Experimental Statistics
2016/17 Quarter 3
(April 2017 release)
ormat or
w this licence,
version/3/ or
ird party
ght holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this
Contents
Front sheet
Contents
Summary of results
Headline statistics
2016/17 Quarter 1
2016/17 Quarter 2
2016/17 Quarter 3
Definitions
Validation rules
Contacts and further information
Summary of results
Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth
(by local authority)
2016/17 Quarter 3
(April 2017 release)
Background
The breastfeeding information within this publication has been obtained via a new interim reporting system to
collect health visiting activity at a local authority resident level. Quarter 1 of 2015-16 was the first reporting
period and the reporting by local authorities to Public Health England is voluntary.
Caution should be exercised when interpreting these figures as it is a new data collection and there is not full
coverage. Any figures shown at a PHE Centre or England level are based on an aggregate total of local
authorities within those areas who supplied data items which complied with national validation criteria for the
breastfeeding indicator.
The statistics produced are still experimental and undergoing evaluation and development. Therefore they are
subject to modifications in future releases.
Summary of Quarter 3
Of 150 reporting local authorities (Hackney & City of London and Cornwall & Isles of Scilly report jointly), 146
submitted a return for the interim reporting collection for Quarter 3 2016/17.
4 of the 146 submissions failed stage 1 validation (failing to provide either the number of infants due a 6-8 week
review or the number of infants totally/partially being breastfed). The aggregated totals for each PHE centre an
the England value is therefore based on submissions from 142 reporting local authorities.
Breastfeeding rates at a PHE centre level can be published for the North East, East Midlands, and East of
England PHE Centres. The others cannot be published as they fail to meet the validation at stage 3 (known
breastfeeding status for infants age 6-8 weeks does not meet the 95% quality standard - please refer to
'Validation Rules' for more information).
An aggregate England value can be published based on the 142 submissions passing stage 1 validation, due t
the England threshold being lower at 85%.
The aggregate breastfeeding rate for Q3 for England based on 142 reporting local authorities is
44.1% (with confidence intervals of 43.9 44.4%).
Full information (percentages and confidence intervals) can only be published for 73 reporting local authorities
10 areas failed validation checks at stage 2 (children due 6-8 week reviews not within 20% of the resident
population of babies aged 0) and 59 failed validation checks at stage 3 (breastfeeding status not known for 95%
of infants due 6-8 week reviews - please refer to 'Validation rules' for more information).
Note: This publication should be read in conjunction with the Statistical Commentary
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/breastfeeding-at-6-to-8-weeks-after-birth-2016-to-2017-q
w interim reporting system to
5-16 was the first reporting
y.
s-after-birth-2016-to-2017-quarterly-data
Headline statistics
Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth (Experimental Statistics)
2016/17 Quarter 3 and previous quarter(s) refreshed
(April 2017 release)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
England (aggregate value of local authorities passing Stage 1
44.3% 44.5% 44.1%
validation)
Notes:
Local Authority did not make a submission to the Interim Reporting Collection
Stage 1 validation: The number of infants due 6 - 8 week reviews does not meet validation criteria (see 'Validatio
Stage 2 validation: The number of infants due 6-8 week reviews is not within 20% of the estimated resident popu
Stage 3 validation: The percentage of infants whose breastfeeding status was known does not meet the minimum
1 Blank cells (with no colour highlight) show where data does not meet validation criteria, therefore percentages or
46 43
C8ii Number of infants due a 6-8 week C8ii Infants totally or partially breastfed 95%confidenceinterval Infants totally breastfed
review
No. % No. %
No. % No. %
830 403 48.6% 45.2% - 52.0% 126 15.2%
501 192 38.3% 34.2% - 42.7% 139 27.7%
723 265 209
340 71 20.9% 16.9% - 25.5% 49 14.4%
416 89 70
531 146 106
696 195 28.0% 24.8% - 31.5% 143 20.5%
495 158 110
381 86 58
919 380 41.3% 38.2% - 44.6% 251 27.3%
594 215 36.2% 32.4% - 40.1% 154 25.9%
985 345 276
867 310 236
1,180 DK DK
354 87 24.6% 20.4% - 29.3% 64 18.1%
450 77 17.1% 13.9% - 20.9% 58 12.9%
3,176 796 573
1,400 457 32.6% 30.2% - 35.1% 320 22.9%
1,818 780 42.9% 40.6% - 45.2% 475 26.1%
793 305 38.5% 35.1% - 41.9% 168 21.2%
725 224 153
880 376 42.7% 39.5% - 46.0% 287 32.6%
694 186 26.8% 23.6% - 30.2% 136 19.6%
451 103 22.8% 19.2% - 26.9% 85 18.8%
772 388 50.3% 46.7% - 53.8% 305 39.5%
636 208 32.7% 29.2% - 36.4% 144 22.6%
643 366 256
541 224 41.4% 37.3% - 45.6% 157 29.0%
No. % No. %
835 256 30.7% 27.6% - 33.9% 186 22.3%
805 257 31.9% 28.8% - 35.2% 187 23.2%
DK DK DK
1,913 761 39.8% 37.6% - 42.0% 493 25.8%
592 521 88.0% 85.1% - 90.4% 183 30.9%
848 270 31.8% 28.8% - 35.1% 182 21.5%
659 308 46.7% 43.0% - 50.6% 247 37.5%
976 302 30.9% 28.1% - 33.9% 222 22.7%
1,487 315 206
2,408 1,149 47.7% 45.7% - 49.7% 806 33.5%
428 100 23.4% 19.6% - 27.6% 73 17.1%
385 89 23.1% 19.2% - 27.6% 69 17.9%
1,423 641 521
714 223 164
1,585 801 572
989 301 30.4% 27.6% - 33.4% 227 23.0%
573 195 155
758 311 41.0% 37.6% - 44.6% 198 26.1%
1,709 660 38.6% 36.3% - 41.0% 482 28.2%
1,223 698 57.1% 54.3% - 59.8% 444 36.3%
1,908 769 562
1,859 717 38.6% 36.4% - 40.8% 551 29.6%
2,236 982 694
999 523 52.4% 49.3% - 55.4% 328 32.8%
2,069 848 622
83 41 27
4,339 1,887 1,073
994 480 48.3% 45.2% - 51.4% 280 28.2%
No. % No. %
941 261 186
436 253 58.0% 53.3% - 62.6% 178 40.8%
1,160 441 38.0% 35.3% - 40.8% 267 23.0%
818 377 46.1% 42.7% - 49.5% 0 0.0%
556 264 47.5% 43.4% - 51.6% 191 34.4%
2,152 582 435
853 277 204
611 205 DK
797 228 123
1,400 649 46.4% 43.8% - 49.0% 480 34.3%
840 292 175
1,403 653 46.5% 43.9% - 49.2% 495 35.3%
520 281 54.0% 49.7% - 58.3% 207 39.8%
1,754 991 56.5% 54.2% - 58.8% 732 41.7%
867 451 52.0% 48.7% - 55.3% 325 37.5%
3,963 1,790 45.2% 43.6% - 46.7% 1,237 31.2%
3,432 1,755 1,226
850 480 56.5% 53.1% - 59.8% 275 32.4%
931 518 326
2,212 1,009 45.6% 43.5% - 47.7% 793 35.8%
789 337 42.7% 39.3% - 46.2% 257 32.6%
555 245 44.1% 40.1% - 48.3% 165 29.7%
1,885 886 47.0% 44.8% - 49.3% 673 35.7%
612 315 51.5% 47.5% - 55.4% 225 36.8%
957 379 184
725 447 288
775 178 108
1,285 438 265
No. % No. %
1,027 530 367
616 160 120
1,516 890 379
1,289 568 364
DK DK DK
1,055 347 238
1,058 656 443
321 242 148
1,022 647 422
879 497 296
850 310 182
973 643 398
1,049 594 373
657 155 88
230 184 128
535 392 73.3% 69.4% - 76.8% 270 50.5%
1,095 DK DK
1,169 873 74.7% 72.1% - 77.1% 504 43.1%
768 365 225
1,472 DK DK
1,073 679 358
681 123 DK
1,119 DK DK
649 335 221
731 561 DK
1,155 392 247
1,155 669 461
339 257 148
No. % No. %
413 228 55.2% 50.4% - 59.9% 162 39.2%
719 442 350
1,525 772 509
1,329 585 424
3,600 1,681 1,216
272 119 43.8% 38.0% - 49.7% 89 32.7%
4,181 1,735 1,228
880 247 175
1,887 1,173 62.2% 60.0% - 64.3% 890 47.2%
677 291 205
722 456 63.2% 59.6% - 66.6% 300 41.6%
742 465 62.7% 59.1% - 66.1% 234 31.5%
784 355 269
3,160 1,863 1,360
526 286 54.4% 50.1% - 58.6% 200 38.0%
2,162 1,059 779
498 309 218
515 326 63.3% 59.1% - 67.4% 217 42.1%
438 242 55.3% 50.6% - 59.8% 179 40.9%
511 276 54.0% 49.7% - 58.3% 202 39.5%
1,539 783 577
1,300 631 48.5% 45.8% - 51.3% 489 37.6%
1,517 793 52.3% 49.8% - 54.8% 646 42.6%
874 436 49.9% 46.6% - 53.2% 331 37.9%
1,566 823 52.6% 50.1% - 55.0% 604 38.6%
545 253 46.4% 42.3% - 50.6% 0 0.0%
744 311 41.8% 38.3% - 45.4% 231 31.0%
405 218 53.8% 49.0% - 58.6% 162 40.0%
No. % No. %
1,222 615 50.3% 47.5% - 53.1% 478 39.1%
775 296 218
687 334 48.6% 44.9% - 52.4% 223 32.5%
340 127 37.4% 32.4% - 42.6% 92 27.1%
1,201 380 323
porting Collection
views does not meet validation criteria (see 'Validation rules' for further details).
ews is not within 20% of the estimated resident population of babies aged 0 (see 'Validation rules' for further details).
eeding status was known does not meet the minimum data quality standard of 95% (see 'Validation rules' for details).
not meet validation criteria, therefore percentages or confidence intervals can not be published (see definitions sheet for details).
Notes:
Local Authority did not make a submission to the Interim Reporting Collection
Stage 1 validation: The number of infants due 6 - 8 week reviews does not meet validation criteria (see 'Validatio
Stage 2 validation: The number of infants due 6-8 week reviews is not within 20% of the estimated resident popu
Stage 3 validation: The percentage of infants whose breastfeeding status was known does not meet the minimum
1 Blank cells (with no colour highlight) show where data does not meet validation criteria, therefore percentages or
50 47
C8ii Number of infants due a 6-8 week C8ii Infants totally or partially breastfed 95%confidenceinterval Infants totally breastfed
review
No. % No. %
No. % No. %
772 353 45.7% 42.2% - 49.3% 258 33.4%
606 223 36.8% 33.1% - 40.7% 159 26.2%
736 258 35.1% 31.7% - 38.6% 210 28.5%
382 92 24.1% 20.1% - 28.6% 74 19.4%
464 131 28.2% 24.3% - 32.5% 99 21.3%
566 161 117
773 190 24.6% 21.7% - 27.7% 150 19.4%
555 173 117
412 97 67
995 397 39.9% 36.9% - 43.0% 252 25.3%
531 220 41.4% 37.3% - 45.7% 165 31.1%
971 482 49.6% 46.5% - 52.8% 371 38.2%
941 358 38.0% 35.0% - 41.2% 265 28.2%
1,254 DK DK
387 69 17.8% 14.3% - 22.0% 47 12.1%
506 95 18.8% 15.6% - 22.4% 65 12.8%
3,354 810 582
1,487 487 32.8% 30.4% - 35.2% 318 21.4%
2,085 901 43.2% 41.1% - 45.4% 547 26.2%
865 321 37.1% 34.0% - 40.4% 213 24.6%
741 294 39.7% 36.2% - 43.2% 188 25.4%
926 367 284
678 202 29.8% 26.5% - 33.3% 149 22.0%
472 101 21.4% 17.9% - 25.3% 67 14.2%
835 410 49.1% 45.7% - 52.5% 277 33.2%
831 267 32.1% 29.0% - 35.4% 182 21.9%
709 389 288
551 200 36.3% 32.4% - 40.4% 146 26.5%
No. % No. %
908 261 28.7% 25.9% - 31.8% 193 21.3%
921 327 35.5% 32.5% - 38.6% 237 25.7%
DK DK DK
2,028 852 42.0% 39.9% - 44.2% 526 25.9%
644 539 83.7% 80.6% - 86.3% 210 32.6%
1,069 321 30.0% 27.4% - 32.8% 218 20.4%
741 330 44.5% 41.0% - 48.1% 251 33.9%
1,087 334 239
1,582 1,202 76.0% 73.8% - 78.0% 373 23.6%
2,531 1,254 49.5% 47.6% - 51.5% 881 34.8%
498 123 24.7% 21.1% - 28.7% 91 18.3%
465 114 24.5% 20.8% - 28.6% 90 19.4%
1,470 643 490
738 215 145
1,620 780 531
1,048 349 33.3% 30.5% - 36.2% 264 25.2%
575 212 172
830 342 41.2% 37.9% - 44.6% 243 29.3%
1,984 792 39.9% 37.8% - 42.1% 613 30.9%
1,364 800 58.7% 56.0% - 61.2% 497 36.4%
1,984 753 545
1,928 733 38.0% 35.9% - 40.2% 538 27.9%
2,227 914 635
1,153 557 48.3% 45.4% - 51.2% 363 31.5%
2,206 885 683
79 37 26
4,631 1,944 1,044
1,202 594 49.4% 46.6% - 52.2% 369 30.7%
No. % No. %
991 324 227
446 DK DK
1,232 456 37.0% 34.4% - 39.7% 262 21.3%
854 420 343
557 238 42.7% 38.7% - 46.9% 178 32.0%
2,075 466 354
886 334 37.7% 34.6% - 40.9% 227 25.6%
659 241 DK
924 296 181
1,389 699 50.3% 47.7% - 52.9% 542 39.0%
912 180 108
1,479 675 45.6% 43.1% - 48.2% 495 33.5%
546 287 52.6% 48.4% - 56.7% 198 36.3%
1,820 1,049 57.6% 55.4% - 59.9% 776 42.6%
835 381 292
4,114 1,839 44.7% 43.2% - 46.2% 1,285 31.2%
3,682 1,822 1,292
860 494 57.4% 54.1% - 60.7% 311 36.2%
942 501 312
2,338 1,087 851
783 387 49.4% 45.9% - 52.9% 270 34.5%
544 236 43.4% 39.3% - 47.6% 167 30.7%
1,879 851 45.3% 43.1% - 47.5% 648 34.5%
674 326 48.4% 44.6% - 52.1% 220 32.6%
1,065 418 176
747 383 265
780 81 48
1,288 742 427
No. % No. %
1,139 487 314
659 219 146
1,453 993 68.3% 65.9% - 70.7% 400 27.5%
1,341 662 409
DK DK DK
1,131 200 141
1,106 591 359
377 234 155
1,078 616 397
965 581 351
890 316 182
1,086 672 392
1,115 633 388
669 448 280
270 168 96
549 401 288
1,083 DK DK
1,078 789 73.2% 70.5% - 75.7% 466 43.2%
781 515 345
1,522 DK DK
1,221 730 382
672 211 DK
1,014 DK DK
732 398 274
1,261 633 291
1,174 348 224
1,272 742 484
339 218 137
No. % No. %
412 210 51.0% 46.2% - 55.8% 152 36.9%
694 469 365
1,880 942 600
1,399 662 471
3,765 1,546 1,104
295 134 45.4% 39.8% - 51.1% 102 34.6%
4,177 1,748 1,259
930 273 185
2,015 1,244 61.7% 59.6% - 63.8% 937 46.5%
704 299 205
696 409 266
799 509 249
838 384 267
3,469 2,036 1,458
513 282 55.0% 50.6% - 59.2% 202 39.4%
2,240 1,145 836
531 335 235
534 307 211
468 256 192
587 343 58.4% 54.4% - 62.4% 253 43.1%
1,696 684 498
1,336 661 49.5% 46.8% - 52.2% 531 39.7%
1,711 931 54.4% 52.0% - 56.8% 741 43.3%
885 422 47.7% 44.4% - 51.0% 321 36.3%
1,538 772 50.2% 47.7% - 52.7% 561 36.5%
533 233 43.7% 39.6% - 48.0% DK
682 282 41.3% 37.7% - 45.1% 195 28.6%
385 202 52.5% 47.5% - 57.4% 149 38.7%
No. % No. %
1,285 637 49.6% 46.8% - 52.3% 476 37.0%
759 244 170
724 341 47.1% 43.5% - 50.7% 236 32.6%
322 134 41.6% 36.4% - 47.1% 97 30.1%
1,303 354 292
porting Collection
views does not meet validation criteria (see 'Validation rules' for further details).
ews is not within 20% of the estimated resident population of babies aged 0 (see 'Validation rules' for further details).
eeding status was known does not meet the minimum data quality standard of 95% (see 'Validation rules' for details).
not meet validation criteria, therefore percentages or confidence intervals can not be published (see definitions sheet for details).
Notes:
Local Authority did not make a submission to the Interim Reporting
1 Blank cells (with no colour highlight) show where data does not me
* joint submission
50
C8ii Number of infants due a 6-8 week C8ii Infants totally or partially breas
review
157,998 69,732
7,216 2,354
19,883 6,571
ng Stage 1 validation) 16,879 6,293
13,145 5,724
17,390 6,702
19,048 9,364
25,360 13,771
24,933 12,449
14,144 6,504
e number of infants due 6 - 8 week reviews does not meet validation criteria (see 'Validation rules' for further detai
e number of infants due 6-8 week reviews is not within 20% of the estimated resident population of babies aged 0
e percentage of infants whose breastfeeding status was known does not meet the minimum data quality standard
lour highlight) show where data does not meet validation criteria, therefore percentages or confidence intervals ca
47
ants totally or partially breastfed 95%confidenceinterval Infants totally breastfed
% No. %
148
45.3% 43.1% - 47.5% 544 27.8%
164
27.9% 25.3% - 30.7% 215 20.2%
42.8% 39.3% - 46.4% 242 33.1%
221
245
47.6% 45.7% - 49.6% 861 32.7%
27.4% 23.6% - 31.5% 101 20.8%
20.9% 17.5% - 24.7% 82 16.8%
509
152
575
31.8% 29.1% - 34.7% 247 23.1%
173
45.3% 41.9% - 48.8% 226 28.1%
40.7% 38.5% - 42.8% 585 29.3%
58.5% 55.8% - 61.1% 469 35.9%
43.2% 41.0% - 45.5% 595 32.8%
37.7% 35.4% - 40.1% 466 29.4%
669
44.7% 41.8% - 47.7% 304 27.9%
689
35
1,175
48.1% 45.1% - 51.0% 323 29.5%
222
135
37.4% 34.7% - 40.2% 256 21.7%
49.3% 45.9% - 52.8% 346 42.7%
DK
281
30.2% 27.3% - 33.3% 194 21.9%
172
162
47.6% 45.0% - 50.1% 543 37.0%
102
45.5% 43.0% - 48.1% 482 32.3%
246
230
212
525
184
123
69.4% 65.9% - 72.7% 366 51.6%
515
49.9% 47.2% - 52.6% 468 35.7%
42.6% 41.0% - 44.2% 1,132 31.2%
46.6% 41.1% - 52.3% 100 33.6%
1,363
218
190
62.6% 58.5% - 66.5% 242 43.5%
464
49.6% 47.0% - 52.3% 516 38.1%
48.1% 45.6% - 50.6% 589 38.1%
50.2% 46.8% - 53.5% 328 38.3%
48.8% 46.3% - 51.2% 576 36.5%
DK
40.4% 36.9% - 44.0% 226 30.1%
51.8% 47.0% - 56.6% 156 38.1%
48.1% 45.4% - 50.8% 492 37.3%
169
48.7% 45.2% - 52.3% 249 33.3%
45.3% 39.8% - 50.9% 103 33.6%
37.9% 35.2% - 40.6% 387 30.7%
confidence intervals can not be published (see definitions sheet for details).
57 554 759
342 17.5% 996 50.9% 1,882
66 268 498
82 7.7% 750 70.6% 1,047
71 9.7% 418 57.2% 731
84 666 971
95 450 790
393 14.9% 1,323 50.3% 2,577
32 6.6% 334 68.7% 467
20 4.1% 386 79.1% 488
147 751 1,407
52 489 693
239 745 1,559
93 8.7% 727 68.1% 1,067
41 182 396
138 17.2% 433 53.9% 797
228 11.4% 1,154 57.7% 1,967
295 22.6% 513 39.3% 1,277
190 10.5% 983 54.1% 1,768
132 8.3% 911 57.5% 1,509
283 992 1,944
183 16.8% 560 51.4% 1,047
229 1,232 2,150
8 23 66
969 1,787 3,931
204 18.6% 516 47.1% 1,043
78 543 843
35 183 353
186 15.7% 712 60.3% 1,154
54 6.7% 395 48.7% 795
DK DK
90 563 934
74 8.3% 592 66.7% 860
70 348 590
129 569 860
155 10.6% 769 52.4% 1,467
68 0 170
197 13.2% 808 54.2% 1,487
88.4%
97.1%
88.8%
90.8%
95.3%
83.3%
95.2%
73.2%
92.9%
91.1%
99.8%
100.0%
94.6%
83.2%
97.5%
100.0%
100.0%
98.4%
100.0%
97.0%
85.3%
98.8%
69.1%
79.3%
97.2%
99.6%
100.0%
94.9%
72.7%
96.7%
97.3%
60.3%
97.9%
89.4%
97.1%
100.0%
93.1%
96.3%
98.8%
98.5%
100.0%
94.6%
49.8%
97.9%
96.1%
100.0%
94.2%
94.5%
91.9%
99.9%
66.0%
99.3%
98.4%
97.8%
97.4%
95.2%
90.0%
96.1%
93.2%
83.5%
88.6%
95.2%
83.9%
81.7%
97.7%
98.0%
43.2%
97.0%
91.0%
90.8%
100.0%
20.5%
99.7%
97.9%
98.0%
9.8%
76.5%
51.8%
85.2%
79.4%
37.0%
80.6%
92.6%
93.2%
95.8%
84.7%
96.7%
99.9%
95.3%
89.0%
94.8%
93.0%
98.6%
61.3%
97.5%
99.7%
97.0%
99.0%
77.9%
100.0%
98.0%
100.0%
58.0%
95.4%
99.0%
100.0%
Public Health England has established an interim reporting system to collate the breastfeeding information
until the Maternity and Children's Dataset (MCDS) is in a position to report more fully.
Local authorities have been asked to report a number of health visiting metrics at a resident population
level (for each quarter of 2015/16 and 2016/17). The following four data items are key:
The number of infants being totally breastfed (defined as infants who are exclusively receiving breast
milk at 6-8 weeks of age - that is, they are NOT receiving formula milk, any other liquids or food).
The number of infants being partially breastfed (defined as infants who are currently receiving breast
milk at 6-8 weeks of age and who are also receiving formula milk or any other liquids or food).
The number of infants being not at all breastfed (defined as infants who are not currently receiving any
breast milk at 6-8 weeks of age).
ed population,
local authorities.
feeding information
ident population
y receiving breast
ids or food).
y receiving breast
or food).
Each area has to pass all 3 stages in order for its values to be shown.
Contacts and further information
Media Enquiries
Please contact:
Naomi Ramage
Communications Officer
Public Health England
Telephone: 020 368 20132
Email: naomi.ramage@phe.gov.uk
Other Enquiries
For all other enquiries relating to the statistics or to offer feedback on the publication
please contact:
Further Information
This publication should be considered alongside the Statistical Commentary which can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/breastfeeding-at-6-to-8-weeks-after-birth-2016-to-2017-quarte