Livability Rank
https://foxhugh.com/2008/08/11/top-100-cities-tourist-destination-vs-livability-rank/
The operational version of this truism would be that tourist cities and livable cities are different
cities. The truism has been named the Visit/Live Theory for the purposes of this study. Two lists
that rank cities were compared. The first list ranks cities according the number of tourists that
arrived in a city.
http://www.euromonitor.com/Top_150_City_Destinations_London_Leads_the_Way
The second list ranks cities according to livability. Mercer Human Resources looked at 39
quality of life issues including political stability, currency-exchange regulations, political and
media censorship, school quality, housing and the environment.
The Mercer list and a description of the list can be found at:
http://bwnt.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/livable_cities_worldwide/
Table 1 shows all the cities on both lists in alphabetical order. In addition, the difference in rank
was calculated for each city when this was possible. If a city was on only one top 100 list then
the difference in rank could not be calculated. The tourist destination study looked at 150 cities,
but for the purposes of comparison, only the top 100 tourist destinations were used in this
study. Many cities were only on one list and not on the other list. The number of cities on both
lists was counted. The number of cities only on one list was also counted. If the number of cities
on both lists was greater than the number of cities not on both lists then this would suggest the
truism is not true.
Top 100 Cities: Tourist Destination vs. Livability Rank
Table 1: Alphabetical List of All Cities
Cities Country Tourist Rank Livability Rank Rank Difference
1 Abu Dhabi UAE 52 88 36
2 Adelaide Australia NR 30 N/A
3 Agra India 99 NR N/A
4 Amsterdam Netherlands 18 13 5
5 Antwerp Netherlands 90 NR 99
6 Athens Greece NR 78 N/A
7 Atlanta USA NR 66 N/A
8 Auckland New Zealand NR 5 N/A
9 Bahrain Bahrain 12 NR 18
10 Bangkok Thailand 2 NR 90
11 Barcelona Spain 10 41 12
12 Beijing China 22 NR N/A
13 Benidorm Spain 33 NR N/A
14 Berlin Germany 34 16 18
Top 100 Cities: Tourist Destination vs. Livability Rank
https://foxhugh.com/2008/08/11/top-100-cities-tourist-destination-vs-livability-rank/
2
Table 2 below shows cities that were on both lists ordered from the least difference between
ranks to the greatest difference between ranks.
4 Milan Italy 42 49 7
5 San Francisco USA 37 29 8
6 Dublin Ireland 11 27 16
7 Tokyo Japan 51 35 16
8 Oahu/Honolulu USA 44 27 17
9 Berlin Germany 34 16 18
10 Washington DC USA 63 44 19
11 Chicago USA 64 44 20
12 Vienna Austria 23 3 20
13 Tallinn Estonia 67 89 22
14 Miami USA 39 62 23
15 Los Angeles USA 31 55 24
16 Birmingham United Kingdom 81 55 26
17 Glasgow United Kingdom 82 55 27
18 Cape Town South Africa 57 85 28
19 Paris France 3 33 30
20 Boston USA 68 36 32
21 Munich Germany 40 8 32
22 Sydney Australia 43 9 34
23 Abu Dhabi UAE 52 88 36
24 Budapest Hungary 36 74 38
25 London United Kingdom 1 39 38
26 New York City USA 6 48 42
27 Copenhagen Sweden 54 11 43
28 Stockholm Sweden 66 20 46
29 Helsinki Finland 77 30 47
30 Lyon France 84 36 48
31 Prague Czech Republic 20 72 52
32 Rome Italy 8 61 53
33 Melbourne Australia 72 17 55
34 Warsaw Poland 29 85 56
35 Taipei China 24 81 57
36 Hamburg Germany 83 24 59
37 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 15 75 60
38 Montreal Canada 85 22 63
39 Hong Kong China 5 70 65
40 Dubai UAE 7 80 73
41 Seoul South Korea 9 87 78
Top 100 Cities: Tourist Destination vs. Livability Rank
https://foxhugh.com/2008/08/11/top-100-cities-tourist-destination-vs-livability-rank/
7
Conclusion
There were a total of 155 cities on either list. 112 cities were only on one list. Only 43 cities were
on both lists. Cities that are only on one list outnumber cities on both lists 2.6:1. Even for cities
on both lists, the mean difference between ranks was 37.6 and quite high. These findings
suggest that cities that are visited are not the same cities that are more livable. The truism that
some cities are nice places to visit and different cities are nice places to live in is correct. Table
2 showed which cities had the least difference between ranks and the greatest difference
between ranks.
The city with the least difference in rank was Lisbon. Lisbon had a rank of 47 on both
lists. Toronto had the second least difference in rank and has the honor of having a relatively
high visitor rank (14) and livability rank (15). Amsterdam showed a similar pattern to Toronto
with a visitor rank of 18 and a livability rank of 13.
Geneva had the greatest difference in rank. Geneva is a great place to live (2) but doesnt get
very many tourists (98) relative to other cities. Shanghai had the second greatest difference in
rank but in the opposite direction as Geneva. Shanghai is a city that many tourists visit (13) but
only ranks 100 in terms of livability. A practical implication for expats is to be wary of deciding
to live in cities you like to visit without taking the Visit/Live Theory into account.