Anda di halaman 1dari 2

2017-04-03 FL SC dismisses motion for rehearing in case concerning FL Statute

of Limitations by Neil Garfield


Last week a Manhattan court ruled in Costa v. Deutsche Bank that Deutsche Bank
had failed to foreclose within the six year window and was therefore barred from
collecting the debt. In the same week, the Florida Supreme Court denied a motion
for rehearing in Bartram v. U.S. Bank regarding the statute of limitations in
foreclosure cases, therefore ruling that there is no statute of limitation on mortgage
debt in Florida.
In the 2016 Bartram opinion the court ruled that if there is an involuntary dismissal
of a foreclosure in a foreclosure case, a follow-up foreclosure action can be filed.
This decision allows a lender to "correct" issues in litigation and refile until they can
successfully foreclose on a homeowner and is likely unconstitutional. Bartram ruled
that a follow-up filing could be done to accelerate the debt involved in a mortgage
foreclosure again and again.
The decision is an especially important one for lending institutions in Florida who
fought tooth and nail for the decision. Banks are allowed to file foreclosure even in
circumstances when previous foreclosure actions have been attempted. For
example, if a bank loses because they came to court with an unendorsed note, this
decision tells the bank exactly what issue to cure before they file to foreclose again.
The banks have deep pockets and can file an unlimited number of lawsuits, while
the homeowner will be forced to defend against foreclosure again and again until
the bank can successfully foreclose.
This ruling affects all Floridians. There is no other state in America where a bank
receives a second, third, fourth, fifth or sixth time (or more) to successfully
foreclose. In theory, a homeowner could spend decades in litigation before the
bank finally wears them down or bankrupts them while defending their home.
Statute of limitations are important in debt collection because people should not be
pursued for decades of their lives- especially by a bank that can't prove standing
without forging and fabricating documents to "perfect" its illusion of being a holder.
This is likely a final decision and a terrible decision at that. The Florida Supreme
Court is no longer bothering to hide its bias for the banks.
A statute of limitations sets a time limit for initiating a legal claim. In the context of
home foreclosure, the statute of limitations for written contracts (that is,
mortgages) is usually the applicable statute or there may be a specific statute that
addresses foreclosures, as is the case in New Jersey. If the foreclosure is initiated
after the statute of limitations has expired, the lenders claim is invalid and the
lender is not entitled to foreclose.
Raising the Statute of Limitations as a Defense to Foreclosure
If the relevant time period for a foreclosure statute of limitations has run out, then
this is an affirmative defense to foreclosure. The statute of limitations defense must
be asserted by the homeowners to defeat the lenders claim. If the homeowners do
not assert the statute of limitations defense, then this defense is deemed waived.
Therefore, it is extremely important for borrowers to be aware of the statute of
limitations for foreclosures in their state because it could mean a quick end to a
foreclosure if the time limit has expired.
On the other hand, if the statute of limitations runs out after the foreclosure process
has already started, then the statute of limitations will not be a defense to the
foreclosure. This means that even if a foreclosure takes years to complete and the
time period under the statute of limitations covering foreclosures runs out while the
foreclosure is in process, this will not prevent the foreclosure from going through.
For instance, if the lender files a foreclosure lawsuit in January, 2017, but the statute
of limitations runs out in June, 2017 while the foreclosure is pending, a statute of
limitations defense is not available. In order to comply with a statute of limitations,
the lender must simply begin the foreclosure before the time period expires.
However, in most states, if the foreclosure is cancelled or dismissed (perhaps due to
a procedural error by the lender), then the statute of limitations will still apply to
any subsequent foreclosure. The lender could restart the foreclosure, but the restart
would have to occur within the time period provided for in the statute of limitations.
In the example above, if the foreclosure was dismissed in April, 2017, the lender
would need to restart the action prior to June, 2017 to fall within the statute of
limitations. It is important to note that if the borrower makes a payment in the
interim, this will reset a statute of limitations in most cases.
How to Determine the Statute of Limitations in Your State
Each state has its own set of statutes of limitations. Generally, for a written
contract, including mortgages, the statute of limitations will vary from three years
to 15 years, though this differs from state to state with most falling within the three-
to-six-year range. Most states have a statute of limitations of six years covering
foreclosures.
The statute of limitations clock for a mortgage foreclosure usually starts when the
default occurs--that is, when the borrowers stop making mortgage payments. It is
usually calculated from the date of the last payment or from the due date of the
first missed mortgage payment. Again, this depends on your state's particular
statute. If you have the misfortune of living in Florida, every time you miss a
payment, the statute of limitations begins all over again.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai