess-risks-and-impacts-to-your-business
Tender Evaluation Criteria
Mars Lander Project
Client: Clive Maynard
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Criteria............................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Communication ............................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Understanding .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Time Management ........................................................................................................................ 3
2.4 Wood Working Experience ........................................................................................................... 3
1.0 Introduction
The Tender Evaluation Criteria is contained in this document which will be used to assess
possible companies to construct our clients Mars Lander. The company that meets the
criteria the best and provides credible evidence will win the job.

2.0 Criteria
2.1 Communication
At 5M Space Agency we value communication above all else as almost everything we do in
our life that involves other parties will not be successful without proper communication. So
we expect prompt and concise communication.

Replies later than Replies earlier than 48 Replies earlier than 24 hrs Replies to texts and
48 hrs to emails or hrs but later than 24 but later than 12 hrs to emails within 12 hrs
texts. hrs to emails or texts emails and texts
0

2.2 Understanding
We are looking for contractors who will look over the design, discuss/suggest any
modifications that they think are necessary for the Mars Lander to succeed.

Does not look over design Looks over the design but does Looks over design and suggests
not suggest improvements improvements or in depth
discussion about design.
0

2.3 Time Management

Time Management is another skill that we desire and is essential for the successful
completion of the Mars Lander prototype.

Does not meet deadlines/show up for meetings Meets Deadlines and is on time to meetings.
or is late.

2.4 Wood Working Experience

For the project, experience in working with power tools and wood is a desirable skill.

No experience with any Some experience with power Adequate experience with
power tools and wood work tools and/or wood work power tools and/or wood
work.