Teacher: Wenwei Li
Class: Advanced conversation, 5 students (4 Japanese, 1 Chinese, 1 Turkish)
Date/Time: Tuesday, Feb 24
Theme: Going viral
The first activity uses portraits of famous people around the world (some from student home
countries, for example, Akio Morita, Jackie Chan, etc.) and anecdotes about their lives.
Students were asked to match the portraits with names, then anecdotes, and finally discussing
what do they know about them in pairs. During the post-activity, students resumed to speak to
the class on few questions: do you look up to anyone here; if not, whos your role model;
Although during selecting material I tried to incorporate famous people from different student
cultural background to make the topic relevant, it did not incur as heated a discussion as I
expected. The material was actually too focused that if a student is uninterested in, or has
little knowledge on the people listed there, student may experience obstacles, like a lack of
topical knowledge, in this activity. Also, target language is also limited to scripted anecdotes
that students were not given enough opportunity to spontaneous speech. One way to improve
is to downsize the material to only one person, say, Steve Jobs, whom all students are familiar
with. Then several key words would help students to brainstorm things about Steve Jobs, like
achievement, personality, gossip, etc. After constructing one figure with the entire class
(model), students can more easily come up with few key words to describe a person they look
up to, probably someone from their own country. Key words and descriptions can be
The second activity is around a TED talk video: why videos go viral? The content of the
video was a little beyond students proficiency level, which is a common problem in using
TED talks. However, I presume it would not be a problem, as in L2 listening, learners should
be conscious to the fact that authentic L2 listening context requires more focus on getting the
gist, rather than details. TED talk video is a good choice in this regard, as the video would
from time to time display examples in visual and/or audio forms, to assist understanding of
unfamiliar concepts.
The main problem occurred in the second activity was that the content of video was culturally
biased, that some of my students could not understand the culture behind the language,
the TED talk was that the speaker was explaining that a You-tube video published by
Yosemite mountain bear has gone viral, because famous people forwarded the video at a
certain time, while pointing out the pun between publishers name and content of video. In
fact, lack of topical knowledge on digital culture can easily hinder comprehension on such
content. I overlooked the fact that 2 senior students from my class lack such knowledge.
Another Turkish student, though being a regular Internet user, actually belongs to a different
online community that she spent a long time figuring things out. This problem reminds me of
how teaching material can bring cognitive challenge students, and thereby threats the
processing of target language. I should always be aware of the fact that what appear
future, I should explicitly assess whether the content is universal to cultures. Also, if I intend
to teach not only language, but also rationale behind content, I should consult to someone
Two tools can be incorporated in teaching TED talk. First is to let students watch videos
before class. They could watch it for several times until they reach full understanding.
Teachers can review, and/or test the language on class then, to consolidate learning. The other
tool is to focus scripts of TED talks. It might be a better fit for advanced learners, as TED
talks involve a number of terminologies. However, teacher can clip parts that are meaningful
to different proficiency groups out from the video and make them a focus.