By
Genevieve Cox
Rachele Wagstaffe
Rhonda Grant
Nyeisha George-Minott
Email: genevieve.cox@my.open.uwi.edu
rachele.wagstaffe@my.open.uwi.edu
rhonda.grant@my.open.uwi.edu
nyeisha.georgeminott@my.open.uwi.edu
Justification proposal
The reason for choosing the chapter on quality management to be adjustment was because the
chapter provided little information on how to conduct quality management on a product.
Chapter 10
10 Managing Project Quality
10.2 Development of Quality as Competitive Advantage
The cost of Quality refers specifically to the costs associated with avoiding poor quality or those
incurred as a consequence of poor quality. By conducting cost of quality analysis project
managers can identify and qualify major opportunities for process improvements and evaluate
the importance of quality and improvement for project operations. The cost of quality can be
divided into four parts: prevention costs, appraisal costs, internal failure costs and external
failure costs.
Prevention costs - Those costs expended to keep nonconforming goods and services from being
made and reaching the customer: These include:
Quality planning costs
Process-control costs
Information system costs
Training and general management costs
Appraisal costs - Those costs expended on determining quality levels through the measurement
and analysis to troubleshoot and correct problems. They include:
Test and inspection costs
Instrument measurement costs
Process-measurement and process-control costs
Internal failure costs - Those costs incurred as a result of unsatisfactory quality this is found
before the delivery of a good or service. They include:
Scrap and rework costs
Costs of corrective action
Downgrading costs
Process failures
External Failure costs - Those costs incurred after poor quality goods or services reach the
customer. These include:
Costs due to customer complaints and returns
Goods and services recall costs and warranty and service guarantee claims
Product liability costs
The unfortunate cost of poor quality
A major news story in 2016 was the case of the consumer electronics company Samsung. The
company had to recall the Galaxy Note 7 devices. According to their website, the affected
devices can overheat and pose a safety risk. Consumers on state and social media retold stories
of these devices that caught fire and lead to personal and property damage. Major airlines banned
them from being stowed in luggage or used onboard. Hundreds of phones in the U.S. and
worldwide had the critically high propensity for battery failure. Following these reports Samsung
and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a complete recall of all
Note 7 devices. It has become illegal to sell any Galaxy Note 7 device, new or used. Samsung
has since moved on to its new flagship device the Galaxy S8, with the hope of rebuilding
consumer trust.
ISO 14000
ISO 9001:2015
http://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/iso-9001-quality-management/ISO-9001-revision-2015/
Other tools and techniques for planning and controlling the quality of a project
The root cause analysis is a term used to designate the source of a problem. In medical analogy,
eliminating the symptoms of problems provides only temporary relief; eliminating the root cause
provides long term relief. The 5-why technique is useful in determining the root cause.
Essentially you are trying to redefine the problem statement by asking why at least 5 times
until you get to the root cause.
In this example, 5 whys are asked to get to the root cause of the problem -
Rust stains on laundry
Why are there rust stains on the laundry? Because of rusty water
Why is there rusty water? Because of a rusty water pump
Why is there a rusty water pump? Because the water pump has never been replaced
Why has the pump never been replaced? Because it has never been inspected since installation
Why has it never been inspected? Because there is no scheduled maintenance plan in place.
Without a proper maintenance plan, the water pump sat uninspected. Years of wear and tear
caused the water pump to become rusty, causing rusty water to pass through the pipes. The
laundry was affected by rust stains as a result. Using rust remover or bleach in the laundry would
only treat the symptoms. Long term relief comes from replacing the rusty pump and having
regular inspections and a maintenance schedule.
Gap Model
Todays consumer wants high quality products as well as high quality customer service. Many
people view quality by comparing features and characteristics of goods and services to a set of
expectations. The aim of the Gap model is to recognize gaps between customer expectations and
the actual services provided and focus on closing the gap and improving customer service.
There are several ways to mismanage the creation and delivery of high levels of quality. These
gaps are see in the model diagram above.
Scatter Diagram
According to the PMBOK Guide 5th edition, the scatter diagram is A correlation chart that uses
a regression line to explain or to predict how the change in an independent variable will change a
dependent variable. The scatter diagram is used to show the relationship between two variables,
usually the first variable is independent and the second variable is dependent on the first variable.
If the variables are correlated, the points will fall along a line or curve. The better the correlation,
the tighter the points will hug the line. (Tague, 2005).
For example, analyzing the pattern of accidents on a highway. The two variables motor speed
and number of accidents are selected, and the diagram is drawn.
Once the diagram is completed, you notice that as the speed of vehicle increases, the number of
accidents also goes up. This shows that there is a relation between the speed of vehicles and
accidents happening on the highway.
SPC Chart
http://www.sjm06.com/SJM%20ISSN1452-4864/2_2_2007_November_101-280/2_2_127-
145.pdf
Quality concepts, and issues in quality management have evolved over the past century,
and emerging trends in the field suggests that the approach to managing quality is shifting from
where the quality professional defined and enforced quality standards towards that of working in
partnership with employees to find the root cause of the problem. The changing role of the
quality professional is gravitating towards a shifting mindset where the quality technician is
seen as a coach, mentor, teacher, and team player. As the role of the quality manager evolves,
the quality manager as part of the team must now work in partnership to find a solution with
employees, and other team members to implement the solution, and ensure that employees and
team members understand the effect of the problem and solution to the success of the
organization. Organizational success can be ensured by implementing the Star Point System,
which drives necessary changes and improves integration between functions, and teams.
The Star Point system, along with lean/employee empowerment is a future trend in
quality management. Both methods have employee involvement as a key component, and
engages all concerned in process ownership.
In organizations where integrated quality management is implemented, this can help to
improve process, quality expectations,financial performance, and improve the image of both
employees and the quality professional. The benefits to be derived from lean production and the
star point system will continually drive the organization to sustainable quality improvement.
Gets more people on the playing field owning critical process work for the team
Links all similar Star Points together so they learn from each other
Provides a leadership role as a Star Point Leader for someone on the bench in a specialty area
Structures a fast way to communicate with all teams via the Star Point system
Improves the consistent delivery of instruction and materials to all employees
Provides mini-leadership opportunities on the self-directed teams for those in SP roles
Accumulates deep knowledge among team members in multiple Star Point areas as rotations
occur on the team
Improved Customer Service; delivering exactly what the customer wants when they want it.
References
Abhijith P. (2014 Nov. 24). Service Gaps and Service Model. Retreived from: ABS-Service
Marketing Blog: https://asbservicemarketing1.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/service-gaps-and-
service/
Samsung. (2016 Oct. 17). Samsung shares important information for Galaxy Note 7 users.
Retreived from : Samsung: http://www.samsung.com/latin_en/note7exchange/
Tague, N. R. (2005). The Quality Toolbox, Second Edition, ASQ Quality Press, pg 471474.
Usami, F. (2014). What is a Scatter Diagram (Correlation Chart)? [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://pmstudycircle.com/2014/08/what-is-a-scatter-diagram-correlation-chart/