Anda di halaman 1dari 11

July 26 2009

In 1797 the Attorney General of Upper Canada acting on behalf of the government of
Upper Canada mat with persons of the elite of questionable professional credentials to
enact the Law Society Act, 1797 proclaiming themselves a monopoly to propagate
“Learned and Honourable” persons to administer the law of Upper Canada, now the
Province of Ontario.

Whereas an exhaustive study has revealed they are traditionally Charlatans of deception,
prevarication, manipulation and orchestration of illegitimate laws inconsistent with the
principles of justice and democracy whereas there successes was dependent on their
cooperation to befuddle the minds of the people for the distinct purpose of expanding the
legal profession industry and interests of their members and political counterparts

Sanity: Good sense, wisdom, reason, understanding, common sense, sense, judgement
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle
Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability,
dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ
Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism
Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality
Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude
Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty,
integrity
Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity

Populace of Society Law applies to all

Constitution Act, 1982: Document


Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and
freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can
be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not
to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental
justice.

1
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the
equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in
particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,
religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been
infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such
remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in
respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating
to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and
government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the
legislature of each province.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law
The Spirit and the Letter of the Law

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of
Conduct
103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should
observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.

Clearly “The Letter of the Law” signed by the authorities ceded supremacy to “The Spirit
of the Law” that is the supremacy of God that is “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” and
hence “The Spirit of the Law”

Due the inherent bias nature of humankind prone to err and the integrity of the invisible,
invincible and untouchable supremacy of God “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” has
precedence in all judgements, whereas it is presumed from the moment of the 1982
enactment of the Constitution that every individual is consistently in, of and with the
“The Spirit of the Law”

The Constitution: Document provides the authority of the Constitution: Establishment


that either states or implies the hierarchy must be UNBIASED, competent, responsible
and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to structure a legal system consistent
with the Constitution of exemplary adeptness to the support of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.

The Ontario Attorney General “guardian of the public interest” is ultimately responsible
to the people through the legislature, the elected representatives of the people.

2
The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.

Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that
governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly
disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps
that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.


According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law
commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of
legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of
law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

publicly disclosed laws

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

ENFORCEMENT

Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15

PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles

1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the


following principles:

1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the
communities they serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

3
Tradition Prior to the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982: Document

Evidence irrefutably proving that the “Learned and Honourable” propagates of the Law
Society of Upper Canada are not in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law”, but in fact are
180 degrees adverse unequivocally in, of and with “The Spirit of Satan”

From “The Rule of Law” Wikipedia

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of
law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

British Columbia history professor Jonathan Swainger writes of Edmund Morgan’s


compelling book “Inventing the people: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and
America” opens with the assertion that the success of any form of government requires
the acceptance of a number of fictions.

In a democracy, for example, it is necessary for the population to “believe that people
have a voice or … that the representatives of the people are the people.

“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”


Published on the Ontario web site with no reference to the Charter

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the
guardian of that most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well
established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects
individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal
liberties.

4
Irrefutable evidence published by the Charter Democracy Force
www.charterdemocracyforce.ca

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273017/law-society-february-10-2007
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829583/Can-Law-August-182008
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829870/Star-Lawyer-Increase-Saturday-July-262008
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All

The federal Accountability Act, 2006 Façade to Cover-Up


The Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and
freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as
can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of
Conduct
103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should
observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.

The Constitution: Document provides the authority of the Constitution: Establishment


that either states or implies the hierarchy must be UNBIASED, competent, responsible
and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to structure a legal system consistent
with the Constitution of exemplary adeptness to the support of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The deviate reprobates of the Law Society of Upper Canada have infested the political
and legal system and infested and invested the corporate world with Mulroney/Schreiber
indicative of their amalgamated conspiracy

The enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982: Document demanded the restructuring of
their illegitimate legal system and the Act was in fact another attempt to cover up their
unscrupulous ways, but their persistence to traditional habit frenzied by insatiable greed
caused them to make a humongous error as their success like any organized crime is
5
dependent on their adeptness not to be caught whereas they are organized crime
personified, like no other with the entire legal system in their hands.

They have documented their every move even when Mulroney abducted the RCMP into
their conspiracy by making the Commissioner and Deputy Minister and then forcing
Zack out and replacing him with one of their own William Elliot.

It is quite obvious that when acting laws every situation cannot be addressed

(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should
observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.

However, every situation is covered by the Charter

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The intention is always to protect every individual as guaranteed from the bad guys and
yet they manipulate the laws to protect the bad guys, namely themselves and to expand
their industry and luxurious lifestyle that requires them to obstruct justice in every which
way possible that includes the police having to go to them for a warrant.

From the R & R of the AG

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the
Attorney General and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the
police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the
charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what
manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

Of course if the police file charges and the Attorney General refuses to proceed he is
using illegitimate authority to obstruct justice

When they create purportedly independent agencies such as the Ombudsman supposedly
to address the situations they had overlooked great effort must be made then to
extensively cover the issues, however that does not relieve them of the responsibility they
always had since the 1982 enactment of the Constitution as every individual has been
guaranteed their Charter rights of equal protection and benefits since then and it was
simply deliberate negligence of competence and responsibility, however they think they
can cover their asses by assigning a date to new legislation making it effective as of that
date. That date just references a date when they got caught being negligent and in fact is
evidence that over rules many prior decisions which they are liable for since 1982.

He evidence clearly shows that they are unequivocally crooks minding the store.

Since the 1982 enactment every judgement had to be made consistent with the
Constitution and any inconsistencies should have been noted and reasonable effort
applied to ensure that the inconsistency was published and circulated throughout the
profession and perhaps every 3 months… a year amend them and by now their would be
6
no inconsistencies, ambiguity or loopholes left for the deviate propagates of the Law
Society to debate the tax payer out of house and home while leaving the people
unprotected, though they are guaranteed.

If they were competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits I would not
have a preponderance of correspondence from the many departments, agencies and police
stating they did not have the authority by their mandate to protect me and obviously every
individual as guaranteed and there would not be a “Threshold” as to whether or not I am
protected by their legal system.

The evidence is overwhelming of the obvious 2 Tier system that by their administration
provides humongous advantage to they with money and in fact that is how the people of
the Upper Tier get their wealth and power (advantage).

The Law Society arrogantly in defiance of common sense, the Constitution and every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit informed either
stated or implied that their members were not required to give a damn about every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights stating their only obligation was to vigorously
advance the interests of their clients.

This of course is necessary or why would anyone go to these deviate propagates of the
Law Society and pay their exorbitant fees to elude justice.

Every individual has a responsibility to maintain the status of the presumption of


innocence being in compliance with “The Spirit of the Law” not their illegitimate laws
that befuddles the minds of the people to a point that they think they have legitimate
cause to do people wrong inconsistent with “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” that is the
epitome of simplicity and sanity that has forever blown in the wind within the grasp od
quadriplegics easily seen by the blind well understood by us all at 5 prior to the first day
of school.

Business people are led to believe that they can deprive others and state it is just business
an ideology derived of illegitimate laws of the ornery critters.

They do it as just a matter of business to expand their corrupt industry to luxurious


lifestyle being the creators of all the woes of humankind which they then address the
symptoms.

They have a vested interest in the corporate world with the Law Society a corporation
itself that suck the life out of the economy and the people to poverty hopelessness and
despair where the greatest physical and mental burden is placed where amoral inclination
is predictable to advance to criminal persuasion leaving innumerable victims in their
wake where they draw an invisible line they call the “Threshold” identifying where the
money is and who they will protect and the rest of us they pass off to their partners in

7
crime to see if there is any money left to be had from the victim that they deliberately
refused to protect, whereas consistent due punishment attentive to deterrence is the only
viable means of present knowledge to protect individual’s prior to becoming victimized.

It is their responsibility to structure the system conducive to protecting every individual


prior to being victimized and most certainly their responsibility to punish the perpetrator
once victimized attentive to deterrence whereas due diligence must always be applied to
see if or where the system failed to remedy the situation to the certainty of the guarantee.

When they pass us off who do not make their “Threshold” they are obstructing us from
the justice that we are entitled to and obviously not protecting every individual as
guaranteed as they allow the criminal to go free aware that he or she can get away with
their crimes and set out to leave a trail of victims in their wake.

They in fact pass the burden onto the victim who was led to believe they were guaranteed
protection and when victimized all they had to do was provide evidence that they were
victimized and the police would make every effort possible to bring the perpetrator before
the courts. After all they have the authority to investigate arrest and commence
proceedings with the wherewithal to do it, being what we financed then for. .. to protect
the innocent from the God damned criminals.

It is simply too obvious that the propagates of the Law Society are the criminals.

The victim is guaranteed the Crown will act competently and responsibly as agents of the
Attorney General who is the “guardian of the public interest” whereas every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights is unequivocally the public interest, irrelevant as to who is most
influential and affluent at election time.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General
must carry out the Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet
and of any partisan political pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for
individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be undertaken -
on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to
initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This
responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the
Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.

How obvious that there must be a clear separation of powers under the rule of law.

According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law


commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of
legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

Yet the Attorney General is a Minister appointed by the political leader in power.

How obvious you can not have the police investigating themselves and their bosses

8
How obvious have they created the legal system humongously more than meaningless
due their ideological abuse for wealth and power to the humongous detriment of society

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of
law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

How obvious the RCMP would find themselves innocent of refusing to investigate
government organized crime while admitting though there was hundreds of pages of
evidence they chose to ignore to do so.

Precisely the ideology of the Law Society that also stated that evidence against their
members is irrelevant and that the Attorney General of Ontario administers the Law
Society Act as a bencher of the Society who appoints the Chair and 4 others and selects 5
others from a list provided by the Society.

How obvious does the evidence published on the www.charterdemocracyforce.ca web


site irrefutably prove they have no principles and government authority is illegitimately
exercised 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights

Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that
governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly
disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps
that are referred to as due process.

legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the
law.

How obvious is it that they believe they are greater than God whether or not He exists or
whether or not one believes He exists.

The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in
respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating
to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and
government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the
legislature of each province.

How obvious they are charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and


orchestration.

9
How obvious the Ombudsman is advised by the Attorney General who administers the
Ombudsman Act and advises all Ministers and heads of departments and agencies and not
an independent agency and is purposely provided limited authority consistent with the
conspiracy.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273037/ombudsman
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13300854/OmbudsmanCompiled10308
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14542085/Ombudsman-Ponders-His-Ass-October-32008

How obvious the RCMP is inducted into the conspiracy

http://www.scribd.com/doc/10772569/BLACK-BOOK-Series-Commentary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14570007/BLACK-BOOK-Series-Commentary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9641760/BLACK-BOOK-IOriginal-September-1-2006
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9272976/black-book
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13402834/Black-Book-II-1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9654291/Black-Book-II-1-Preamble
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9640180/Black-Book-II-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13405112/BLACK-BOOK-III
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13406249/Black-Book-IV
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13407554/Black-Book-V

How obvious the Law Society is Societies Enemy # 1(Satan’s Disciples)

How obvious they have messed with the minds of society with the aid of media
conglomerates such as Conrad Black

How obvious the Queen who knighted Conrad Black and signed the Constitution is in on
the conspiracy having informed Governor General Michaelle Jean by registered mail as
well as Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada, Minister of Public Safety my MP Peter Van Loan and Deputy Minister RCMP
Commissioner William Elliot.

How obvious the Ontario Attorney General, Premier of Ontario, Lieutenant Governor,
my MPP Julia Munro, former Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, OPP, YRP,
Ombudsman, Minister of Community Safety, Civilian Commission for Police Services
and many others published on the http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-
disposition web site are in on the conspiracy.
10
The www.charterdemocracyforce.ca site provides substantial irrefutable evidence of their
conspiracy and when the people know the truth our lives will begin.

These people are worse than the mafia ever were having much more power and wealth
handed to them by the taxpayer a world wide phenomenon and when they clean us out …
that’s okay because they just borrow what they want and give us the tab.

We are all victims and we always pay though much more than just money

11

Anda mungkin juga menyukai