Griffin Lange
English 3 Honors
8 May 2017
South vs North:
Sixty-four years ago the Korean War was put to a diplomatic halt by an armistice
signed by both North and South Korea. Tensions, which have been resurfaced through
the Norths recent nuclear testing, have shown the world that this war was never truly
ended. On the birthday of Kim il Sung, or North Koreas most important holiday, North
Korea held a massive parade in Pyongyang that displayed their military might in
celebration. The next day, under their Supreme leader Kim Jong-un, they tested a
medium range ballistic missile that exploded almost immediately after launch. Although
this test was considered a failure, it did not fail in opening South Koreas eyes as to the
growth of the Norths nuclear development, and the increasing pertinence of the threat
located just 30 miles away from their capital city. This called South Korea to action. In
the days following the launch, South Korea sped up the shipment and assembly of a
Thaad, or Terminal High Altitude Area Defense unit, which was originally scheduled to
be finished by the end of 2017, but has now been finished on May 2nd. Along with this
development, they have also increased preparation for a punitive strike against the
north in anticipation of another missile test or any other provocative behaviors (North
Korea: Washington and Seoul Pledge Swift Punitive Measures). With these strategic
measures South Korea plans to continue the protection of their people and cease North
The primary defensive strategy put in place by South Korea has largely to do with
the recent implementation of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, or Thaad.
Originally, South Korea showed interest in the Thaad in 2013, but they did not reveal
until later that they would be receiving a system in late 2017. However, prompted by the
most recent North Korean ballistic missile test, South korea has publicly stressed the
need to speed up the development of the technology as tensions have mounted with
Pyongyang leading to the finished installation of the Thaad falling on May 2nd, 2017
anti ballistic missile system that has been designed to locate, track and intercept short,
medium and intermediate range missiles after they have been launched. Considering
that these are exactly the type of missiles that North Korea has tested up to this point,
Though the Thaad is a seemingly perfect fit for South Korean defense, there is
still an utmost amount of controversy surrounding it. From South Korean government
officials- to residents of the neighborhood where it's been placed- there has been an
unfaltering level of backlash against it. In an interview discussing the Thaads placement
at an old golf course located in the seongju region, a resident of the area, when asked
his opinion, responded by saying it is a quiet place being ruined by the arrival of
American weapons that have turned us into a North Korean target (U.S. Moves Missile
Defence to South Korea Site amid Tensions with North). Unfortunately, due to the close
proximity of South Koreas capital city (Seoul) to North Koreas capital city
(Pyongyang),in the event of an attack the whole of Seoul would be available to strike,
and the Thaads capability to intercept missiles does not falter if the missile is aimed
Lange 3
directly at it, making the town no more a viable target than any other location in Seoul.
Why would North Korea target a small mountain village first when all of Seoul is
available to them?
Along with opposition coming from people affected by the location of the Thaad,
there are those who question its effectiveness as a defensive system. In a Reuters
article by James Pearson, Pearson questions the Souths safety and the Thaads
effectiveness due to the ability of North Korea to accurately launch multiple medium
range ballistic missiles at once. He explains that due to classifications and lack of
utilization in wartime, it is uncertain how the Thaad would fair against an assault
involving multiple missiles. (Even with THAAD defense, North Korea missile barrage
poses threat to South). Although Pearson offers a strong argument, it would only be
effective if the Thaad stood alone. South Koreas line of defense does not only come
from the Thaad. There are also upgraded Patriot and Aegis units that both serve as
interceptors of ballistics missles and when paired with the Thaad, form a three tier line
of defense, or an umbrella that would make short work of North Koreas barrage (How
is a last resort in the event that North Korea actually launches an assault. Before that is
allowed to happen, South Korea and the U.S. have issued a statement to the North
warning them of the increasing consequences that another ballistic missile test would
bring to them. In a discussion about South Korean diplomatic and military strategy after
the recent bomb test, the South Korean presidents office announced that they had
agreed to swiftly take punitive measures against North Korea if they continued their
Lange 4
another unauthorized test. This could eventually lead to a cease in their nuclear threats.
(North Korea: Washington and Seoul Pledge Swift Punitive Measures). In another
suggestion is made to strike North Koreas potential nuclear launch zones preemptively.
This would not only inhibit the Norths ability to launch multiple missiles at once, but
would also put a hole in their efforts to develop new ballistic technology, and ultimately
put a stop to their development of the ICBMs that would make them a threat to the
As the turmoil increases and tensions rise, South Korea and its allies continue to
be cautious while building defenses and preparing for the worst. In a discussion of North
Korean policy Senior minister Cho June-Hyuck says North Korea's repeated
provocations clearly show the nature of Kim Jong Un's regime, irrationality and
maniacally obsessed in its nuclear and ballistic missile development. (North Korean
Missile tests absolutely intolerable). Theres no way of predicting what North Koreas
next move will be, but another nuclear test is probable, and in the event of an attack,
South Korea and the rest of the world are more than prepared.
Works Cited
Euronews. "North Korea Missile Test 'absolutely Intolerable'." Euronews. N.p., 12 Feb.
Ackerman, Spencer, and Ben Jacobs. "North Korea: Washington and Seoul pledge
'swift punitive measures'" The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 27 Apr.
Browne, Ryan. "Anti-missile system in South Korea operational in 'coming days'" CNN.
McCurry, Justin. "US moves missile defence to South Korea site amid tensions with
North." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 26 Apr. 2017. Web. 08 May
2017.
Pearson, James. "Even with THAAD defense, North Korea missile barrage poses threat
Lendon, Brad. "How would missile defense systems work against North Korea?" CNN.
"North Korea's dictator challenges Donald Trump." The Economist. The Economist