0 Introduction
2.0 Question
Task 1: You are required to select any TWO of the family of models of teaching
and learning. Based your selection, compare and contrast the models in terms
of its features, characteristics, principles and concepts. Provide examples to
justify your statements.
More onwards, learning models were used widely as guidelines for developing
specific educational experiences. More than that, it is a definite patterns and
requirements for each instructional event. That is why a body of research
surrounding their development and implementation, and/ or an evaluation of their
effectiveness.
Joyce, Weil and Calhouns (2008) state that there are 6 criteria should be
qualified in learning and teaching model. First of all, focus. It is the central intent of
the model. It also focus the learning event to encourage learning by manipulating
thought or types of thinking; growth in learning through external stimuli or rewards;
social learning, or social and emotional growth through interaction; or increased level
of self-achievement and personal growth through personally directed choices?
Models are usually developed with a focus, an end-game, or specific intention in
mind. For instance, Madeline Hunters very popular Mastery Teaching concept
focuses on presenting materials in a tightly controlled, very repetitive way so that
learners have optimal opportunities to get content, concepts, or processes right the
first time. Another example in cooperative learning models the focus is on the
importance of social interchange and peer support in learning new things. Therefore
models differ one from the other in terms of their primary objective or focal point of
their intended outcomes.
Second criteria which is Syntax which describes the models structure and
includes the sequence of steps involved in the organization of the model. It includes
the major components and the phases of unfolding, or the sequencing of steps, and
describes how the model progresses. Obviously the syntax can be quite different for
each model.
Thirdly, the principles of reaction. It tell the teacher how to regard the learner
and how to respond to what the learner does during the use of the model. Often
responses in using a designated model should be appropriate and selectively
specific. This element is concerned with the teachers reactions to the students
responses. This portion of the model alerts the teacher on how to react to the
responses of the students. It is here that the teacher learns whether the learners
have been actively involved in the models processes and steps.
Forth traits, the social system. Which describes the interactions between
students and teacher as each model is viewed as if it were a mini society. Since
every teaching model is different, each model will have its own social system and
rules of engagement. This portion concerns the interactive roles and relationships
between the teacher and the student, expected norms, and which student behaviors
should be rewarded. These may be overtly described or simply inferred. Depending
on the philosophical orientation of the model, in some models the role of the
teachers is dominant, while in others his or her role is passive. In some models the
roles center on the teacher, and in others the concentration is on the students. There
are still other models that require shared roles whereby teachers and students share
roles equally. In this segment both motivational strategies and tactics for engaging
students could be discussed too.
First model chosen is Social Learning Models. Social learning theory (also
known as Social Cognitive Theory) is the idea that people learn by watching what
others do and that human thought processes are central to understanding
personality. Social learning theory stemmed out of work by N.E. Miller and J. Dollard
in 1941. Their proposition posits that if humans were motivated to learn a particular
behaviour that particular behaviour would be learned through clear observations. By
imitating these observed actions the individual observer would solidify that learned
action and would be rewarded with positive reinforcement (Miller & Dollard, 1941).
The proposition of social learning was expanded upon and theorized by Albert
Bandura from 1962 to the present.
In small groups, students can share strengths and also develop their weaker
skills. They develop their interpersonal skills. They learn to deal with conflict. When
cooperative groups are guided by clear objectives, students engage in numerous
activities that improve their understanding of subjects explored.
Learning from each other gradually diminishes the need to try to out-perform
each other because one student's learning enhances the performance of the other
students instead of inhibiting it, as is usually the case in most competitive, teacher-
oriented classrooms.
First and foremost, it is a remarkably efficient way to learn the material. But
even more important, the jigsaw process encourages listening, engagement, and
empathy by giving each member of the group an essential part to play in the
academic activity. Group members must work together as a team to accomplish a
common goal; each person depends on all the others. No student can succeed
completely unless everyone works well together as a team. This cooperation by
design facilitates interaction among all students in the class, leading them to value
each other as contributors to their common task.
Jurisprudential Inquiry Model by Donald Oliver and Jame Shaver (1971) The
Social Family. Social values legitimately conflict with one another. Negotiations of
Difference can help to resolve complex and controversial issues. A skilful citizen is
like a competent judge. He/she listens to the evidence, analyses the legal positions
taken by both sides, weighs these positions and the evidence assess the meaning
provisions of the law and finally make the best possible decision. To play the role;
three types of competencies are required: (1) Familiarity with values (2) Skills for
clarifying and resolving issues (3) Knowledge of contemporary political and public
issues.
In adults the tool respects their prior knowledge, experience and the reality
they bring to a concept. It helps to make the concept being taught to be constructed
and then reflected on. It helps to move beyond any comfort zones and helps bring on
attitudinal change through different viewpoints too. It helps to develop all domains of
learning, cognitive (knowledge), psychomotor (skills) and affective (emotional) Its
also a lot of fun (trust me) and helps shake off those lecture room cobwebs. There is
plenty of evidence that confirms the retention from participation is far higher than any
other modes of learning.
Laboratory Method stressed on group or interpersonal skills, personal
awareness and flexibility skills. Students investigate, analyse and reflect. They test
and apply theories to make abstract concepts concrete. To ensure processes of
investigation run smoothly, students need guidance to make sense of their result.
Strategies for designing and supervising effective lab sections are as follow.
First of all, we must plan a laboratory class in an effective way. It depends on what
projects/ experiment, how to integrate, how to balance and organise cooperative and
independent study and finally what equipment needed.
Secondly, the choices of projects that related to the goals stated. It is to help
students understand theory by observing and verifying concepts. It also helps them
go through research and design processes. Other than that, it helps them to improve
their powers of reasoning by manipulating cause-and-effect relationships. Finally, it is
to acquaint them with essential equipment.
The purpose of critical thinking is to determine the intellectual traits that fair-
minded critical thinkers seek to develop. Other than that, it analyse the elements of
ones' thinking. Last but not least, it applies intellectual standards to the elements of
thought. The proposed model is a mode of thinking that can be applied to all
disciplines of study, problems, or issues
The model consists of three components: intellectual traits that are developed
by the habitual use of intellectual standards applied to the elements of thought or
reasoning. One needs to identify the parts or elements of thinking (take it apart by
looking at its purpose, the question or problem it seeks to address, the assumptions
involved, along with the points of view, the concepts involved, the conclusions or
interpretations reached, and future implications or consequences. The quality of
each part of one's thinking needs to be assessed by comparing it to intellectual
standards. These include: (a) clarity through elaborations, example, illustration), (b)
accuracy through verification or cross-check), (c) precision though providing more
specifics or details), (d) relevance through tangible linkages with the issue), (e)
significance through determination of relative importance), (f) breath through
consideration of different perspectives), (g) depth through consideration of
complexities involved), (h) logic through making sense of it as a whole, conclusion
following from evidence), and (i) fairness through consideration of context, free from
distortions). Disciplined application of the intellectual standards to the elements of
thought will help us develop as fair-minded critical thinkers.
Learning styles model, These plans are devised and written reflecting concepts
developed by one of the learning style theorists or followers (such as Kathleen Butler
or Bernice McCarthy, Dunn and Dunn, etc.) The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style
Model indicates a range of variables proven to influence the achievements of
individual learners from kindergarten age to adulthood. Each learner has his or her
own unique combination of preferences. Some preferences may be strong, in which
case the learner will benefit significantly if the need is addressed when he or she is
learning challenging content. Others preferences may be moderate worth
addressing if learning isnt progressing smoothly. For some variables, no preference
may be indicated. The learners ability to engage with the work and to achieve
success may depend on extraneous factors or his/her level of interest in the subject -
or it may be that that particular variable has no real bearing on the learners ability to
concentrate and study.
From what I have chosen, Social Learning Model and Information Processing
Model, there were many differences in features, characteristics, principles and
concepts. It would be helpful to compare it in table form.
Principles
1. The highest level of
observational learning is achieved by
first organizing and rehearsing the
modeled behavior symbolically and
then enacting it overtly. Coding
modeled behavior into words, labels or
images results in better retention than
simply observing.
Concepts
The most Examples
common (and pervasive) examples of
social learning situations are television
commercials. Commercials suggest
that drinking a certain beverage or
using a particular hair shampoo will
make us popular and win the
admiration of attractive people.
Depending upon the component
processes involved (such as attention
or motivation), we may model the
behavior shown in the commercial and
buy the product being advertised.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-
1184.
Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Miller, Katherine (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts (2nd ed.).
New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.