Through out the history of mankind, it has been observed that human
beings, belonging to any race any community have worshiped God, despite
of choices they have made for selecting their God. Some worship one True
God, some bow down to fire and sun etc.
In the very same manner, there has always been the concept of the
presence of ‘SATAN’, who has been struggling to destroy the piece of the
World and astray mankind from the path of God. His struggle of provoking
starts since we take our first breath, due to which people involve in the
sins and forget the righteous way told by The Creator of this World.
Based on these realities, people have adopted idea that since they are
sinful from the very early age so they are born in sin and they name the
idea as ORIGINAL SIN. They further reason mankind have inherited sin from
their parents Adam and Eve as they committed sin in the Heaven by eating
from the tree which was forbidden by God. This story is told by our
Christian brethren and they quote this from their holy book The Bible
(Genesis 2:17).
Mr. Ginger Ketting – Weller in his “Why Jesus had to die” says that “death
is the consequence of disobedience in God’s law”. He continues “if God
had not thought ahead, He would have been on a very difficult spot …..
the consequence was sure, He (God) would lose these two beloved
rebellious children of His – for eternity”. Hence God went through His
alternate plan as Mr. Ginger claims that God said “I will take the
consequence, I will pay the price”.
The question arises, if God took the consequence and paid the price, why
He punished Adam and Eve then and why He sent them on Earth.
Furthermore, we are told that God doer of all things and He has power
over all things, couldn’t He just forgive His children for the mistake they
make unintentionally. Our Christian brethren also boast that God is so
loving, so caring and so forgiving. Yes He is, He is so forgiving that He was
prepared to sacrifice ‘His own innocent son’ (as Christians say), but He
was not prepared to forgive our parents who admitted their mistake and
asked for forgiveness. Seems like Jesus was not sent to Earth because of
the sin of Adam and Eve but God had them sin to kill ‘His son’ or may be
God was helpless in that situation as Mr. Ginger says that “God cannot
undo Universal law”.
1. When Moses escaped from Egypt with his people and came to the
river, God helped Moses and commanded the water to give smooth dry
path to Moses and Children of Israel and it did so. Moses and his people
crossed the river without even having their cloths wet. However, universal
law for water is to flow and to drown not to stand firm like mountains and
give crossways. So, God broke His law to help Moses.
These were only a few examples from the Bible but there are many more
stories where God broke His own laws as and when He wanted. If He can
undo His laws for His Prophets (who are sons of Adam), then why not for
Adam?? It was much simpler to forgive Adam instead of scarifying “His
innocent son”, except, He just wanted “His son” to be sacrificed. It is not
the quality of God to be on difficult spot as Mr. Ginger says.
To support their idea of original sin and Jesus’ sacrifice they quote from
their Holy Book:
1. “Then said Jesus, father, forgive them, for they know not what
they do”.
(LUKE
23:34)
Jews were not committing any sin while crucifying Jesus as it was
not their choice at all, they were just fulfilling the Plan of God (as
such they were helping God to get His plan completed). But
Christian brethren believe that they committed sin by crucifying
Jesus and as such they will all go to hell. However, God needed
someone on the earth to execute His plan of killing “His innocent
son” and His plan was to redeem mankind from the sin, yet He
Himself involved Jews in the assassination of Jesus. If they have to
go to hell, then what was the point of all this sacrifice? Seems like
God failed in His plan.
2. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, and that
the whole nation perish not”
(JOHN
11:50)
We are in an amazing situation that God did not forget to inspire Mathew,
Mark, Luke and John that “His son” rode donkey in Jerusalem but He
forgot to tell the contract between God and “His son”, the existence of
original sin and ascension of Jesus.
The idea of original sin and sacrifice of Jesus is only supported by Mark and
Luke. In the King James Version there are only two places where ascension
of Jesus Christ is mentioned and the pen of Mathew and John had never
touched the topic what so ever.
Mark 16:19
Luke 24-51
So they revised it. In that revision they threw out the verses of ascension
mentioned by Mark and Luke as a fabrication. Amazing, the ascension was
mentioned only twice in the 73 books of Roman Catholics and 66 books of
Protestant Bible and that was deleted. In other words there is no ascension
in the Bible.
LAW OF GOD
Every religion on the face of Earth say that God is Oft-Forgiving. You
commit sin and repent; God will show His Grace and forgive. But
Christianity in the only religion that came up with the idea of non-forgiving
God as He was not able to forgive our parents and listen their repentance.
Well this is just an idea of few people like Mr. Ginger, the law of God is
totally different. As we are told that God has set the laws in the very
beginning, likewise He had already fixed the law for the punishment of
sinner and forgiveness of repenter.
(EZEKIEL 18:20-21)
These are only two verses which gives outline of God’s forgiveness and the
law of punishment, but you need to read the complete chapter and believe
me this will throw original sin out of your brain.
This is common sense as well that how God can hold me responsible for
the sin of Adam when they never asked me before eating that fruit. So
Ezekiel 18:20 gives a vivid picture that no one accountable for others sins,
in other words there is no original sin.
"Allah wants ease for you and does not want difficulty for
you." (Al-Quran 2:185)
Now take your choice, God of Quran, Who has power over all matters, Who
is so merciful, and Who loves us so much or the God of Bible who stuck
even on the forgiveness of a little mistake.