Tanya Weller
Both Smith and Parsons view of the Standard American Family are in agreement with
the accepted norm, which still stands today, that the couple are married where the husband
provides financially for his family and his wife tends to the needs of her husband, household,
and children (Nestor, R. 2015 Unit 4 6 parenting. P. 1). This has worked well for both Sidney
Workmans and Kendra Wilds families seem to be able to make this work in a way that is
mutually agreeable to both families. (Unit 1 Forum 1 July 5 1:02 pm and 4:01 pm). However, for
many women gender inequality exists within the home, at work and in society, especially in
patriarchy societies.
A century ago or more women were needed as domestic partners for the men of the
colonial times and the Indigenous people needed the help of a woman, as well, to take care of all
the domestic needs including having children. This they did without the right to own land, to
handle their own money or to have custody of her own children (Baker. M. 2014. P. 8).
Unfortunately, as Dranoff is quoted in Choices and Constraints on Family Life, the husband
[also] had the right to decide what was necessary [for his family] (cited in Baker, M. 2014. P.
12). However, the roles of the Huron (matriarchy) and the Ojibway tribes we learn that though
the gender roles were, usually separate and apart, they portrayed an aura of fairness. Amongst the
Ojibways if a girl was an only child she would fulfill the role of a son (Nestor, R. 2015. Unit 2
Prior to the 1960s society expected women to leave the labour force and be supported by
their husbands, if married. Unfair husbands led a number of wives feeling discontented with the
gender inequities in their marriages leading them to separate and divorce (Baker, M. 2014. P.12).
After the sixties, women, whether married or not were becoming more commonplace outside the
home. Yet, they were still left with the majority of the work at home after they returned home
3
GENDER INEQUALITY FOR THOSE OF THE WEAKER SEX
after working all day, although men surpassed their forefathers, somewhat, in this regard (Nestor,
Men receiving state assistance or benefits often do so as wage earners, thus the state does
not keep tabs on them. Single moms are assumed to be unemployed and in need of welfare-to-
work programs that guarantee close monitoring by the state (Baker. M. 2014. P.16). After the
Pill became legal in Canada in 1969 young women were able to go to school and/or work
without the worry of pregnancy. Unfortunately, they were limited mostly to service orientated job
that meant less pay than their male counterparts (Nestor, R. Unit 3 2 Paid work p.3).
nursing, clerical, sales or service with many working part-time (Nestor, R. Unit 3 2 Paid work
p.3). Interesting to note, is that, also, in 2006 55 percent of doctors and dentists were women.
However, in the field of engineering only 22 percent were women (Nestor, R. Unit 3 2 Paid
work p.3).
In the late 40s and early 50s Sociologists Margaret Mead and George Murdoch (Nestor,
R. 2015. Unit 1 -2 Theories and Methods. P.2), Talcott Parsons and Dorothy Smith (Nestor, R.
2015. Unit 4 6 Parenting Roles and children. P. 1) described what the ideal family should look
like. Although they differed in whether the stereotypes for the nuclear family were by nurture or
by nature, the result was the same. Women find themselves in the nurturing role, men the
provider role. Sharon Hays delineates the dichotomy for working women she is expected to
exhibit masculine attributes while at work and show her nurturing nature at home (as cited in
Television shows like All in the Family (Nestor. R. 2015. Unit 1 Television Families)
depicting the traditional nuclear family and pictures with a woman working in the kitchen while
another photo shows a man, presumably the husband, leaning on a bookshelf further illustrates
gender inequity. Cliff and Claire have a seemingly equal in their relationship harbours echoes of
the traditional roles father as disciplinarian and mother as hostess and while Cliff tells a story
mom is getting ready to prepare a meal. The films in Unit 2 forum 1 and 2 seem different at first
glance but the portrayal of the white men in both films are callous and uncaring, whereas, their
Indian wives Ikwe and Mistress Madeline - fulfill their duties as homemakers and child
bearers/carers. Their husbands offer them little in return (Bailey, Norma *1986); Johnston,
Aaron. (1986)).
Gender inequality is not specific to any single time period and is still present today.
From our course work it would seem that the Indigenous peoples were less overbearing than the
white men to their wives or even the white man to their Native women. Is it because the
Indigenous people have extended family very near to them, like the Huron and Ojibway (Nestor,
R. 2015. Unit 2 2 Traditional Aboriginal Families. Pp. 1-2)? Or is it because we have limited
material with which to study Aboriginal families than we do our own? Baker suggests that the
European embraced the nuclear family model because several generations ago this was one of
the only possible family structures because extended family were left behind when Canada was
colonized. Shorter life expectancies were also a contributor to the close knit families. Now that
several generations in one family are alive at the same time why is the nuclear structure still
preferable?
5
GENDER INEQUALITY FOR THOSE OF THE WEAKER SEX
References
Baker, Maureen. (2014). Choices and Constraints in Family Life. Don Mills, Ontario. Oxford
University Press.
https://www.nfb.ca/film/mistress_madeleine/
id=5383
https://urcourses.uregina.ca/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=281083
https://urcourses.uregina.ca/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=281083