Emissions CO2
(Gt/y) #1 Nuclear*
& Biomass
Technological mix
CCS
#1 Hydro
Efficiency: Plant
Optimisation & Retrofit
* Conventional islands
Industry
Private Consumers
United Kingdom
Korea
Added
Plant Optimisation of the CCPP
Architect
Architect
Engineers
Value - Component Focus
Engineers
- Integrator strategy
Turnkey
focus
Customer
Competitor
Competitor Competitor
Competitor Value
Competitor
Competitor
Component focus
KA26 Reference Plant CCPP products utilizing: KA26-1 (1-on-1 single-shaft) CCPP
- Alstom GT26 gas turbine
- Alstom STF15C & STF30C steam turbine
- Alstom TOPAIR & TOPGAS generators
- Alstom Drum-type HRSG
- Alstom ALSPA plant control system
100%
90%
80%
70% >15%
98.2% 97.3%
92.3% 91.3%
60% 81.1%
65.5%
50%
40%
GT Availability GT Reliability GT Service Factor
2002
1999
Compressor +
SEV Burner +
Compressor + LP-Turbine Upgrade
Turbine + Combustor
Performance Best in class all-round
Improvements + performance
FLEXIBILITY
?
Compressor Upgrade + Staged EV-combustion Unprecedented
Exhaust Housing part-load efficiency
Standard EV-burner + Increased mass flow
LP-Turbine Upgrade Upgrade (virtually 100% to 80%
Improved cooling and load)
leakage
Superior Part-Load Increased mass flow Low Load Operation
Start-up optimization
Efficiency Improved all-round Lower Emissions 10 min Spinning Reserve
Start up <60 min performance (base-load Low Load Operation of >450 MW
High fuel flexibility and part-load) option Start-up of ~30 min**
Switchable Operation
15 x GT26 engines 9 x GT26 engines 47 X GT26 engines Modes (PO and MCO)
EV burners Annular
Combustor
(no Combustor Inspections
no exchange of parts between Hot
Gas Path inspections)
Blade 2
Design characteristics
Increased outer flow path diameter
Advanced CDA* profile
Aerodynamically optimised blades
and vanes
Designed with Rolls-Royce tools
Blade 3
Design characteristics
Better mixing behaviour
SEV burner SEV lance Increased flow velocity
Design characteristics
3D blade design
Optimised shroud design
Part-Load Characteristics
GT26 (2011)
110%
100%
90%
EV combustor
80% SEV combustor off
CCPP RelativeLoad
70%
1
60%
30%
3
20% KA26 Low Load Point
10%
2
0%
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 10
10 11
11
Time
Fuel Costs
70%
$9 /mmBtu LHV
60%
~13500 $/h
50%
40%
~10150 $/h Reduced maintenance
30% (no start/stop)
No start-up failure
20% ~6750 $/h Emissions @ base load level
10% Online spinning reserve
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time
70%
60% 350+MW
50%
40%
30%
20%
15 min.
10%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time
350+ MW in 15 minutes
Malakoff - Next Generation GT26/KA26 - MH - 25 Oct 2011 - P 23
ALSTOM 2011. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is indicative only. No representation or warranty is given or should be relied on that it is complete or correct or will apply to any
particular project. This will depend on the technical and commercial circumstances. It is provided without liability and is subject to change without notice. Reproduction, use or disclosure to third parties, without
express written authority, is strictly prohibited.
The Next Generation GT26 Gas Turbine
NOx Emissions Clean Combustion
Engine Characteristic
25
Low Load
Parking
0
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
Relative CCPP Load
16
C2+ varies 0% - 12%
16
14
C2+ varies 6% - 14% 14
12 12
C2+ (%)
10 10
C2+ (%)
8
8
6
4 6
2
4
0
Malaysia
Abu
Algeria
Australia
Nigeria
Oman
Qatar
Indonesia
Dhabi
0
03 Oct 17 Oct 31 Oct 14 Nov 28 Nov
09 09 09 09 09
C2+: High Hydrocarbons (Ethane C2H6, Propane C3H8, Butane C4H10, C5, C6)
15
GT26 allowed
variation up to
10 18%
5
0
Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05
Wobbe Index
Alstom
Gas turbines
Wobbe Index (MJ/m3)
15%
50
45
40
35 Typical
OEM value
30 5%
Maintenance Cost
Optimised operation mode
ft
aft
Sha
lti Sh
gle
Mu
Sin
GT Ignition
Single Shaft: 47 115 145
Multi Shaft: 52 140 165
Time [minutes]
MS with 1 static frequency converter, HRSG purging excluded
28 minutes
ST Speed
GT Speed
GT Ignition
CC Power
Introduce
Derive Detail
Specify Validate to
Concept Design
fleet
Gate reviews
SEV burner
Tested in high pressure test rig
500 measurement points
Fuel flexibility tests
LP Turbine
Validated with Thermal Paint run in
Alstom Test Power Plant
Released for front runner
implementation
In commercial operation
since Nov 2009
- Performance and
Emission
guarantees achieved
hc energa KA26 Castejon CCPP
Borescope inspection
in Sep 2010 (>5,500 OH, >40 Starts)
- Turbine in excellent condition
2002
1999
Compressor +
SEV Burner +
LP-Turbine Upgrade
Performance Unprecedented
FLEXIBILITY
15 x GT26 engines 9 x GT26 engines 47 X GT26 engines Modes (PO and MCO)
20% 10%
Relative CCPP Load
100%
CCPP RelativeLoad
in lean prem ix m ode
70%
1
60%
30%
3
20% K A26 Low Load Point
10%
2
0%
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 10
10 11
11
Tim e