21 April 2017
FPE
Starting this class, I didnt like writing. I felt like I was terrible at writing. I still do. I
was just trying to get this class over with and move on to the next thing. I didnt think I
would have fun or actually learn anything in this class. To my surprise, it was different I
had a little bit of fun and I actually learned quite a bit in this class. One of the biggest
things Ive learned was how to peer review. My original thought when peer reviewing
was being nice and that Im a terrible writer so I shouldnt criticize anyone elses writing.
Now I know that is not the case. And it actually hinders the person who Im peer
reviewing instead of helping. What Ive learned to do is, even if the persons draft looks
amazing and I cant find anything grammatically wrong, unorganized, or not enough
information, to put suggestions and give feedback. I also learned that feedback
shouldnt just be for the bad but also the good, even things I like.
Another big thing Ive learned from this class is the importance of brainstorming
and drafts. I was never one to write drafts for anything. My drafts were me just typing
out the paper. Looking for errors and then sending that in. I never did any proofreading
or got any peer review on it. This was a big reason why I didnt like writing or English
classes. We wrote a lot of drafts in this class and I learned how to actually use drafts to
make my writing more precise. I learned how brainstorming and putting my ideas on
paper as soon as I have an idea. Keeping my ideas on paper not only helps me
How I learned how to do peer review is actually the reading from Richard Straub.
by answering the simple questions I had. Be always of two (or three) minds about your
response to the paper. You like the paper, but it could use more interesting detail. You
found this statement interesting, but it could be outstanding if the writer said what was
really bothering her. Always be ready to praise. But always look to point to places that
are not working well or that are not yet working as well as they might. Always be ready
to expect more from the writer. (Richard 140), this means that you should praise the
parts that you like or that you think is good and you should point to places that are not
working well. This gave me a good idea and allowed me to become just a bit better at
peer review.
I learned how to brainstorm by doing the activities we had to do for the Extended
Inquiry Project. The activity that I learned brainstorming from is the Topic worksheet for
UWRT 1102 EIP(Extended Inquiry Projects). By following all the question and
myself for any topic. As well as a way to organize my thoughts. I even learned how to
make a web where it shows connections between keywords to search for books and as
the next thing that happens would be revising and editing. Since coming into this class
Ive learned a lot about what to do before the writing, it only makes sense that I learned
what to do after. Thanks to everyone in class taking peer review seriously and actually
giving really good feedback, as well as, the teacher I could honestly read through and
revise and edit my papers to make them a lot better. A lot of my revising and editing, I
feel, were just simple grammar issues and reorganizing my structures. I loved getting
good feedback on my papers because when I do, and I edit and revise them, I make
sure to keep those points as strong as possible. I like to add more to the already strong
worked was Id type my draft and bring it in and then put on the back of my paper what
aspect of my writing I feel least confident on and then the teacher or my classmates
would read my letter and look for the problems I think my writing had. They also look for
things I could add to make my paper better, they also look at my paper and comment on
the things I did good and they liked. Id get my paper back and then read the comments
letter says I need help with staying focus and maybe expanding on my ideas., so
when I get my paper peer reviewed Ill get more comments on the structure of my paper
and organization and then edited off of the comments and new ideas and revise.
When you first go through my e-portfolio, the first artifact I wanted people to see
was my midterm, the sandbox page. What I wanted to show is what Ive learned...so far!
And then when they go through the rest they can understand a little more about my
process. Also since its my midterm, they can understand my problem and maybe itll
give the viewer a little more, insight on what Ive been trying to get better at.
The next thing is my Developing Curiosity artifact. I placed this artifact here
because its the first big paper that we did. Its also a requirement for the FEP (Final
Essay Project/e-portfolio). I also think this is here to show what we did to get ready for
After, is the annotated Bibliography, this is here again for the requirement but its
also placed here to show the next thing we did was practicing making annotated
bibliographies. We did it early because this was for the EIP. We made our annotated bib
first to have information to add into our Inquiry Project. So, it just makes sense to place
So, now we have the Developing Curiosity and annotated bibliography artifacts.
The next artifact would be the multigenre project. This is the project to show all of our
research we did and how we answered our Inquiry project question. We also show the
audience we want to appeal to. Its kind of aligned with the timeline of classes.
Next we move over to the Writers Choice Artifacts and the first thing is the work
artifacts. I placed the doodles and scrabble and prewriting notes to show my
important artifact for this as the activity we did in the library with the keyword web
connections.
The feedback artifacts is next, this is here because after the drafts its feedback.
For these I placed my favorite pieces I got feedback on. I put the developing curiosity
essay feedback and the annotated bibliography feedback up because it was gave the
most feedback. It also made me feel more confidence about my writing and how to write
things correct.
The next thing is starting to get into what I learned. These are the Writers
notebook artifacts. These are here to show what was important to me and how I learned
from it. I used the RRL(Reader Response Letters) and the Mini-research project as
what Ive learned from. I learned from the feedback. I also learned how to organize my
writing and stay focused through these by reading the questions the teacher defined. It
shows I can do it if I can think of similar questions for any topic I am writing about.
This is the wild car artifact now. For this artifact I put my RRL #4. The
significance of the wild card being the RRL #4 is that its the latest thing I did as well as
something I am proud of. I think it serves its purpose and it fits the right artifact
I did do the makeup artifact. The makeup artifact I did was the blog post number
3. I technically had put this up because I didnt turn in my blog post 3. So, instead I
placed it up as the makeup artifact. The next thing was that I had already did the blog
Last, I have my blogs. We have been working on these all semester. I think the
blogs were all used to, shows that we read and comprehended the writing. We also
practice our writing and get warmed up for the day. We get our brain thinking doing
such and more ideas come naturally. The significance of the blogs are like a journal,
knowledge and knowledge of convention. How I better understood critical reading was
reading through the peer editing piece in class and I was able to fully understand peer
editing. Another was the reader response letters and blog posts that we had to read
something and write about it. And my idea was similar to my classmates. For rhetorical
knowledge our multi-genre projects helped me with this. For instance, my business
post can be very informal and maybe should be to catch the attention of middle school
through college kids. Last I got better with knowledge of convention by creating the
annotated bibliography. Each of these took time but I got better at these key concepts
by completing assignments and getting good and bad feedback which I either fixed it
The Design of my portfolio I was aiming for calming. When you open it I want it to
be easy on the eyes and calming. That's why my main tabs have a really nice looking
distract you from my artifacts but it's definitely filling the emptiness of the whole page.
My e-portfolio is fairly simple, the modes of communication I used was visual and
linguistic.
The grade I want is an A, the grade I deserve is hard to say. I put a lot of effort
and time into my e-portfolio and I used the A part of the syllabus as a checklist for my
own e-portfolio. I think I did well on the presentation as well. I think my presentation did
what it should have which is make people think about different routes other than
What I will take from this class and use in other classes is keeping a portfolio of
all of my previous work for a class to see if I had any growth from the beginning. I will
also use what I learned about peer review for the rest of my life. I will bring my
knowledge of peer review with me to the rest of my classes when looking over reports
and I'll also bring it to work with me. I think it was the most beneficial thing I've learned.