Chi-Square Tests

zemlje Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

1,00 Pearson Chi-Square 29,094a 3 ,000

Likelihood Ratio 29,643 3 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 27,735 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 1412

2,00 Pearson Chi-Square 27,555b 3 ,000

Likelihood Ratio 30,512 3 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 25,274 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 1407

3,00 Pearson Chi-Square 13,262c 3 ,004

Likelihood Ratio 13,399 3 ,004

Linear-by-Linear Association ,648 1 ,421

N of Valid Cases 1488

4,00 Pearson Chi-Square 8,027d 3 ,045

Likelihood Ratio 7,954 3 ,047

Linear-by-Linear Association 6,672 1 ,010

N of Valid Cases 1447

parents responsibilities to their children at expense of/not sacrifice own well-being (Q50) * sex
respondent (Q86) Crosstabulation

sex respondent
(Q86)

zemlje male female Total

1,00 Count 606 668 1274

 parents responsibilities do utmost best for % within sex
87,2% 87,4% 87,3%
to their children at children respondent (Q86)
expense of/not
sacrifice own well- Standardized Residual ,0 ,0

being (Q50)
no sacrifice of well- Count 64 63 127
being
% within sex
9,2% 8,2% 8,7%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual ,5 -,4

neither Count 25 33 58

% within sex
3,6% 4,3% 4,0%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual -,5 ,5

Total Count 695 764 1459

% within sex
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
respondent (Q86)

parents responsibilities do utmost best for Count 489 578 1067

to their children at children
2,00 % within sex
expense of/not 71,9% 78,2% 75,2%
respondent (Q86)
sacrifice own well-
being (Q50)
Standardized Residual -1,0 ,9

no sacrifice of well- Count 113 103 216

being
% within sex
16,6% 13,9% 15,2%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual ,9 -,9

neither Count 78 58 136

% within sex
11,5% 7,8% 9,6%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual 1,6 -1,5

Total Count 680 739 1419

 % within sex
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
respondent (Q86)

3,00 parents responsibilities do utmost best for Count 580 631 1211
to their children at children
% within sex
expense of/not 79,3% 81,8% 80,6%
respondent (Q86)
sacrifice own well-
being (Q50)
Standardized Residual -,4 ,4

no sacrifice of well- Count 132 112 244

being
% within sex
18,1% 14,5% 16,2%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual 1,2 -1,2

neither Count 19 28 47

% within sex
2,6% 3,6% 3,1%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual -,8 ,8

Total Count 731 771 1502

% within sex
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
respondent (Q86)

4,00 parents responsibilities do utmost best for Count 474 540 1014
to their children at children
expense of/not % within sex
65,9% 73,4% 69,7%
sacrifice own well- respondent (Q86)

being (Q50)
Standardized Residual -1,2 1,2

no sacrifice of well- Count 245 196 441

being
% within sex
34,1% 26,6% 30,3%
respondent (Q86)

Standardized Residual 1,8 -1,8

Total Count 719 736 1455

% within sex
100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
respondent (Q86)
 Chi-Square Tests

zemlje Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

1,00 Pearson Chi-Square

35,524a 4 ,000

Likelihood Ratio
34,476 4 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association
30,599 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases
1390

2,00 Pearson Chi-Square

8,516b 4 ,074

Likelihood Ratio
8,608 4 ,072

Linear-by-Linear Association
7,531 1 ,006

N of Valid Cases
1362

3,00 Pearson Chi-Square

9,424c 4 ,051

Likelihood Ratio 11,212 4 ,024

 Linear-by-Linear Association
4,366 1 ,037

N of Valid Cases
1395

4,00 Pearson Chi-Square

7,317d 2 ,026

Likelihood Ratio
7,344 2 ,025

Linear-by-Linear Association
7,304 1 ,007

N of Valid Cases
1463

children responsibilities to their parents in need at expense of/not sacrifice own well-being (Q51) * DOB
Crosstabulation

DOB

zemlje 1,00 2,00 3,00

1,00 children duty to provide Count 201 274 254

responsibilities to long- term care
their parents in % within DOB 70,3% 65,1% 62,9%

need at expense
Standardized
of/not sacrifice own ,9 -,2 -,7
Residual
well-being (Q51)

no sacrifice of well- Count 71 114 121

being
% within DOB 24,8% 27,1% 30,0%

Standardized
-,5 ,3 1,4
Residual

neither Count 14 33 29
 % within DOB 4,9% 7,8% 7,2%

Standardized
-1,7 ,1 -,4
Residual

Total Count 286 421 404

% within DOB 100,0 100,0 100,0

% % %

2,00 children duty to provide Count 164 298 271

responsibilities to long- term care
% within DOB 71,0% 72,7% 66,3%
their parents in
need at expense
Standardized
of/not sacrifice own ,5 1,1 -,4
Residual
well-being (Q51)
no sacrifice of well- Count 41 80 89
being
% within DOB 17,7% 19,5% 21,8%

Standardized
-,9 -,5 ,5
Residual

neither Count 26 32 49

% within DOB 11,3% 7,8% 12,0%

Standardized
-,1 -2,2 ,3
Residual

Total Count 231 410 409

% within DOB 100,0 100,0 100,0

% % %

3,00 children duty to provide Count 86 121 211

responsibilities to long- term care
% within DOB 29,1% 28,5% 43,6%
their parents in
need at expense
Standardized
of/not sacrifice own -2,3 -2,9 2,3
Residual
well-being (Q51)
no sacrifice of well- Count 192 279 240
being
% within DOB 64,9% 65,6% 49,6%

Standardized
2,1 2,7 -1,9
Residual
 neither Count 18 25 33

% within DOB 6,1% 5,9% 6,8%

Standardized
-,6 -,8 -,1
Residual

Total Count 296 425 484

% within DOB 100,0 100,0 100,0

% % %

4,00 children duty to provide Count 31 59 86

responsibilities to long- term care
% within DOB 10,6% 13,1% 17,4%
their parents in
need at expense
Standardized
of/not sacrifice own -3,1 -2,6 -,5
Residual
well-being (Q51)
no sacrifice of well- Count 232 352 366
being
% within DOB 79,5% 78,0% 74,2%

Standardized
1,4 1,4 ,5
Residual

neither Count 29 40 41

Chi-Square Tests

zemlje Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

1,00 Pearson Chi-Square 13,376a 6 ,037

Likelihood Ratio 13,328 6 ,038

Linear-by-Linear Association 3,414 1 ,065

N of Valid Cases 1397

2,00 Pearson Chi-Square 14,476b 6 ,025

Likelihood Ratio 14,655 6 ,023

Linear-by-Linear Association 9,257 1 ,002

N of Valid Cases 1368

3,00 Pearson Chi-Square 57,168c 6 ,000

 Likelihood Ratio 57,410 6 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 18,127 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 1467

4,00 Pearson Chi-Square 98,368d 6 ,000

Likelihood Ratio 88,396 6 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 36,138 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 1480