COURSE OUTLINE ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE D.

Liability for damages for violation of rights and liberties

By Atty. Rosario Olivas
DLSU College of Law E. When does right to counsel set in?
Second Semester, AY 2016-17
1. Extrajudicial confession
2. Police line-up
3. Reenactment
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 4. Confessions before the media

A. Importance of criminal procedure in the light of Article III of the 1987
Constitution
B. Coverage of basic criminal procedure
C. References
- Rules on Criminal Procedure
- Riano, Updated Criminal Procedure (The Bar Lecture Series) 2011
- Cases and issuances listed under each section below
- Additional cases and issuances to be assigned from time to time.
SECTION 2. POLICE INVESTIGATION STAGE
Read:
-Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 2, 3, 12, 19, 20
-Republic Act 7438
-Revised Penal Code Art. 124, 125
-Civil Code, Art. 32
-Jesalva vs. People, GR No. 187725 (2011)
-People vs. Baloloy, GR No. 140740, 381 SCRA 31 (2002)
-People vs. Ayson, GR No. 85215, 175 SCRA 216 (1989)
-People vs. Escordial, 373 SCRA 585 (2002)
-People vs. Hilarion Teves, 356 SCRA 14 (2001)
-People vs. Deorito Porio, 376 SCRA 596 (2002)
-People vs. Andan, 269 SCRA 95 (1997)
-PNP Legal Advisory on voluntary surrender and extrajudicial confessions -
see PNP website

A. When does custodial investigation begin?

B. Rights of persons arrested, detained and under custodial investigation

SECTION 3. ARREST

C. Criminal liabilities for:

A. General rule: warrant must be issued
B. Requisites and procedure for issuance of warrant of arrest; probable
1. Arbitrary arrest
cause test
2. Delay in delivery of detained persons
C. Which court has jurisdiction to issue; where can warrant be served
3. Violation of rights of persons arrested, detained and under custodial
D. Manner of execution of warrant of arrest
investigation
E. Grounds for warrantless arrest
F. Inquest procedure A. General rule: Warrant must be issued
G. John Doe warrants B. Particularity of description, place, item
H. Consequence of invalid in flagrante delicto arrest C. Requisites and procedure for issuance
I. Special rules on juveniles in conflict with law D. Which court has jurisdiction to issue; where can warrant be served
E. Procedure for serving warrant
Read:
F. Warrantless searches: when allowed
-Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 2 1. Incident to lawful arrest
-Revised Penal Code, Art. 269 2. Plain view exception
-New Civil Code, Art. 32(4) 3. Check point search
-Rule 112, Sec. 5, Sec. 6 4. Consented search
-Rule 113, Sec 5, Sec. 13 5. Stop and frisk
- Rule 114, Sec. 26 6. Others: Regulatory searches, automobile exception, customs searches,
- Rule on Juveniles in Conflict with Law, Sec. 6, 7 inventory exception
- Rule on Commitment of Children
- Rule 135, Sec. 3; BP 129, Sec. 37, last par. Sec. 38(2) G. Consequences of unlawful search
- DOJ Dept. Circular No. 61, New Rules on Inquest
- DOJ Dept. Circular No. 50, Series of 2012, Guidelines on Application of Read:
RPC Art. 125
- Allado vs. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192 (1994) - Constitution, Article III Sec. 2

- AAA vs. Carbonell, GR No. 171465, June 8, 2007 - Rule 126

- Roberts, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 113930, (1996) - Stonehill vs. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)

- Pangandaman vs. Casar, 159 SCRA 599 (1988) - Bache vs. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 823

- People vs. Nasario Molina, 352 SCRA 174 (2001) - People vs. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683 (2001)

- People vs. Dequina, GR 177570 (2011) - Al-Ghoul vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 126859, Sept. 4, 2001

- People vs. Ng Yi Bun, GR 180452 (2011) - Social Justice Society vs. Dangerous Drugs Board, GR No. 157870, 3

- Abraham Miclat vs. People, GR 176077 (2011) November 2008

- People vs. Rolando S.Delos Reyes, GR 174774 (2011) - Nala vs. Barroso, GR No. 153087, Aug. 7, 2003

- People vs. Raquero, GR 186529 (2010) - People vs. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993)

- People vs. Aruta, GR 120915 (1998) - People vs. Ruben Burgos, 144 SCRA 1 (1986)

- Alvin Comerciante v. People, GR No. 205926 (22 July 2015)
SECTION 4. SEARCH AND SEIZURE
- Terry vs. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)
- Posadas vs. Court of Appeals, 188 SCRA 288 (1990)
- People vs. Jose Ancheta, GR 197371, June 13, 2012
- Pollo vs. Constantino-David et al, GR 181881 (2011)
- People v. Sonia Bernel Nuarin, GR No. 188698 (22 July 2015) 4. Jurisdiction of Court of Appeals
- People v. Rodolfo Bocadi, GR 193388 (1 July 2015) 5. Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
6. Venue
MIDTERM EXAM
Read:

- Constitution, Art. VIII, Sec. 5(2)(d)

SECTION 5. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION - BP 129, as amended
- Republic Act No. 8249, Sec. 4
1. Procedure
- Rule 110, Sec, 15
2. Appeal
- Rule 124, Sec. 12 as amended by SC Circular AM No. 00-5-03-SC (2004)
3. What can Ombudsman investigate?
- SC Circular AM No. 00-5-03-SC effective Oct. 15, 2004 (Amendment to
4. Can preliminary investigation be ordered even after trial has begun?
Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure to Govern Death Penalty Cases)
5. Conduct of preliminary investigation when inquest investigation is null and
- PD 1606 as amended by RA 8249 Sec. 7
void
- People vs. Grospe, 157 SCRA 154 (1988) - Ms. Roxas - April 12 - vg
- People vs. Munar (1973) - Mr. Escueta - April 12 - vg.
Read:
- Bonifacio v. RTC, GR 184800, (2010) - Ms. Tria - April 12 - vg. (For future
course outline, Cybercrime law)
- Rule 112
- Ambil v. Sandiganbayan, GR 175457 (2011) - Mr. Reago - April 12 -
- BP 129, Sec. 37
Excellent
- Crespo vs. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462 (1987)
- San Agustin vs. People, 437 SCRA 392 (2004)
- George Uy vs. Sandiganbayan, 354 SCRA 651 (2001)
- Rolito Go vs. CA, 206 SCRA 138 (1992) SECTION 7. COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION
- Sausi vs. Querubin, 62 SCRA 155 (1975) - miss yumul - vg report, april 12
- Budiongan vs. De La Cruz, GR 170288 (2006) - miss pabrua - april 12 - vg - Rule 110
- Olivas vs. Ombudsman, GR No. 102420 (1994) - mr. estioko - april 12 - - 1991 Revised Rules on Summary Procedure
excellent - Ramiscal vs. Sandiganbayan, GR Nos. 140576-99, Dec. 13, 2004
- Uy vs. Sandiganbayan, 354 SCRA 651 (2001)
- Sta. Rosa Mining Co. vs. Zabala, GR No. 44723, Aug. 31, 1987, 153 SCRA
367 (1987)
SECTION 6. JURISDICTION AND VENUE (Meeting 9)
- Tan vs. Gallardo , 73 SCRA 306 (1976)
- People vs. Dela Cruz, 383 SCRA 410 (21 June 2002)
1. Jurisdiction of Municipal / Metropolitan / Municipal Circuit Trial Courts
- People vs. Godofredo Teves, 310 SCRA 788 (20 July 1999)
2. Jurisdiction of Sandiganbayan
- People vs. Mascarinas, 382 SCRA 349 (2002)
3. Jurisdiction of Regional Trial Courts
- Nilo Hipos vs. Hon. Teodoro Bay, GR No. 174813-15 ( 2009)
- Albert v. Sandiganbayan, GR 164015 (2009)
- People v. Galvez, G.R. No. 212929 (July 29, 2015)
- Jovito Canceran v. People, GR No. 206442 (July 1, 2015)
- People v.Arsenio Misa III, GR 212336 (July 15, 2015)
SECTION 8. THE CIVIL ASPECT
- PD 1606, Section 4 as amended by RA 8249 last paragraph
- Silangan Textile Mills vs. Hon. Avelino Demetrio, GR No. 166719 (12 Mar.
2007)
- Yakult Philippines vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 91856 (1990)
- Alejandro Ras vs. Hon. Rasul, GR No. L-50441-42 (1980)
- Manuel R. Jimenez vs. Hon. Alberto Averia, GR No. L-22759 (29 Mar. 1968)
- People vs. Rafael Jose Consing, Jr., GR No. 148193 (2003)
- Jeffrey Reso Dayap vs. Pretzy-Lou Sendiong, GR No. 177960 (29 Jan.
2009)
- Provisional Remedies:
1. Preliminary attachment (Rule 127, Sec. Rule 57)
2. Lis pendens
3. Preliminary injunction
4. Receivership
5. Replevin
6. Support pendente lite
SECTION 9. BAIL
- Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 13
- Rule 114
- RA 6036, Section 1
- Government of Hong Kong vs. Olalia, GR No. 153675 ( 2007)
- Government of USA vs. Guillermo Purganan, GR No. 14851 (24 Sept.
2002)
- Francisco Yap vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 141529 (2001)
- Manolet O. Lavides vs. CA, GR No. 129670 (1 Feb. 2000)
- Miguel Paderanga vs. CA, GR No. 115407 (28 Aug. 1995)
- Guillerma De Los Santos-Reyes vs. Montesa Jr., AM No. RTJ-93-983 (7
Aug. 95)
- People vs. Hon. Procoro Donato, GR No. 79269 (1991)
- Juan Ponce Enrile v.Sandiganyaban, GR 213847 (18 August 2015) -
include dissenting opinion of J. Leonen
SECTION 10. ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA
- Constitution, Art. III, sec. 14(2)
- Rule 116
- RPC, Art. 13, par. 7
- Ramon A. Albert vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 164015 (2009)
- Rodolfo B. Baygar vs. Judge Panontongan, AM No. MTJ-08-1699 (17 Mar.
2009)
- People vs. Melchor Estomaca, GR No. 117485-86 (1996)
- People vs. Durango, 329 SCRA 2000 (5 Apr. 2000)
- People vs. Alberto Chua, 366 SCRA 283 (1 Oct. 2001)
- People vs. Danilo Espidol, GR No. 150033 (12 Nov. 2004)
- People vs. Alcalde, 382 SCRA 621, GR No. 139225-28 (29 May 2002)
- People vs. Roberto Estrada, GR No.130487, (19 June 2000)
SECTION 11. QUASHAL
- Rule 117
- Jumaquiao vs. Hon. Villarosa, GR No. 165924 (19 Jan. 2009)
- Bernie G. Miaque vs. Hon. Virgilio Patag, GR No. 170609-13 (30 Jan. 2009)
- Pat. Herrera y Baltoribio vs. Hon. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 119660-61 (13
Feb. 2009)
- People vs. Hermenegildo Dumlao, GR No. 168918 (2009)
- People vs. Judge Nitafan & Imelda Marcos, 302 SCRA 424 (1999)
- John Eric Loney vs. People, GR No. 152644 (2006)
- Galman vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 72670 (12 Sept. 1986)
- People vs. Galicia, GR No. 159261 (21 Feb. 2007)
- Jamaca v. People, G.R. No. 183681 (27 July 2015)
SECTION 12. PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL
- Rule 115 - Rights of accused at trial
- Rule 118 - Pre-trial
- Rule 119 - Trial
- RA 6981 - Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Act
- A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC - Judicial Affidavit Rule
- Bernardo vs. People, GR No. 166940 (4 April 2007)
- People vs. Verceles, 388 SCRA 515 (2002)
- People vs. Licayan, 378 SCRA 281 (2002)
- People v. Nerio, GR No. 200940 (22 July 2015)
SECTION 13. JUDGMENT
- Constitution, Art. VIII, Sec. 14, par. 1
- Rule 120
- PD 968 as amended, Sec. 4
- Marietta Duque vs. Judge Garrido, AM RTJ-06-2027 (2009)
- Belfast Surety vs. People, 111 SCRA 385 (1982)
- Yao vs. Court of Appeals, 344 SCRA 202 (2000)
- Emilio Francisco vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 45674 (1983)
- Samson vs. CA, GR No. 10364 and 10376 (31 March 1958)
SECTION 14. NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION
- Rule 121
- Rule 119, Sec. 24
- Custodio vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 96027-28 (2005)
- Potot vs. People, 383 SCRA 448 (2002)
- Jose vs. Court of Appeals, 70 SCRA 257 (1976)
SECTION 15. APPEAL
- Rule 122
- Rule 124
- Tan vs. People, 381 SCRA 74 (2002) - Read including the dissenting
opinion
- People vs. Madali, 349 SCRA 104 (2001)
- People vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 140633 (4 Feb. 2002)
- People vs.Josefino Fernandez, GR No. 80481 (27 June 1990) Class participation will consist of recitations, handwritten comparative case
- Teodoro vs. Court of Appeals, 258 SCRA 603 (11 July 1996) analysis, discussion board on Facebook, reaction papers, group work and
other activities and assignments throughout the course.

1) HANDWRITTEN COMPARATIVE CASE ANALYSIS

SECTION 16. POST-CONVICTION REVIEW
- Bautista, Chapter 16
- Certiorari, prohibition, mandamus
- Habeas corpus
- Galman vs. Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 (1986)
Each of you will be expected to submit a handwritten comparative analysis of
all the cases assigned for each section of the course outline. This is not a
mere listing of cases and rulings. It should be a real COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS. For your guidance, see:
http://www.ssag.sk//How%20to%20write%20a%20Comparative
%20e

This is required for three reasons: First, this will force you to read all the
MEETING 14 - INTEGRATION cases. Second, this will train you to take a critical look at the cases, to see
the similarities and differences, so that you will remember the principles
better. Third, this will force you to improve your handwriting in preparation for
the bar exams.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
Every handwritten analysis must be on yellow pad, single space with a one-
1. Attendance and class participation (see below for details) inch margin on the left side, with a minimum of three pages. There should be
2. Mid-term examination an introduction, a body and a conclusion, as stated in the above link.
3. Final examination
All comparative analysis papers will be graded, equivalent to 10 points each.
Equal weight for each of these components. Example: These will be collected at the end of the class discussion involving that
particular topic.
Class participation 90

2) DISCUSSION BOARD (FACEBOOK GROUP)

Mid-term exam 87

All class members are expected to join the Facebook Group. From time to
Final exam 85
time, links to articles and videos will be posted with questions involving
criminal procedure. Students are expected to give their comments as threads
Total 262 / 3 = 87.33 = 87
to the discussion. Students are also encouraged to post articles, videos and

CLASS PARTICIPATION other links that are relevant to the topic, to spur discussion. Active
involvement in these discussions will count towards class participation.
3) CURRENT EVENTS MONITORING -----
Updated as of January 15, 2016.
Students are encouraged to read the newspapers everyday and identify news All rights reserved. Atty. Rosario Olivas
articles that involve criminal procedure. Links to these articles may be posted
on our Facebook page, so that the principles and rules studied in class will
come to life.