Langford 16013044
Checklist
Answer explicitly addresses the question? x
Structure: Introduction, Middle section, Conclusion? x
Citations in the text using the Harvard referencing system? x
All cited sources are listed alphabetically in full in the bibliography? x
All images are appropriately captioned and referenced? x
Images have been formatted to minimise file size? x
Word count is within 10% of the target length? x
Document has been spell checked and proof read? x
File saved as a Word (.doc) or rich text file (.rtf) with the filename format
x
Student number_module initials_assignment number?
The University of the Highlands and Islands recognises that plagiarism, where deliberately engaged in,
is unacceptable and is considered serious academic malpractice. Students are responsible for
ensuring the work they submit is their own. If you have any queries you should contact the module
leader or your Personal Academic Tutor before submitting your assessment.
Declaration
This assessment is entirely my own work, and all internet and conventional x
sources which I have used have been fully acknowledged and attributed.
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Introduction
The overall journey examining the use of space within the broch at
Scatness; a complex multi-period structure of positive features
with a high preservation of walls still standing to full ground floor
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
8
Figure illustrating Scatness Broch complex
12 illustrating structure 8 and 12 as in
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Hillier and Hanson (1984) could argue that structure 8 and 12 can
be construed as having a direct relationship with each other.
Structure 12 would essentially be in the ascendancy over structure
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Archaeology can be too less functional and basic with its approach
to how a structure would operate in reality in the past, moreover it
is easy for archaeologists to infer that the past is very much a
vehicle from the current academic understanding in how the lapse
of time should operate. Methodology of two seemingly different
approaches, allows for a responsible debate to how the past may
have reasoned within the use of space or not so as the case maybe.
Ingold (2000) has continued to support his original paper from 1993
(The temporality of the landscape), a valid point in relation to how
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Hillier & Hanson (1984) along with Foster (1989) fixes the
archaeological dynamic for contained bounded context; for Space
syntax and gamma analysis (Hillier & Hanson 1984). For Hillier &
Hanson (1984) methodology to work there has to be tangibility of
archaeology, actual structural evidence, as opposed to Ingold (1993)
projected dynamic of past temporality of place.
There are those who would however challenge the Hillier & Hanson
(1984) approach. Are Hillier & Hanson (1984) visions of a simplified
plan of sites, a snap shot in-time? Inconsistencies with spatial
syntax even at a simple level have been revealed by Ratti (2004).
Comparison is made with Manhattan Urban analysis Robson (1969)
and has exposed spatial syntax having inherent problems in
allowing the individual to make a choice, which would according to
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Archaeologists who are critics of Tim Ingold seem to be far and few
between, probably because his theories come to explain the fabric
of the archaeological data from a number of diverse disciplines.
Those writers that are critical of Ingold (1993) in-particularly Murray
(2004), can cite that the building archaeological research data
associated with time and temporality may not always be
meaningful (Murray 2004:4). Before Ingold (1993) landmark work,
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
Since 1984 and 1993, the two main methodologies can be said to be
fairly established within the archaeological landscape, after all a
number of writers from a number of fields (archaeology,
anthropology, geography, mathematics, phycology and so on) have
cited these works and this is a testament to their longevity and
academic standing. The most recent academic papers to have cited
and at times quoted Hillier and Hanson (1984) are Munro & Grierson
Methodological evaluation in regards to the use of space at Scatness, Research & Dissertation Skills K-J
Langford 16013044
(2017), Shen & Karimi (2017) and Xiao (2017) and similarly for
Ingold (1993) are Clarke (2017), Gardner (2017) and Thomas (2017).
Bibliography
Bafna, S., 2003. Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and
analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), pp.17-29.
Batty, M., 1985. Review of Hillier & Hanson (1984). Sociology, 19,
pp.161-2.
Clarke, B., 2017. The secret taskscape: implications for the study of
Cold War activities. Forms of Dwelling: 20 years of Taskscapes in
archaeology, p.236.
Gardner, T., Westra, A., Wood, A. and Vogelaar, C., 2017. Stone and
social circles: taskscape and landscape survey at Yadlee Stone
Circle. Forms of Dwelling: 20 years of Taskscapes in archaeology,
p.151.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J. and Graham, H., 1987. Ideas are in things: an
application of the space syntax method to discovering house
genotypes. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 14(4),
pp.363-385.
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J., 1989. The social logic of space. Cambridge
university press.
Shen, Y. and Karimi, K., 2017. The economic value of streets: mix-
scale spatio-functional interaction and housing price patterns.
Applied Geography, 79, pp.187-202.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'sullivan, D. and Penn, A., 2001. From isovists
to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural
space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 28(1),
pp.103-121.
Van Dyke, R.M., 1999. Space syntax analysis at the Chacoan outlier
of Guadalupe. American Antiquity, pp.461-473.