Knowledge of Learners:
How do I start a lesson without speaking mathematics so that by the 2nd or 3rd lesson the
students are speaking mathematics? That has been the focus of my learning and teaching for the
past year. In my student teaching this semester I began day 1 of an introduction to systems of
a partner in order to efficiently eliminate 15 of the 16 graphs of systems on their computer screen
and zero in on the one their partner has chosen. The activity begins with any social and
mathematical language the students bring to the classroom, and ends with students using
class of my peers which consisted of at least 20 people who loathe and/or fear math. The lesson
needed to focus on literacy so my partner and I chose to teach limits from a conceptual
standpoint, focusing on the way that a word used in math can differ greatly from the word as it is
used in English. We chose to begin the lesson at a place where the students would feel
comfortable-- the English language. We knew that the students would bring their own personal
math baggage with them so we wanted to begin with what they already knew. The intention
was to connect what they already knew to the math that they might not know.
We created a lesson which focused more on discussion and exploration and less on actual
calculations. It was a success in my eyes because it sparked an interest in math in people who
likely have a lot of math baggage. One student even said he was looking forward to what we
would learn tomorrow. Another mentioned that they understood more from our lesson than they
ever had in their past academic experiences. While another, upon hearing an official definition of
limits, said that she had come up with that very definition on her own by working through the
lesson.
When I began taking the required math sequence at Hunter, at first I could not see the
connection between what I was learning and what I would someday be teaching. As I continued
in my work as a private tutor, and eventually in my Student Teaching, I realized that, as a result
of my Hunter coursework, I had a much deeper understanding of the math. In particular in the
areas of divisibility, thanks to Math 620 and 630: Math From An Advanced Perspective, and
I recall a unit in Math 620 which dealt with rational and irrational numbers. As I thought
about the definition of a rational number, a number which can be expressed as a quotient of two
integers, I realized that up to that point I had thought that = 22/7 and that the approximation of
3.14 was simply 22/7 rounded to the nearest hundredth. But that was a contradiction to what I
Therefore, 22/7 must also be an approximation of . Somehow I had missed that fact in both high
Not only did my Hunter coursework clear up misconceptions that I had, it helped me in
the teaching of mathematics to my high school students. For the student who wants to know why
the product of the slopes of two perpendicular lines is -1, I can show them the relationship
between a point on a line and its image after a ninety degree rotation. I can express algebraically
why we need only to look at the last two digits of an integer to determine whether or not it is
divisible by the number four. Having this deeper understanding and the ability to represent a
concept in a different way helps with student comprehension and retention of the material.
of the subject matter has improved, resulting in a newfound confidence in my abilities to both