Chapter 1:
What is a facility:
Examples of facilities:
Manufacturing Plant
Hospital
School
Airport
Military Facility
Warehouse
Shopping Mall
Theater
Bank
What is Planning?
The act or process of developing a scheme or method of action in advance
Determine how an activitys tangible fixed assets best support achieving the
activitys objective
The analysis, conceptualization, and arrangement of physical facilities and
their interrelationships in terms of their assets and functions to manufacture
a product or provide a service efficiently, economically and safely.
Results of SC excellence :
Facilities
Facilites
systems
Location
design
Facilities
Layout design
Design
Holding
system design
Evaluation Criteria
Cost
Customer satisfaction
Ability to meet requirements
Ease of future expansion
Flexibility of layout
Material handling effectiveness
Space utilization
Safety and housekeeping
Ease of supervision and control
Equipment utilization
Strategic FP
Strategic planning is the science and art of employing the resources of a firm
to achieve its business objectives.
For the facilities plan to support the overall strategic plan, it is necessary for
facility planners to take a proactive role, rather than a reactive one.
Chapter 2:
Product Design: Specify end products
Product Designer
Exploded assembly drawing or photograph
Can be analyzed by CAD
Component Designer:
Detailed component part drawing
Can be prepared and analyzed in CAD
Process Design:
Process design is needed when:
Involves determining:
Consists of 3 stages
When Making a Make or Buy Decision the following questions are asked:
Schedule Design:
Schedule design involves determining:
Machine selection
Number of machines
Number of shifts
Number of employees
Space requirements
Material handling equipment
Facilities Design:
Once the product, process and schedule design decisions have been made,
the facilities planner needs to organize the information and generate and
evaluate layout, handling, storage, and unit load design alternatives.
Facilities planner must keep in mind the business objectives and goals in the
design
1. Breakthrough in production cost, on-time delivery, quality, lead time
The seven management and planning tools
1. Affinity diagram
Brainstorming session
Ideas and issues organized into groups
2. Interrelationship diagraph
Used to map logical links among related items under the same
group heading
Identifies which items impact others the most
3. Tree diagram
Used to map in increasing detail the actions that need to be
accomplished to achieve a general objective
4. Prioritization matrix
Determine the criteria for evaluating facilities design
alternatives
Determine the relative importance of each criterion
The most important criteria is found by adding the values
of the rows of the prioritization matrix
o The most important criteria is the one with the
largest row total
If a prioritization of layout alternatives based on one criteria is
given, the most desirable layout is found by finding the
alternative with the largest row total.
If the prioritization of layout alternatives is given for all the
criteria the most desirable is given by multiplying the % row
total of the criteria with the row total % for every alternative
row.
5. Contingency
diagram
Antici
pating and
solving
problems that
may arise
during
implementation
What could go wrong?
What can we do to prevent it?
What can we do in advance to prepare?
What will we do in response?
Murphys Law: anything that can go wrong, will go wrong
6. Matrix diagram
Shows the participants and their roles within teams
Provides visibility to key contacts on specific issues
Identifies individuals who are assigned to too many teams
7. Activity network diagram
Synonymous with the critical path method (CPM); can also be
replaced by a GANTT chart.
Used to develop a work schedule for an effort.
All task are carefully mapped in their logical sequence and dates
are identified for key project milestones
Chapter 3
Flow Systems
Flow as movement of goods, materials, information, and/or people..
A flow process may be described in terms of:
o The subject (the item to be processed) of flow
o The Resources (processing and transporting facilities required) that
bring about flow
o The communications (include the procedures that facilitate the
management of the flow process) that coordinate the resources
Flow systems can be categorized per the stages of the:
o Supply
o Manufacturing
o Distribution cycles
A logistics system contains the following (with both materials management
system and physical distribution system making up the supply chain
management system):
o Materials management system (to the facility from the
vendor): the flow of materials into a manufacturing facility
The subjects of MMS are:
Materials
Parts
Supplies
The resources of MMS include:
The production control and purchasing functions
The vendors
The transportation and material handling equipment
The receiving, storage, and accounting functions
The communications within MMS include production forecast,
inventory records, stock requisition.
Kanban: is an inventory-control system to control the supply
chain done in between handling
Move ticket: A move ticket is the official document which
includes all the details of work flow in a work center. It enables
supervisors to keep a record of the time taken to complete each
production activity as it logs the start and end time of each
activity.
Bill of lading: A detailed list of a ships cargo in the form of a
receipt given by the master of the ship to the person cosigning
the goods
o Material flow system (within the facility): The flow of materials,
parts, and supplies within the facility
The subject of material flow system are:
Materials
Parts
Supplies
The resources of MFS include:
The production control and quality control departments
The manufacturing, assembly and storage departments
The communication includes production, schedules, work order
releases, move tickets, kanbans, bar codes, route sheets,
assembly charts, and warehouse records.
o Physical distribution (from the facility to the customer): the
flow of products from a manufacturing facility
The subjects of material flow systems are:
Final goods produced by a firm
The resources of PDS include:
The customer
The sales and accounting departments and warehouses
The MHE and transportating equipment
The distributors of the finished product
The communications include sales order, picking lists, shipping
reports, shipping releases, kanbans, and bills of lading.
Material Flow System
o Defines the overall flow environment within which material movement
takes place
o Effective flow planning within a facility is a hierarchal planning process:
o
Effective flow within departments:
Motion studies and ergonomics are important in
establishing the flow within workstations. Planners must
consider:
o Visiblility
o Reach requirements
o Sitting or standing workstations
o HCI
o Ergonomic workstation guidelines
o Fixed locations for work components
o Symmetrical motions
o Natural movements
o Rhythmic and habitual flow
Aim for a directed flow path
o A sequential flow path
o Does not intersect with other paths
o No backtracking
The flow pattern within departments is dependent on the
type of departments:
o Product department: the processing is sequential
with minimal or no backtracking
Flow between workstations with operators:
o Process department: similar or identical
machines are grouped in the same department.
A minimal amount of flow should occur
between workstations within departments
Flow patterns are dictated by the orientation
of the workstation to the aisles
Three common arrangement patterns for
process departments:
o Product family departments: similar products
are grouped in the same departments
Effective flows within departments:
Flow between workstations in the case of mechanized and
automated systems:
o The line flow pattern: A sequential,
uninterrupted flow path with minimal or no
backtracking.
Most effective flow pattern
o The spine flow pattern: Material handling device
operating along a central spine
o The loop flow pattern: A loop that services the
workstations around it
o
Effective flow
between
workstationL
The flow patterns
used within
departments can be
adopted for
establishing flow
between departments
Flow between departments is a criterion often used to
evaluate overall flow within a facility
Must consider the location of the pickup and delivery
stations for each department
Departmental Planning
o Planning departments: include production, support, administrative,
and service areas
o Production planning departments: collections of workstations
grouped together during the facilities layout process
o General Rule Combine workstations that perform like
functions:
Workstations performing operations on similar
products/components
Workstations performing similar processes.
o The Volume-Variety relationship of the different production planning
departments can be classified as:
Advantages Limitations
Smooth, simple, logical, and direct flow Machine stoppage stops the line
lines result
Small work-in-process inventories should Product design changes cause the layout
result to become obsolete
Total production time per unit is short Slowest station paces the line
Material handling requirements are General supervision is required
reduced
Less skill required by personnel Higher equipment investment usually
results
Simple production control is possible
Special-purpose equipment can be used
Advantages Limitations
Material movement is reduced Personal and equipment movement is
increased
When a team approach is used, May result in duplicate equipment
continuity of operations and
responsibility results
Provides job enrichment opportunities Requires greater skill for personnel
Promotes pride and quality because an Requires general supervision
individual can complete the whole job
Highly flexible; can accommodate May result in increased space and
changes in product design, product mix greater work-in-process
and production volume
Requires close control and coordination
in scheduling production
Advantages Limitations
By grouping products, higher machine General supervision required
utilization can result
Smoother flow lines and shorter travel Greater labor skills required for team
distances are expected than for process members to be skilled on all operations
layouts
Team atmosphere and job enlargement Critically dependent on production
benefits often result balancing the flows through the
individual cells
Has some of the benefits of product If flow is not balanced in each cell,
layouts and process layouts buffers and work-in-progress storage are
required in the cell to eliminate the need
for added material handling to and from
the cell
Encourages consideration of general- Has some of the disadvantages of both
purpose equipment product and process layouts
The opportunity to use special-purpose
equipment is decreased
o Process Layout:
Advantages Limitations
Increased machine utilization Increased material handling
requirements
General-purpose equipment can be used More complicated production control
required
Highly flexible on allocating personnel Increased work-in-process
and equipment
Diversity of tasks for personnel Longer production lines
Specialized supervision is possible Higher skills required to accommodate
diversity of tasks required
Activity relationships:
o Activity relationships may be specified in a quantitative or qualitative manner
o Quantitative Flow Measurements
o Steps for constructing a from-to chart:
1. List all departments down the row and across the column
following the overall flow pattern
2. Establish a measure of flow for the facility that accurately
indicates equivalent flow volumes
If the items moved are equivalent with respect to ease of
movement, the number of trips may be recorded in the
from-to chart
If the items vary in size, weight, value, shape, and so on,
then some common unit of measure may be established
so that the quantities recorded in the from-to chart
represents the proper relationship
3. Based on the flow Paths for the items to be moved and the
established measure of flow, record the flow volumes in the
from-to chart.
o Qualitative Flow Measurements
o Flows may be measured qualitatively using the closeness relationship
given below
Value Closeness
A Absolutely Necessary
E Especially important
I Important
O Ordinary closeness okay
U Unimportant
X undesirable
Difference between relationship values U and X
o Two departments can be placed adjacent to each other with
relationship value U
o Two departments cannot be placed adjacent to one another
with a relationship value X
Activity relationship can be satisfied in ways other than physical
distance
How to construct a relationship chart
1. List all departments on the relationship chart
2. Conduct interviews or surveys with persons from each
department listed on the relationship chart and with
the management responsible for all departments
3. Define the criteria for assigning closeness relationships
and itemize and record the criteria as the reasons for
relationship values on the relationship chart
4. Establish the relationship value and the reason for the
value
5. Evaluate and discuss changes in the charts
Space Requirements
The most difficult determination in facilities planning is the amount of space
needed in the facility, which depends on the uncertain future.
Must predict future customer demands, technology, product mixes, and
facility development/modifications
In manufacturing and office environments, space requirements should be
determined first for individual work stations and then departments
A workstation should include space for: equipment, material and personnel.
The materials areas for a workstation consist of space for
1. Receiving and storing inbound materials
2. Holding in-process materials
3. Storing outbound materials and shipping
4. Storing and shipping waste and scrap
5. Holding tools, fixtures, jigs, dies and maintenance materials
Chapter 6
Introduction:
Layout: the physical arrangement of departments, including:
Machines
Equipment
Workstation
People
Material handling equipment
New facility
New product
Product design changes
Cost reduction
Improve material flow and efficiency of an existing facility
Minimize z = F ij c ij dij
i=1 j=1
oWhere
M is the # of departments
Fij is the flow from department i to j (# of
units moved/unit time)
Cij cost of moving a unit one distance unit
from i to j
Dij rectilinear distance from i to j
o Adjacency-based objective: Maximize adjacency score
m m
Maximize z= F ij x ij
i=1 j=1
oWhere
xij = xji = 1 of i is adjacent to j
M is the # of departments
Fij is the flow from department i to j (# of
units moved/unit time)
Normalized adjacency score (efficiency rating)
m m
F ij x ij
i =1 j=1
o Z= m m
F ij
i=1 j=1
Discrete vs Continuous:
1. Discrete
o Area of each department is rounded off to the nearest integer #
of grids
o if the grid size is too large, large departments may have too
many grids
o If the grid size is too small, small departments may have too few
grids
o The grid size determines the overall resolution of the layout
2. Continuous
o No underlying grid structure
o More flexibility, but more difficult
o Restricted to rectangular building/department shapes
Improvement vs. construction layout
1. Layout Improvement: start with an initial layout
2. Layout construction: Start from scratch
o Building dimensions may not be provided.
Algorithm Approaches
Pairwise Exchange Method:
o Improvement-type layout algorithm
o Claims only local optimality, since the final outcome depends on the
initial layout.
o Can be used with adjacency-based or distance-based objectives (often
used with the latter)
o Use equal-area departments
o Sets the foundation for the other methods
o Steps for the method:
1. Pairwise exchange method simply states that for each iteration,
all feasible exchanges of department pair are evaluated one at a
time
2. Distance matrix is recomputed each time an exchange is
performed
3. The pair that results in the lowest cost is selected
4. Continue the top steps until the total cost doesnt drop (TC =
flow x distance x cost of moving 1 unit(usually 1$))
Graph-Based Method
o Similar to the SLP method
o Construction-type layout algorithm
o Often used with adjacency-based objective
o Node represents departments
o Arcs represent two departments that are adjacent
o Procedure:
1. From the relationship chart, select the department pair with the
largest weight. Ties are broken arbitrarily
2. 3rd department chosen is the one with the largest total weight
with the current departments
3. Continue doing it until all the departments are selected
4. Construct a corresponding block layout
CRAFT
o Computerized Relative Allocation of Facilities Technique
o Input is From-to chart
o Layout cost is measured by rhe distance based objective
o Layout represented discretely
o Improvement-type layout
o Procedure:
1. Determines the centroids of each department with respect to a
coordinate system
2. Calculate rectilinear distance(d) between department pairs
3. Construct a distance matrix
4. Initial cost is found by TC = fijcijdij
5. Next, consider all possible two-way department exchanges and
identify the best exchange (largest reduction in the layout cst)
Excanges are estimated by swapping the centroids of
departments
Feasible exchanges: departments with equal areas or
adjacent departments.
6. Updates the layout accordingly and compute the new centroids,
distances and subsequently the new layout cost
7. Continue until no further reduction is found
8. Final layout should be massaged into a practical layout
o Dummy departments can be used to transform non-rectangular
buildings into rectangular ones
Pros Cons
Can capture initial layout with Guarantees only locally optimality based
reasonable accuracy on the initial layout supplied
Departments are not restricted to Estimated centroids during exchanges
rectangular shapes can differ substantially from the actual
centroids, which affect the estimated
and actual layout costs
can accommodate nonrectangular Departments shapes deteriorate as a
buildings number of iterations increase
Can include obstacles, using dummy Final layout needs to be massages into a
departments practical layout
Allows to fix the location of any
departments
MCRAFT
o MICRO-CRAFT
o Input from-to chart
o Layout cost is measured by the distance based objective
o Layout represented in a discrete fashion
o Improvement-type layout algorithm
o Procedure
Similar to CRAFT, except it can exchange two non-adjacent
departments of different sizes.
Layout formation techniques that allow easy shifting of
departments
Layout formed by starting at the upper-left corner of the building
and sweeping the bands from left to right and top to bottom
Two way exchanges done until no further improvements are
achieved
o Limitations
May be hard to fit the existing layout to bands
Band width is assumed to be the same for all bands
A fixed department may float when certain non-equal area
departments are exchanged
Pros Cons
Can exchange two departments of Cannot capture the initial layout
different areas even if they are not accurately unless the departments are
adjacent; when a department pair are already arranged in bands
exchanged, other departments are
automatically adjusted/shifted
Department shapes obtained in the final Band width is assumed to be equal
layout tend to be more reasonable than
in CRAFT
Not as effective in treating fixed
departments
Guarantees only local optimality
BLOCPLAN
o Input is relationship chart and from-to chart
o Layout cost is measured by both the adjacency based objective and
distance based objective
o Uses a continuous representation
o Construction or improvement-type layout algorithm
o Procedure
Similar to MCRAFT, departments are arranged in bands, but
band widths are allowed to vary.
Each department occupies exactly one band; all the
departments are rectangular
Improvements in the department are sought through two-way
department exchanges
BLOCPLAN considers all possible two-way exchanges
Pros Cons
Can exchange two departments of Cannot capture the initial layout
different areas even if they are not
adjacent; band widths are adjusted as accurately unless the departments are
necessary
already arranged in bands
Department shapes obtained in the final Bands are limited to 3
layout tend to be more reasonable than
in other methods
Band widths are allowed to vary Not as effective in treating fixed
departments
Guarantees only local optimality
Objective
o Find a nonoverlapping planar arrangement of a number of rectangular
departments of specified areas within a rectangular facility of given
dimensions
o Design objective is to minimize the total flow among all departments
Input Parameters
o Lx: Facilitiy length along the x-axis
o Ly: Facility length along the y-axis
o N: number of departments
o ai: Area of departments i
o i: Aspect ratio of Department i: Wi/Li= max(lix, liy)/min(lix, liy)
o Fij: Flow from I to j
Decision Variables
o Cix: x-axis coordinates of department is centroid
o Ciy: y-axis coordinate of departments is centroid
o lix: half-length of department i along the x-axis
o liy : half-length of department i along the y-axis
o zijx: relative location of department i with respect to department j along
the x-axis
Zij = 1 if department i is to the west of department j
y
o zij : relative location of department i with respect to department j
along the y-axis
Zij = 1 if department i is to the south of department j
Formulation:
o Can be solved as a non linear program
o Objective Function
n1 n
o Constraints
d xij = c xi c xj
1. Nonlinear constraint to find x-axis
d xij = c iy c yj distance
2. Nonlinear constraint to find y-axis
x x x x
l i c i L l j distance
3. Ensures the department is in the
l iy c iy L y l yj given area
4. Ensures the department is in the
x y
ai = 4 l i l i given area
5. Non-kinear area
6. Aspect ratio
7. Prevents departments from
overlapping
8. Prevents departments from
overlapping
9. Prevents departments from
x y
max (l i ,l i )
i=
min(l i , l i ) gv b
x y
c xi +l ix c xj l ix + L x ( 1z xi j )
c iy +l iy c yj l iy + L y (1z iyj )
z xij + z xij 1
y y
z ij + z ij 1