EDAD 610
Before observing Michelle teach a literature lesson to her seventh grade class, she and I
sat down to talk about the lesson and what she would want me to look for during the observation.
Michelle explained to me that she had a lot of boys in the class and she wanted to make sure they
were reading, understanding, and enjoying the current novel they were reading, The True
COnfessions of Charlotte Doyle. She also wanted to make sure that all of the students understood
the concept of protagonist and antagonist, could identify qualities of each, and could provide
evidence for their opinions. Michelle informed me that she had four ELL students in her class,
and she wanted to make sure that she was teaching in a way they could understand.
Michelle informed me that her lesson would start off very general. They would talk about
the two terms and make sure everyone knew the definition of each. She would also connect the
terms to more known words: hero and villain. Michelle said she would then give an example of a
known character and have the class decide if they were a protagonist or an antagonist. The class
would also list some qualities of that character. I asked Michelle if all of the students would
know enough about each character and if not, then what would she do. She told me that she had
video clips of each character to show to the class. I thought this was an excellent strategy to use
especially for the ELL students. It would help for them to see a visual of each character. I also
asked Michelle if her students would know what qualities are. She told me they would because
they had made a list of qualities for other characters from other stories that they have read
Michelle planned to use a lot of collaboration in her lesson. The students would be able to
discuss at their table groups the definitions and the examples. She also planned to have them
complete a graphic organizer for their novel in pairs. I asked her why they would be working in
pairs, and she said that she thought it would help the students, especially the lower level students,
if they had the opportunity to discuss their thoughts with a partner. Michelle planned to assess
her students through questions, observations, and the completed graphic organizer.
I think that our pre-observation conference went really well. We were comfortable with
talking to each other. Michelle was able to do most of the talking because she needed to explain
her lesson to me. I only asked questions to have her clarify or explain things. After having our
conference, I was excited to see the lesson in action. I felt likt it had a lot of good components
Sit down.
After Michelle taught her literature lesson to her seventh graders, she reflected on her
lesson by completing the post-observation form. We then sat down to talk about her lesson and
future steps she would like to take. I prepared some questions ahead of time, but I also asked
some unplanned questions during our conference based on how she responded. During the
conference, I really tried to make Michelle feel comfortable by trying to mirror her body
language and make it known that I really was listening to what she was saying. During the
conference, I tried to stick to the rule I speak twenty percent of the time and she speaks eighty
percent of the time. I found this to be somewhat challenging. At times, I felt myself explaining to
her what I observed instead of letting her reflect on what she saw during the lesson. I tried to
stick to mainly questions to ask her about her teaching. Coming up with questions seemed easier
than I thought it would. However, I did feel at times that some of the questions I asked were
leading to a certain response that I was looking for. I believe I asked her a questions about if she
feels having the students work independently on an assignment was more beneficial than having
them work in pairs. I think that she might have only answered yes because she felt it was the
response I was looking for. I then decided to ask her a follow-up questions about why it is
beneficial to have students work in pairs just so she could highlight those positives and know that
someone, I felt that it went okay, but I sure do have a lot of improving to do. The conversation
felt awkward at times, but when we had more of a true discussion about classroom practices, I
felt more comfortable, and I think Michelle did too. I think that I chose some good questions to
really get Michelle thinking about her lesson and how it went. I think this experience really
required Michelle to take a step back and really think about her teaching and the choices that she
made. I think that Michelle presented a really good lesson and I am happy that she was able to
see the positives and strengths in her lessons. Michelle was also able to see what changes she
could have made or how she could have improved her lesson. During the post-observation
conference I think we were able to scratch the surface on what Michelles next steps could be,
but I dont think we got into it deep enough. This is the area that I feel I was weakest at during
the conference. I was not really able to get the decisional answers that I was looking for from
Michelle. This is definitely an area I need more practice with. I am hoping with more practice I
will be able to facilitate teachers in making a future game plan on how that can improve their